journal article·2023-12-21Open access

Occupational Exoskeletons: Understanding the Impact on Workers and Suggesting Guidelines for Practitioners and Future Research Needs

Lucia Botti, Riccardo Melloni

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 1

Abstract

This paper examines occupational exoskeletons and their effects on workers. The study includes a thorough evaluation of the current literature on occupational exoskeletons, with an emphasis on the impact of these devices on workers’ health and the safety, performance and users’ subjective perceptions. The aim of the study was to gain knowledge of how exoskeletons affect the workers and to identify practical suggestions for practitioners. The findings of the study suggest that exoskeletons can have both positive and negative effects on workers. Some users claimed enhanced comfort and decreased fatigue, whilst others reported discomfort and suffering. The study highlights the importance of considering the individual needs and preferences of workers when selecting and implementing exoskeletons in the workplace, with a focus on health, safety, performance and user acceptance. Based on the findings, the paper presents suggestions for employers and practitioners to ensure the effective and safe use of exoskeletons in occupational settings. These recommendations cover areas such as the assessment of workplace requirements, the selection and fit of exoskeletons, the optimization of design and ergonomics and the evaluation of performance. The paper concludes by highlighting the need for further research in this area, particularly in the areas of long-term use.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Interdepartment Research Center on Security and Safety (CRIS), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via P. Vivarelli 10, 41125 Modena, Italy

Department of Engineering “Enzo Ferrari” (DIEF), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via P. Vivarelli 10, 41125 Modena, Italy

Funding

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. How Technologic Change Can Increase the Risk of Repetitive Motions Injuries
2. Effects of Progressive Levels of Industrial Automation on Force and Repetitive Movements of the Wrist10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00045-1 ↗
3. Biomechanical Analysis of Risk Factors for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders during Repetitive Lifting Task in Construction Workers10.1016/j.autcon.2017.07.007 ↗
4. Application of Concise Exposure Index (OCRA) to Tasks Involving Repetitive Movements of the Upper Limbs in Various Industrial Settings: Preliminary Experience and Validation
5. Exposure Assessment of Upper Limb Repetitive Movements: A Consensus Document Developed by the Technical Committee on Musculoskeletal Disorders of International Ergonomics Association (IEA) Endorsed by International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH)
6. Subjective Assessment of a Lumbar Exoskeleton’s Impact on Lower Back Pain in a Real Work Situation10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11420 ↗
7. Exoskeletons: Comprehensive, Comparative and Critical Analyses of Their Potential to Improve Manufacturing Performance10.1108/JMTM-01-2019-0023 ↗
8. Exoskeletons—A Review of Industrial Applications10.1108/IR-05-2018-0109 ↗
9. Bornmann, J., Schirrmeister, B., Parth, T., and Gonzalez-Vargas, J. (2020). Comprehensive Development, Implementation and Evaluation of Industrial Exoskeletons. Curr. Dir. Biomed. Eng., 6.10.1515/cdbme-2020-2001 ↗
10. Marinov, B. (The Verge, 2016). 22 Exoskeletons for Work and Industry Into 6 Categories, The Verge.
11. Critical Review on Applications and Roles of Exoskeletons in Patient Handling10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103290 ↗
12. The Impact of Passive Shoulder Exoskeletons during Simulated Aircraft Manufacturing Sealing Tasks10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103337 ↗
13. Madinei, S., and Nussbaum, M.A. (2023). Estimating Lumbar Spine Loading When Using Back-Support Exoskeletons in Lifting Tasks. J. Biomech., 147.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111439 ↗
14. Exoskeletons for Manual Material Handling—A Review and Implication for Construction Applications10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103493 ↗
15. (2023, July 20). Occupational Safety & Health Administration OSHA Publications, Available online: https://www.osha.gov/publications.
16. (2023, July 20). European Agency for Safety and Health at Work EU-OSHA Publications. Available online: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications.
17. Borg, G. (1998). Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales, Human Kinetics.
18. Development of a Practical Method for Measuring Body Part Discomfort
19. Gosnell, E.S., and Thikkurissy, S. (2019). Pediatric Dentistry, Elsevier.
20. Smith, C.B., and Goldberg, G.R. (2012). Evidence-Based Practice of Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
21. An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale10.1080/10447310802205776 ↗
22. Albert, W., and Tullis, T.S. (2023). Measuring the User Experience, Morgan Kaufmann.
23. Assessment of an Active Industrial Exoskeleton to Aid Dynamic Lifting and Lowering Manual Handling Tasks10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.004 ↗
24. Considerations for Industrial Use: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Active and Passive Upper Limb Exoskeletons on Physical Exposures10.1080/24725838.2019.1684399 ↗
25. Del Ferraro, S., Falcone, T., Ranavolo, A., and Molinaro, V. (2020). The Effects of Upper-Body Exoskeletons on Human Metabolic Cost and Thermal Response during Work Tasks—A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17207374 ↗
26. Occupational Exoskeletons: Overview of Their Benefits and Limitations in Preventing Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders10.1080/24725838.2019.1638331 ↗
27. The Effectivity of a Passive Arm Support Exoskeleton in Reducing Muscle Activation and Perceived Exertion during Plastering Activities10.1080/00140139.2020.1868581 ↗
28. The Effect of Arm Support Exoskeletons in Realistic Work Activities: A Review Study
29. Exoskeletons for Industrial Application and Their Potential Effects on Physical Work Load10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988 ↗
30. Subject-Specific, Whole-Body Models of the Stooped Posture with a Personal Weight Transfer Device10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.08.016 ↗
31. A Follow-Up Study of the Effects of An Arm Support Exoskeleton on Physical Demands and Task Performance during Simulated Overhead Work10.1080/24725838.2018.1551255 ↗
32. Assessing the Influence of a Passive, Upper Extremity Exoskeletal Vest for Tasks Requiring Arm Elevation: Part I—“Expected” Effects on Discomfort, Shoulder Muscle Activity, and Work Task Performance10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.025 ↗
33. A Passive Exoskeleton Reduces Peak and Mean EMG during Symmetric and Asymmetric Lifting10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.05.003 ↗
34. Biomechanical Assessment of Two Back-Support Exoskeletons in Symmetric and Asymmetric Repetitive Lifting with Moderate Postural Demands10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103156 ↗
35. Koopman, A.S., Kingma, I., de Looze, M.P., and van Dieën, J.H. (2020). Effects of a Passive Back Exoskeleton on the Mechanical Loading of the Low-Back during Symmetric Lifting. J. Biomech., 102.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109486 ↗
36. The Effect of a Passive Trunk Exoskeleton on Metabolic Costs during Lifting and Walking10.1080/00140139.2019.1602288 ↗
37. Alabdulkarim, S.A., Farhan, A.M., and Ramadan, M.Z. (2020). Effects of a Wearable Carriage Aid on Whole-Body Physiological Measures and Balance. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10228076 ↗
38. Liu, Y., Li, X., Lai, J., Zhu, A., Zhang, X., Zheng, Z., Zhu, H., Shi, Y., Wang, L., and Chen, Z. (2021). The Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Human Thermal Responses in Temperate and Cold Environments. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18083889 ↗
39. Multijoint Passive Elastic Spine Exoskeleton for Stoop Lifting Assistance10.1177/17298814211062033 ↗
40. Ergonomic Contribution of ABLE Exoskeleton in Automotive Industry10.1016/j.ergon.2014.03.008 ↗
41. The Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for Care Support Successfully Reduced Lumbar Load in Repetitive Lifting Movements10.1016/j.jocn.2018.04.057 ↗
42. Development and Testing of a Wearable Passive Lower-Limb Support Exoskeleton to Support Industrial Workers10.1016/j.bbe.2020.12.010 ↗
43. Influences of Different Exoskeleton Designs and Tool Mass on Physical Demands and Performance in a Simulated Overhead Drilling Task10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.004 ↗
44. Effects of Passive Exoskeleton Support on EMG Measures of the Neck, Shoulder and Trunk Muscles While Holding Simulated Surgical Postures and Performing a Simulated Surgical Procedure10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103646 ↗
45. Liu, C., Liang, H., Ueda, N., Li, P., Fujimoto, Y., and Zhu, C. (2020). Functional Evaluation of a Force Sensor-Controlled Upper-Limb Power-Assisted Exoskeleton with High Backdrivability. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20216379 ↗
46. The Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Muscle Activity and Metabolic Cost of Energy10.1080/01691864.2019.1707708 ↗
47. The Use of Exoskeletons in the Occupational Context for Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Prevention of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Complaints10.1080/24725838.2020.1844344 ↗
48. Postural Control When Using an Industrial Lower Limb Exoskeleton: Impact of Reaching for a Working Tool and External Perturbation10.1177/0018720820957466 ↗
49. SPEXOR: Design and Development of Passive Spinal Exoskeletal Robot for Low Back Pain Prevention and Vocational Reintegration10.1007/s42452-019-0266-1 ↗
50. The Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Muscle Activity, Discomfort and Endurance Time in Forward Bending Work10.1016/j.apergo.2015.12.003 ↗
51. Park, J.-H., Lee, Y., Madigan, M.L., Kim, S., Nussbaum, M.A., and Srinivasan, D. (2022). Wearing a Back-Support Exoskeleton Impairs Single-Step Balance Recovery Performance Following a Forward Loss of Balance—An Exploratory Study. J. Biomech., 144.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111352 ↗
52. Assessment of a Passive Exoskeleton System on Spinal Biomechanics and Subjective Responses during Manual Repetitive Handling Tasks among Construction Workers10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105382 ↗
53. Antonellis, P., Galle, S., De Clercq, D., and Malcolm, P. (2018). Altering Gait Variability with an Ankle Exoskeleton. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0205088 ↗
54. Industrial Exoskeletons from Bench to Field: Human-Machine Interface and User Experience in Occupational Settings and Tasks10.3389/fpubh.2022.1039680 ↗
55. Applicability of an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton to Carrying Activities10.3389/frobt.2020.579963 ↗
56. Passive Back Support Exoskeleton Improves Range of Motion Using Flexible Beams10.3389/frobt.2018.00072 ↗
57. Adoption Potential of Occupational Exoskeletons in Diverse Enterprises Engaged in Manufacturing Tasks10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103103 ↗
58. Passive Trunk Exoskeleton Acceptability and Effects on Self-Efficacy in Employees with Low-Back Pain: A Mixed Method Approach10.1007/s10926-020-09891-1 ↗
59. Spine-Inspired Continuum Soft Exoskeleton for Stoop Lifting Assistance10.1109/LRA.2019.2935351 ↗
60. Subjective Evaluation of a Passive Lower-Limb Industrial Exoskeleton Used during Simulated Assembly10.1080/24725838.2018.1560376 ↗
61. Wijegunawardana, I.D., Kumara, M.B.K., De Silva, H.H.M.J., Viduranga, P.K.P., Ranaweera, R.K.P.S., Gopura, R.A.R.C., and Madusanka, D.G.K. (2019, January 24–28). ChairX: A Robotic Exoskeleton Chair for Industrial Workers. Proceedings of the IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779501 ↗
62. Shoulder Muscle Activity and Perceived Comfort of Industry Workers Using a Commercial Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Simulated Tasks10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103718 ↗
63. Passive Shoulder Exoskeleton Support Partially Mitigates Fatigue-Induced Effects in Overhead Work10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103903 ↗