journal article·2023-10-14Open access

Soft, Rigid, and Hybrid Robotic Exoskeletons for Hand Rehabilitation: Roadmap with Impairment-Oriented Rationale for Devices Design and Selection

Gabriele Maria Achilli, Cinzia Amici, Mihai Dragusanu, Massimiliano Gobbo, Silvia Logozzo, Monica Malvezzi, Monica Tiboni, Maria Cristina Valigi

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 20

Abstract

In recent decades, extensive attention has been paid to the study and development of robotic devices specifically designed for hand rehabilitation. Accordingly, a many concepts concerning rigid, soft, and hybrid types have emerged in the literature, with significant ongoing activity being directed towards the development of new solutions. In this context, the paper focuses on the technical features of devices conceived for the robotic rehabilitation of the hand with reference to the three kinds of exoskeleton architecture and the clinical requirements demanded by the target impairment of the end-user. The work proposes a roadmap (i) for both the design and selection of exoskeletons for hand rehabilitation, (ii) to discriminate among the peculiarities of soft, rigid, and hybrid devices, and (iii) with an impairment-oriented rationale. The clinical requirements expected for an exoskeleton are identified by applying a PICO-inspired approach focused on the impairment analysis; the technical features are extracted from a proposed design process for exoskeletons combined with a narrative literature review. A cross-analysis between device families and features is presented to provide a supporting tool for both the design and selection of exoskeletons according to an impairment-oriented rationale.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Soft Robotics and Applications · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Via G. Duranti, 93, 06125 Perugia, Italy

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, Via Branze, 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy

Department of Information Engineering and Mathematics, University of Siena, Via Roma, 56, 53100 Siena, Italy

Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Viale Europa, 11, 25123 Brescia, Italy

Funding

Fondazione CARIT 2022

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Effectiveness of a Soft Robotic Glove to Assist Hand Function in Stroke Patients: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study
2. Huang, Y., Nam, C., Li, W., Rong, W., Xie, Y., Liu, Y., Qian, Q., and Hu, X. (2020). A comparison of the rehabilitation effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation robotic hand training and pure robotic hand training after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 56.10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101723 ↗
3. Active Physical Practice Followed by Mental Practice Using BCI-Driven Hand Exoskeleton: A Pilot Trial for Clinical Effectiveness and Usability10.1109/JBHI.2018.2863212 ↗
4. Hand robotics rehabilitation: Feasibility and preliminary results of a robotic treatment in patients with hemiparesis
5. Du Plessis, T., Djouani, K., and Oosthuizen, C. (2021). A Review of Active Hand Exoskeletons for Rehabilitation and Assistance. Robotics, 10.10.3390/robotics10010040 ↗
6. An Original Classification of Rehabilitation Hand Exoskeletons10.24218/jrmer.2016.18 ↗
7. Meng, Q., Xiang, S., and Yu, H. (2017, January 23–24). Soft Robotic Hand Exoskeleton Systems: Review and Challenges Surrounding the Technology. Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Electrical, Automation and Mechanical Engineering (EAME 2017), Shanghai, China.10.2991/eame-17.2017.45 ↗
8. Shahid, T., Gouwanda, D., Nurzaman, S.G., and Gopalai, A.A. (2018). Moving toward Soft Robotics: A Decade Review of the Design of Hand Exoskeletons. Biomimetics, 3.10.3390/biomimetics3030017 ↗
9. Soft robotic devices for hand rehabilitation and assistance: A narrative review10.1186/s12984-018-0350-6 ↗
10. Soft, Wearable Robotics and Haptics: Technologies, Trends, and Emerging Applications10.1109/JPROC.2021.3140049 ↗
11. Design Requirements of Generic Hand Exoskeletons and Survey of Hand Exoskeletons for Rehabilitation, Assistive or Haptic Use10.1109/TOH.2019.2924881 ↗
12. Defining the design requirements for an assistive powered hand exoskeleton: A pilot explorative interview study and case series10.1177/0309364620963943 ↗
13. Appearance of Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome as research question in the title of articles of three different anesthesia journals: A pilot study10.4103/sja.SJA_767_17 ↗
14. de la Tejera, J.A., Bustamante-Bello, R., Ramirez-Mendoza, R.A., and Izquierdo-Reyes, J. (2021). Systematic review of exoskeletons towards a general categorization model proposal. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11010076 ↗
15. A survey on wearable hand robotics design for assistive, rehabilitative, and haptic applications10.1007/s41315-023-00282-2 ↗
16. Design and modeling of a hybrid soft-rigid hand exoskeleton for poststroke rehabilitation10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106831 ↗
17. A pilot study on the design and validation of a hybrid exoskeleton robotic device for hand rehabilitation10.1016/j.jht.2020.03.024 ↗
18. The well-built clinical question: A key to evidence-based decisions10.7326/ACPJC-1995-123-3-A12 ↗
19. Formicola, R., Amici, C., Mor, M., Bissolotti, L., and Borboni, A. (2023). Design of Medical Devices with Usability in Mind: A Theoretical Proposal and Experimental Case Study Using the LEPRE Device. Designs, 7.10.3390/designs7010009 ↗
20. Formicola, R., Ragni, F., Borboni, A., and Amici, C. (2021). Robotics, Machinery and Engineering Technology for Precision Agriculture, Proceedings of XIV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2021”, Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 24–26 February 2021, Springer. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies.
21. Exoskeletal Devices for Hand Assistance and Rehabilitation: A Comprehensive Analysis of State-of-the-Art Technologies10.1109/TMRB.2021.3064412 ↗
22. Tong, K., Ho, S., Pang, P., Hu, X., Tam, W., Fung, K., Wei, X., Chen, P., and Chen, M. (September, January 31). An intention driven hand functions task training robotic system. Proceedings of the 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Buenos Aires, Argentina.10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627930 ↗
23. Cui, L., Phan, A., and Allison, G. (2015, January 25–29). Design and fabrication of a three dimensional printable non-assembly articulated hand exoskeleton for rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Milan, Italy.10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319425 ↗
24. Iqbal, J., Tsagarakis, N.G., and Caldwell, D.G. (September, January 30). A multi-DOF robotic exoskeleton interface for hand motion assistance. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090458 ↗
25. Design and development of a hand exoskeleton for rehabilitation following stroke10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.279 ↗
26. Power-assistive finger exoskeleton with a palmar opening at the fingerpad10.1109/TBME.2014.2325948 ↗
27. Design and control of a wearable and force-controllable hand exoskeleton system10.1016/j.mechatronics.2016.12.001 ↗
28. Design and development of a portable exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2878778 ↗
29. An attention-controlled hand exoskeleton for the rehabilitation of finger extension and flexion using a rigid-soft combined mechanism10.3389/fnbot.2019.00034 ↗
30. Sandison, M., Phan, K., Casas, R., Nguyen, L., Lum, M., Pergami-Peries, M., and Lum, P.S. (2020, January 20–24). HandMATE: Wearable robotic hand exoskeleton and integrated android app for at home stroke rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175332 ↗
31. Design and characterization of a lightweight underactuated RACA hand exoskeleton for neurorehabilitation10.1016/j.robot.2021.103828 ↗
32. Design, development, and control of a hand/wrist exoskeleton for rehabilitation and training10.1109/TRO.2022.3172510 ↗
33. Tang, T., Zhang, D., Xie, T., and Zhu, X. (2013, January 12–14). An exoskeleton system for hand rehabilitation driven by shape memory alloy. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Shenzhen, China.10.1109/ROBIO.2013.6739553 ↗
34. A novel exoskeleton robotic system for hand rehabilitation—Conceptualization to prototyping10.1016/j.bbe.2014.01.003 ↗
35. Design and development of a hand exoskeleton robot for active and passive rehabilitation10.5772/62404 ↗
36. Sarakoglou, I., Brygo, A., Mazzanti, D., Hernandez, N.G., Caldwell, D.G., and Tsagarakis, N.G. (2016, January 9–14). Hexotrac: A highly under-actuated hand exoskeleton for finger tracking and force feedback. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.10.1109/IROS.2016.7759176 ↗
37. Esposito, D., Centracchio, J., Andreozzi, E., Savino, S., Gargiulo, G.D., Naik, G.R., and Bifulco, P. (2022). Design of a 3D-printed hand exoskeleton based on force-myography control for assistance and rehabilitation. Machines, 10.10.3390/machines10010057 ↗
38. EMG-controlled hand exoskeleton for assisted bilateral rehabilitation10.1016/j.bbe.2022.04.001 ↗
39. Review: Hand Exoskeleton Systems, Clinical Rehabilitation Practices, and Future Prospects10.1109/TMRB.2021.3100625 ↗
40. Design and Prototyping of an Underactuated Hand Exoskeleton With Fingers Coupled by a Gear-Based Differential10.3389/frobt.2022.862340 ↗
41. A novel kinematic architecture for portable hand exoskeletons10.1016/j.mechatronics.2016.03.002 ↗
42. Design and development of 3D printed myoelectric robotic exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation
43. A portable and spring-guided hand exoskeleton for exercising flexion/extension of the fingers10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.02.004 ↗
44. Wearable robots: An original mechatronic design of a hand exoskeleton for assistive and rehabilitative purposes10.3389/fnbot.2021.750385 ↗
45. An original mechatronic design of a kinaesthetic hand exoskeleton for virtual reality-based applications10.1016/j.mechatronics.2023.102947 ↗
46. A powered finger–thumb wearable hand exoskeleton with self-aligning joint axes10.1109/TMECH.2014.2315528 ↗
47. Evolutionary synthesis of mechanisms applied to the design of an exoskeleton for finger rehabilitation10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.06.022 ↗
48. Malvezzi, M., Baldi, T.L., Villani, A., Ciccarese, F., and Prattichizzo, D. (September, January 31). Design, development, and preliminary evaluation of a highly wearable exoskeleton. Proceedings of the 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Virtual.10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223604 ↗
49. Kinematic design to improve ergonomics in human machine interaction10.1109/TNSRE.2006.881565 ↗
50. A novel hand exoskeleton with series elastic actuation for modulated torque transfer10.1016/j.mechatronics.2019.06.001 ↗
51. Lambercy, O., Schröder, D., Zwicker, S., and Gassert, R. (2013, January 29–31). Design of a thumb exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 7th International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology, Singapore.
52. Dragusanu, M., Iqbal, Z., Prattichizzo, D., and Malvezzi, M. (2021, January 1–5). Design of a modular hand exoskeleton for rehabilitation and training. Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Virtual.10.1115/IMECE2021-70343 ↗
53. Development and pilot testing of HEXORR: Hand EXOskeleton rehabilitation robot10.1186/1743-0003-7-36 ↗
54. In, H., Cho, K.J., Kim, K., and Lee, B. (July, January 29). Jointless structure and under-actuation mechanism for compact hand exoskeleton. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Zurich, Switzerland.
55. Towards a realistic biomechanical model of the thumb: The choice of kinematic description may be more critical than the solution method or the variability/uncertainty of musculoskeletal parameters10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00061-7 ↗
56. Postural hand synergies for tool use10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-23-10105.1998 ↗
57. Physical therapy treatment time during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation10.1179/107902611X12971826988057 ↗
58. SCIRehab Project series: The physical therapy taxonomy10.1080/10790268.2009.11760781 ↗
59. The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work10.1016/j.apergo.2015.12.003 ↗
60. Evaluation of the effects of the Arm Light Exoskeleton on movement execution and muscle activities: A pilot study on healthy subjects10.1186/s12984-016-0117-x ↗
61. Variable admittance control of a hand exoskeleton for virtual reality-based rehabilitation tasks10.3389/fnbot.2021.789743 ↗
62. Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., and Preece, J. (2004). User-Centered Design, Sage Publications.
63. When robots care: Public deliberations on how technology and humans may support independent living for older adults10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.038 ↗
64. Interactive robots for health in Europe: Technology readiness and adoption potential10.3389/fpubh.2023.979225 ↗
65. Tiboni, M., and Amici, C. (2022). Soft Gloves: A Review on Recent Developments in Actuation, Sensing, Control, and Applications. Actuators, 11.10.3390/act11080232 ↗
66. Tiboni, M., and Loda, D. (2023). Monolithic PneuNets Soft Actuators for Robotic Rehabilitation: Methodologies for Design, Production and Characterization. Actuators, 12.10.3390/act12070299 ↗
67. Assisting hand function after spinal cord injury with a fabric-based soft robotic glove10.1186/s12984-018-0391-x ↗
68. Elmoughni, H.M., Yilmaz, A.F., Ozlem, K., Khalilbayli, F., Cappello, L., Tuncay Atalay, A., Ince, G., and Atalay, O. (2021). Machine-Knitted Seamless Pneumatic Actuators for Soft Robotics: Design, Fabrication, and Characterization. Actuators, 10.10.3390/act10050094 ↗
69. Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.014 ↗
70. Tiboni, M., Borboni, A., Vérité, F., Bregoli, C., and Amici, C. (2022). Sensors and Actuation Technologies in Exoskeletons: A Review. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22030884 ↗
71. Polygerinos, P., Lyne, S., Wang, Z., Nicolini, L.F., Mosadegh, B., Whitesides, G.M., and Walsh, C.J. (2013, January 3–7). Towards a soft pneumatic glove for hand rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo, Japan.10.1109/IROS.2013.6696549 ↗
72. Design and optimization of actuator for multi-joint soft rehabilitation glove10.1108/IR-02-2021-0036 ↗
73. Chen, Y., Yang, Z., and Wen, Y. (2021). A soft exoskeleton glove for hand bilateral training via surface EMG. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21020578 ↗
74. Do, P.T., Vo, D.T., and Le, H.P. (2021, January 6–10). A Soft Pneumatic Robotic Glove for Hand Rehabilitation after Stroke. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), Ljubljana, Slovenia.10.1109/ICAR53236.2021.9659404 ↗
75. Li, M., Wang, T., Zhuo, Y., He, B., Tao, T., Xie, J., and Xu, G. (2020, January 22–26). A soft robotic glove for hand rehabilitation training controlled by movements of the healthy hand. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR), Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/UR49135.2020.9144753 ↗
76. Low cost soft robotic gloves for at-home rehabilitation and daily living activities
77. Jiang, Y., Chen, D., Que, J., Liu, Z., Wang, Z., and Xu, Y. (2017, January 5–8). Soft robotic glove for hand rehabilitation based on a novel fabrication method. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2017, Macau, Macao.10.1109/ROBIO.2017.8324518 ↗
78. Soft robotic glove for kinesthetic haptic feedback in virtual reality environments10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2017.3.ERVR-102 ↗
79. Jiralerspong, T., Heung, K.H., Tong, R.K., and Li, Z. (2018, January 26–29). A Novel Soft Robotic Glove for Daily Life Assistance. Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob), Enschede, The Netherlands.10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8488060 ↗
80. Soft robotic glove controlling using brainwave detection for continuous rehabilitation at home
81. Kiss, B., and Harmati, I.T.Z. (2020, January 15–17). Master-Slave Control for a Pneumatically Actuated Low Pressure Soft Robotic Glove to Facilitate Bilateral Training for Stroke Patients. Proceedings of the 2020 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Measurement and Control in Robotics, ISMCR 2020, Budapest, Hungary.
82. Hu, D., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Li, Q., Li, D., and Hong, J. (2020, January 6–9). A novel soft robotic glove with positive-negative pneumatic actuator for hand rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Virtual.10.1109/AIM43001.2020.9158826 ↗
83. Simulation analysis for optimal design of pneumatic bellow actuators for soft-robotic glove10.1016/j.bbe.2020.08.002 ↗
84. Design, Modeling, and Evaluation of Fabric-Based Pneumatic Actuators for Soft Wearable Assistive Gloves10.1089/soro.2019.0105 ↗
85. High-Force Fabric-Based Pneumatic Actuators with Asymmetric Chambers and Interference-Reinforced Structure for Soft Wearable Assistive Gloves10.1109/LRA.2021.3062588 ↗
86. A Fully Fabric-Based Bidirectional Soft Robotic Glove for Assistance and Rehabilitation of Hand Impaired Patients10.1109/LRA.2017.2669366 ↗
87. Koizumi, S., Chang, T.H., Nabae, H., Endo, G., Suzumori, K., Mita, M., Saitoh, K., Hatakeyama, K., Chida, S., and Shimada, Y. (2020, January 12–15). Soft Robotic Gloves with Thin McKibben Muscles for Hand Assist and Rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/SII46433.2020.9025832 ↗
88. Cao, X., Ma, K., Jiang, Z., and Xu, F. (2021, January 26–28). A Soft Robotic Glove for Hand Rehabilitation using Pneumatic Actuators with Jamming Structure. Proceedings of the 40th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Shanghai, China.10.23919/CCC52363.2021.9550076 ↗
89. A Magnetic Resonance Compatible Soft Wearable Robotic Glove for Hand Rehabilitation and Brain Imaging10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2602941 ↗
90. Du, Q., Zhao, W., Cui, X., and Fei, Y. (2020, January 4–6). Design, control and testing of soft pneumatic rehabilitation glove. Proceedings of the 2020 3rd World Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Manufacturing, WCMEIM 2020, Shanghai, China.10.1109/WCMEIM52463.2020.00017 ↗
91. Robotic Glove with Soft-Elastic Composite Actuators for Assisting Activities of Daily Living10.1089/soro.2017.0125 ↗
92. Design and testing of a soft rehabilitation glove integrating finger and wrist function10.1115/1.4041789 ↗
93. Ang, B.W.K., and Yeow, C.H. (2017, January 24–28). Print-it-Yourself (PIY) glove: A fully 3D printed soft robotic hand rehabilitative and assistive exoskeleton for stroke patients. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/IROS.2017.8202295 ↗
94. Design and preliminary feasibility study of a soft robotic glove for hand function assistance in stroke survivors10.3389/fnins.2017.00547 ↗
95. Haghshenas-Jaryani, M., Carrigan, W., Nothnagle, C., and Wijesundara, M.B.J. (2016, January 26–29). Sensorized soft robotic glove for continuous passive motion therapy. Proceedings of the IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Singapore.10.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523728 ↗
96. Yap, H.K., Ang, B.W.K., Lim, J.H., Goh, J.C.H., and Yeow, C.H. (2016, January 16–21). A fabric-regulated soft robotic glove with user intent detection using EMG and RFID for hand assistive application. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Stockholm, Sweden.10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487535 ↗
97. Yu, H., and Braun, D.C.D. (2015, January 1–14). MRC-glove: A fMRI compatible soft robotic glove for hand rehabilitation application. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Singapore.
98. Design, Modeling, and Testing of a Soft Pneumatic Glove with Segmented PneuNets Bending Actuators10.1109/TMECH.2019.2911992 ↗
99. Rocker, C., Ziefle, M., O’Donoghue, J., Helfert, M., and Molloy, W. (2016, January 21–22). Preliminary findings of feasibility of a wearable soft-robotic glove supporting impaired hand function in daily life: A soft-robotic glove supporting adl of elderly people. Proceedings of the ICT4AWE 2016—2nd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health, Proceedings, Rome, Italy.
100. Preliminary Evaluation of a Wearable Soft-Robotic Glove Supporting Grip Strength in ADL10.1007/978-3-319-46669-9_203 ↗