Using WebXR Metaverse Platforms to Create Touristic Services and Cultural Promotion
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a surge of Metaverse applications and tools striving to capture the attention of both the general public and businesses, with a particularly strong potential within the tourism sector. However, there has been significant criticism towards major corporations for marketing a concept of the Metaverse that fails to align with reality. On the other hand, smaller entities such as Spatial-io, which is an innovative metaverse platform, are introducing a different style of the Metaverse, one that is highly accessible from contemporary devices like smartphones, tablets, VR headsets, and traditional PCs via WebXR platforms. This article delves into and scrutinizes various methodologies of a tourism-oriented Metaverse, considering its prospective utility as a vehicle to attract more visitors. A virtual tourist information center was established on the Spatial-io Metaverse platform to promote Valencia, Spain. This research scrutinizes the navigation, accessibility, and usability of the service from a conventional PC browser, contrasting it with the experience offered by the Meta Quest 2 virtual reality headset. The study’s quantitative and qualitative data analysis indicates that these innovative services are highly regarded, particularly when a real person (not a bot) provides information, fostering trust and offering details about various tourist attractions within the promoted city. The comparison of user inquiries’ time and depth aligns with the immersion level, demonstrating more positive feedback when the service is accessed through the VR system rather than a standard PC browser.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Augmented Reality Applications · Digital Marketing and Social Media
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Instituto de Diseño y Fabricación, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain
Funding
Spanish Government
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Steve, R. (2023, May 25). “The Metaverse Will Be Our Slow Death!” Is Facebook losing Its $100bn Gamble on Virtual Reality?. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/dec/07/metaverse-slow-death-facebook-losing-100bn-gamble-virtual-reality-mark-zuckerberg.
2. Hastuti, T.D., Sanjaya, R., and Koeswoyo, F. (2023). The Readiness of Lasem Batik Small and Medium Enterprises to Join the Metaverse. Computers, 12.10.3390/computers12010005 ↗
3. Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542 ↗
4. Building a Human-Intelligent Metaverse
5. Metaverse in a virtual education context
6. Educational applications of metaverse: Possibilities and limitations10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.32 ↗
7. Panda, M., Dehuri, S., Patra, M.R., Behera, P.K., Tsihrintzis, G.A., Cho, S.B., and Coello Coello, C.A. (2022). Innovations in Intelligent Computing and Communication, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-031-23233-6 ↗
8. Advertising in the Metaverse: Research Agenda10.1080/15252019.2021.2001273 ↗
9. Avatars in the metaverse: Potential legal issues and remedies10.1365/s43439-022-00056-9 ↗
10. Understanding consumer behavior in the multimedia context: Incorporating gamification in VR-enhanced web system for tourism e-commerce10.1007/s11042-021-11149-8 ↗
11. A comparative analysis of two immersive virtual reality systems in the integration and visualization of natural hand interaction10.1007/s11042-021-11760-9 ↗
12. Barrett, R.C.A., Poe, R., O’Camb, J.W., Woodruff, C., Harrison, S.M., Dolguikh, K., Chuong, C., Klassen, A.D., Zhang, R., and Joseph, R.B. (2022). Comparing virtual reality, desktop-based 3D, and 2D versions of a category learning experiment. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0275119 ↗
13. New realities: A systematic literature review on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism research10.1080/13683500.2017.1417359 ↗
14. Zhou, M., and Yu, H. (2022). Exploring How Tourist Engagement Affects Destination Loyalty: The Intermediary Role of Value and Satisfaction. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14031621 ↗
15. Exploring the factors influencing the adoption and usage of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality applications in tourism education within the context of COVID-19 pandemic
16. Koo, C., Kwon, J., Chung, N., and Kim, J. (2022). Metaverse tourism: Conceptual framework and research propositions. Curr. Issues Tour.10.1080/13683500.2022.2122781 ↗
17. Metaverse as a disruptive technology revolutionising tourism management and marketing10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104724 ↗
18. Zhang, X., Yang, D., Yow, C.H., Huang, L., Wu, X., Huang, X., Guo, J., Zhou, S., and Cai, Y. (2022). Metaverse for Cultural Heritages. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11223730 ↗
19. Tourist Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction10.1016/j.annals.2009.07.001 ↗
20. The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intentions: Evidence from Chinese online visitors10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.10.008 ↗
21. Examining the Effect of Tour Guide Performance, Tourist Trust, Tourist Satisfaction, and Flow Experience on Tourists’ Shopping Behavior10.1080/10941665.2012.739189 ↗
22. When artificial intelligence meets the hospitality and tourism industry: An assessment framework to inform theory and management
23. Analysis of the attributes of smart tourism technologies in destination chatbots that influence tourist satisfaction10.1080/13683500.2021.1997942 ↗
24. Varitimiadis, S., Kotis, K., Pittou, D., and Konstantakis, G. (2021). Graph-Based Conversational AI: Towards a Distributed and Collaborative Multi-Chatbot Approach for Museums. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11199160 ↗
25. Zlatanov, S., and Popesku, J. (2019, January 20). Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Tourism and Hospitality. Proceedings of the Sinteza 2019—International Scientific Conference on Information Technology and Data Related Research, Belgrade, Serbia.10.15308/Sinteza-2019-84-90 ↗
26. A critical review of state-of-the-art chatbot designs and applications10.1002/widm.1434 ↗
27. Praetorius, A.S., and Görlich, D. (2020). How Avatars Influence User Behavior: A Review on the Proteus Effect in Virtual Environments and Video Games, Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3402942.3403019 ↗
28. A conceptual comparative approach on personal AI assistants and external service robots10.2478/picbe-2022-0134 ↗
29. Blattgerste, J., Strenge, B., Renner, P., Pfeiffer, T., and Essig, K. (2017, January 21–23). Comparing Conventional and Augmented Reality Instructions for Manual Assembly Tasks. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, Rhodes, Greece.10.1145/3056540.3056547 ↗
30. Stephanidis, C. (2017). HCI International 2017—Posters’ Extended Abstracts, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 9–14 July 2017, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-58750-9 ↗
31. A Personal Resource for Technology Interaction: Development and Validation of the Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) Scale10.1080/10447318.2018.1456150 ↗
32. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire10.1162/105474698565686 ↗
33. The Factor Structure of the Presence Questionnaire10.1162/105474605323384654 ↗
34. Brooke, J. (1996). Usability Evaluation in Industry, CRC Press.
35. Lee, N. (2019). Encyclopedia of Computer Graphics and Games, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-08234-9 ↗
36. Sharma, A., Bajpai, P., Singh, S., and Khatter, K. (2017). Virtual Reality: Blessings and Risk Assessment. arXiv.
37. Visit València Foundation (2023, June 01). 3rd World Conference on Smart Destination. Available online: https://www.smartdestinationsworldconference.org/80399/programme/iii-congreso-mundial-de-destinos-turisticos-inteligentes.html.