A Review of Blast Loading in the Urban Environment
Source abstract
Abstract
Urban blasts have become a significant concern in recent years. Whilst free-field blasts are well understood, the introduction of an urban setting (or any complex geometry) gives rise to multiple blast wave interactions and unique flow complexities, significantly increasing the difficulty of loading predictions. This review identifies commonly agreed-upon concepts or behaviours that are utilised to describe urban shock wave propagation, such as channelling and shielding, in conjunction with exploring urban characterisation metrics that aim to predict the effects on global blast loading for an urban blast. Likewise, discrepancies and contradictions are highlighted to promote key areas that require further work and clarification. Multiple numerical modelling programmes are acknowledged to showcase their ability to act as a means of validation and a preliminary testing tool. The findings contained within this review aim to inform future research decisions and topics better.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis · Combustion and Detonation Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
Atomic Weapons Establishment, Damage Assessment, AWE Aldermaston, Reading RG7 4PR, UK
Funding
EPSRC and the Atomic Weapons Establishment
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Ritchie, H., and Roser, M. (2022, November 11). Plastic Pollution. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution.
2. Dusenberry, D. (2010). Handbook for Blast-Resistant Design of Buildings, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470549070 ↗
3. Glass-related injuries in Oklahoma City bombing10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1999)13:2(50) ↗
4. Preliminary yield estimation of the 2020 Beirut explosion using video footage from social media10.1007/s00193-020-00970-z ↗
5. Rufolo, P., Muraro, D., and Lorini, V. (2021). Social Media Image Analysis in the Immediate Aftermath of the 2020 Beirut Blast, Joint Research Centre, Publications Office of the European Union. Technical Report JRC124081.
6. Halswijk, W. (2015, January 9–13). BeamBlast: Blast path-finding algorithms. Proceedings of the 16th ISIEMS International Symposium for the Interaction of the Effects of Munitions with Structures, Destin, FL, USA.
7. Blast resistance and mitigation strategies of structures: Present status and future trends10.1680/jstbu.17.00056 ↗
8. Cormie, D., Mays, G., and Smith, P. (2009). Blast Effects on Buildings, Thomas Telford. [2nd ed.].10.1680/beob2e.35218 ↗
9. Duncan-Miller, G. (2016). Urban Blast Waves: A Semi-Analytic Solution for Intense Explosions with Rigid Wall Reflections. [Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mathematics, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology].
10. Explosions in complex geometries–A comparison of several approaches10.1260/2041-4196.1.2.169 ↗
11. Stirling, C., Misselbrook, N., Nikodym, L., Mould, J., and Wesevic, J. (2017, January 10–12). The importance of considering realistic blast waveforms and corresponding methods of assessing structural damage when conducting quantitative risk assessments. Proceedings of the IChemE Hazards 27, Birmingham, UK.
12. The negative phase of the blast load10.1260/2041-4196.5.1.1 ↗
13. Rigby, S., Tyas, A., Fay, S., Clarke, S., and Warren, J. (2014, January 16–17). Validation of semi-empirical blast pressure predictions for far-field explosions-is there inherent variability in blast wave parameters?. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Protection of Structures against Hazards, Tianjin, China.10.1260/2041-4196.6.1.23 ↗
14. Reflected near-field blast pressure measurements using high speed video10.1007/s11340-020-00615-3 ↗
15. Hopkinson, B. (1915). British Ordnance Board Minutes 13565, Public Records Office.
16. Cranz, C. (1926). Lehrbuch der Basllistik, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-52612-1 ↗
17. Experimental Measurement of Specific Impulse Distribution and Transient Deformation of Plates Subjected to Near-Field Explosive Blasts10.1007/s11340-018-00438-3 ↗
18. Predicting the response of plates subjected to near-field explosions using an energy equivalent impulse10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.01.014 ↗
19. Spherical equivalence of cylindrical explosives: Effect of charge shape on deflection of blast-loaded plates10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103892 ↗
20. Near-field spatial and temporal blast pressure distributions from non-spherical charges: Horizontally-aligned cylinders10.1177/20414196211013443 ↗
21. Experimental studies of the effect of rapid afterburn on shock development of near-field explosions10.1177/2041419616665931 ↗
22. An investigation of TNT equivalence of hemispherical PE4 charges
23. Bogosian, D., Yokota, M., and Rigby, S. (2016, January 19–23). TNT equivalence of C-4 and PE4: A review of traditional sources and recent data. Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock (MABS24), Halifax, NS, Canada.
24. TNT equivalency analysis of specific impulse distribution from close-in detonations10.1177/2041419620972423 ↗
25. Farrimond, D.G., Woolford, S., Tyas, A., Rigby, S.E., Clarke, S.D., Barr, A., Whittaker, M., and Pope, D.J. (Int. J. Prot. Struct., 2023). Far-field positive phase blast parameter characterisation of RDX and PETN based explosives, Int. J. Prot. Struct., ahead of print.10.1177/20414196221149752 ↗
26. Small scale models of complex geometry for blast overpressure assessment10.1016/0734-743X(92)90112-7 ↗
27. Johnson, E.M., Grahl, N., Langenderfer, M.J., Doucet, D.P., Schott, J., Williams, K., Rutter, B., and Johnson, C. (Int. J. Prot. Struct., 2022). An experimental and simulated investigation into the validity of unrestricted blast wave scaling models when applied to transonic flow in complex tunnel environments, Int. J. Prot. Struct., ahead of print.10.1177/20414196221095252 ↗
28. Air blast TNT equivalence concept for blast-resistant design10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105871 ↗
29. Hyde, D.W. (1988). Microcomputer Programs CONWEP and FUNPRO, Applications of TM 5-855-1, ‘Fundamentals of Protective Design for Conventional Weapons’ (User’s Guide), Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg MS Structures Lab.. Technical Report.
30. Britt, J.R., and Lumsden, M.G. (1994). Internal Blast and Thermal Environment from Internal and External Explosions: A User’s Guide for the BLAST-X Code, Version 3.0, Science Applications International Corporation. Technical Report SAIC 405-94-2.
31. Angelides, S., Burgan, B., Kyprianou, C., Rigby, S., and Tyas, A. (2022, January 19–21). EMBlast: A software for rapidly and accurately calculating blast loads on structures. Proceedings of the 97th Comité International Des Construction Industrielles (CICIND) Conference, Paphos, Cyprus.
32. Blast wave propagation in city streets—An overview10.1002/pse.209 ↗
33. Gautier, A., Sochet, I., and Courtiaud, S. (2022). Analysis of shock wave interaction with an obstacle by coupling pressure measurements and visualization. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22093325 ↗
34. Shock Wave Propagation in an Obstructed Area10.2495/SUSI200021 ↗
35. Analysis of 3D interaction of a blast wave with a finite wall10.1007/s00193-022-01081-7 ↗
36. Influence of barrier material and barrier shape on blast wave mitigation10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.078 ↗
37. Smith, P., Rose, T., and Ng, S. (October, January 27). The influence of areal density on the shielding and channelling of blast by buildings. Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Military Aspect of Blast and Shock (MABS18), Bad Reichenhall, Germany.
38. Rose, T.A. (2002). Air3d User’s Guide, Cranfield University, Royal Military College of Science.
39. Urban spatial order: Street network orientation, configuration, and entropy10.1007/s41109-019-0189-1 ↗
40. Smith, P., Rose, T., and Green, J. (2003, January 5–9). The effect of arrays of suburban buildings in providing shielding from blast. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Interaction of the Effects of Munitions with Structures, Mannheim, Germany.
41. Probabilistic analysis of blast–obstacle interaction in a crowded internal environment10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103227 ↗
42. Experimental investigation of blast wave propagation in an urban environment10.1016/j.jlp.2017.06.021 ↗
43. Blast loading on buildings from explosions in City Streets10.1680/stbu.2001.146.1.47 ↗
44. Kinney, G.F., and Graham, K.J. (1985). Internal blast. Explosive Shocks in Air, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-86682-1 ↗
45. France groupe d’etude des Modes Operatoires (GEMO) (2013). Determination Desequivalents tnt par Effetde Souffle des Explosifs, GEMO.
46. Influence of the principal geometrical parameters of straight city streets on positive and negative phase blast wave impulses10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00060-4 ↗
47. Ripley, R., Cloney, C., Donahue, L., and Zhang, F. (2012, January 4). Extended near-field regime in urban confinement. Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock, Bourges, France.
48. Numerical models for afterburning of TNT detonation products in air10.1007/s00193-013-0467-2 ↗
49. Characterisation of blast loading in complex, confined geometries using quarter symmetry experimental methods10.1007/s00193-016-0621-8 ↗
50. Sochet, I., Gault, K., and Hakenholz, L. (2019). Direct Numerical Simulations-An Introduction and Applications, IntechOpen.
51. Donahue, L., Ripley, R., and Zhang, F. (2016, January 19–23). Validation of the correlation between urban blast confinement and structural load. Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock (MABS24), Halifax, NS, Canada.
52. Façade failure effects on blast propagation along city streets10.1680/stbu.2003.156.4.359 ↗
53. On the blast-wave shielding effect of porous buildings10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2022.103787 ↗
54. Photogrammetry of spherical shocks reflected from real and ideal surfaces10.1017/S0022112077002304 ↗
55. Direct simulations of outdoor blast wave propagation from source to receiver10.1007/s00193-017-0711-2 ↗
56. Beirut ammonium nitrate explosion: Are not we really learning anything?10.1002/prs.12203 ↗
57. Damage detection using SAR coherence statistical analysis, application to Beirut, Lebanon10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.01.001 ↗
58. Agapiou, A. (2020). Damage Proxy Map of the Beirut Explosion on 4th of August 2020 as Observed from the Copernicus Sensors. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20216382 ↗
59. Kingery, C., and Bulmash, G. (1984). Airblast Parameters from TNT Spherical Air Burst and Hemispherical Surface Burst, U.S Army BRL, Aberdeen Proving Ground. Technical Report ARBRL-TR-02555.
60. An estimate of the TNT-equivalent net explosive quantity (NEQ) of the Beirut Port explosion using publicly-available tools and data10.1002/prep.202000227 ↗
61. Beirut explosion: TNT equivalence from the fireball evolution in the first 170 milliseconds10.1007/s00193-021-01031-9 ↗
62. Explosion analysis from images: Trinity and Beirut10.1088/1361-6404/abe131 ↗
63. Blast wave kinematics: Theory, experiments, and applications10.1007/s00193-022-01089-z ↗
64. Locking, P. (2011, January 12–16). The trouble with TNT equivalence. Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Ballistics, Miami, FL, USA.
65. Investigative consequence analysis: A case study research of beirut explosion accident10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104387 ↗
66. Yield estimation of the 2020 Beirut explosion using open access waveform and remote sensing data10.1038/s41598-021-93690-y ↗
67. Case study of the Beirut port explosion using 3D laser scan and nonlinear finite element model
68. Analysis of the structural response of Beirut port concrete silos under blast loading
69. Silos structural response to blast loading10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112671 ↗
70. Comprehensive study on the catastrophic explosion of ammonium nitrate stored in the warehouse of Beirut port10.1016/j.psep.2021.05.030 ↗
71. Reconciling conflicting estimates of the Beirut explosion yield and mushroom cloud height: Effects of an aqueous near source environment
72. Steel column response to thermal and long duration blast loads inside an air blast tunnel10.1080/15732479.2019.1635627 ↗
73. Long-duration blast loading & response of steel column sections at different angles of incidence10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.019 ↗
74. Structural response of simple partially-clad steel frames to long-duration blast loading10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.024 ↗
75. Non-linear long duration blast loading of cylindrical shell structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.030 ↗
76. Dynamic response of polyurea coated thin steel storage tank to long duration blast loadings10.1016/j.tws.2021.107747 ↗
77. Response of structures to planar blast loads – A finite element engineering approach10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.02.005 ↗
78. Dynamic response and failure analysis for urban bridges under far-field blast loads10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116043 ↗
79. Evaluating long-duration blast loads on steel columns using computational fluid dynamics10.1080/15732479.2019.1599966 ↗
80. Eulerian solver sensitivity for computing long-duration blast drag loading on columns
81. Innovative protection of urban areas–Experimental research on the blast mitigating potential of hedges10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103876 ↗
82. Alshammari, O.G., Isaac, O.S., Clarke, S.D., and Rigby, S.E. (Int. J. Prot. Struct., 2022). Mitigation of blast loading through blast–obstacle interaction, Int. J. Prot. Struct., ahead of print.10.1177/20414196221115869 ↗
83. Isaac, O.S., Alshammari, O.G., Clarke, S.D., and Rigby, S.E. (Int. J. Prot. Struct., 2022). Experimental investigation of blast mitigation of pre-fractal obstacles, Int. J. Prot. Struct., ahead of print.10.1177/20414196221144066 ↗
84. Isaac, O.S., Alshammari, O.G., Pickering, E.G., Clarke, S.D., and Rigby, S.E. (Int. J. Prot. Struct., 2022). Blast wave interaction with structures–An overview, Int. J. Prot. Struct., ahead of print.10.1177/20414196221118595 ↗
85. Century-Dynamics (2003). AUTODYN Users Manual; Version 4.3, Century-Dynamics.
86. Armstrong, B.J., Rickman, D.D., Baylot, J.T., and Bevins, T.L. (2002, January 10–14). Code validation studies for blast in urban terrain. Proceedings of the 2002 HPC User’s Group Conference, Austin, TX, USA.
87. Modelling blast loads on buildings in complex city geometries10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.04.003 ↗
88. Johansson, M., Larsen, O., and Laine, L. (2007, January 4–8). Explosion at an intersection in an Urban Environment—Experiments and analyses. Proceedings of the 78th Shock and Vibration Symposium, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
89. Modeling blast waves, gas and particles dispersion in urban and hilly ground areas10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.08.011 ↗
90. Numerical study of confined explosions in urban environments10.1260/2041-4196.4.4.591 ↗
91. Drazin, W. (2017). Blast Propagation and Damage in Urban Topographies. [Ph.D. Thesis, The Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge].
92. Mohr, L., Benauer, R., Leitl, P., and Fraundorfer, F. (2019, January 3–6). Damage estimation of explosions in urban environments by simulation. Proceedings of the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences–ISPRS Archives Volume XLII-3/W8. Gi4DM 2019—GeoInformation for Disaster Management, Prague, Czech Republic.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W8-253-2019 ↗
93. Study on Overpressure Propagation Law of Vapor Cloud Explosion under Different Building Layouts10.1021/acsomega.1c05332 ↗
94. Analysing explosive damage in an urban environment10.1680/stbu.2005.158.1.1 ↗
95. Location and mass of explosive from structural damage10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.09.003 ↗
96. Christensen, S.O., and Hjort, Ø.J.S. (2012, January 4). Back Calculation of the Oslo Bombing on July 22nd, Using Window Breakage. Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock, Bourges, France.
97. Airblast variability and fatality risks from a VBIED in a complex urban environment10.1016/j.ress.2021.107459 ↗
98. Probabilistic assessment of airblast variability and fatality risk estimation for explosive blasts in confined building spaces10.1177/2041419619849083 ↗
99. Beirut explosion 2020: A case study for a large-scale urban blast simulation10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105190 ↗
100. Willenborg, B. (2015). Simulation of Explosions in Urban Space and Result Analysis Based on CityGML City Models and a Cloud Based 3D Web Client, Technical University Munich Chair of Geoinformatics.