journal article·2021-11-12Open access

Comparative Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of Camber Morphing and Conventional Airfoils

Tuba Majid, Bruce W. Jo

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 22

Abstract

This paper aims to numerically validate the aerodynamic performance and benefits of variable camber rate morphing wings, by comparing them to conventional ones with plain flaps, when deflection angles vary, assessing their D reduction or L/D improvement. Many morphing-related research works mainly focus on the design of morphing mechanisms using smart materials, and innovative mechanism designs through materials and structure advancements. However, the foundational work that establishes the motivation of morphing technology development has been overlooked in most research works. All things considered, this paper starts with the verification of the numerical model used for the aerodynamic performance analysis and then conducts the aerodynamic performance analysis of (1) variable camber rate in morphing wings and (2) variable deflection angles in conventional wings. Finally, we find matching pairs for a direct comparison to validate the effectiveness of morphing wings. As a result, we validate that variable camber morphing wings, equivalent to conventional wings with varying flap deflection angles, are improved by at least 1.7% in their L/D ratio, and up to 18.7% in their angle of attack, with α = 8° at a 3% camber morphing rate. Overall, in the entire range of α, which conceptualizes aircrafts mission planning for operation, camber morphing wings are superior in D, L/D, and their improvement rate over conventional ones. By providing the improvement rates in L/D, this paper numerically evaluates and validates the efficiency of camber morphing aircraft, the most important aspect of aircraft operation, as well as the agility and manoeuvrability, compared to conventional wing aircraft.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Advanced Dynamics Mechatronics and Collaborative Robotics (ADAMS) Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, State University of New York (SUNY), Stony Brook University, Incheon 406840, Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea · InnoScience Co. Ltd

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. A Review of Morphing Aircraft10.1177/1045389X11414084 ↗
2. La, S., Joe, W.Y., Akbar, M., and Alsaidi, B. (2018, January 8–12). Surveys on skin design for morphing wing aircraft: Status and challenges. Proceedings of the 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2018-0315 ↗
3. Nordmann, A. (2012, October 12). Control Surfaces on Airfoil. Available online: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Control_surfaces_on_airfoil.svg.
4. The belt-rib concept: A structronic approach to variable camber10.1106/6H4B-HBW3-VDJ8-NB8A ↗
5. Keidel, D., Sodja, J., Werter, N., de Breuker, R., and Ermanni, P. (2015, January 25). Development and testing of an unconventional morphing wing concept with variable chord and camber. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Adaptive Structures and Technologies, Kobe, Japan.
6. Conceptual Design and Experimental Demonstration of a Distributedly Actuated Morphing Wing10.2514/1.C032739 ↗
7. Design and simulative experiment of an innovative trailing edge morphing mechanism driven by artificial muscles embedded in skin10.1088/0964-1726/25/9/095004 ↗
8. Design, realization and structural testing of a compliant adaptable wing10.1088/0964-1726/24/10/105027 ↗
9. Maki, M. (2016, January 13–17). Experimental Study of a Morphing Wing Configuration with Multi-Slotted Variable-Camber Mechanism. Proceedings of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Washington, DC, USA.10.2514/6.2016-3849 ↗
10. Integrated Multidisciplinary Topology Optimization Approach to Adaptive Wing Design10.2514/1.12802 ↗
11. Morphing aircraft based on smart materials and structures: A state-of-the-art review10.1177/1045389X16629569 ↗
12. A review of modelling and analysis of morphing wings10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.06.002 ↗
13. Dhileep, K., Kumar, D., Ghosh, S., and Faruque Ali, S. (2020, January 15–19). Numerical Study of Camber Morphing in NACA0012 Airfoil. Proceedings of the AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM, Online.10.2514/6.2020-2781 ↗
14. Structural and Aerodynamics Studies on Various Wing Configurations for Morphing10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.05.084 ↗
15. Aeroelastic model and analysis of an active camber morphing wing10.1016/j.ast.2021.106534 ↗
16. Development of an SMA-based camber morphing UAV tail core design10.1088/1361-665X/ab1143 ↗
17. Morphing Wing Mechanism Using an SMA Wire Actuator10.5139/IJASS.2012.13.1.58 ↗
18. Experimental study of a bio-inspired robotic morphing wing mechanism actuated by shape memory alloy wires10.1016/j.mechatronics.2014.10.010 ↗
19. Development of Variable Camber Morphing Airfoil Using Corrugated Structure10.2514/1.C032573 ↗
20. Complete morphing wing design using flexible-rib system10.1007/s10999-015-9323-0 ↗
21. Communier, D., Botez, R.M., and Wong, T. (2020). Design and Validation of a New Morphing Camber System by Testing in the Price—Païdoussis Subsonic Wind Tunnel. Aerospace, 7.10.3390/aerospace7030023 ↗
22. A morphing aerofoil with highly controllable aerodynamic performance10.1017/aer.2016.113 ↗
23. Topology-Optimized Design and Testing of a Pressure-Driven Morphing-Aerofoil Trailing-Edge Structure10.2514/1.J052239 ↗
24. Meyer, P., Lück, S., Spuhler, T., Bode, C., Hühne, C., Friedrichs, J., and Sinapius, M. (2021). Transient Dynamic System Behavior of Pressure Actuated Cellular Structures in a Morphing Wing. Aerospace, 8.10.3390/aerospace8030089 ↗
25. Wind tunnel testing of the fish bone active camber morphing concept10.1177/1045389X14521700 ↗
26. Design of compliant mechanism-based variable camber morphing wing with nonlinear large deformation10.1177/1729881419886740 ↗
27. Aerostructural Performance of Distributed Compliance Morphing Wings: Wind Tunnel and Flight Testing10.2514/1.J055073 ↗
28. Analysis and experimental validation of morphing UAV wings10.1017/aer.2017.130 ↗
29. Design, Development, and Structural Testing of a Camber-Morphing Flying Wing Airplane
30. Structural design and verification of an innovative whole adaptive variable camber wing10.1016/j.ast.2019.02.032 ↗
31. Composite additive manufacturing of morphing aerospace structures10.1016/j.mfglet.2019.12.004 ↗
32. A Comparative Study: Aerodynamics of Morphed Airfoils Using CFD Techniques and Analytical Tools
33. Cheung, K., Cellucci, D., Copplestone, G., Cramer, N., Fusco, J., Jenett, B., Kim, J., Langford, A., Mazhari, A., and Trinh, G. (2017, January 5–9). Development of Mission Adaptive Digital Composite Aerostructure Technologies (MADCAT). Proceedings of the 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Denver, CO, USA.10.2514/6.2017-4273 ↗
34. Overview of the DARPA Smart Wing Project10.1177/1045389X04042796 ↗
35. Kota, S., Osborn, R., Ervin, G., Maric, D., Flick, P., and Paul, D. (2009). Mission adaptive compliant wing–design, fabrication and flight test. RTO Applied Vehicle Technology Panel (AVT) Symposium, NATO-OTAN. RTO-MP-AVT-168.
36. Evaluation of a Compliant Droop-Nose Morphing Wing Tip via Experimental Tests10.2514/1.C033909 ↗
37. Nguyen, N., Lebofsky, S., Ting, E., Kaul, U., Chaparro, D., and Urnes, J. (2015). Development of Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap for Performance Adaptive Aeroelastic Wing. SAE AeroTech Congress & Exhibition, SAE International.10.4271/2015-01-2565 ↗
38. Aerodynamic Performance Estimation of Camber Morphing Airfoils for Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle10.5028/jatm.v12.1094 ↗
39. Huntley, S.J., Woods, B.K., and Allen, C.B. (2019, January 17–21). Computational Analysis of the Aerodynamics of Camber Morphing. Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum, Dallas, TX, USA.10.2514/6.2019-2914 ↗
40. Alulema, V.H., Valencia, E., Pillajo, D., Jacome, M., Lopez, J., and Ayala, B. (2020, January 24–28). Degree of Deformation and Power Consumption of Compliant and Rigid-linked Mechanisms for Variable-Camber Morphing Wing UAVs. Proceedings of the AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2020 Forum, Virtual Event.10.2514/6.2020-3958 ↗
41. Experimental Study about the Deformation and Aerodynamic Characteristics of the Passive Morphing Airfoil10.2322/tjsass.63.18 ↗
42. Spalart, P., and Allmaras, S. (1992, January 6–9). A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. Proceedings of the 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA.10.2514/6.1992-439 ↗
43. Goetten, F., Finger, D., Marino, M., Bil, C., Havermann, M., and Braun, C. (2019). A review of guidelines and best practices for subsonic aerodynamic simulations using RANS CFD. APISAT 2019: Asia Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology, Engineers Gold Coast.
44. Schlichting, H., and Kestin, J. (1961). Boundary Layer Theory, Springer.10.1115/1.3641813 ↗
45. Ladson, C.L. (1988). Effects of Independent Variation of Mach and Reynolds Numbers on the Low-Speed Aerodynamic Characteristics of the NACA 0012 Airfoil Section, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Division.
46. (2021, October 20). 2D NACA 0012 Airfoil Validation Case, Available online: https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/naca0012numerics_val.html.
47. (2021, October 20). Airfoil Tools. Available online: http://airfoiltools.com/airfoil/naca4digit.
48. Nonlinearity of the aerodynamic characteristics of NACA0012 aerofoil at low Reynolds numbers