journal article·2020-02-02Open access

Cross-National Comparison of Soundscape in Urban Public Open Spaces between China and Croatia

Lingtong Deng, Jian Kang, Wei Zhao, Kristian Jambrošić

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 3

Abstract

There are similarities and differences between open public space soundscape evaluation in different countries, mainly due to the influence of cultural background. This paper systematically compares the effect of social-cultural context on soundscape of urban public open spaces in China and Croatia. Eleven well-known and typical squares were selected. A series of questionnaire surveys within the soundscape framework were carried out during the summer season, and gathered data were analyzed. Principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in two principal components, eventfulness and pleasantness, as notable soundscape factors. However, eventfulness is the major factor in China, and pleasantness is the major factor in Croatia. In terms of environmental satisfaction, natural condition is the major factor based on PCA. Urban condition is the second factor in China, however, it is the third factor in Croatia. It is interesting to note that the physical environment is the most important factor in Croatian inland and coastal places, which is different compared to Chinese places. Visit purpose is the dominant factor associated with sound and environmental satisfaction. Natural sound and children have mainly positive correlations to sound and environmental satisfaction in China, whereas sounds of human activities have mainly negative correlations to sound and environmental satisfaction in Croatia.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Noise Effects and Management · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Key Laboratory of Cold Region Urban and Rural Human Settlement Environment Science and Technology, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin 150001, China

Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, The Bartlett, University College London, London WC1H 0NN, UK

Department of Electroacoustics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Unska 3, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of China · Heilongjiang Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation in China · Heilongjiang Province Philosophy and Social Science Project · Intergovernmental Science and Technology Cooperation Project

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Semantic differential analysis of the soundscape in urban open public spaces10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.05.014 ↗
2. Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00745.x ↗
3. Relationships among satisfaction, noise perception, and use of urban green spaces10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.148 ↗
4. Effects of audio-visual interactions on soundscape and landscape perception and their influence on satisfaction with the urban environment10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106544 ↗
5. Soundscape quality in suburban green areas and city parks
6. Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban environment10.1016/S0003-682X(01)00053-6 ↗
7. Effects of contexts on perception of urban soundscape10.1121/1.3588481 ↗
8. Effects of soundscape perception on visiting experience in a renovated historical block10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106375 ↗
9. Modeling soundscape pleasantness using perceptual assessments and acoustic measurements along paths in urban context10.3813/AAA.919073 ↗
10. Using the soundscape approach to develop a public space in Berlin-perception and evaluation10.1121/1.2935520 ↗
11. ISO 12913-1:2014 (2014). Acoustics Soundscape Part 1: Definition and Conceptual Framework, International Standardization Organization.
12. Kang, J. (2006). Urban Sound Environment, Taylor & Francis incorporating Spon.10.1201/9781482265613 ↗
13. Comparative analysis of methods to estimate urban noise exposure of inhabitants10.3813/AAA.918546 ↗
14. Road traffic noise, sleep and mental health10.1016/j.envres.2014.02.010 ↗
15. Ambient noise and cognitive processes among primary schoolchildren10.1177/0013916503256260 ↗
16. Chetoni, M., Fredianelli, L., Minichilli, F., Cori, L., Licitra, G., and Bianco, F. (2016, January 10–14). Correlation between perceived and measured noise, within the GIOCONDA project. Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Sound and Vibration: From Ancient to Modern Acoustics (ICSV 2016), Athens, Greece.
17. The relationship between transportation noise exposure and ischemic heart disease: A meta-analysis10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.023 ↗
18. Long-term residential road traffic noise and NO2 exposure in relation to risk of incident myocardial infarction—A Danish cohort study10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.019 ↗
19. Annoyance evaluation due to overall railway noise and vibration in Pisa urban areas10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.071 ↗
20. Advances in the development of common noise assessment methods in Europe: The CNOSSOS-EU framework for strategic environmental noise mapping10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.031 ↗
21. Noise annoyance assessment of various urban road vehicle pass-by noises in isolation and combined with industrial noise: A laboratory study10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.07.017 ↗
22. Assessment of railway noise in an urban setting10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.10.025 ↗
23. A case study of the influence of urban morphology on aircraft noise10.1007/s40857-017-0102-y ↗
24. Analytical assessment of wind turbine noise impact at receiver by means of residual noise determination without the wind farm shutdown10.3397/1/376558 ↗
25. Developing a multivariate model for predicting the noise annoyance responses due to combined water sound and road traffic noise exposure10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.06.020 ↗
26. Exploring spatial relationships among soundscape variables in urban areas: A spatial statistical modelling approach10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.006 ↗
27. Relationship between spatiotemporal variability of soundscape and urban morphology in a multifunctional urban area: A case study in Seoul, Korea10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.021 ↗
28. Psychoacoustical evaluation of natural and urban sounds in soundscapes10.1121/1.4807800 ↗
29. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises10.1121/1.3598455 ↗
30. Effects of noise sensitivity on psychophysiological responses to building noise10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.061 ↗
31. Ten questions on the soundscapes of the built environment10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.011 ↗
32. Soundscape expectations of rural tourism: A comparison between Chinese and English potential tourists10.1121/1.5019466 ↗
33. Human preference for countryside soundscapes10.3813/AAA.918299 ↗
34. Soundscape and sound preferences in urban squares: A case study in Sheffield10.1080/13574800500062395 ↗
35. Effects of social, demographical and behavioral factors on the sound level evaluation in urban open spaces10.1121/1.2821955 ↗
36. Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise10.1121/1.424662 ↗
37. Landscape effects on soundscape experience in city parks10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.038 ↗
38. Non-auditory factors affecting urban soundscape evaluation10.1121/1.3652902 ↗
39. The importance of auditory-visual interaction in the construction of ‘tranquil space’10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.006 ↗
40. Acoustical and perceptual assessment of water sounds and their use over road traffic noise10.1121/1.4770242 ↗
41. Audio-visual interaction and perceptual assessment of water features used over road traffic noise10.1121/1.4897313 ↗
42. Kuwano, S., Namba, S., Florentine, M., Zheng, D., Fastl, H., and Schick, A. (1999, January 14–20). A cross-cultural study of the factors of sound quality of environmental noise. Proceedings of the Forum Acusticum 1999, Berlin, Germany.
43. Emotional expression of noise: A cross-cultural study10.1016/0022-460X(91)90539-V ↗
44. Semantic evaluations of noise with tonal components in Japan, France, and Germany: A cross-cultural comparison10.1121/1.3050275 ↗
45. Mohamed, M.A.E., and Dokmeci, Y.P.N. (2019). Indoor soundscape perception in residential spaces: A cross-cultural analysis in Ankara, Turkey. Build. Acoust.10.1177/1351010X19885030 ↗
46. Phan, H.A.T., Nishimura, T., Phan, H.Y.T., Yano, T., Sato, T., and Hashimoto, Y. (2008, January 21). Annoyance from road traffic noise with horn sounds: A cross-cultural experiment between Vietnamese and Japanese. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN 2008), Foxwoods, CT, USA.
47. A cross-national comparison in assessment of urban park soundscapes in France, Korea, and Sweden through laboratory experiments10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.12.016 ↗
48. Classification of urban park soundscapes through perceptions of the acoustical environments10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.005 ↗
49. A principal components model of soundscape perception10.1121/1.3493436 ↗
50. Effect of sound-related activities on human behaviours and acoustic comfort in urban open spaces10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.130 ↗
51. Jiang, J., Zhang, J., Zheng, C., Zhang, H., and Zhang, J. (2018). Natural soundscapes in nature-based tourism: Leisure participation and perceived constraints. Curr. Issues Tour.10.1080/13683500.2018.1540559 ↗
52. Acoustical characteristics of water sounds for soundscape enhancement in urban open spaces10.1121/1.3681938 ↗
53. Urban park soundscape in distinct sociocultural and geographical contexts
54. On the influence of square dance in the park on the evaluation of soundscape
55. Influence of urban contexts on soundscape perceptions: A structural equation modeling approach10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.004 ↗
56. Soundscape descriptors and a conceptual framework for developing predictive soundscape models10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.02.001 ↗
57. Soundscape effects on visiting experience in city park: A case study in Fuzhou, China10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.022 ↗
58. Factors associated with soundscape experiences in urban green spaces: A case study in Rostock, Germany10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.003 ↗