Quantitative Volumetric Enamel Loss after Orthodontic Debracketing/Debonding and Clean-Up Procedures: A Systematic Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Objectives: To conduct a systematic review assessing quantitative enamel loss occurring after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures. Materials and Methods: A systematic search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was performed on different databases (Embase, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science) for papers investigating volumetric enamel loss due to bracket and clear aligner attachment debonding and/or clean-up procedures. Studies investigating in vivo and in vitro articles published in the English language until 16 July 2022 were included. The study selection was then performed by two authors who screened the abstracts independently. Results: Of 421 screened abstracts, 41 articles were selected for full-text analysis. Finally, nine studies were included in this review. No in vivo papers were retrieved. In vitro papers investigated volumetric loss caused by the removal of metal brackets (n = 7), ceramic brackets (n = 1), and both (n = 1). The clean-up procedure varied among all investigations. Impressions at baseline and after debonding/clean-up were superimposed, and the volumes were subtracted using different 3D digital analysis software. Among all included studies, the volumetric loss of enamel ranged from 0.02 ± 0.01 mm3 to 0.61 ± 0.51 mm3 per tooth. Conclusions: Debonding and clean-up procedures produce enamel loss. The debonding/clean-up procedure that is able to cause the least enamel volume loss has yet to be identified.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Dental Erosion and Treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dental School, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, 20132 Milan, Italy
Independent Researcher, 00100 Rome, Italy
Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
Independent Researcher, 80035 Nola, Italy
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Enamel Surfaces after Orthodontic Bracket Debonding
2. Orthodontic Treatment with Clear Aligners and The Scientific Reality Behind Their Marketing: A Literature Review10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18083 ↗
3. Effect of Orthodontic Debonding and Adhesive Removal on the Enamel—Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review10.12659/MSM.890912 ↗
4. Debonding Forces Applied to Ceramic Brackets Simulating Clinical Conditions
5. Enamel Loss and Adhesive Remnants Following Bracket Removal and Various Clean-up Procedures In Vitro10.1093/ejo/cjq128 ↗
6. Loss of Surface Enamel after Bracket Debonding: An In-Vivo and Ex-Vivo Evaluation10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.028 ↗
7. Orthodontic Bracket Removal Using Conventional and Ultrasonic Debonding Techniques, Enamel Loss, and Time Requirements10.1016/0889-5406(93)70007-B ↗
8. Three-Dimensional Measurement of Enamel Loss Caused by Bonding and Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70232-4 ↗
9. Comparisons of Different Debonding Techniques for Ceramic Brackets: An In Vitro Study. Part I. Background and Methods10.1016/0889-5406(90)70008-Z ↗
10. Direct Composites in Anteriors: A Matter of Substrate
11. Direct Composite Restorations in Anterior Teeth. Managing Symmetry in Central Incisors
12. Comparative Effects of Tungsten, Diamond Burs and Laser for Residual Adhesive Removal after Orthodontic Debonding on Flexural Strength, Surface Roughness and Phase Transformation of High-Translucent Zirconia: An In Vitro Study10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100665 ↗
13. Finishing of Enamel Surfaces after Debonding of Orthodontic Attachments
14. The Effect of Different Debonding Techniques on the Enamel Surface: An in Vitro Qualitative Study10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70023-4 ↗
15. Remnant Amount and Cleanup for 3 Adhesives after Debracketing10.1067/mod.2002.121008 ↗
16. Microscopic Evaluation of Enamel after Debonding: Clinical Application10.1016/0002-9416(77)90281-0 ↗
17. Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding10.2319/012610-55.1 ↗
18. Different Techniques of Residual Composite Removal Following Debonding--Time Taken and Surface Enamel Appearance10.1179/bjo.19.2.131 ↗
19. Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Enamel Surface Following Five Composite Removal Methods after Bracket Debonding10.1093/ejo/17.2.121 ↗
20. Epidemiological Survey of Different Clinical Techniques of Orthodontic Bracket Debonding and Enamel Polishing10.4103/2278-0203.173425 ↗
21. Clinical Trials with Crystal Growth Conditioning as an Alternative to Acid-Etch Enamel Pretreatment10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8 ↗
22. An Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Enamel Surface Subsequent to Various Debonding Procedures10.1111/j.1834-7819.1990.tb05402.x ↗
23. External Gap Progression after Cyclic Fatigue of Adhesive Overlays and Crowns Made with High Translucency Zirconia or Lithium Silicate10.1111/jerd.12837 ↗
24. Enamel Loss Due to Orthodontic Bonding with Filled and Unfilled Resins Using Various Clean-up Techniques10.1016/0002-9416(80)90082-2 ↗
25. Enamel Loss Associated with Orthodontic Adhesive Removal on Teeth with White Spot Lesions: An in Vitro Study10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.07.009 ↗
26. Enamel Loss during Bonding, Debonding, and Cleanup with Use of a Self-Etching Primer10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.032 ↗
27. Enamel Loss at Bond-up, Debond and Clean-up Following the Use of a Conventional Light-Cured Composite and a Resin-Modified Glass Polyalkenoate Cement10.1093/ejo/cji031 ↗
28. An In Vitro Investigation of the Effectiveness of Bioactive Glass Air-Abrasion in the “selective” Removal of Orthodontic Resin Adhesive10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00561.x ↗
29. Enamel Loss Following Ceramic Bracket Debonding: A Quantitative Analysis In Vitro10.2319/032414-224.1 ↗
30. PRISMA-P Group Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 ↗
31. Three-Dimensional Quantitative Analysis of Adhesive Remnants and Enamel Loss Resulting from Debonding Orthodontic Molar Tubes10.1186/1746-160X-10-37 ↗
32. Janiszewska-Olszowska, J., Tandecka, K., Szatkiewicz, T., Stępień, P., Sporniak-Tutak, K., and Grocholewicz, K. (2015). Three-Dimensional Analysis of Enamel Surface Alteration Resulting from Orthodontic Clean-up -Comparison of Three Different Tools. BMC Oral Health, 15.10.1186/s12903-015-0131-6 ↗
33. Evaluation of a Fluorescence-Aided Identification Technique (FIT) to Assist Clean-up after Orthodontic Bracket Debonding10.2319/100318714.1 ↗
34. Effect of Different Resin Removal Methods on Enamel after Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Micro-Computed Tomography Study10.1007/s00056-021-00306-1 ↗
35. Engeler, O., Stadler, O., Horn, S., Dettwiler, C., Connert, T., Verna, C., and Kanavakis, G. (2021). Fluorescence-Aided Identification Technique (FIT) Improves Tooth Surface Clean-Up after Debonding of Buccal and Lingual Orthodontic Appliances. J. Clin. Med., 11.10.3390/jcm11010213 ↗
36. Sheth, V.H., Shah, N.P., Jain, R., Bhanushali, N., and Bhatnagar, V. (2022). Development and Validation of a Risk-of-Bias Tool for Assessing In Vitro Studies Conducted in Dentistry: The QUIN. J. Prosthet. Dent., in press.10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.019 ↗
37. Paolone, G., Scolavino, S., Gherlone, E., and Spagnuolo, G. (2021). Direct Esthetic Composite Restorations in Anterior Teeth: Managing Symmetry Strategies. Symmetry, 13.10.3390/sym13050797 ↗
38. Enamel Cracks and Ceramic Bracket Failure during Debonding in Vitro10.2319/112007-540.1 ↗
39. Problems Associated with Ceramic Brackets Suggest Limiting Use to Selected Teeth
40. Enamel Surface Roughness Following Debonding Using Two Resin Grinding Methods10.1093/ejo/26.3.333 ↗
41. Effects of Different Orthodontic Adhesives and Resin Removal Techniques on Enamel Color Alteration10.2319/060613-433.1 ↗
42. Lingual Orthodontics and Forced Eruption: A Means for Osseous and Tissue Regeneration
43. Thermotransduction and Heat Stress in Dental Structures during Orthodontic Debonding: Effectiveness of Various Cooling Strategies10.1007/s00056-016-0023-7 ↗