journal article·2022-04-29Open access

A Systematic Literature Review of Learning-Based Traffic Accident Prediction Models Based on Heterogeneous Sources

Pablo Marcillo, Ángel Leonardo Valdivieso Caraguay, Myriam Hernández-Álvarez

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 9

Abstract

Statistics affirm that almost half of deaths in traffic accidents were vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists. Despite the efforts in technological infrastructure and traffic policies, the number of victims remains high and beyond expectation. Recent research establishes that determining the causes of traffic accidents is not an easy task because their occurrence depends on one or many factors. Traffic accidents can be caused by, for instance, mechanical problems, adverse weather conditions, mental and physical fatigue, negligence, potholes in the road, among others. At present, the use of learning-based prediction models as mechanisms to reduce the number of traffic accidents is a reality. In that way, the success of prediction models depends mainly on how data from different sources can be integrated and correlated. This study aims to report models, algorithms, data sources, attributes, data collection services, driving simulators, evaluation metrics, percentages of data for training/validation/testing, and others. We found that the performance of a prediction model depends mainly on the quality of its data and a proper data split configuration. The use of real data predominates over data generated by simulators. This work made it possible to determine that future research must point to developing traffic accident prediction models that use deep learning. It must also focus on exploring and using data sources, such as driver data and light conditions, and solve issues related to this type of solution, such as high dimensionality in data and information imbalance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques · Traffic and Road Safety · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Informática y Ciencias de la Computación, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Ladrón de Guevara E11-25 y Andalucía, Edificio de Sistemas, Quito 170525, Ecuador

Funding

Escuela Politécnica Nacional

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (2018). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018.
2. Pan American Health Organization (2019). Status of Road Safety in the Region of the Americas 2018, PAHO.
3. An artificial neural network model for highway accident prediction: A case study of Erzurum, Turkey10.7307/ptt.v27i3.1551 ↗
4. A Bayesian network based framework for real-time crash prediction on the basic freeway segments of urban expressways10.1016/j.aap.2011.08.004 ↗
5. Paikari, E., Moshirpour, M., Alhajj, R., and Far, B.H. (2014, January 13–15). Data integration and clustering for real time crash prediction. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 15th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IEEE IRI 2014), Redwood City, CA, USA.10.1109/IRI.2014.7051936 ↗
6. Real-time crash prediction in an urban expressway using disaggregated data10.1016/j.trc.2017.11.014 ↗
7. A genetic programming model for real-time crash prediction on freeways10.1109/TITS.2012.2226240 ↗
8. Real-time crash prediction for expressway weaving segments10.1016/j.trc.2015.10.008 ↗
9. A novel variable selection method based on frequent pattern tree for real-time traffic accident risk prediction10.1016/j.trc.2015.03.015 ↗
10. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews, Keele University. Joint Technical Report.
11. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–A systematic literature review10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009 ↗
12. What is the best database for computer science journal articles?10.1007/s11192-014-1506-1 ↗
13. Missing data imputation by K nearest neighbours based on grey relational structure and mutual information10.1007/s10489-015-0666-x ↗
14. Wang, S., Li, B., Yang, M., and Yan, Z. (2018). Missing Data Imputation for Machine Learning. International Conference on Internet of Things as a Service, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-14657-3_7 ↗
15. Missing data techniques in classification for cardiovascular dysautonomias diagnosis10.1007/s11517-020-02266-x ↗
16. Class center-based firefly algorithm for handling missing data
17. Missing data imputation on biomedical data using deeply learned clustering and L2 regularized regression based on symmetric uncertainty10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102214 ↗
18. Jaramillo-Yánez, A., Benalcázar, M.E., and Mena-Maldonado, E. (2020). Real-time hand gesture recognition using surface electromyography and machine learning: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20092467 ↗
19. Wu, M., Shan, D., Wang, Z., Sun, X., Liu, J., and Sun, M. (2019, January 14–17). A Bayesian Network Model for Real-time Crash Prediction Based on Selected Variables by Random Forest. Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS), Liverpool, UK.10.1109/ICTIS.2019.8883694 ↗
20. Ren, H., Song, Y., Wang, J., Hu, Y., and Lei, J. (2018, January 4–7). A deep learning approach to the citywide traffic accident risk prediction. Proceedings of the 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA.10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569437 ↗
21. Wenqi, L., Dongyu, L., and Menghua, Y. (2017, January 1–3). A model of traffic accident prediction based on convolutional neural network. Proceedings of the 2017 2nd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE), Singapore.10.1109/ICITE.2017.8056908 ↗
22. A new framework of vehicle collision prediction by combining SVM and HMM10.1109/TITS.2017.2699191 ↗
23. Ozbayoglu, M., Kucukayan, G., and Dogdu, E. (2016, January 5–8). A real-time autonomous highway accident detection model based on big data processing and computational intelligence. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/BigData.2016.7840798 ↗
24. A real-time explainable traffic collision inference framework based on probabilistic graph theory10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106442 ↗
25. A semantic-based classification and regression tree approach for modelling complex spatial rules in motor vehicle crashes domain10.1002/widm.1152 ↗
26. A spatiotemporal deep learning approach for citywide short-term crash risk prediction with multi-source data10.1016/j.aap.2018.10.015 ↗
27. Moosavi, S., Samavatian, M.H., Parthasarathy, S., Teodorescu, R., and Ramnath, R. (2019, January 5–8). Accident risk prediction based on heterogeneous sparse data: New dataset and insights. Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1145/3347146.3359078 ↗
28. Crash prediction based on random effect negative binomial model considering data heterogeneity10.1016/j.physa.2019.123858 ↗
29. Huang, C., Zhang, C., Dai, P., and Bo, L. (2019, January 3–7). Deep dynamic fusion network for traffic accident forecasting. Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Beijing, China.10.1145/3357384.3357829 ↗
30. Parra, C., Ponce, C., and Rodrigo, S.F. (2020, January 16–20). Evaluating the Performance of Explainable Machine Learning Models in Traffic Accidents Prediction in California. Proceedings of the 2020 39th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC), Coquimbo, Chile.10.1109/SCCC51225.2020.9281196 ↗
31. Yuan, Z., Zhou, X., and Yang, T. (2018, January 19–23). Hetero-convlstm: A deep learning approach to traffic accident prediction on heterogeneous spatio-temporal data. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, London, UK.10.1145/3219819.3219922 ↗
32. Highway crash detection and risk estimation using deep learning10.1016/j.aap.2019.105392 ↗
33. Highway traffic accident prediction using VDS big data analysis10.1007/s11227-016-1624-z ↗
34. Chen, Q., Song, X., Yamada, H., and Shibasaki, R. (2016, January 12–17). Learning deep representation from big and heterogeneous data for traffic accident inference. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Phoenix, AZ, USA.10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10011 ↗
35. Operational Forecasting of Road Traffic Accidents via Neural Network Analysis of Big Data
36. Predicting crashes on expressway ramps with real-time traffic and weather data10.3141/2514-04 ↗
37. Yuan, Z., Zhou, X., Yang, T., Tamerius, J., and Mantilla, R. (2017, January 13–17). Predicting traffic accidents through heterogeneous urban data: A case study. Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on urban computing (UrbComp 2017), Halifax, NS, Canada.
38. Prediction of crash severity on two-lane, two-way roads based on fuzzy classification and regression tree using geospatial analysis10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000432 ↗
39. Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, D., Lu, Y., and Wang, D. (2019, January 27–30). Riskcast: Social sensing based traffic risk forecasting via inductive multi-view learning. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1145/3341161.3342912 ↗
40. Chen, C., Fan, X., Zheng, C., and Xiao, L. (2018, January 12–15). Sdcae: Stack denoising convolutional autoencoder model for accident risk prediction via traffic big data. Proceedings of the 2018 Sixth International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data (CBD), Lanzhou, China.10.1109/CBD.2018.00065 ↗
41. Zhou, Z., Chen, L., Zhu, C., and Wang, P. (2019, January 22–24). Stack ResNet For Short-term Accident Risk Prediction Leveraging Cross-domain Data. Proceedings of the 2019 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Hangzhou, China.10.1109/CAC48633.2019.8996483 ↗
42. Support vector machine in crash prediction at the level of traffic analysis zones: Assessing the spatial proximity effects10.1016/j.aap.2015.05.018 ↗
43. Zhu, L., Li, T., and Du, S. (2019, January 14–19). TA-STAN: A deep spatial-temporal attention learning framework for regional traffic accident risk prediction. Proceedings of the 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8852212 ↗
44. Yu, L., Du, B., Hu, X., Sun, L., Lv, W., and Huang, R. (2019, January 19–23). Traffic Accident Prediction Based on Deep Spatio-Temporal Analysis. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI), Leicester, UK.10.1109/SmartWorld-UIC-ATC-SCALCOM-IOP-SCI.2019.00195 ↗
45. Sharma, B., Katiyar, V.K., and Kumar, K. (2015, January 18–25). Traffic accident prediction model using support vector machines with Gaussian kernel. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
46. Al Mamlook, R.E., Abdulhameed, T.Z., Hasan, R., Al-Shaikhli, H.I., Mohammed, I., and Tabatabai, S. (August, January 31). Utilizing Machine Learning Models to Predict the Car Crash Injury Severity among Elderly Drivers. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT), Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/EIT48999.2020.9208259 ↗
47. Data Science Dojo (2021, November 24). 101 Machine Learning Algorithms for Data Science with Cheat Sheets. Available online: https://online.datasciencedojo.com/blogs/101-machine-learning-algorithms-for-data-science-with-cheat-sheets.
48. Bhowan, U., Zhang, M., and Johnston, M. (2010). Genetic programming for classification with unbalanced data. European Conference on Genetic Programming, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-12148-7_1 ↗
49. Identification of risk factors influencing road traffic accidents10.48084/etasr.1615 ↗
50. Road traffic accident: Human security perspective10.5897/IJPDS2016.0289 ↗
51. Human factors contributing to the road traffic accident occurrence10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.057 ↗
52. Predicting motor vehicle crashes using support vector machine models10.1016/j.aap.2008.04.010 ↗
53. Joseph, V.R., and Vakayil, A. (2021). SPlit: An Optimal Method for Data Splitting. arXiv.10.1080/00401706.2021.1921037 ↗
54. A crash-prediction model for multilane roads10.1016/j.aap.2006.10.012 ↗
55. A rear-end collision prediction scheme based on deep learning in the Internet of Vehicles10.1016/j.jpdc.2017.08.014 ↗
56. Intelligent algorithm in a smart wearable device for predicting and alerting in the danger of vehicle collision10.1007/s12652-019-01609-3 ↗
57. Real-time estimation of accident likelihood for safety enhancement10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:5(358) ↗
58. Road traffic accidents prediction modelling: An analysis of Anambra State, Nigeria10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.016 ↗
59. Chantamit-o pas, P., Pongpum, W., and Kongsaksri, K. (2020, January 18–22). Road Traffic Injury Prevention Using DBSCAN Algorithm. Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing, Bangkok, Thailand.10.1007/978-3-030-63823-8_22 ↗
60. Traffic accident prediction using 3-D model-based vehicle tracking10.1109/TVT.2004.825772 ↗
61. Metropolitan Expressway Company Limited (2021, November 24). Metropolitan Expressway Company Limited. Available online: https://www.shutoko.co.jp/en/index/.
62. California Department of Transportation (2021, November 24). Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) Data, Available online: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/research-innovation-system-information/highway-performance-monitoring-system.
63. Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (2021, November 24). Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System, Available online: https://www.chp.ca.gov/programs-services/services-information/switrs-internet-statewide-integrated-traffic-records-system.
64. US Department of Transportation (2021, November 24). Highway Performance Monitoring System, Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/hpms.cfm.
65. TASS International (2021, November 24). Prescan. Available online: https://tass.plm.automation.siemens.com/prescan-overview.
66. Virginia Government (2021, November 24). Virginia Department of Transportation, Available online: https://www.virginiadot.org/.
67. Istanbul Municipal Traffic Control Development (2021, November 24). Intelligent Transportation System, Available online: https://www.isbak.istanbul/en/intelligent-transportation-systems/traffic-management-systems/.
68. Twitter (2021, November 24). Twitter API. Available online: https://developer.twitter.com/en/products/twitter-api.
69. City of New York (2021, November 24). New York City Open Data, Available online: https://opendata.cityofnewyork.us/.
70. Government of Iran (2021, November 24). Iran National Cartographic Center, Available online: https://www.ncc.gov.ir/en/.
71. Government of Iran (2021, November 24). Ministry of Roads and Urban Development Islamic Republic of Iran, Available online: https://www.mrud.ir/en.
72. Ministry of Roads and Urban Development (2021, November 24). Iran Meteorological Organization, Available online: https://www.irimo.ir/index.php.
73. Government of Iran (2021, November 24). Iranian Police, Available online: https://www.police.ir.
74. New York City Government (2021, November 24). New York City and Limousine Commission (Trip Data), Available online: https://www1.nyc.gov/site/tlc/index.page.
75. New York City Government (2021, November 24). New York City Department of Transportation, Available online: https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/home/home.shtml.
76. The United States Government (2021, November 24). United States Census Bureau, Available online: https://www.census.gov/.
77. New York City Department of City Planning (2021, November 24). New York City Department of City Planning, Available online: https://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/index.page.
78. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2021, November 24). National Centers for Environmental Information, Available online: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/.
79. Sobhan Moosavi (2021, November 24). US-Accidents. Available online: https://smoosavi.org/datasets/us_accidents.
80. AOL (2021, November 24). MapQuest. Available online: https://www.mapquest.com/.
81. Microsoft (2021, November 24). Bing Maps. Available online: https://www.bing.com/maps.
82. State of Washington Government (2021, November 24). Washington State Department of Transportation, Available online: https://wsdot.wa.gov/.
83. U.S. Department of Transportation (2021, November 24). Highway Safety Information System, Available online: https://www.hsisinfo.org/.
84. Washington State Department of Transportation (2021, November 24). Digital Roadway Interactive Visualization and Evaluation Network, Available online: https://wsdot.wa.gov/research/reports/800/digital-roadway-interactive-visualization-and-evaluation-network-applications.
85. Paramics Microsimulation SYSTRA Ltd. (2021, November 24). Paramics Microsimulation. Available online: https://www.paramics.co.uk/en/.
86. AIMSUN (2021, November 24). AIMSUN Next. Available online: https://www.aimsun.com/.
87. PTV Group (2021, November 24). VISSIM. Available online: https://www.ptvgroup.com/en/solutions/products/ptv-vissim/.
88. New York City Government (2021, November 24). New York City’s Governmental Platform, Available online: https://www1.nyc.gov/.
89. Sobhan Moosavi (2021, November 24). US Accidents, A Countrywide Traffic Accident Dataset. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/sobhanmoosavi/us-accidents.
90. The Weather Channel (2021, November 24). The Weather Channel. Available online: https://weather.com/.
91. Iowa Government (2021, November 24). Iowa Department of Transportation, Available online: http://iowadot.gov/.
92. Iowa State University (2021, November 24). Iowa Environmental Mesonet. Available online: https://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/request/rwis/traffic.phtml.
93. Iowa State University (2021, November 24). Iowa Dot Gis, Available online: https://gis.iowadot.gov/public/rest/services/RAMS.
94. Google LLC (2021, November 24). Google Earth. Available online: https://earth.google.com/web/.
95. Korea Expressway Corporation (2021, November 24). Korea Expressway Corporation. Available online: http://www.ex.co.kr/.
96. Korean National Policy Agency (2021, November 24). Korean National Policy Agency, Available online: https://www.police.go.kr/eng/main.do.
97. Department of Urban and Regional Planning (2021, November 24). Signal Four Analytics. Available online: https://s4.geoplan.ufl.edu/.
98. Central Florida Expressway Authority (2021, November 24). Central Florida Expressway Authority, Available online: https://www.cfxway.com/.
99. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (2021, November 24). NCEP/EMC 4KM Gridded Data (GRIB) Stage IV Data. Available online: https://data.eol.ucar.edu/dataset/21.093.
100. Government of Iran (2021, November 24). National Geographical Organization of Iran, Available online: https://www.ngo-iran.ir.