Composite Panel Damage Classification Based on Guided Waves and Machine Learning: An Experimental Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Ultrasonic guided waves (UGW) are widely used in structural health monitoring (SHM) systems due to the sensitivity of their propagation mechanisms to local material changes, i.e., those induced by damage. Post-processing of the signals gathered by piezoelectric sensors, typically used for both the excitation and the sensing of UGW, is a fundamental step to extract all the peculiar features that can be related to both damage location and severity. This research probes the efficacy of machine learning (ML) models in discerning damage location (R-Classification) and size (S-Classification). Seven supervised ML classifiers were examined: Ensemble-Subspace K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Ensemble-Bagged Trees, KNN-Fine, Ensemble-Boosted Trees, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Linear Discriminant, and SVM-Quadratic. The experimental dataset comprised measurements from varied reversible damage configurations on a composite panel, represented by wooden cuboids of single and three different sizes. Signal noise was minimized by performing a low-pass filter, and sequence forward selection-aided feature selection. The optimized ensemble classifier proved to be the most precise for R-Classification (95.83% accuracy), while Ensemble-Subspace KNN excelled in S-Classification (98.1% accuracy). This method offers accurate, efficient damage diagnosis and classification in composite structures, promising potential applications in aerospace, automotive, and civil engineering sectors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Via Roma 29, 81031 Aversa, Italy
Funding
University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Rezazadeh, N., De Luca, A., Lamanna, G., and Caputo, F. (2022). Diagnosing and Balancing Approaches of Bowed Rotating Systems: A Review. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12189157 ↗
2. Prediction of Residual Burst Strength for Composite Pressure Vessels after Low Velocity Impact10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.021 ↗
3. Estimation of Residual Tensile Strength of Composite Laminate after Low-Velocity Impact Using Visually Inspection10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105898 ↗
4. Evaluation of Barely Visible Indentation Damage (BVID) in CF/EP Sandwich Composites Using Guided Wave Signals10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.01.023 ↗
5. In Situ Barely Visible Impact Damage Detection and Localization for Composite Structures Using Surface Mounted and Embedded PZT Transducers: A Comparative Study10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.09.021 ↗
6. Wronkowicz-Katunin, A., Katunin, A., and Dragan, K. (2019). Reconstruction of Barely Visible Impact Damage in Composite Structures Based on Non-Destructive Evaluation Results. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19214629 ↗
7. Experiments and Modelling of Ultrasonic Waves in Composite Plates under Varying Temperature10.1016/j.ultras.2022.106820 ↗
8. A Modelling Technique to Investigate the Effects of Quasi-Static Loads on Guided-Wave Based Structural Health Monitoring Systems10.1016/j.finmec.2022.100125 ↗
9. Common Type of Damages in Composites and Their Inspections10.4236/wjm.2017.72003 ↗
10. Kralovec, C., and Schagerl, M. (2020). Review of Structural Health Monitoring Methods Regarding a Multi-Sensor Approach for Damage Assessment of Metal and Composite Structures. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20030826 ↗
11. A Review of Structural Health Monitoring Techniques as Applied to Composite Structures
12. Development and Validation of a Probabilistic Multistage Algorithm for Damage Localization in Piezo-Monitored Structures10.1088/1361-665X/ace141 ↗
13. Ultrasonic Guided Wave Based Structural Damage Detection and Localization Using Model Assisted Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Networks10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114189 ↗
14. Su, Z., and Ye, L. (2009). Identification of Damage Using Lamb Waves: From Fundamentals to Applications, Springer Science & Business Media. [1st ed.]. Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics.10.1007/978-1-84882-784-4 ↗
15. Structural Health Monitoring with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors--Predictive Modeling and Simulation10.13111/2066-8201.2010.2.3.4 ↗
16. Hameed, M.S., Li, Z., Chen, J., and Qi, J. (2019). Lamb-Wave-Based Multistage Damage Detection Method Using an Active PZT Sensor Network for Large Structures. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19092010 ↗
17. An Improved Time Reversal Method for Diagnostics of Composite Plates Using Lamb Waves10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.096 ↗
18. A Damage Index of Generalised Applicability10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.014 ↗
19. Broadband Signal Reconstruction for SHM: An Experimental and Numerical Time Reversal Methodology10.1177/1045389X20972474 ↗
20. Guided Lamb Waves for Identification of Damage in Composite Structures: A Review10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.020 ↗
21. A Review of Vibration-Based Damage Detection in Civil Structures: From Traditional Methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107077 ↗
22. A Study of Two Unsupervised Data Driven Statistical Methodologies for Detecting and Classifying Damages in Structural Health Monitoring10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.05.020 ↗
23. Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves under Varying Temperature Conditions10.1177/14759217221107566 ↗
24. A Hybrid Physics-Assisted Machine-Learning-Based Damage Detection Using Lamb Wave10.1007/s12046-021-01582-8 ↗
25. Perfetto, D., De Luca, A., Perfetto, M., Lamanna, G., and Caputo, F. (2021). Damage Detection in Flat Panels by Guided Waves Based Artificial Neural Network Trained through Finite Element Method. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14247602 ↗
26. Zhang, Z., Pan, H., Wang, X., and Lin, Z. (2020). Machine Learning-Enriched Lamb Wave Approaches for Automated Damage Detection. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20061790 ↗
27. Kumar, N., and Mitra, M. (2016, January 3–5). Lamb Wave Based Damage Detection Using Orthogonal Matching Pursuit and Artificial Neural Network. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace, Bangalore, India. Special Issue of e-Journal of Nondestructive Testing.
28. Structural Damage Detection Using Deep Learning of Ultrasonic Guided Waves10.1063/1.5031651 ↗
29. Ultrasonic Lamb Wave Mixing Based Fatigue Crack Detection Using a Deep Learning Model and Higher-Order Spectral Analysis10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107028 ↗
30. Damage Characterization Using CNN and SAE of Broadband Lamb Waves10.1016/j.ultras.2021.106592 ↗
31. Automated Fatigue Damage Detection and Classification Technique for Composite Structures Using Lamb Waves and Deep Autoencoder10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108148 ↗
32. A Multilevel Bayesian Method for Ultrasound-Based Damage Identification in Composite Laminates10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.09.035 ↗
33. Structural Health Monitoring for Impact Localisation via Machine Learning10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109621 ↗
34. Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A.D., and Pekcan, G. (2020). Data-Driven Structural Health Monitoring and Damage Detection through Deep Learning: State-of-the-Art Review. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20102778 ↗
35. A Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Assessment of Delamination in Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Beams10.1177/1475921720967157 ↗
36. Delamination Identification in Sandwich Composite Structures Using Machine Learning Techniques10.1016/j.compstruc.2023.106990 ↗
37. Application of Fuzzy Decision Tree for Signal Classification10.1109/TII.2019.2904845 ↗
38. Gupta, V.K., Varde, P.V., Kankar, P.K., and Joshi, N. (2020). Reliability and Risk Assessment in Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-3746-2 ↗
39. Random and Coherent Noise Attenuation by Empirical Mode Decomposition10.1190/1.3157244 ↗
40. Xie, L., Yang, G., Xu, L., Seoane, F., Chen, Q., and Zheng, L. (2013). Characterization of Dry Biopotential Electrodes, IEEE.
41. Jagtap, S.K., and Uplane, M.D. (2012). The Impact of Digital Filtering to ECG Analysis: Butterworth Filter Application, IEEE.10.1109/ICCICT.2012.6398145 ↗
42. Wavelet Transform Feature Extraction from Human PPG, ECG, and EEG Signal Responses to ELF PEMF Exposures: A Pilot Study10.1016/j.dsp.2007.05.009 ↗
43. Methods of EEG Signal Features Extraction Using Linear Analysis in Frequency and Time-Frequency Domains
44. Shaheen, F., Verma, B., and Asafuddoula, M.D. (December, January 30). Impact of Automatic Feature Extraction in Deep Learning Architecture. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA), Gold Coast, Australia.10.1109/DICTA.2016.7797053 ↗
45. Machine Learning: Algorithms, Real-World Applications and Research Directions10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x ↗
46. De-La-Bandera, I., Palacios, D., Mendoza, J., and Barco, R. (2020). Feature Extraction for Dimensionality Reduction in Cellular Networks Performance Analysis. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20236944 ↗
47. Stability of Feature Selection Algorithm: A Review
48. An Overview of Overfitting and Its Solutions10.1088/1742-6596/1168/2/022022 ↗
49. A Modified T-Test Feature Selection Method and Its Application on the HapMap Genotype Data10.1016/S1672-0229(08)60011-X ↗
50. Unbalanced, Cracked, and Misaligned Rotating Machines: A Comparison between Classification Procedures throughout the Steady-State Operation10.1007/s40430-022-03750-1 ↗
51. Rezazadeh, N., de Oliveira, M., Perfetto, D., De Luca, A., and Caputo, F. (2023). Classification of Unbalanced and Bowed Rotors under Uncertainty Using Wavelet Time Scattering, LSTM, and SVM. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13126861 ↗