journal article·2023-06-22Open access

Prediction of Water Leakage in Pipeline Networks Using Graph Convolutional Network Method

Ersin Şahin, Hüseyin Yüce

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 13

Abstract

This study aims to predict leaks in water-carrying pipelines by monitoring pressure drops. Timely detection of leaks is crucial for prompt intervention and repair efforts. In this research, we represent the network structure of pipelines using graph representations. Consequently, we propose a machine learning model called Graph Convolutional Neural Network (GCN) that leverages graph-type data structures for leak prediction. Conventional machine learning models often overlook the dependencies between nodes and edges in graph structures, which are critical in complex systems like pipelines. GCN offers an advantage in capturing the intricate relationships among connections in pipelines. To assess the predictive performance of our proposed GCN model, we compare it against the Support Vector Machine (SVM) model, a widely used traditional machine learning approach. In this study, we conducted experimental studies to collect the required pressure and flow data to train the GCN and SVM models. The obtained results were visualized and analyzed to evaluate their respective performances. The GCN model achieved a performance rate of 94%, while the SVM model achieved 87%. These results demonstrated the potential of the GCN model in accurately detecting water leaks in pipeline systems. The findings hold significant implications for water resource management and environmental protection. The knowledge acquired from this study can serve as a foundation for predicting leaks in pipelines that transport gas and oil.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Water Systems and Optimization · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Computer Programming, Beykoz Vocational School, Beykoz University, 34820 Istanbul, Turkey

Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Marmara University, 34722 Istanbul, Turkey

Funding

Marmara University

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang, W., Sun, H., Guo, J., Lao, L., Wu, S., and Zhang, J. (2021). Experimental study on water pipeline leak using in pipe acoustic signal analysis and artificial neural network prediction. Measurement, 186.10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110094 ↗
2. Anfinsen, H., and Aamo, O.M. (2022). Leak detection, size estimation and localization in branched pipe flows. Automatica, 140.10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110213 ↗
3. Shivananju, B.N., Kiran, M., Nithin, S.P., Vidya, M.J., Hegde, G.M., and Asokan, S. (2013). International Conference on Optics in Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology (icOPEN2013), SPIE.
4. Zeng, W., Do, N., Lambert, M., Gong, J., Cazzolato, B., and Stephens, M. (2023). Linear phase detector for detecting multiple leaks in water pipes. Appl. Acoust., 202.10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.109152 ↗
5. A review on different pipeline fault detection methods10.1016/j.jlp.2016.03.010 ↗
6. Liang, L., Feng, K., Xu, G., Zhu, Z., and Zhou, X. (2018). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing.
7. Yu, D., Zhang, L., Wei, L., and Wang, Z. (October, January 29). Projective Noise Reduction Algorithm for Negative Pressure Wave Signal Processing. Proceedings of the 2008 7th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, AB, Canada.10.1115/IPC2008-64126 ↗
8. Bai, L., Yue, Q., and Li, H. (2004, January 23–28). Sub-sea Pipelines Leak Detection and Location Based on Fluid Transient and FDI. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Toulon, France.
9. A new method for leak detection in gas pipelines10.2118/2014-1891568-PA ↗
10. Reddy, R.S., Payal, G., Karkulali, P., Himanshu, M., Ukil, A., and Dauwels, J. (2016, January 14–17). Pressure and flow variation in gas distribution pipeline for leak detection. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/ICIT.2016.7474831 ↗
11. Korlapati, N.V.S., Khan, F., Noor, Q., Mirza, S., and Vaddiraju, S. (2022). Review and analysis of pipeline leak detection methods. J. Pipeline Sci. Eng., 2.10.1016/j.jpse.2022.100074 ↗
12. Goni, M.F., Anower, M., Rahman, M., Islam, M., Ahsan, M., Haider, J., and Shahjalal, M. (2023). Fast and Accurate Fault Detection and Classification in Transmission Lines using Extreme Learning Machine. E-Prime-Adv. Electr. Eng. Electron. Energy, 3.10.1016/j.prime.2023.100107 ↗
13. Leak detection of pipeline: An integrated approach of rough set theory and artificial bee colony trained SVM10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.170 ↗
14. Ayati, A.H., Haghighi, A., and Ghafouri, H.R. (2022). Machine Learning–Assisted Model for Leak Detection in Water Distribution Networks Using Hydraulic Transient Flows. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag., 148.10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001508 ↗
15. Detection of faults in subsea pipelines by flow monitoring with regression supervised machine learning10.1016/j.psep.2022.03.049 ↗
16. Artificial intelligence-based machine learning considering flow and temperature of the pipeline for leak early detection using acoustic emission10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.03.010 ↗
17. Leakage detection in the natural gas pipeline based on unsupervised learning and stress perception. Process10.1016/j.psep.2022.12.001 ↗
18. WML: Wireless sensor network-based machine learning for leakage detection and size estimation10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.329 ↗
19. Pipeline leak detection based on variational mode decomposition and support vector machine using an interior spherical detector. Process10.1016/j.psep.2021.07.024 ↗
20. A Neural Network System for Fault Prediction in Pipelines by Acoustic Emission Techniques10.1080/09349847.2021.1930305 ↗
21. Neural network identification of water pipe blockage from smart embedded passive acoustic measurements10.1002/cjce.24202 ↗
22. Xiao, R., and Li, J. (2023). Evaluation of acoustic techniques for leak detection in a complex low-pressure gas pipeline network. Eng. Fail. Anal., 143.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106897 ↗
23. Banjara, N.K., Sasmal, S., and Voggu, S. (2020). Machine learning supported acoustic emission technique for leakage detection in pipelines. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 188.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104243 ↗
24. Yu, X., and Tian, X. (2022). A fault detection algorithm for pipeline insulation layer based on immune neural network. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 196.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104611 ↗
25. De Kerf, T., Gladines, J., Sels, S., and Vanlanduit, S. (2020). Oil spill detection using machine learning and infrared images. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12244090 ↗
26. Li, Q., Shi, Y., Lin, R., Qiao, W., and Ba, W. (2022). A novel oil pipeline leakage detection method based on the sparrow search algorithm and CNN. Measurement, 204.10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112122 ↗
27. Zheng, J., Wang, C., Liang, Y., Liao, Q., Li, Z., and Wang, B. (2022). Deeppipe: A deep-learning method for anomaly detection of multi-product pipelines. Energy, 259.10.1016/j.energy.2022.125025 ↗
28. Bohorquez, J., Alexander, B., Simpson, A.R., and Lambert, M.F. (2020). Leak detection and topology identification in pipelines using fluid transients and artificial neural Networks. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag., 146.10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001187 ↗
29. Asghari, V., Kazemi, M.H., Duan, H.-F., Hsu, S.-C., and Keramat, A. (2023). Machine learning modeling for spectral transient-based leak detection. Autom. Constr., 146.10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104686 ↗
30. Liao, Z., Liu, M., Du, B., Zhou, H., and Li, L. (2022). A temporal and spatial prediction method for urban pipeline network based on deep learning. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl., 608.10.1016/j.physa.2022.128299 ↗
31. Edwards, M., and Xie, X. (2016). Graph-based convolutional neural network. arXiv.10.5244/C.30.114 ↗
32. Shafqat, W., and Byun, Y.-C. (2021). Incorporating similarity measures to optimize graph Convolutional neural network for a product recommendation. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11041366 ↗
33. Zhang, Y.-J., and Hu, L.-S. (2021). Fault Propagation Inference Based on a Graph Neural Network for Steam Turbine Systems. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14020309 ↗
34. A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386 ↗
35. Toulouse, M., Dai, H.K., and Le, T.G. (Int. J. Web Inf. Syst, 2022). Distributed load-balancing for account-based sharded blockchains, Int. J. Web Inf. Syst, ahead of print.10.1108/IJWIS-04-2022-0081 ↗
36. Yao, L., Mao, C., and Luo, Y. (27–1, January 27). Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classification. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Honolulu, HI, USA.
37. Kipf, T.N., and Welling, M. (2016). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv.
38. Detection and classification of transmission line transient faults based on graph convolutional neural Network
39. Valero-Carreras, D., Alcaraz, J., and Landete, M. (2023). Comparing two SVM models through different metrics based on the confusion matrix. Comput. Oper. Res., 152.10.1016/j.cor.2022.106131 ↗
40. Vapnik, V. (1999). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1 ↗
41. Roy, A., and Chakraborty, S. (2023). Support vector machine in structural reliability analysis: A review. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 233.10.1016/j.ress.2023.109126 ↗
42. Gao, H., Qiu, B., Barroso, R.J.D., Hussain, W., Xu, Y., and Wang, X. (2022). TSMAE: A novel anomaly detection approach for the internet of things time series data using memory-augmented autoencoder. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng.10.1109/TNSE.2022.3163144 ↗
43. Visualizing data using t-SNE