Wearable Hand Orthotic Device for Rehabilitation: Hand Therapy with Multi-Mode Control and Real-Time Feedback
Source abstract
Abstract
IoT-based wearable devices are significantly contributing to personalized and pervasive modern healthcare. Traditional healthcare systems are handicapped by several factors, including shortages of physicians, nurses, healthcare devices, hospital beds, healthcare cost, etc. Conventional therapy is carried out either at a hospital or at home by certified therapists which is not affordable for many in developing nations. In this research work, we present IoT-based monitoring and an evaluation of key parameters and indicators of a wearable device used during the rehabilitation process in stroke patients’ hand therapy which can be operated by the users at home without the need for therapists. Sensors along with a controller board are used for signal acquisition, processing, and monitoring. The efficiency of therapy can be increased through real-time follow-up and feedback from therapists. Three different control methods are proposed and studied: smartphone-based speech, smartphone-based touch, and Internet of Things (IoT)-based dashboard. In addition, four different architectures, including: therapist therapy wearable, dual therapy wearable, user therapy wearable, and multiuser therapy wearable architectures are discussed. A rehabilitation therapy-based case study using the proposed wearable device with multiple volunteers was conducted. Therapists can remotely operate the device and train the users. Users can benefit and save on costs without the need to visit hospitals or therapy centers or hire therapists. Based on the results of the experiments with volunteers, we can confidently say that the proposed IoT-based wearable device can enhance the quality of life and well-being of the users.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: IoT and Edge/Fog Computing · Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri Campus, Vallikavu 690525, India
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469, USA
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. IoT-to-the-Rescue: A Survey of IoT Solutions for COVID-19-Like Pandemics10.1109/JIOT.2021.3082838 ↗
2. Body sensor networks: In the era of big data and beyond10.1109/RBME.2015.2427254 ↗
3. Optimization of IoT-Based Artificial Intelligence Assisted Telemedicine Health Analysis System10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3088262 ↗
4. A Rigid-Flex Wearable Health Monitoring Sensor Patch for IoT-Connected Healthcare Applications10.1109/JIOT.2020.2977164 ↗
5. The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications investments and challenges for enterprises10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.008 ↗
6. Wu, F., Wu, T., and Yuce, M. (2019). An Internet-of-Things (IoT) network system for connected safety and health monitoring applications. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19010021 ↗
7. A Flexible and Pervasive IoT-Based Healthcare Platform for Physiological and Environmental Parameters Monitoring10.1109/JIOT.2020.2980432 ↗
8. Ubiquitous WSN for healthcare: Recent advances and future prospects10.1109/JIOT.2014.2329462 ↗
9. From wearable sensors to smart implants—Toward pervasive and personalized healthcare10.1109/TBME.2015.2422751 ↗
10. Smart Equipment Design Challenges for Real Time Feedback Support in Sport
11. Big data big knowledge: Big data for personalized healthcare10.1109/JBHI.2015.2406883 ↗
12. Williamson, J., Liu, Q., Lu, F., Mohrman, W., Li, K., Dick, R., and Shang, L. (2015, January 12). Data sensing and analysis: Challenges for wearables. Proceedings of the IEEE 20th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC), Chiba, Japan.10.1109/ASPDAC.2015.7058994 ↗
13. (2019, January 01). Disability Statistics Annual Report. Available online: https://disabilitycompendium.org/sites/default/files/user-uploads/2017_AnnualReport_2017_FINAL.pdf.
14. National Library of Medicine (2019, January 05). Rehabilitation Needs of Stroke Survivors after Discharge from Hospital in India, Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813710.
15. National Library of Medicine (2019, February 01). Disability and Rehabilitation Services in India: Issues and Challenges, Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24479007.
16. Hand Spring Operated Movement Enhancer (HandSOME): A Portable, Passive Hand Exoskeleton for Stroke Rehabilitation10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2157705 ↗
17. (2019, February 01). World Health Organization. Available online: https://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/.
18. A narrative review on haptic devices: Relating the physiology and psychophysical properties of the hand to devices for rehabilitation in central nervous system disorders10.3109/17483107.2012.697532 ↗
19. Hand Extension Robot Orthosis (HERO) Glove: Development and Testing with Stroke Survivors with Severe Hand Impairment10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2910011 ↗
20. User-Driven Functional Movement Training with a Wearable Hand Robot After Stroke10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3021691 ↗
21. A Wearable Multi-Site System for NMES-Based Hand Function Restoration10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2703151 ↗
22. Clinical Test of a Wearable, High DOF, Spring Powered Hand Exoskeleton (HandSOME II)10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3110201 ↗
23. An IoT-Enabled Stroke Rehabilitation System Based on Smart Wearable Armband and Machine Learning10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2822681 ↗
24. A Wearable Hand Rehabilitation System with Soft Gloves10.1109/TII.2020.3010369 ↗
25. A five-fingered hand exoskeleton driven by pneumatic artificial muscles with novel polypyrrole sensors10.1108/01439911311309951 ↗
26. Design and development of the cable actuated finger exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation following stroke10.1109/TMECH.2012.2224359 ↗
27. Development of tool-type devices for a multi-fingered haptic interface robot10.1109/TRO.2012.2212831 ↗
28. Megalingam, R.K., Vijay, E., Naveen, P.N., Reddy, C.P., and Chandrika, D. (2019, January 25). Voice-based Hand Orthotic Device. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP) Chennai, Melmaruvathur, India.10.1109/ICCSP.2019.8698051 ↗
29. Low cost hand orthotic device to improve hand function of stroke patients10.3233/TAD-180197 ↗
30. Communication and Security Trade-Offs for Battery-Powered Devices: A Case Study on Wearable Medical Sensor Systems10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3075980 ↗
31. A Critical Analysis of ECG-Based Key Distribution for Securing Wearable and Implantable Medical Devices10.1109/JSEN.2018.2879929 ↗
32. Securing the Internet of Things: A standardization perspective10.1109/JIOT.2014.2323395 ↗
33. BSN-care: A secure IoT-based modern healthcare system using body sensor network10.1109/JSEN.2015.2502401 ↗
34. Self-correcting pattern recognition system of surface EMG signals for upper limb prosthesis control10.1109/TBME.2013.2296274 ↗
35. Megalingam, R.K., Boddupalli, S., and Apuroop, K.G.S. (2017, January 24). Robotic arm control through mimicking of miniature robotic arm. Proceedings of the 2017 4th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore, India.10.1109/ICACCS.2017.8014622 ↗
36. Malik, H., Srivastava, S., Sood, Y., and Ahmad, A. (2019). Applications of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Engineering, Springer. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing.10.1007/978-981-13-1822-1 ↗
37. Thangavel, D., Ma, X., Valera, A., Tan, H.-X., and Tan, C.K.-Y. (2014, January 9). Performance evaluation of MQTT and CoAP via a common middleware. Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Conference Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing. (ISSNIP), Singapore.10.1109/ISSNIP.2014.6827678 ↗
38. Franck, J.A., Smeets, R.J.E.M., and Seelen, H.A.M. (2019). Changes in actual arm-hand use in stroke patients during and after clinical rehabilitation involving a well-defined arm-hand rehabilitation program: A prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0214651 ↗
39. Lemmens, R.J., Timmermans, A.A., Janssen-Potten, Y.J., Smeets, R.J., and Seelen, H.A. (2012). Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: A systematic review. BMC Neurol., 12.10.1186/1471-2377-12-21 ↗
40. Arata, J., Ohmoto, K., Gassert, R., Lambercy, O., Fujimoto, H., and Wada, I. (2013, January 17). A new hand exoskeleton device for rehabilitation using a three-layered sliding spring mechanism. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany.10.1109/ICRA.2013.6631126 ↗
41. Hand Rehabilitation Learning System with an Exoskeleton Robotic Glove10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2501748 ↗
42. Design and Development of a Hand Exoskeleton Robot for Active and Passive Rehabilitation10.5772/62404 ↗