journal article·2021-04-17Open access

Graphical and Analytical Quantitative Comparison in the Domes Assessment: The Case of San Francesco di Paola

Concetta Cusano, Andrea Montanino, Carlo Olivieri, Vittorio Paris, Claudia Cennamo

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 8

Abstract

(1) Methods for checking the condition of monumental masonry structures can still be considered understudied. Among the different approaches available in the literature, the graphical ones have a special role, due to their simplicity and effectiveness. (2) In this work, a 2D method (Thrust Line Analysis (TLA)), the Modified Thrust Line Method (MTLM), and the 3D Membrane Equilibrium Analysis (MEA) method are compared. All methods have the same starting concept: no tensile strength, no sliding between the stone blocks, infinite compressive strength. (3) The methods are compared in terms of stress distribution (for the same—or similar—thrust line), and in terms of the Geometrical Safety Factor ensured. (4) The work shows that these theories, if properly conveyed in a scientific methodology (as many authors are doing currently and have done in the past) demonstrate the effectiveness and the advantages of graphical methods for simple structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, Universitá degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Abbazia di San Lorenzo in Septimum, 81031 Aversa (CE), Italy

Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Via Claudio 21, 80143 Napoli (NA), Italy

Department of Civil Engineering, DICIV, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy

Department of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Via G. Marconi 5, 24044 Dalmine (BG), Italy

References (49)

Show source-provided references
2. Cennamo, C., Cusano, C., and Angelillo, M. (2017, January 4–7). The neoclassical dome of San Francesco di Paola in Naples. A study on form and stability. Proceedings of the XXIII Conference of the Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Salerno, Italy.
3. A limit analysis approach for masonry domes: The basilica of San Francesco di Paola in Naples10.1504/IJMRI.2019.100568 ↗
4. Cennamo, C., Cusano, C., and Angelillo, M. (2018, January 9–11). On the statics of large domes: A static and kinematic approach for San Francesco di Paola in Naples. Proceedings of the British Masonry Society, Milan, Italy.
5. A study on form and seismic vulnerability of the dome of San Francesco di Paola in Naples
6. Stability analysis and seismic vulnerability of large masonry domes
7. Seismic vulnerability of domes: A case study10.2140/jomms.2018.13.679 ↗
8. Three-dimensional (3D) equilibrium analysis of gothic masonry vaults10.1080/15583058.2013.826301 ↗
9. Eddy, H.T. (1878). Researches in Graphical Statics, D.Van Nostrand.
10. Angelillo, M., and Fortunato, A. (2004). Equilibrium of masonry vaults. Novel Approaches in Civil Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-45287-4_6 ↗
11. Cusano, C., Angjeliu, G., Montanino, A., Zuccaro, G., and Cennamo, C. (2021). Considerations about the static response of masonry domes: A comparison between limit analysis and finite element method. Int. J. Mason. Res. Innov., in press.10.1504/IJMRI.2021.118835 ↗
12. Reconciling elastic and equilibrium methods for static analysis10.1145/2835173 ↗
13. Guerra, G. (1958). Statica e Tecnica Costruttiva delle Cupole Antiche e Moderne, Istituto di Architettura Tecnica.
14. Statics of self-balancing masonry domes constructed with a cross-herringbone spiraling pattern10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110440 ↗
15. The principles of dome construction: I and II
16. Domes—Ancient and Modern10.1080/00038628.1977.9697235 ↗
17. Die konstruktion der kuppeldächer
18. Huerta Fernández, S. (2004). Arcos, Bóvedas y Cúpulas. Geometría y Equilibrio en el Cálculo Tradicional de Estructuras de FábricaArcos, Bóvedas y Cúpulas: Geometría y Equilibrio en el Cálculo Tradicional de Estructuras de Fábrica, Instituto Juan de Herrera.
19. Poleni, G. (1748). Memorie Istoriche Della Gran Cvpola Del Tempio Vaticano, E De’Danni Di Essa, E De’Ristoramenti Loro, Divise In Libri Cinqve, Padua Nella Stamperia del Seminario.
20. Como, M. (2015). Statica delle Costruzioni Storiche in Muratura: Archi, Volte, Cupole, Architetture Monumentali, Edifici Sotto Carichi Verticali e Sotto Sisma, Aracne Edizioni.
21. Rankine, W.J.M. (1876). Manual of Applied Mechanics, Griffin.
22. Wolfe, W.S. (1921). Graphical Analysis: A Text Book on Graphic Statics, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Incorporated.
23. Lau, W.W. (2006). Equilibrium Analysis of Masonry Domes. [Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
24. Ochsendorf, J.A. (2002). Collapse of Masonry Structures. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge].
25. Block, P.P.C.V. (2009). Thrust Network Analysis: Exploring Three-Dimensional Equilibrium. [Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
26. Huerta Fernández, S. (2001). Mechanics of masonry vaults: The equilibrium approach. Historical Constructions: Possibilities of Numerical and Experimental Techniques, Universidade do Minho.
27. Ochsendorf, J.A., and Block, P. (2010). Designing unreinforced masonry. Form and Forces: Designing Efficient, Expressive Structures, Wiley.
28. Como, M. (2013). Statics of Historic Masonry Constructions, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-30132-2 ↗
29. Manzanares, G.L., and Fernández, S.H. (1999). Estabilidad y Construcción de Cúpulas de Fábrica: El Nacimiento de la Teoría y su Relación con la Práctica. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid].
30. Huerta Fernández, S. (2004). Mecánica de las Bóvedas de la Catedral de Gerona, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid.
31. Huerta, S., and Fuentes, P. (2020). The Cathedral of Girona and the Language of Equilibrium. Konstruktionssprachen, Birkhäuser.10.1515/9783035622317-007 ↗
32. Huerta Fernández, S. (2008). Informe Sobre la Estabilidad de la Bóveda de la Antigua Cocina del Castillo de Bellver (Palma de Mallorca), E.T.S. Arquitectura (UPM).
33. Cipriani, B., and Lau, W.W. (April, January 29). Construction Techniques in Medieval Cairo: The Domes of Mamluk Mausolea (1250 AD-1517A. D.). Proceedings of the Second International Congress on Construction History, Cambridge, UK.
34. Limit analysis of cloister vaults: The case study of Palazzo Caracciolo di Avellino10.2140/jomms.2019.14.739 ↗
35. Static analysis of cross vaults: The case of the Cathedral of Casertavecchia10.2174/1874836801610010329 ↗
36. Static analysis of a Guastavino helical stair as a layered masonry shell10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.007 ↗
37. Equilibrium of cracked masonry domes
38. Davidson, S. (2021, March 17). Grasshopper Algorithmic Modeling for Rhino. Addons for Grasshopper. Available online: https://www.grasshopper3d.com/.
39. McNeel (2021, March 17). Rhino 6 per Windows. Available online: https://www.rhino3d.com/it/.
40. Singular stress fields for masonry-like vaults10.1007/s00161-012-0270-9 ↗
41. Automatic generation of statically admissible stress fields in masonry vaults10.2140/jomms.2019.14.719 ↗
42. Limit analysis for unilateral masonry-like structures10.2174/1874836801610010346 ↗
43. On the Connection Between Geometry and Statically Determined Membrane Stresses in the Human Cornea10.1115/1.4044742 ↗
44. Parametric design of purely compressed shells10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.103782 ↗
45. A lumped stress method for plane elastic problems and the discrete-continuum approximation10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00472-9 ↗
46. Displacement capacity of masonry structures under horizontal actions via PRD method10.2140/jomms.2019.14.703 ↗
47. Piecewise rigid displacement (PRD) method: A limit analysis-based approach to detect mechanisms and internal forces through two dual energy criteria10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103557 ↗
48. Numerical limit analysis-based modelling of masonry structures subjected to large displacements10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106372 ↗
49. Heyman, J. (1997). The Stone Skeleton: Structural Engineering of Masonry Architecture, Cambridge University Press.