journal article·2024-10-16Open access

AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance in Modern Maritime Transport—Enhancing Operational Efficiency and Reliability

Dragos Simion, Florin Postolache, Bogdan Fleacă, Elena Fleacă

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 20

Abstract

Maritime transport has adapted to recent political and economic shifts by addressing stringent pollution reduction requirements, redrawing transport routes for safety, reducing onboard technical incidents, managing data security risks and transitioning to autonomous vessels. This paper presents a novel approach to predictive maintenance in the maritime industry, leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques to enhance fault detection and maintenance planning for naval systems. Traditional maintenance strategies, such as corrective and preventive maintenance, are increasingly ineffective in meeting the high safety and efficiency standards required by maritime operations. The proposed model integrates AI-driven methods to process operational data from shipboard systems, enabling more accurate fault diagnosis and early identification of system failures. By analyzing historical operational data, ML algorithms identify patterns and estimate the functional states, helping prevent unplanned failures and costly downtime. This approach is critical in environments where technical failures are a leading cause of incidents, as demonstrated by the high rate of machinery-related accidents in maritime operations. Our study highlights the growing importance of AI and ML in predictive maintenance and offers a practical tool for improving operational safety and efficiency in the naval industry. The paper discusses the development of a fault detection approach, evaluates its performance on real shipboard data-through tests on a seawater cooling system from an oil tanker and concludes with insights into the broader implications of AI-driven maintenance in the maritime sector.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability · Risk and Safety Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Entrepreneurship, Business Engineering and Management, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, Splaiul Independenței 313, 060042 București, Romania

Faculty of Marine Engineering, Romanian Naval Academy “Mircea cel Batran”, Fulgerului 1, 900218 Constanța, Romania

Funding

National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest · PubArt

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. (2024, August 19). Safety and Shipping Review. 2024, Allianz Commercial, Online. Available online: https://commercial.allianz.com/content/dam/onemarketing/commercial/commercial/reports/Commercial-Safety-Shipping-Review-2024.pdf.
2. Konieczny, J., and Stojek, J. (2021). Use of the K-Nearest Neighbour Classifier in Wear Condition Classification of a Positive Displacement Pump. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21186247 ↗
3. Prognostics and Health Management Design for Rotary Machinery Systems—Reviews, Methodology and Applications10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.06.004 ↗
4. Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Aircraft Engine Based on Degradation Pattern Learning10.1016/j.ress.2017.02.007 ↗
5. Remaining Useful Life Estimation in Prognostics Using Deep Convolution Neural Networks10.1016/j.ress.2017.11.021 ↗
6. A Review of Applications of Fuzzy Sets to Safety and Reliability Engineering10.1016/j.ijar.2018.05.005 ↗
7. Ericson, C. (1999, January 16–21). Fault Tree Analysis—A History. Proceedings of the 17th International System Safety Conference, Orlando, FL, USA. Available online: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1049972.
8. Fault Tree Event Classifiction by Neural Network Analysis
9. Functional modeling for fault Diagnosis and its application for NPP10.5516/NET.04.2014.721 ↗
10. Lin, J., Yuan, Y., and Zhang, M. (2014). Improved FTA Methodology and Application to Subsea Pipeline Reliability Design. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0093042 ↗
11. An Improved FMEA Method Based on the Expert Trust Network for Maritime Transportation Risk Management10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121705 ↗
12. A Combined Multi-Criteria Approach to Support FMECA Analyses: A Real-World Case10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.017 ↗
13. An Improved Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Method for Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making in Green Logistics Risk Assessment10.1016/j.ress.2021.107826 ↗
14. Predicting Ship Machinery System Condition through Analytical Reliability Tools and Artificial Neural Networks10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.017 ↗
15. An Integrated Multicriteria Decision Making Methodology Using Compromise Solution Methods for Prioritising Risk of Marine Machinery Systems10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.005 ↗
16. Liu, N., Guo, N., and Zhang, N. (2019). An Improved Assessment Method for FMEA for a Shipboard Integrated Electric Propulsion System Using Fuzzy Logic and DEMATEL Theory. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12163162 ↗
17. Shafiee, M., Enjema, E., and Kolios, A. (2019). An Integrated FTA-FMEA Model for Risk Analysis of Engineering Systems: A Case Study of Subsea Blowout Preventers. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9061192 ↗
18. Safety Analysis of Combined FMEA and FTA with Computer Software Assistance—Take Photovoltaic Plant for Example10.3182/20130619-3-RU-3018.00370 ↗
19. Allal, A.A., Mansouri, K., Youssfi, M., and Qbadou, M. (2017, January 20–22). Toward a Reliable Main Engine Lubricating Oil System for a Safe Operation of Autonomous Ship. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS), Milan, Italy.10.1109/ICSRS.2017.8272854 ↗
20. A functional model-based approach for ship systems safety and reliability analysis: Application to a cruise ship lubricating oil system
21. RADIS: A Real-Time Anomaly Detection Intelligent System for Fault Diagnosis of Marine Machinery10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117634 ↗
22. Developing an advanced reliability analysis framework for marine systems operations and maintenance10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113766 ↗
23. Bluvband, Z., Polak, R., and Grabov, P. (2005, January 24–27). Bouncing failure analysis (BFA): The unified FTA-FMEA methodology. Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Alexandria, VA, USA.
24. A new approach for evaluation of risk priorities of failure modes in FMEA10.1080/00207540110056162 ↗
25. Risk analysis using FMEA: Fuzzy similarity value and possibility theory based approach10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.058 ↗
26. A Novel Failure Mode Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) Using Fuzzy Rule-Based Method: A Case Study of Industrial Centrifugal Pump10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105305 ↗
27. (2024, September 30). Machine Learning Yearning, Online. Available online: https://nessie.ilab.sztaki.hu/~kornai/2020/AdvancedMachineLearning/Ng_MachineLearningYearning.pdf.
28. Industrial Big Data Analytics and Cyber-Physical Systems for Future Maintenance & Service Innovation10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.026 ↗
29. Mobley, R.K. (2002). An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-075067531-4/50006-3 ↗
30. Lughofer, E., and Sayed-Mouchaweh, M. (2019). Predictive Maintenance in Dynamic Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-05645-2 ↗
31. Dhillon, B.S. (2020). Reliability, Maintainability and Safety for Engineers, CRC Press.10.1201/9780429340574 ↗
32. An unsupervised machine learning algorithms: Comprehensive review10.12785/ijcds/130172 ↗
33. A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance10.1016/j.cie.2019.106024 ↗
34. Joshi, A., Khosravy, M., and Gupta, N. (2020). Machine learning for predictive analysis. Proceedings of the ICTIS 2020, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-7106-0 ↗
35. Pommé, L.-E., Bourqui, R., Giot, R., and Auber, D. (2022, January 19–22). Relative Confusion Matrix: Efficient Comparison of Decision Models. Proceedings of the 2022 26th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV), Vienna, Austria.10.1109/IV56949.2022.00025 ↗
36. Remaining useful life prediction based on a joint model with degradation-failure association structures
37. EN13306, and Maintenance Terminology (2017). European Standard, European Committee for Standardization.
38. Proposal of maintenance-types classification to clarify maintenance concepts in production and operations management
39. Computerized Planned Maintenance System Software Models10.31217/p.32.1.14 ↗
40. Stazić, L., Račić, N., Stanivuk, T., and Dobrota, Đ. (2023). Determination of Benefits of the Application of CMMS Database Improvement Proposals. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042731 ↗
41. Wang, C., Zhou, B., Li, P., and Li, P. (2017, January 19–21). Study on Maintenance Progress FMECA for Ship Equipment. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Computer Technology, Electronics and Communication (ICCTEC), Dalian, China.10.1109/ICCTEC.2017.00073 ↗
42. Knežević, V., Orović, J., Stazić, L., and Čulin, J. (2020). Fault Tree Analysis and Failure Diagnosis of Marine Diesel Engine Turbocharger System. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8121004 ↗
43. An RCM Approach for Assessing Reliability Challenges and Maintenance Needs of Unmanned Cargo Ships10.1016/j.ress.2021.107550 ↗
44. Park, J., and Oh, J. (2023). Anomalistic Symptom Judgment Algorithm for Predictive Maintenance of Ship Propulsion Engine Using Machine Learning. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132111818 ↗
45. Postolache, F. (2018). Programarea Calculatoarelor si Limbaje de Programare Prin Exemple Practice, Editura Academiei Navale Mircea cel Bătrân Constanţa.
46. Research Process on Software Development Model10.1088/1757-899X/394/3/032045 ↗
47. Tinga, T., Tiddens, W., Amoiralis, F., and Politis, M. (2017). Predictive maintenance of maritime systems: Models and challenges. European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017, Taylor & Francis.10.1201/9781315210469-56 ↗
48. A Systematic Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis for Offshore Wind Turbine Systems towards Integrated Condition Based Maintenance Strategies10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.02.048 ↗
49. Assesment of Marine Propulsion System Reliability Based on Fault Tree Analysis
50. A Multinomial Process Tree for Reliability Assessment of Machinery in Autonomous Ships10.1016/j.ress.2021.107484 ↗
51. Fault tree analysis and its modifications as tools for reliability and risk analysis Ebgineering systems—An overview
52. Reliability, availability and maintainability analysis of the propulsion system of a fleet
53. Vahed, A.T., Ghodrati, B., and Hossienie, H. Enhanced K-Nearest Neighbors Method Application in Case of Draglines Reliability Analysis. Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection—MPES.
54. Tiwari, A. (2022). Supervised Learning: From Theory to Applications. Artificial Inteligence and Machine Learning for EDG Computing, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-824054-0.00026-5 ↗
55. Sisode, M., and Devare, M. (2022, January 22–24). A Review on Machine Learning Techniques for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applications of Machine Intelligence and Data Analytics (ICAMIDA), Aurangabad, India. Advances in Computer Science Research.10.2991/978-94-6463-136-4_67 ↗
56. Zhang, P., Gao, Z., Cao, L., Dong, F., Zou, Y., Wang, K., Zhang, Y., and Sun, P. (2022). Marine Systems and Equipment Prognostics and Health Management: A Systematic Review from Health Condition Monitoring to Maintenance Strategy. Machines, 10.10.3390/machines10020072 ↗
57. De Aguiar Vallim Filho, A.R., Moraes, D.F., De Aguiar Vallim, M.V.B., Da Silva, L.S., and Da Silva, L.A. (2022). A Machine Learning Modeling Framework for Predictive Maintenance Based on Equipment Load Cycle: An Application in a Real World Case. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15103724 ↗
58. Machine Learning Framework for Predictive Maintenance in Milling
59. Why and How to Employ the SIPOC Model10.69554/ZQRH7192 ↗
60. A Hybrid Framework Based on SIPOC and Six Sigma DMAIC for Improving Process Dimensions in Supply Chain Network10.1108/IJQRM-06-2012-0089 ↗