Smart Tool Wear Monitoring of CFRP/CFRP Stack Drilling Using Autoencoders and Memory-Based Neural Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
The drilling of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) materials is a key process in the aerospace industry, where ensuring high product quality is a critical issue. Low-quality of final products may be caused by the occurrence of drilling-induced defects such as delamination, which can be highly affected by the tool conditions. The abrasive carbon fibers generally produce very fast tool wear with negative effects on the hole quality. This suggests the need to develop a method able to accurately monitor the tool wear development during the drilling process in order to set up optimal tool management strategies. Nowadays, different types of sensors can be employed to acquire relevant signals associated with process variables which are useful to monitor tool wear during drilling. Moreover, the increasing computational capacity of modern computers allows the successful development of procedures based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques for signal processing and decision making aimed at online tool condition monitoring. In this work, an advanced tool condition monitoring method based on the employment of autoencoders and gated recurrent unit (GRU) recurrent neural networks (RNN) is developed and implemented to estimate tool wear in the drilling of CFRP/CFRP stacks. This method exploits the automatic feature extraction capability of autoencoders to obtain relevant features from the sensor signals acquired by a multiple sensor system during the drilling process and the memory abilities of GRU to estimate tool wear based on the extracted sensor signal features. The results obtained with the proposed method are compared with other neural network approaches, such as traditional feedforward neural networks, and considerations are made on the influence that memory-based hyperparameters have on tool wear estimation performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Advanced Metrological and Technological Services (CESMA), University of Naples Federico II, Corso Nicolangelo Protopisani 70, 80146 Naples, Italy
Fraunhofer Joint Laboratory of Excellence on Advanced Production Technology (Fh J_LEAPT UniNaples), Piazzale Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, Italy
Department of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Piazzale Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, Italy
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. High performance cutting of advanced aerospace alloys and composite materials10.1016/j.cirp.2015.05.002 ↗
2. Composite materials parts manufacturing10.1016/j.cirp.2018.05.005 ↗
3. Fernandez-Vidal, S.R., Fernandez-Vidal, S., Batista, M., and Salguero, J. (2018). Tool wear mechanism in cutting of stack CFRP/UNS A97075. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11081276 ↗
4. Performance analysis of new external chip breaker for efficient machining of Inconel 718 and optimization of the cutting parameters10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.03.025 ↗
5. Modeling and tool wear in drilling of CFRP10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.10.004 ↗
6. Analytical stochastic modeling and experimental investigation on abrasive wear when turning difficult to cut materials10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.055 ↗
7. Process monitoring of machining10.1016/j.cirp.2022.05.009 ↗
8. Hornby, A., Michael, A., Joanna, T., Diana, L., Dilys, P., Patrick, P., and Victoria, B. (2010). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, Oxford University Press.
9. Nele, L., Mattera, G., and Vozza, M. (2022). Deep Neural Networks for Defects Detection in Gas Metal Arc Welding. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12073615 ↗
10. Mattera, G., Paolela, D., and Nele, L. (J. Intell. Manuf., 2023). Monitoring and control the Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing process using artificial intelligence techniques: A review, J. Intell. Manuf., in press.10.1007/s10845-023-02085-5 ↗
11. Machine learning-based image processing for on-line defect recognition in additive manufacturing10.1016/j.cirp.2019.03.021 ↗
12. A smart tool wear prediction model in drilling of woven composites10.1007/s00170-020-06049-4 ↗
13. Early detection of drilling tool wear by vibration data acquisition and classification10.1016/j.mfglet.2019.08.006 ↗
14. Caggiano, A. (2018). Tool wear prediction in Ti-6Al-4V machining through multiple sensor monitoring and PCA features pattern recognition. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18030823 ↗
15. Artificial neural network based prediction of drill flank wear from motor current signals10.1016/j.asoc.2006.06.001 ↗
16. A comparative study on machine learning algorithms for smart manufacturing: Tool wear prediction using random forests10.1115/1.4036350 ↗
17. Multi-frequency-band deep CNN model for tool wear prediction10.1088/1361-6501/abb7a0 ↗
18. Tool wear prediction in high-speed turning of a steel alloy using long short-term memory modelling10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109329 ↗
19. Deep transfer learning based on sparse autoencoder for remaining useful life prediction of tool in manufacturing10.1109/TII.2018.2881543 ↗
20. Tool wear prediction in face milling of stainless steel using singular generative adversarial network and LSTM deep learning models10.1007/s00170-022-09356-0 ↗
21. Teti, R., Segreto, T., Caggiano, A., and Nele, L. (2020). Smart multi-sensor monitoring in drilling of CFRP/CFRP composite material stacks for aerospace assembly applications. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10030758 ↗
22. Tool wear in drilling of composite/titanium stacks using carbide and polycrystalline diamond tools10.1016/j.wear.2011.05.038 ↗
23. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
24. Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks10.1002/aic.690370209 ↗
25. Auto-encoder based dimensionality reduction10.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.104 ↗
26. Fan, J., Wang, W., and Zhang, H. (2017, January 24–26). AutoEncoder based high-dimensional data fault detection system. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Emden, Germany.10.1109/INDIN.2017.8104910 ↗
27. Denoising autoencoder for eletrocardiogram signal enhancement10.1166/jmihi.2015.1649 ↗
28. A novel deep learning approach for short-term wind power forecasting based on infinite feature selection and recurrent neural network10.1063/1.5024297 ↗
29. Zhang, Y., Liu, Q., and Song, L. (2018). Sentence-state lstm for text representation. arXiv.10.18653/v1/P18-1030 ↗
30. Xu, Z., Hu, J., and Deng, W. (2016, January 11–15). Recurrent convolutional neural network for video classification. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/ICME.2016.7552971 ↗
31. Lipton, Z.C., Berkowitz, J., and Elkan, C. (2015). A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning. arXiv.
32. The vanishing gradient problem during learning recurrent neural nets and problem solutions10.1142/S0218488598000094 ↗
33. Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult10.1109/72.279181 ↗
34. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
35. Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. (2015, January 7–9). Gated feedback recurrent neural networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France.
36. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv.
37. Machine learning approach in non-intrusive monitoring of tool wear evolution in massive CFRP automatic drilling processes in the aircraft industry10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.10.018 ↗