journal article·2022-01-27Open access

Recognition of mRNA N4 Acetylcytidine (ac4C) by Using Non-Deep vs. Deep Learning

Muhammad Shahid Iqbal, Rashid Abbasi, Md Belal Bin Heyat, Faijan Akhtar, Asmaa Sayed Abdelgeliel, Sarah Albogami, Eman Fayad, Muhammad Atif Iqbal

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

Deep learning models have been successfully applied in a wide range of fields. The creation of a deep learning framework for analyzing high-performance sequence data have piqued the research community’s interest. N4 acetylcytidine (ac4C) is a post-transcriptional modification in mRNA, is an mRNA component that plays an important role in mRNA stability control and translation. The ac4C method of mRNA changes is still not simple, time consuming, or cost effective for conventional laboratory experiments. As a result, we developed DL-ac4C, a CNN-based deep learning model for ac4C recognition. In the alternative scenario, the model families are well-suited to working in large datasets with a large number of available samples, especially in biological domains. In this study, the DL-ac4C method (deep learning) is compared to non-deep learning (machine learning) methods, regression, and support vector machine. The results show that DL-ac4C is more advanced than previously used approaches. The proposed model improves the accuracy recall area by 9.6 percent and 9.8 percent, respectively, for cross-validation and independent tests. More nuanced methods of incorporating prior bio-logical knowledge into the estimation procedure of deep learning models are required to achieve better results in terms of predictive efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Based on an experiment’s acetylated dataset, the DL-ac4C sequence-based predictor for acetylation sites in mRNA can predict whether query sequences have potential acetylation motifs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: RNA modifications and cancer · Machine Learning in Bioinformatics · Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Computer Science and Technology, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, China

Department of Computer Science, Air University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

School of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Electronics Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610056, China

IoT Research Center, College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

Department of Science and Engineering, Novel Global Community Education Foundation, Hebersham, NSW 2770, Australia

School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610056, China

Department of Botany & Microbiology, South Valley University, Qena 83523, Egypt

Department of Biotechnology, College of Science, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Yoon, J., Kim, T., Dia, O., Kim, S., Bengio, Y., and Ahn, S. (2018, January 3–8). Bayesian Model Agnostic Meta-Learning. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’18, Montreal, QC, Canada.
2. Liu, Q., and Wang, D. (2016, January 5–10). Stein Variational Gradient Descent: A General-Purpose Bayesian Inference Algorithm. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’16, Barcelona, Spain.
3. MODOMICS: A database of RNA modification pathways10.1093/nar/gkx1030 ↗
4. Yeast kre33 and human nat10 are conserved 18s rrna cytosine acetyltransferases that modify trnas assisted by the adaptor tan1/thumpd110.1093/nar/gkv075 ↗
5. Acetylation of cytidine in mrna promotes translation efciency10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.030 ↗
6. PACES: Prediction of N4-acetylcytidine (ac4C) modification sites in mRNA10.1038/s41598-019-47594-7 ↗
7. iNuc-STNC: A sequence-based predictor for identification of nucleosome positioning in genomes by extending the concept of SAAC and Chou’s PseAAC10.1039/C6MB00221H ↗
8. Psdentification: Identifcation of transmembrane helix segments using ensemble feature space by incorporated fuzzy support vector machine10.1039/C5MB00196J ↗
9. Prediction of n6-methyladenosine sites using convolution neural network model based on distributed feature representations10.1016/j.neunet.2020.05.027 ↗
10. Identifcation of promoters and their strength using deep learning10.1016/j.ibror.2019.07.1738 ↗
11. A deep learning-based computational approach for discrimination of dna n6-methyladenosine sites by fusing heterogeneous features10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.104151 ↗
12. Ten Quick tips for machine learning in computational biology10.1186/s13040-017-0155-3 ↗
13. Alam, W., Tayara, H., and Chong, K.T. (2021). i4mC-Deep: An Intelligent Predictor of N4-Methylcytosine Sites Using a Deep Learning Approach with Chemical Properties. Genes, 12.10.3390/genes12081117 ↗
14. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., and Hung Byers, A. (2011). Big Data: The Next Frontier for Innovation, Competition, and Productivity, McKinsey Global Institute.
15. Building Watson: An overview of the DeepQA project
16. (2022, January 03). IBM and Oncology. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/watson-health/solutions/cancer-research-treatment.
17. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search10.1038/nature16961 ↗
18. Google DeepMind and healthcare in an age of algorithms10.1007/s12553-017-0179-1 ↗
19. Deep learning recognition of diseased and normal cell representation10.1002/ett.4017 ↗
20. Mitochondrial Organelle Movement Classification (Fission and Fusion) via Convolutional Neural Network Approach10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2925041 ↗
21. Cell Recognition of Microscopy Images of TPEF (Two Photon Excited Florescence) Probes10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.188 ↗
22. Efficient cell classification of mitochondrial images by using deep learning10.1007/s12596-018-0508-4 ↗
23. Machine learning in bioinformatics10.1093/bib/bbk007 ↗
24. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
25. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices10.1006/jmbi.1999.3091 ↗
26. Conformational and physicochemical DNA features specific for transcription factor binding sites10.1093/bioinformatics/15.7.654 ↗
27. Support vector machines for predicting rRNA-, RNA-, and DNA-binding proteins from amino acid sequence10.1016/S1570-9639(03)00112-2 ↗
28. Solving the protein sequence metric problem10.1073/pnas.0408677102 ↗
29. Branden, C.I. (1999). Introduction to Protein Structure, Garland Science.
30. The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60520-3 ↗
31. Predicting backbone Cα angles and dihedrals from protein sequences by stacked sparse auto-encoder deep neural network10.1002/jcc.23718 ↗
32. Improving prediction of secondary structure, local backbone angles, and solvent accessible surface area of proteins by iterative deep learning10.1038/srep11476 ↗
33. A Deep Learning Network Approach to ab initio Protein Secondary Structure Prediction. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics10.1109/TCBB.2014.2343960 ↗
34. Nguyen, S.P., Shang, Y., and Xu, D. (2014, January 6–11). DL-PRO: A novel deep learning method for protein model quality assessment. Proceedings of the 2014 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Beijing, China.10.1109/IJCNN.2014.6889891 ↗
35. Exploiting the past and the future in protein secondary structure prediction10.1093/bioinformatics/15.11.937 ↗
36. Baldi, P., Pollastri, G., Andersen, C.A., and Brunak, S. (2000, January 19–23). Matching protein beta-sheet partners by feedforward and recurrent neural networks. Proceedings of the 2000 Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB00), La Jolla, CA, USA.
37. Sønderby, S.K., and Winther, O. (2014). Protein Secondary Structure Prediction with Long Short-Term Memory Networks. arXiv.
38. Lena, P.D., Nagata, K., and Baldi, P.F. (2012). Deep spatio-temporal architectures and learning for protein structure prediction. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
39. Deep architectures for protein contact map prediction10.1093/bioinformatics/bts475 ↗
40. The principled design of large-scale recursive neural networ—Architectures—Dag-rnns and the protein structure prediction problem
41. Deep learning of the tissue-regulated splicing code10.1093/bioinformatics/btu277 ↗
42. Lee, T., and Yoon, S. (2015, January 7–9). Boosted Categorical Restricted Boltzmann Machine for Computational Prediction of Splice Junctions. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France.
43. A deep learning framework for modeling structural features of RNA-binding protein targets10.1093/nar/gkv1025 ↗
44. Gene expression inference with deep learning10.1093/bioinformatics/btw074 ↗
45. Denas, O., and Taylor, J. (2013, January 2–4). Deep modeling of gene expression regulation in an Erythropoiesis model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning workshop on Representation Learning, Atlanta, GA, USA.
46. Predicting the sequence specificities of DNAand RNA-binding proteins by deep learning10.1038/nbt.3300 ↗
47. Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model10.1038/nmeth.3547 ↗
48. Lee, B., Lee, T., Na, B., and Yoon, S. (2015). DNA-Level Splice Junction Prediction using Deep Recurrent Neural Networks. arXiv.
49. Fast model-based protein homology detection without alignment10.1093/bioinformatics/btm247 ↗
50. Sønderby, S.K., Sønderby, C.K., Nielsen, H., and Winther, O. (2015). Convolutional LSTM Networks for Subcellular Localization of Proteins. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-319-21233-3_6 ↗
51. Fakoor, R., Ladhak, F., Nazi, A., and Huber, M. (2013, January 4–7). Using deep learning to enhance cancer diagnosis and classification. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Washington, DC, USA.
52. Using deep neural networks and biological subwords to detect protein S-sulfenylation sites10.1093/bib/bbaa128 ↗
53. Improved Prediction Model of Protein Lysine Crotonylation Sites Using Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00848 ↗
54. Detection, Treatment Planning, and Genetic Predisposition of Bruxism: A Systematic Mapping Process and Network Visualization Technique
55. Sleep Bruxism Detection Using Decision Tree Method by the Combination of C4-P4 and C4-A1 Channels of Scalp EEG10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928020 ↗
56. Bin Heyat, M.B., Akhtar, F., Khan, A., Noor, A., Benjdira, B., Qamar, Y., Abbas, S.J., and Lai, D. (2020). A Novel Hybrid Machine Learning Classification for the Detection of Bruxism Patients Using Physiological Signals. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10217410 ↗
57. Progress in Detection of Insomnia Sleep Disorder: A Comprehensive Review
58. Abbasi, R., Xu, L., Wang, Z., Chughtai, G.R., Amin, F., and Luo, B. (2018, January 28–30). Dynamic weighted histogram equalization for contrast enhancement using for Cancer Progression Detection in medical imaging. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Signal Processing and Machine Learning, Shanghai, China.10.1145/3297067.3297086 ↗
59. RDH-based dynamic weighted histogram equalization using for secure transmission and cancer prediction10.1007/s00530-020-00718-w ↗
60. Brain tumor segmentation using K-means clustering and deep learning with synthetic data augmentation for classification10.1002/jemt.23694 ↗
61. XG-ac4C: Identification of N4-acetylcytidine (ac4C) in mRNA using eXtreme gradient boosting with electron-ion interaction pseudopotentials10.1038/s41598-020-77824-2 ↗