journal article·2021-09-06Open access

Multiple-Input Convolutional Neural Network Model for Large-Scale Seismic Damage Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings

Chen Xiong, Jie Zheng, Liangjin Xu, Chengyu Cen, Ruihao Zheng, Yi Li

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 17

Abstract

This study introduces a multiple-input convolutional neural network (MI-CNN) model for the seismic damage assessment of regional buildings. First, ground motion sequences together with building attribute data are adopted as inputs of the proposed MI-CNN model. Second, the prediction accuracy of MI-CNN model is discussed comprehensively for different scenarios. The overall prediction accuracy is 79.7%, and the prediction accuracies for all scenarios are above 77%, indicating a good prediction performance of the proposed method. The computation efficiency of the proposed method is 340 times faster than that of the nonlinear multi-degree-of-freedom shear model using time history analysis. Third, a case study is conducted for reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings in Shenzhen city, and two seismic scenarios (i.e., M6.5 and M7.5) are studied for the area. The simulation results of the area indicate a good agreement between the MI-CNN model and the benchmark model. The outcomes of this study are expected to provide a useful reference for timely emergency response and disaster relief after earthquakes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Durability for Marine Civil Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Lessons from the Haiti earthquake10.1038/463878a ↗
2. Design objectives and collapse prevention for building structures in mega-earthquake10.1007/s11803-010-0005-5 ↗
3. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1985). Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California, Applied Technology Council. ATC-13 Report.
4. Whitman, R.V., Reed, J.W., and Hong, S.T. (1973, January 25–29). Earthquake damage probability matrices. Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome, Italy.
5. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (1997). Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology (HAZUS 97).
6. Lai, T.W., Liu, P.M., and Kao, M.S.S. (2004, January 1–6). Demonstration project of earthquake hazard for Chia-i City of Taiwan. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
7. Hazus-MH earthquake modeling in the central USA10.1007/s11069-012-0206-5 ↗
8. Insights from Hazus loss estimations in Israel for Dead Sea transform earthquakes10.1007/s11069-014-1325-y ↗
9. Hori, M. (2006). Introduction to Computational Earthquake Engineering, Imperial College Press.10.1142/p423 ↗
10. Multi-LOD seismic-damage simulation of urban buildings and case study in Beijing CBD10.1007/s10518-018-00522-y ↗
11. Framework for city-scale building seismic resilience simulation and repair scheduling with labor constraints driven by time–history analysis10.1111/mice.12496 ↗
12. A nonlinear computational model for regional seismic simulation of tall buildings10.1007/s10518-016-9880-0 ↗
13. Two frugal options to assess class fragility and seismic safety for low-rise reinforced concrete school buildings in Southern Italy10.1007/s10518-020-01033-5 ↗
14. Kwag, S., Ryu, Y., and Ju, B.S. (2020). Efficient seismic fragility analysis for large-scale piping system utilizing Bayesian approach. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10041515 ↗
15. Seismic fragility assessment of masonry building aggregates: A case study in the old city Centre of Seixal, Portugal10.1002/eqe.3405 ↗
16. Regional seismic risk assessment of infrastructure systems through machine learning: Active learning approach10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002831 ↗
17. Xu, Y., Lu, X., Tian, Y., and Huang, Y. (2020). Real-time seismic damage prediction and comparison of various ground motion intensity measures based on machine learning. J. Earthq. Eng., 1–21.10.2749/christchurch.2021.1158 ↗
18. Real-time regional seismic damage assessment framework based on long short-term memory neural network10.1111/mice.12628 ↗
19. Automated regional seismic damage assessment of buildings using an unmanned aerial vehicle and a convolutional neural network10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102994 ↗
20. Structural damage assessment criteria for reinforced concrete buildings by using a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy process10.1016/j.undsp.2018.04.002 ↗
21. Regional ground-motion simulation using recorded ground motions10.1785/0120200243 ↗
22. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD) (2016). Seismic Design Code for Buildings, GB50011-2010.
23. Zheng, R., Xiong, C., Deng, X., Li, Q., and Li, Y. (2020). Assessment of earthquake destructive power to structures based on machine learning methods. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10186210 ↗
24. An efficient optimization approach for designing machine learning models based on genetic algorithm10.1007/s00521-020-05035-x ↗
25. Deep transfer learning for image-based structural damage recognition10.1111/mice.12363 ↗
26. Parameter determination and damage assessment for THA-based regional seismic damage prediction of multi-story buildings10.1080/13632469.2016.1160009 ↗
27. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD) (2012). Load Code for Building Structures, GB50009-2012.
28. PEER Center (2013). PEER ground motion database. PEER NGA-West2 Database 2013/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Headquarters at the University of California.
29. K-Net (2021, September 04). Strong-Motion Seismograph Network (K-Net, Kik-Net), Available online: https://www.kyoshin.bosai.go.jp/kyoshin/.
30. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2021, September 04). Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980.
31. Ruder, S. (2021, September 04). An Overview of Gradient Descent Optimization Algorithms. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04747.
32. The real-world-weight cross-entropy loss function: Modeling the costs of mislabeling10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962617 ↗
33. On early stopping in gradient descent learning10.1007/s00365-006-0663-2 ↗
34. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree
35. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
36. Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (2021, September 04). SFUN. Available online: https://www1.fang.com/.
37. Active fault exploration and seismic hazard assessment in Shenzhen city
38. Yu, Y. (2002). Study on Attenuation Relationships of Long Period Ground Motions. [Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration]. (In Chinese).
39. Site coefficients suitable to China site category10.1007/s11589-007-0071-6 ↗
40. Gasparini, D., and Vanmarcke, E.H. (1976). SIMQKE, A Program for Artificial Motion Generation, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.