Acoustic Scattering Models from Rough Surfaces: A Brief Review and Recent Advances
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper proposes a brief review of acoustic wave scattering models from rough surfaces. This review is intended to provide an up-to-date survey of the analytical approximate or semi-analytical methods that are encountered in acoustic scattering from random rough surfaces. Thus, this review focuses only on the scattering of acoustic waves and does not deal with the transmission through a rough interface of waves within a solid material. The main used approximations are classified here into two types: the two historical approximations (Kirchhoff approximation and the perturbation theory) and some sound propagation models more suitable for grazing observation angles on rough surfaces, such as the small slope approximation, the integral equation method and the parabolic equation. The use of the existing approximations in the scientific literature and their validity are highlighted. Rough surfaces with Gaussian height distribution are usually considered in the models hypotheses. Rather few comparisons between models and measurements have been found in the literature. Some new criteria have been recently determined for the validity of the Kirchhoff approximation, which is one of the most used models, owing to its implementation simplicity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Underwater Acoustics Research · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, List, F-91120 Palaiseau, France
French Alternative Energies and Nuclear Energy Commission—Division of Nuclear Energy CEA-DES, 13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance CEDEX, France
Funding
French government
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Romanova, A.V., Horoshenkov, K.V., and Krynkin, A. (2018). Dynamically Rough Boundary Scattering Effect on a Propagating Continuous Acoustical Wave in a Circular Pipe with Flow. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18041098 ↗
2. Wang, Z., Cui, X., Ma, H., Kang, Y., and Deng, Z. (2018). Effect of Surface Roughness on Ultrasonic Testing of Back-Surface Micro-Cracks. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8081233 ↗
3. A high-frequency sonar for profiling small-scale subaqueous bedforms10.1016/0025-3227(77)90072-X ↗
4. Niu, L., Qian, M., Yang, W., Meng, L., Xiao, Y., Wong, K.K.L., Abbott, D., Liu, X., and Zheng, H. (2013). Surface Roughness Detection of Arteries via Texture Analysis of Ultrasound Images for Early Diagnosis of Atherosclerosis. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0076880 ↗
5. Hériveaux, Y., Nguyen, V.-H., Biwa, S., and Haïat, G. (2020). Analytical modeling of the interaction of an ultrasonic wave with a rough bone-implant interface. Ultrasonics, 108.10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106223 ↗
6. Model for the ultrasonic inspection of rough defects10.1016/0041-624X(89)90016-4 ↗
7. Theoretical comparison of ultrasonic signal amplitudes from smooth and rough defects10.1016/0308-9126(86)90028-3 ↗
8. Elastic model for simulating ultrasonic inspection of smooth and rough defects10.1016/0041-624X(91)90080-R ↗
9. Surface roughness induced attenuation of reflected and transmitted ultrasonic waves10.1121/1.395545 ↗
10. Surface roughness and the ultrasonic detection of subsurface scatterers10.1063/1.353366 ↗
11. Nagy, P.B., Adler, L., and Rose, J.H. (1993). Effects of Acoustic Scattering at Rough Surfaces on the Sensitivity of Ultrasonic Inspection. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4615-2848-7_228 ↗
12. Bilgen, M. (1993). Effects of randomly rough surfaces on ultrasonic inspection. Retrosp. Theses Diss.
13. Ogilvy, J.A. (1991). Theory of Wave Scattering From Random Rough Surfaces, Taylor & Francis.10.1121/1.401410 ↗
14. A critical survey of approximate scattering wave theories from random rough surfaces10.1088/0959-7174/14/4/R01 ↗
15. Wave-Propagation and Scattering in Random-Media and Rough Surfaces10.1109/5.104210 ↗
16. Ticconi, F., Pulvirenti, L., and Pierdicca, N. (2011). Models for Scattering from Rough Surfaces. Electromagn. Waves.10.5772/19318 ↗
17. Hermansson, P., and Forssell, G. (2020, March 25). A Review of Models for Scattering from Rough Surfaces, Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=9344336395593944459&hl=fr&as_sdt=0,5&sciodt=0,5.
18. Wave scattering from rough surfaces10.1088/0034-4885/50/12/001 ↗
19. Brekhovskikh, L.M., and Lysanov, Y.P. (2013). Fundamentals of Ocean Acoustics, Springer Science & Business Media.
20. Voronovich, A.G. (2013). Wave Scattering from Rough Surfaces, Springer Science & Business Media.
21. The validity of the Kirchhoff approximation for rough surface scattering using a Gaussian roughness spectrum10.1121/1.396188 ↗
22. The two-scale model for random rough surface scattering10.1109/OCEANS.1996.568346 ↗
23. Random Process Model of Rough Surfaces10.1115/1.3451608 ↗
24. Johnson, K.L., and Johnson, K.L. (1987). Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press.
25. A non-gaussian model for random surfaces
26. Generating randomly rough surfaces with given height probability distribution and power spectrum10.1016/j.triboint.2018.11.020 ↗
27. Computer simulation of acoustic wave scattering from rough surfaces10.1088/0022-3727/21/2/006 ↗
28. (2020, November 20). Civa Software Website. Available online: http://www.extende.com/.
29. An overview of ultrasonic beam propagation and flaw scattering models in the civa software10.1063/1.3362393 ↗
30. Toullelan, G., Raillon, R., Chatillon, S., Dorval, V., Darmon, M., and Lonné, S. (2016). Results of the 2015 UT Modeling Benchmark Obtained with Models Implemented in Civa. AIP Conf. Proc.10.1063/1.4940642 ↗
31. Raillon-Picot, R., Toullelan, G., Darmon, M., Calmon, P., and Lonné, S. (2012, January 16–20). Validation of CIVA ultrasonic simulation in canonical configurations. Proceedings of the World Conference of Non Destructive Testing (WCNDT) 2012, Durban, South Africa.
32. Results of the 2010 ut modeling benchmark obtained with civa: Responses of backwall and surface breaking notches10.1063/1.3592143 ↗
33. Results of the 2009 ut modeling benchmark obtained with civa: Responses of notches, side-drilled holes and flat-bottom holes of various sizes10.1063/1.3362396 ↗
34. Seismic scattering from topographic irregularities
35. Bass, F.G., and Fuks, I.M. (1973). Wave Scattering from Statistically Rough Surfaces, Pergamon Press.
36. Blakemore Scattering of acoustic waves by the rough surface of an elastic solid10.1016/0041-624X(93)90003-I ↗
37. Backscattering of acoustic waves by randomly rough surfaces of elastic solids immersed in water10.1121/1.388040 ↗
38. Self-consistent perturbation approach to rough surface scattering in stratified elastic media10.1121/1.398712 ↗
39. Modeling of subcritical penetration into sediments due to interface roughness10.1121/1.428303 ↗
40. Scattering from elastic sea beds: First-order theory10.1121/1.421093 ↗
41. Acoustic plane-wave scattering from a rough surface over a random fluid medium10.1016/S0029-8018(01)00056-7 ↗
42. Acoustic wave reflection from a rough seabed with a continuously varying sediment layer overlying an elastic basement10.1016/j.jsv.2003.06.012 ↗
43. A time-domain model for seafloor scattering10.1121/1.5009932 ↗
44. Scattering of plane acoustic waves at elastic particles with rough surfaces10.1121/1.4920909 ↗
45. Neighbors, T., and Bradley, D. (2017). Applied Underwater Acoustics: Leif Bjørnø, Elsevier.
46. Sound Scattering by Solid Cylinders and Spheres10.1121/1.1906780 ↗
47. Theory of elastic resonance excitation by sound scattering10.1121/1.381780 ↗
48. On relating the perturbation theory and random cylinder generation to study scattered field10.1016/j.phycom.2020.101003 ↗
49. Investigation of a surface field phase perturbation technique for scattering from rough surfaces10.1029/RS020i002p00161 ↗
50. Application of the phase-perturbation technique to randomly rough surfaces10.1364/JOSAA.2.002285 ↗
51. A Numerical Comparison of the Phase Perturbation Technique with the Classical Field Perturbation and Kirchhoff Approximations for Random Rough Surface Scattering
52. Broschat, S.L., Thorsos, E.I., and Ishimaru, A. (2012). The Phase Perturbation Technique vs. an Exact Numerical Method for Random Rough Surface Scattering. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl.
53. A phase-perturbation technique for light scattering from randomly dielectric rough surfaces10.1088/0256-307X/14/1/009 ↗
54. On the use of the Kirchhoff approximation for the solution of reflection problems
55. Bouche, D., Molinet, F., and Mittra, R. (1997). Asymptotic Methods in Electromagnetics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-60517-8 ↗
56. Chungang, J., Lixin, G., and Pengju, Y. (2020, September 21). Time-Domain Physical Optics Method for the Analysis of Wide-Band EM Scattering from Two-Dimensional Conducting Rough Surface. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijap/2013/584260/.10.1155/2013/584260 ↗
57. A general Kirchhoff approximation for echo simulation in ultrasonic NDT10.1063/1.4716230 ↗
58. Modelling of Scattering of Ultrasounds by Flaws for NDT10.1007/978-3-540-89105-5_6 ↗
59. Models Comparison for the scattering of an acoustic wave on immersed targets10.1088/1742-6596/353/1/012009 ↗
60. Geometrical theory of diffraction10.1364/JOSA.52.000116 ↗
61. Darmon, M., Chatillon, S., Mahaut, S., Fradkin, L., and Gautesen, A. (2008, January 20–25). Simulation of disoriented flaws in a TOFD technique configuration using GTD approach. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1063/1.2902622 ↗
62. Chaffai, S., Darmon, M., Mahaut, S., and Menand, R. (2007, January 15–20). Simulations tools for TOFD inspection in Civa software. Proceedings of the ICNDE 2007, Istanbul, Turkey.
63. Recent Modelling Advances for Ultrasonic TOFD Inspections10.1063/1.4914799 ↗
64. The spectral functions method for acoustic wave diffraction by a stress-free wedge: Theory and validation10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.040 ↗
65. 2D elastic plane-wave diffraction by a stress-free wedge of arbitrary angle10.1016/j.jcp.2019.06.016 ↗
66. Ufimtsev, P.Y. (2007). Fundamentals of the Physical Theory of Diffraction, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0470109017 ↗
67. Numerical comparison of acoustic wedge models, with application to ultrasonic telemetry10.1016/j.ultras.2015.10.009 ↗
68. A refinement of the Kirchhoff approximation to the scattered elastic fields10.1016/j.ultras.2011.09.008 ↗
69. A system model for ultrasonic NDT based on the Physical Theory of Diffraction (PTD)10.1016/j.ultras.2015.08.006 ↗
70. A semi-numerical model for near-critical angle scattering10.1121/1.4939494 ↗
71. The Uniform geometrical Theory of Diffraction for elastodynamics: Plane wave scattering from a half-plane10.1121/1.4935020 ↗
72. The Scattering of Sound from the Sea Surface10.1121/1.1907123 ↗
73. Imbert, C. (1997). Visualisation Ultrasonore Rapide Sous Sodium Application Aux Reacteurs a Neutrons Rapides, INSA de Lyon.
74. Shadowing of Randomly Rough Surfaces10.1121/1.1910308 ↗
75. A method for calculating the acoustic field near a rough surface
76. An improved Kirchhoff formula for reflection loss at a rough ocean surface at low grazing angles10.1121/1.388997 ↗
77. The validity of Kirchhoff theory for scattering of elastic waves from rough surfaces
78. Elastic shear wave scattering by randomly rough surfaces10.1016/j.jmps.2019.103852 ↗
79. Appraising Kirchhoff approximation theory for the scattering of elastic shear waves by randomly rough defects10.1016/j.jsv.2019.114872 ↗
80. Theory of elastic wave scattering: Applications of the method of optimal truncation10.1063/1.336122 ↗
81. An analysis of new mixed finite elements for the approximation of wave propagation problems10.1137/S0036142998345499 ↗
82. Application of the fictitious domain method to 2D linear elastodynamic problems
83. Kirchhoff approximation revisited—Some new results for scattering in isotropic and anisotropic elastic solids10.1080/09349840600787956 ↗
84. Darmon, M. (2014). Validity of the Kirchhoff Approximation for Small Flaws, CEA/DISC/LSMA.
85. Longitudinal Wave Scattering from Rough Crack-Like Defects10.1109/TUFFC.2011.2066 ↗
86. Wedge diffraction of a critically incident Gaussian beam10.1016/j.wavemoti.2013.01.004 ↗
87. Aspects of diffraction of a creeping wave by a back-wall crack10.1088/1742-6596/353/1/012017 ↗
88. Mahaut, S., Huet, G., and Darmon, M. (2008, January 20–25). Modeling of Corner Echo in UT Inspection Combining Bulk and Head Waves Effect. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, 35th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1063/1.3114330 ↗
89. Fradkin, L.J., Djakou, A.K., Prior, C., Darmon, M., Chatillon, S., and Calmon, P.-F. (2020). The Alternative Kirchhoff Approximation in Elastodynamics with Applications in Ultrasonic Nondestructive Testing. ANZIAM J., 1–17.10.1017/S1446181120000036 ↗
90. Modeling of ray paths of head waves on irregular interfaces in TOFD inspection for NDE10.1016/j.ultras.2013.12.007 ↗
91. Use of the Kirchhoff Approximation in Scattering from Elastic, Rough Surfaces
92. The Kirchhoff approximation for acoustic scattering from a rough fluid–elastic solid interface10.1121/1.399748 ↗
93. Scattering of scalar fields by hard and soft rough surfaces. Angular distribution of intensity
94. Ploix, M.-A., Kauffmann, P., Chaix, J.-F., Lillamand, I., Baqué, F., and Corneloup, G. (2020). Acoustical properties of an immersed corner-cube retroreflector alone and behind screen for ultrasonic telemetry applications. Ultrasonics, 106.10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106149 ↗
95. Main Features of a Complete Ultrasonic Measurement Model: Formal Aspects of Modeling of Both Transducers Radiation and Ultrasonic Flaws Responses10.4236/oja.2013.33A008 ↗
96. Recent advances and current trends of ultrasonic modelling in CIVA10.1784/insi.2009.51.2.78 ↗
97. Finite Element Modeling of Acoustic Scattering from Fluid and Elastic Rough Interfaces10.1109/JOE.2014.2313060 ↗
98. Botten, L.C., Cadilhac, M., Derrick, G.H., Maystre, D., McPhedran, R.C., Nevière, M., and Vincent, P. (2013). Electromagnetic Theory of Gratings, Springer Science & Business Media.
99. Acoustic scattering comparison of Kirchhoff approximation to Rayleigh-Fourier method for sinusoidal surface waves at low grazing angles10.1121/1.5052256 ↗
100. High-frequency forward scattering from Gaussian spectrum, pressure release, corrugated surfaces. I. Catastrophe theory modeling10.1121/1.410248 ↗