journal article·2025-01-24Open access

A (Comprehensive) Review of the Application of Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship (QSAR) in the Prediction of New Compounds with Anti-Breast Cancer Activity

Boris Vasilev, Mariyana Atanasova

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 3

Abstract

Computational approaches applied in drug discovery have advanced significantly over the past few decades. These techniques are commonly grouped under the term “computer-aided drug design” (CADD) and are now considered one of the key pillars of pharmaceutical discovery pipelines in both academic and industrial settings. In this work, we review Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships (QSARs), one of the most used ligand-based drug design (LBDD) methods, with a focus on its application in the discovery and development of anti-breast cancer drugs. Critical steps in the QSAR methodology, essential for its correct application—but often overlooked, leading to insignificant or misleading models—are examined. Additionally, current anti-breast cancer treatment strategies were briefly overviewed, along with some targets for future treatments. The review covers QSAR studies from the past five years and includes a discussion of notable works that could serve as models for future applications of this interdisciplinary and complex method and that may help in feature drug design and development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Synthesis and biological activity · Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria

Funding

European Union-NextGenerationEU

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Einfluss Der Configuration Auf Die Wirkung Der Enzyme10.1002/cber.18940270364 ↗
2. Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis10.1073/pnas.44.2.98 ↗
3. Protein Conformational Populations and Functionally Relevant Substates10.1021/ar400084s ↗
4. Allostery and Population Shift in Drug Discovery10.1016/j.coph.2010.09.002 ↗
5. Principles: Receptor Theory in Pharmacology10.1016/j.tips.2004.02.012 ↗
6. Belorkar, S.A., and Jogaiah, S. (2022). Enzymes—Past, Present, and Future. Protocols and Applications in Enzymology, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-323-91268-6.00007-7 ↗
7. Bardal, S.K., Waechter, J.E., and Martin, D.S. (2011). Basic Principles and Pharmacodynamics. Applied Pharmacology, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-1-4377-0310-8.00001-4 ↗
8. Böhm, H.-J., and Schneider, G. (2003). Protein-Ligand Interactions, Wiley. Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry.10.1002/3527601813 ↗
9. Seidel, T., Schuetz, D.A., Garon, A., and Langer, T. (2019). The Pharmacophore Concept and Its Applications in Computer-Aided Drug Design. Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products 110: Cheminformatics in Natural Product Research, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-14632-0_4 ↗
10. High Throughput Virtual Screening (HTVS) of Peptide Library: Technological Advancement in Ligand Discovery10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114766 ↗
11. From Virtuality to Reality–Virtual Screening in Lead Discovery and Lead Optimization: A Medicinal Chemistry Perspective
12. The Druggable Genome and Support for Target Identification and Validation in Drug Development10.1126/scitranslmed.aag1166 ↗
13. Oprea, T.I., and Hasselgren, C. (2017). Predicting Target and Chemical Druggability. Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry III., Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.12342-X ↗
14. Carvalho, A.L., Trincão, J., and Romão, M.J. (2010). X-Ray Crystallography in Drug Discovery. Ligand-Macromolecular Interactions in Drug Discovery: Methods and Protocols, Springer.10.1007/978-1-60761-244-5_3 ↗
15. Emwas, A.-H., Szczepski, K., Poulson, B.G., Chandra, K., McKay, R.T., Dhahri, M., Alahmari, F., Jaremko, L., Lachowicz, J.I., and Jaremko, M. (2020). NMR as a “Gold Standard” Method in Drug Design and Discovery. Molecules, 25.10.3390/molecules25204597 ↗
16. Bridging Structural and Cell Biology with Cryo-Electron Microscopy10.1038/s41586-024-07198-2 ↗
17. Appasani, K. (2024). Cryo-Electron Microscopy in Structural Biology, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003326106 ↗
18. Wishart, D.S. (2008). Identifying Putative Drug Targets and Potential Drug Leads. Molecular Modeling of Proteins, Springer.10.1007/978-1-59745-177-2_17 ↗
19. Pharmacophore Modeling in Drug Discovery: Methodology and Current Status10.18596/jotcsa.927426 ↗
20. Pharmmaker: Pharmacophore Modeling and Hit Identification Based on Druggability Simulations10.1002/pro.3732 ↗
21. Giordano, D., Biancaniello, C., Argenio, M.A., and Facchiano, A. (2022). Drug Design by Pharmacophore and Virtual Screening Approach. Pharmaceuticals, 15.10.3390/ph15050646 ↗
22. Molecular Similarity: Theory, Applications, and Perspectives10.1016/j.aichem.2024.100077 ↗
23. Similarity Searching10.1002/wcms.23 ↗
24. Yu, W., and MacKerell, A.D. (2017). Computer-Aided Drug Design Methods. Antibiotics: Methods and Protocols, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4939-6634-9_5 ↗
25. Computational Ligand-Based Rational Design: Role of Conformational Sampling and Force Fields in Model Development10.1039/c1md00044f ↗
26. Pharmacophore Modeling and Applications in Drug Discovery: Challenges and Recent Advances10.1016/j.drudis.2010.03.013 ↗
27. Zur Theorie Der Alkoholnarkose10.1007/BF01834479 ↗
28. Zur Theorie Der Alkoholnarkose10.1007/BF01978064 ↗
29. Contributions to the Theory of Narcosis10.1039/tf9373301062 ↗
30. Overton, C.E. (1901). Studien Über Die Narkose Zugleich Ein Beitrag Zur Allgemeinen Pharmakologie, Fischer.
31. The Effect of Structure upon the Reactions of Organic Compounds. Benzene Derivatives10.1021/ja01280a022 ↗
32. P-σ-π Analysis. A Method for the Correlation of Biological Activity and Chemical Structure10.1021/ja01062a035 ↗
33. A New Substituent Constant, π, Derived from Partition Coefficients10.1021/ja01077a028 ↗
34. A Mathematical Contribution to Structure-Activity Studies10.1021/jm00334a001 ↗
35. The Importance of the Domain of Applicability in QSAR Modeling10.1016/j.jmgm.2008.01.002 ↗
36. Drug Discovery: A Historical Perspective10.1126/science.287.5460.1960 ↗
37. Franco, L.S., de Jesus, B.d.S.M., Pinheiro, P.d.S.M., and Fraga, C.A.M. (2024). Remapping the Chemical Space and the Pharmacological Space of Drugs: What Can We Expect from the Road Ahead?. Pharmaceuticals, 17.10.3390/ph17060742 ↗
38. Statistical Molecular Design of Balanced Compound Libraries for QSAR Modeling10.2174/092986710791233661 ↗
39. Principal Component Analysis: A Review and Recent Developments10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 ↗
40. Data Dimensional Reduction and Principal Components Analysis10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.111 ↗
41. Ramachandran, K.M., and Tsokos, C.P. (2015). Design of Experiments. Mathematical Statistics with Applications in R., Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-417113-8.00009-6 ↗
42. Experimental Design and Optimization10.1016/S0169-7439(98)00065-3 ↗
43. Statistical Molecular Design of Building Blocks for Combinatorial Chemistry10.1021/jm991118x ↗
44. He, S., Zhiti, A., Barba-Bon, A., Hennig, A., and Nau, W.M. (2020). Real-Time Parallel Artificial Membrane Permeability Assay Based on Supramolecular Fluorescent Artificial Receptors. Front. Chem., 8.10.3389/fchem.2020.597927 ↗
45. Evaluation of Various PAMPA Models to Identify the Most Discriminating Method for the Prediction of BBB Permeability10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.01.003 ↗
46. Caco-2 Cell Permeability Assays to Measure Drug Absorption10.1517/17425255.1.2.175 ↗
47. P-Glycoprotein Substrate Assessment in Drug Discovery: Application of Modeling to Bridge Differential Protein Expression Across In Vitro Tools10.1016/j.xphs.2020.09.017 ↗
48. Ladumor, M.K., Tiwari, S., Patil, A., Bhavsar, K., Jhajra, S., Prasad, B., and Singh, S. (2016). High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry in Metabolite Identification. Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry, Elsevier.10.1016/bs.coac.2016.01.004 ↗
49. Update on in Vitro Cytotoxicity Assays for Drug Development10.1517/17460441.3.6.655 ↗
50. The in Vivo Rodent Test Systems for Assessment of Carcinogenic Potential10.1006/rtph.2001.1505 ↗
51. Guy, R.C. (2024). Ames Test. Encyclopedia of Toxicology, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-824315-2.01101-5 ↗
52. Chromosome Aberration Assays in Genetic Toxicology Testing in Vitro10.1016/S0027-5107(98)00110-9 ↗
53. Assessment of Cytochrome P450 Enzyme Inhibition and Inactivation in Drug Discovery and Development10.2174/156802611794480882 ↗
54. CYP Induction-Mediated Drug Interactions: In Vitro Assessment and Clinical Implications10.1007/s11095-006-0277-7 ↗
55. Establishment of In Vitro P-Glycoprotein Inhibition Assay and Its Exclusion Criteria to Assess the Risk Of Drug–Drug Interaction at the Drug Discovery Stage10.1002/jps.22652 ↗
56. Physicochemical QSAR Analysis of Passive Permeability Across Caco-2 Monolayers10.1016/j.xphs.2018.10.006 ↗
57. Evaluation of QSAR Models for Predicting Mutagenicity: Outcome of the Second Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project10.1080/1062936X.2023.2284902 ↗
58. In Silico Prediction of Compounds Binding to Human Plasma Proteins by QSAR Models10.1002/cmdc.201700582 ↗
59. Evaluation of QSAR Models for Predicting the Partition Coefficient (LogP) of Chemicals under the REACH Regulation10.1016/j.envres.2015.09.025 ↗
60. Open-Source QSAR Models for PKa Prediction Using Multiple Machine Learning Approaches10.1186/s13321-019-0384-1 ↗
61. QSAR-Based Solubility Model for Drug-like Compounds10.1016/j.bmc.2010.08.003 ↗
62. Lead Optimization of 4-(Thio)-Chromenone 6-O-Sulfamate Analogs Using QSAR, Molecular Docking and DFT—A Combined Approach as Steroidal Sulfatase Inhibitors10.1080/10799893.2020.1794004 ↗
63. Arian, R., Hariri, A., Mehridehnavi, A., Fassihi, A., and Ghasemi, F. (2020). Protein Kinase Inhibitors’ Classification Using K-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm. Comput. Biol. Chem., 86.10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2020.107269 ↗
64. Prediction of Organ Toxicity Endpoints by QSAR Modeling Based on Precise Chemical-Histopathology Annotations10.1111/j.1747-0285.2012.01411.x ↗
65. Transparency in Modeling through Careful Application of OECD’s QSAR/QSPR Principles via a Curated Water Solubility Data Set10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00379 ↗
66. Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation10.1002/minf.201000061 ↗
67. Bassani, D., and Moro, S. (2023). Past, Present, and Future Perspectives on Computer-Aided Drug Design Methodologies. Molecules, 28.10.3390/molecules28093906 ↗
68. Golbraikh, A., Wang, X.S., Zhu, H., and Tropsha, A. (2017). Predictive QSAR Modeling: Methods and Applications in Drug Discovery and Chemical Risk Assessment. Handbook of Computational Chemistry, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-27282-5_37 ↗
69. (2024, December 24). PubChem, Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
70. (2024, December 24). ChemSpider. Available online: https://www.chemspider.com.
71. (2024, December 24). DrugBank. Available online: https://go.drugbank.com.
72. (2024, December 24). ChEMBL. Available online: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl.
73. (2024, December 24). NCI60, Available online: https://dtp.cancer.gov/discovery_development/nci-60/.
74. (2025, January 18). STITCH. Available online: http://stitch.embl.de/.
75. (2024, December 24). BioAssay, Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/guide/chemicals-bioassays/.
76. Benefits of Statistical Molecular Design, Covariance Analysis, and Reference Models in QSAR: A Case Study on Acetylcholinesterase10.1007/s10822-014-9808-1 ↗
77. Orthogonality, Uncorrelatedness, and Linear Independence of Vectors10.1002/cem.2816 ↗
78. Gómez-Jiménez, G., Gonzalez-Ponce, K., Castillo-Pazos, D.J., Madariaga-Mazon, A., Barroso-Flores, J., Cortes-Guzman, F., and Martinez-Mayorga, K. (2018). The OECD Principles for (Q)SAR Models in the Context of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD). Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology, Springer.10.1016/bs.apcsb.2018.04.001 ↗
79. Biocurators and Biocuration: Surveying the 21st Century Challenges10.1093/database/bar059 ↗
80. Todeschini, R., and Consonni, V. (2000). Handbook of Molecular Descriptors, Wiley. Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry.10.1002/9783527613106 ↗
81. (2024, December 24). ACD/Labs. Available online: www.acdlabs.com.
82. (2024, December 24). DRAGON. Available online: https://www.talete.mi.it/products/dragon_description.htm.
83. (2024, December 24). E-DRAGON. Available online: https://vcclab.org/lab/edragon/.
84. Virtual Computational Chemistry Laboratory—Design and Description10.1007/s10822-005-8694-y ↗
85. (2024, December 24). CDK. Available online: https://cdk.github.io/.
86. (2024, December 24). CODESSA. Available online: https://www.codessa-pro.com/index.htm.
87. (2024, December 24). Chemical Computing Group Inc Molecular Operating Environment (MOE). Available online: https://www.chemcomp.com/en/Products.htm.
88. (2024, December 24). MOE. Available online: www.chemcomp.com.
89. (2024, December 24). MOLD2, Available online: https://www.fda.gov/science-research/bioinformatics-tools/mold2.
90. Mold 2, Molecular Descriptors from 2D Structures for Chemoinformatics and Toxicoinformatics10.1021/ci800038f ↗
91. (2024, December 24). PowerMV. Available online: https://www.niss.org/research/software/powermv.
92. (2024, December 24). PreADMET. Available online: https://preadmet.webservice.bmdrc.org/.
93. Chemistry and Algebra10.1038/017284a0 ↗
94. Characterization of Molecular Branching10.1021/ja00856a001 ↗
95. The Connectivity Index 25 Years After10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00098-5 ↗
96. Molecular Connectivity VII: Specific Treatment of Heteroatoms10.1002/jps.2600651228 ↗
97. Structural Determination of Paraffin Boiling Points10.1021/ja01193a005 ↗
98. Overall Molecular Descriptors. 3. Overall Zagreb Indices10.1080/10629360108035379 ↗
99. Highly Discriminating Distance-Based Topological Index10.1016/0009-2614(82)80009-2 ↗
100. A Shape Index from Molecular Graphs10.1002/qsar.19850040303 ↗