An Image Denoising Technique Using Wavelet-Anisotropic Gaussian Filter-Based Denoising Convolutional Neural Network for CT Images
Source abstract
Abstract
Denoising computed tomography (CT) medical images is crucial in preserving information and restoring images contaminated with noise. Standard filters have extensively been used for noise removal and fine details’ preservation. During the transmission of medical images, noise degrades the visibility of anatomical structures and subtle abnormalities, making it difficult for radiologists to accurately diagnose and interpret medical conditions. In recent studies, an optimum denoising filter using the wavelet threshold and deep-CNN was used to eliminate Gaussian noise in CT images using the image quality index (IQI) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). Although the results were better than those with traditional techniques, the performance resulted in a loss of clarity and fine details’ preservation that rendered the CT images unsuitable. To address these challenges, this paper focuses on eliminating noise in CT scan images corrupted with additive Gaussian blur noise (AGBN) using an ensemble approach that integrates anisotropic Gaussian filter (AGF) and wavelet transform with a deep learning denoising convolutional neural network (DnCNN). First, the noisy image is denoised by AGF and Haar wavelet transform as preprocessing operations to eliminate AGBN. The DnCNN is then combined with AGF and wavelet for post-processing operation to eliminate the rest of the noises. Specifically, we used AGF due to its adaptability to edge orientation and directional information, which prevents blurring along edges for non-uniform noise distribution. Denoised images are evaluated using PSNR, mean squared error (MSE), and the structural similarity index measure (SSIM). Results revealed that the average PSNR value of the proposed ensemble approach is 28.28, and the average computational time is 0.01666 s. The implication is that the MSE between the original and reconstructed images is very low, implying that the image is restored correctly. Since the SSIM values are between 0 and 1.0, 1.0 perfectly matches the reconstructed image with the original image. In addition, the SSIM values at 1.0 or near 1.0 implicitly reveal a remarkable structural similarity between the denoised CT image and the original image. Compared to other techniques, the proposed ensemble approach has demonstrated exceptional performance in maintaining the quality of the image and fine details’ preservation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Image and Signal Denoising Methods · Advanced Image Fusion Techniques · Advanced Image Processing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture & Technology, Nairobi P.O. Box 62000-00200, Kenya
College of Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Kigali BP 6150, Rwanda
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Alanazi, T.M., Berriri, K., Albekairi, M., Ben Atitallah, A., Sahbani, A., and Kaaniche, K. (2023). New Real-Time High-Density Impulsive Noise Removal Method Applied to Medical Images. Diagnostics, 13.10.3390/diagnostics13101709 ↗
2. Deep learning on image denoising: An overview10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.025 ↗
3. Kadhim, M.A. (2021, January 19–20). Restoration Medical Images from Speckle Noise Using Multifilters. Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore, India.10.1109/ICACCS51430.2021.9441814 ↗
4. Lung Nodule Detection using Segmentation Approach for Computed Tomography Scan Images10.22214/ijraset.2021.38258 ↗
5. A Review on Preprocessing Techniques for Noise Reduction in PET-CT Images for Lung Cancer10.1007/978-981-16-9113-3_34 ↗
6. Choi, H., and Jeong, J. (2020). Despeckling algorithm for removing speckle noise from ultrasound images. Symmetry, 12.10.3390/sym12060938 ↗
7. Bharati, S., Khan, T.Z., Podder, P., and Hung, N.Q. (2021). Cognitive Internet of Medical Things for Smart Healthcare: Services and Applications, Springer.
8. Image quality assessment along the one-metre axial field-of-view of the total-body Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system for 18F-FDG10.1186/s40658-022-00516-5 ↗
9. Goyal, B., Agrawal, S., and Sohi, B.S. (2018). Noise issues prevail in various types of medical images. Biomed. J., 11.10.13005/bpj/1484 ↗
10. Florez-Aroni, S.M., Hancco-Condori, M.A., and Torres-Cruz, F. (2023). Noise Reduction in Medical Images. arXiv.
11. Bhonsle, D., Bagga, J., Mishra, S., Sahu, C., Sahu, V., and Mishra, A. (2022, January 21–22). Reduction of Gaussian noise from Computed Tomography Images using Optimized Bilateral Filter by Enhanced Grasshopper Algorithm. Proceedings of the 2022 Second International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Computing, Communication and Sustainable Technologies (ICAECT), Bhilai, India.10.1109/ICAECT54875.2022.9808017 ↗
12. Hermena, S., and Young, M. (2022). StatPearls [Internet], StatPearls Publishing.
13. Possibility of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on improvement of computed tomography image quality10.1097/RCT.0000000000000928 ↗
14. A Complete Review on Image Denoising Techniques for Medical Images10.1007/s11063-023-11286-1 ↗
15. Mehta, D., Padalia, D., Vora, K., and Mehendale, N. (2022, January 2–3). MRI image denoising using U-Net and Image Processing Techniques. Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Advances in Science and Technology (ICAST), Mumbai, India.10.1109/ICAST55766.2022.10039653 ↗
16. Ultra-low-dose 18F-FDG, brain PET/MR denoising, using deep learning and multi-contrast information
17. Performance comparison of convolutional neural network-based image denoising methods: The effect of loss functions on low-dose CT images10.1002/mp.13713 ↗
18. Sagheer, S.V.M., and George, S.N. (2020). A review on medical image denoising algorithms. Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 61.10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102036 ↗
19. Kaur, J., Goyal, B., and Dogra, A. (2023). Advances in Signal Processing, Embedded Systems, and IoT: Proceedings of Seventh ICMEET-2022, Springer Nature.
20. Thakur, R.S., Chatterjee, S., Yadav, R.N., and Gupta, L. (2023). Digital Image Enhancement and Reconstruction, Academic Press.
21. Abdelhamed, A., Timofte, R., and Brown, M.S. (2019, January 16–20). Ntire 2019 challenge on actual image denoising: Methods and results. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Long Beach, CA, USA.
22. Wavelet transform approach for image processing–A research motivation for engineering graduates10.1177/0020720919825815 ↗
23. Zhang, X. (2023). A modified non-local means using bilateral thresholding for image denoising. Multimed. Tools Appl., 1–22.10.1007/s11042-023-15928-3 ↗
24. Mayasari, R., and Heryana, N. (2019). Reduce Noise in Computed Tomography Images using Adaptive Gaussian Filter. arXiv.
25. Fine-Tuned Medical Images Denoising using Median Filtering
26. Denoising of computed tomography using bilateral median-based autoencoder network10.1002/ima.22668 ↗
27. Digital Image Denoising Techniques Based on Multi-resolution Wavelet Domain with Spatial Filters: A Review10.18280/ts.380311 ↗
28. Anam, C., Adi, K., Sutanto, H., Arifin, Z., Budi, W.S., Fujibuchi, T., and Dougherty, G. (2020). Noise reduction in CT images using a selective mean filter. J. Biomed. Physicsengineering, 10.10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2002-1072 ↗
29. Diwakar, M., and Singh, P. (2020). CT image denoising using the multivariate model and its method of noise thresholding in the non-subsampled shearlet domain. Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 57.10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101754 ↗
30. Peningkatan Kualitas Citra CT-Scan dengan Penggabungan Metode Filter Gaussian dan Filter Median
31. Chillaron, M., Vidal, V., and Verdu, G. (2020). Evaluation of image filters for their integration with LSQR computerized tomography reconstruction method. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0229113 ↗
32. Deep cnn model for multimodal medical image denoising
33. Yue, Z., Zhao, Q., Zhang, L., and Meng, D. (2020, January 23–28). Dual adversarial network: Toward real-world noise removal and noise generation. Proceedings of the Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK. Part X 16.10.1007/978-3-030-58607-2_3 ↗
34. Noisy-as-clean: Learning self-supervised denoising from corrupted images10.1109/TIP.2020.3026622 ↗
35. Noise removal from medical images using hybrid filters of technique10.1088/1742-6596/1518/1/012061 ↗
36. You, N., Han, L., Zhu, D., and Song, W. (2023). Research on image denoising in edge detection based on wavelet transform. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13031837 ↗
37. Liang, H., and Zhao, S. (2020). Cognitive Internet of Things: Frameworks, Tools and Applications, Springer.
38. Restoration of highly salt-and-pepper-noise-corrupted images using a novel adaptive trimmed median filter10.1007/s11760-020-01695-3 ↗
39. Gupta, S., and Sunkaria, R.K. (2017, January 21–23). Real-time salt and pepper noise removal from medical images using a modified weighted average filtering. Proceedings of the 2017 the Fourth International Conference on Image Information Processing (ICIIP), Shimla, India.10.1109/ICIIP.2017.8313718 ↗
40. Usui, K., Ogawa, K., Goto, M., Sakano, Y., Kyougoku, S., and Daida, H. (2021). Quantitative evaluation of deep convolutional neural network-based image denoising for low-dose computed tomography. Vis. Comput. Ind. Biomed. Art, 4.10.1186/s42492-021-00087-9 ↗
41. Kim, B.G., Kang, S.H., Park, C.R., Jeong, H.W., and Lee, Y. (2020). Noise level and similarity analysis for computed tomographic thoracic image with fast non-local means denoising algorithm. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10217455 ↗
42. Sarita, D.R., and Saini, J. (2022). Emergent Converging Technologies and Biomedical Systems: Select Proceedings of ETBS 2021, Springer.
43. Convolutional neural network-based image denoising for synchronous temperature measurement and deformation at elevated temperature10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166977 ↗
44. Goceri, E. (2022). Evaluation of denoising techniques to remove speckle and Gaussian noise from dermoscopy images. Comput. Biol. Med., 152.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106474 ↗
45. Gaussian noise removal in an image using fast guided filter and its method noise thresholding in medical healthcare application10.1007/s10916-019-1376-4 ↗
46. Optimal Bilateral Filter and convolutional neural network-based denoising method of medical image measurements10.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.072 ↗
47. Ebrahimnejad, J., and Naghsh, A. (2021). Adaptive Removal of high-density salt-and-pepper Noise (ARSPN) for robust ROI detection used in watermarking brain MRI images. Comput. Biol. Med., 137.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104831 ↗
48. An impulse noise removal model algorithm based on the logarithmic image before the medical image10.1007/s11760-020-01842-w ↗
49. Automatic Placement of Regions of Interest using Distance transform to Measure Spatial Resolution on the Clinical Computed Tomography Images: A Pilot Study10.32628/IJSRST229653 ↗
50. Arnal, J., and Súcar, L. (2022). Fast Method Based on Fuzzy Logic for Gaussian-Impulsive Noise Reduction in CT Medical Images. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10193652 ↗
51. Robust Gaussian noise detection and removal in color images using modified fuzzy set filter
52. A spatially adaptive hybrid total variation model for image restoration under Gaussian plus impulse Noise10.1016/j.amc.2021.126862 ↗
53. The edge-preserving median filter and weighted coding with sparse non-local regularization for the low-dose CT image denoising algorithm10.1155/2021/6095676 ↗
54. Shah, V.H., and Dash, P.P. (2023). Two-stage self-adaptive cognitive neural network for mixed noise removal from medical images. Multimed. Tools Appl., 1–23.10.1007/s11042-023-15423-9 ↗
55. The IQ-OTHNCCD lung cancer dataset
56. Variational-based mixed noise removal with CNN deep learning regularization10.1109/TIP.2019.2940496 ↗