Show source-provided references
2. Evaluation of postoperative changes in condylar positions after orthognathic surgery using balanced orthognathic surgery system
10.1186/s40902-022-00341-x ↗3. Hartmann, A., Schmohl, J., Cascant Ortolano, L., Bayer, O., Schweizer, S., Welte-Jzyk, C., Al-Nawas, B., and Daubländer, M. (2022). Therapy of neurophysiological changes after oral and maxillofacial surgery—A systematic review. Appl. Sci., 12.
10.3390/app12031507 ↗6. Comparison of time and cost between conventional surgical planning and virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery in Korea
10.1186/s40902-021-00305-7 ↗7. Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy in a Jehovah’s Witness patient: Strategies for minimizing blood loss and maximizing safety
10.1186/s40902-022-00338-6 ↗8. Retrospective examination of complications observed in orthognathic surgical surgery in 85 patients
10. Customized virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: A prospective randomized trial
10.1007/s00784-018-2732-3 ↗12. Can computer-assisted implant surgery improve clinical outcomes and reduce the frequency and intensity of complications in implant dentistry? A critical review
10.1111/prd.12458 ↗13. Current trends in three-dimensional visualization and real-time navigation as well as robot-assisted technologies in hepatobiliary surgery
10.4240/wjgs.v13.i9.904 ↗14. Planning and scheduling in healthcare for better care coordination: Current understanding, trending topics, and future opportunities
10.1111/poms.13867 ↗16. Current and emerging trends in polymeric 3D printed microfluidic devices
17. A comprehensive review of emerging additive manufacturing (3D printing technology): Methods, materials, applications, challenges, trends and future potential
10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.059 ↗21. Dod, G., Jibhakate, R., and Walke, P. A review on 3D printing maxillofacial surgery: Present work and future prospects. Mater. Today Proc., 2023. in press.
10.1016/j.matpr.2023.06.049 ↗23. Comparison of presurgical dental models manufactured with two different three-dimensional printing techniques
10.1155/2020/8893338 ↗24. Guided “sandwich” technique: A novel surgical approach for safe osteotomies in the treatment of vertical bone defects in the posterior atrophic mandible: A case report
10.1097/ID.0000000000000062 ↗31. Mandibular reconstruction using a customized three-dimensional titanium implant applied on the lingual surface of the mandible
10.1097/SCS.0000000000004119 ↗33. Seok, J., Yoon, S., Ryu, C.H., Kim, S.K., Ryu, J., and Jung, Y.S. (2021). A personalized 3D-printed model for obtaining informed consent process for thyroid surgery: A randomized clinical study using a deep learning approach with mesh-type 3D modeling. J. Pers. Med., 11.
10.3390/jpm11060574 ↗34. Short and long-term outcomes of three-dimensional printed surgical guides and virtual surgical planning versus conventional methods for fibula free flap reconstruction of the mandible: Decreased nonunion and complication rates
10.1002/hed.26688 ↗35. Singh, A.K., Khanal, N., Chaulagain, R., Sharma, N., and Thieringer, F.M. (2023). Is the pre-shaping of an orbital implant on a patient-specific 3D-printed model advantageous compared to conventional free-hand shaping? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med., 12.
10.3390/jcm12103426 ↗39. A prospective multicenter study to compare the precision of posttraumatic internal orbital reconstruction with standard preformed and individualized orbital implants
10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.014 ↗43. Fibular flap for mandible reconstruction in osteoradionecrosis of the jaw: Selection criteria of fibula flap
10.1186/s40902-016-0093-x ↗44. Computer-assisted designed and manufactured procedures facilitate the lingual application of mandible reconstruction plates
10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.015 ↗46. Tilton, M., Lewis, G.S., Hast, M.W., Fox, E., and Manogharan, G. (2021). Additively manufactured patient-specific prosthesis for tumor reconstruction: Design, process, and properties. PLoS ONE, 16.
10.1371/journal.pone.0253786 ↗47. Barbur, I., Opris, H., Crisan, B., Cuc, S., Colosi, H.A., Baciut, M., Opris, D., Prodan, D., Moldovan, M., and Crisan, L. (2023). Statistical comparison of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed resin through triple-jetting technology and conventional PMMA in orthodontic occlusal splint manufacturing. Biomedicines, 11.
10.3390/biomedicines11082155 ↗48. Moiduddin, K., Mian, S.H., Elseufy, S.M., Alkhalefah, H., Ramalingam, S., and Sayeed, A. (2023). Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and its 3D-printed quantitate assessment in cranial reconstruction. J. Funct. Biomater., 14.
10.3390/jfb14080429 ↗49. Clinical usefulness of mandibular reconstruction using custom-made titanium mesh tray and autogenous particulate cancellous bone and marrow harvested from tibia and/or ilia
10.1097/SCS.0000000000002472 ↗50. Accurate reconstruction of discontinuous mandible using a reverse engineering/computer-aided design/rapid prototyping technique: A preliminary clinical study
10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.033 ↗51. Simultaneous bimaxillary surgery and mandibular reconstruction with a 3-dimensional printed titanium implant fabricated by electron beam melting: A preliminary mechanical testing of the printed mandible
10.1016/j.joms.2016.02.031 ↗52. Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing: Methodology and applications in veterinary oromaxillofacial surgery
10.3389/fvets.2022.971318 ↗53. Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with mandible first sequence: A retrospective study
10.1016/j.jcms.2023.05.015 ↗54. Effect of maxillary impaction on mandibular surgical accuracy in virtually-planned orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study
10.1016/j.jcms.2023.05.014 ↗55. Accuracy of hard and soft tissue prediction using three-dimensional simulation software in bimaxillary osteotomies: A systematic review
10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100802 ↗56. The impact of machine learning on 2d/3d registration for image-guided interventions: A systematic review and perspective
10.3389/frobt.2021.716007 ↗58. A meta-analysis and systematic review comparing the effectiveness of traditional and virtual surgical planning for orthognathic surgery: Based on randomized clinical trials
10.1016/j.joms.2020.09.005 ↗59. Relevance of 3D virtual planning in predicting bony interferences between distal and proximal fragments after sagittal split osteotomy
10.1016/j.ijom.2019.12.001 ↗60. Single stage surgery for contouring the prominent mandibular angle with a broad chin deformity: En-bloc Mandibular Angle-Body-Chin Curved Ostectomy (MABCCO) and Outer Cortex Grinding (OCG)
10.1016/j.jcms.2014.03.004 ↗63. Genioplasty using a simple CAD/CAM (computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing) surgical guide
10.1186/s40902-015-0044-y ↗66. Postoperative three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular contouring surgery using computer-assisted simulation planning and a three-dimensional-printed surgical guide
10.1097/SCS.0000000000003442 ↗67. An integrated 3D-driven protocol for surgery first orthognathic approach (SFOA) using virtual surgical planning (VSP)
10.1053/j.sodo.2022.11.006 ↗73. Standardized protocol for virtual surgical plan and 3-dimensional surgical template—Assisted single-stage mandible contour surgery
10.1097/SAP.0000000000001149 ↗74. Ostaș, D., Almășan, O., Ileșan, R.R., Andrei, V., Thieringer, F.M., Hedeșiu, M., and Rotar, H. (2022). Point-of-care virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in oral and cranio-maxillofacial surgery: A narrative review. J. Clin. Med., 11.
10.3390/jcm11226625 ↗75. Patel, P., Dhal, K., Gupta, R., Tappa, K., Rybicki, F.J., and Ravi, P. (2023). Medical 3D printing using desktop inverted vat photopolymerization: Background, clinical applications, and challenges. Bioengineering, 10.
10.3390/bioengineering10070782 ↗76. Zoabi, A., Redenski, I., Oren, D., Kasem, A., Zigron, A., Daoud, S., Moskovich, L., Kablan, F., and Srouji, S. (2022). 3D printing and virtual surgical planning in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J. Clin. Med., 11.
10.3390/jcm11092385 ↗77. Surgical accuracy in 3D planned bimaxillary osteotomies: Intraoral scans and plaster casts as digital dentition models
10.1016/j.ijom.2021.11.016 ↗78. Francisco, I., Ribeiro, M.P., Marques, F., Travassos, R., Nunes, C., Pereira, F., Caramelo, F., Paula, A.B., and Vale, F. (2022). Application of three-dimensional digital technology in orthodontics: The state of the art. Biomimetics, 7.
10.3390/biomimetics7010023 ↗79. Point of care virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in facial gender confirmation surgery: A narrative review
10.21037/atm-20-6369 ↗81. Pamias-Romero, J., Masnou-Pratdesaba, J., Sáez-Barba, M., de-Pablo-García-Cuenca, A., Siurana-Montilva, S., Sala-Cunill, A., Valls-Comamala, V., Pujol-Pina, R., and Bescós-Atín, C. (2022). Personalized surgery service in a tertiary hospital: A method to increase effectiveness, precision, safety and quality in maxillofacial surgery using custom-made 3D prostheses and implants. J. Clin. Med., 11.
10.3390/jcm11164791 ↗82. (2023, August 28). Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on Medical Devices, Amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and Repealing Council Directive 90/985/EEC and 93/42/EEC. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R0745.