journal article·2023-05-20Open access

Digital Standardization of Lean Manufacturing Tools According to Industry 4.0 Concept

Daniel Medyński, Piotr Bonarski, Piotr Motyka, Adam Wysoczański, Renata Gnitecka, Krzysztof Kolbusz, Magdalena Dąbrowska, Anna Burduk, Zdzisław Pawelec, José Machado

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 10

Abstract

Standardization is a key element in the effective use of lean manufacturing methodologies and tools for achieving process sustainability. Their combination is conducive to eliminating waste and improving the efficiency of production processes and guarantees the company that employees use the most efficient tools and do not waste time on unnecessary activities. These activities can be further improved by using digital solutions, in accordance with the concept of Industry 4.0. Therefore, the authors have developed the e-Lean system, whose task is to digitize selected lean manufacturing tools. The subject of this work is analysis of the functionality and effectiveness of the essential part of the e-Lean system in the form of specialized TPM (Total Productive Maintenance) software as an application. During implementation in a construction production company, the TPM application was tested by lean manufacturing and maintenance specialists. The research consisted of assessing the functionality and efficiency of processes in relation to conventional TPM solutions. Additional functionalities of the e-Lean system have been confirmed, such as systemic approval of machinery inspection, which requires passing all necessary steps at individual inspection points, direct access for supervisors to the results of inspection activities and their status, direct and easy access to photographic documentation of machines added during inspection both in optimization of working time and its course (e.g., the optimal number of steps taken by the employee during the inspection), as well as an efficient system of motivating employees (collecting points). The improvement in the effectiveness of processes was determined by measuring the control times for three control points (polymerization furnace, packing area, and defibering machines). The average control time was reduced from 16,200 to 13,923 s. Thus, thanks to the use of the application, it was found that the efficiency of using the TPM tool was increased by approx. 15% compared to previously used non-digital solutions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Quality and Management Systems · Surface Treatment and Coatings

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Production Engineering and Logistics, Faculty of Technical and Economic Sciences, Witelon Collegium State University, Sejmowa 5A, 59-220 Legnica, Poland

Technonicol-Insulation (Currently Boerner Insulation), Wyzwolenia 55, Wykroty, 59-730 Nowogrodziec, Poland

Industrial Support, Sejmowa 5A, 59-220 Legnica, Poland

Institute of Technology and Innovation, Witelon Collegium State University, Sejmowa 5A, 59-220 Legnica, Poland

Department of Laser Technologies, Automatization and Product Organization, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland

MEtRICs Research Centre, School of Engineering, University of Minho, Campus of Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Łazicki, A. (2013). Knowledge and Practice, Sage.
2. Rose, A.N.M., Deros, B.M., and Rahman, M.N.A. (2009, January 29). A review of lean manufacturing practices in small and medium enterprises. Proceedings of the Seminar 3—AMReG 09, Kajang, Malaysia.
3. Womack, J., and Jones, D. (2001). Elimination of Waste—the Key to Success, Manager’s Information Center Publishing House.
4. Conditions for implementing the concept of Lean Management in the SME sector
5. The Productivity Press Development Team (2008). Standard Work for the Shopfloor, Productivity Press.
6. Antosz, K., Pacana, A., Stadnicka, D., and Zielecki, W. (2013). Lean Manufacturing Tools, Publishing House of Rzeszow University of Technology.
7. Hamrol, A. (2018). Strategies and Practices for Lean Efficient Operation. Six Sigma and Others, PWN Publishing House.
8. Relationships between selected lean management tools and innovations
9. Lean implementation within SMEs: A literature review10.1108/JMTM-02-2014-0013 ↗
10. Application of work standardization to improve production efficiency. Department of Production Engineering
11. Digital Lean Production. An Approach to Identify Potentials for the Migration to a Digitalized Production System in SMEs from a Lean Perspective10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.255 ↗
12. Lean 4.0: How can digital technologies support lean practices?10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108258 ↗
13. Gil-Vilda, F., Yagüe-Fabra, J.A., and Sunyer, A. (2021). From Lean Production to Lean 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review with a Historical Perspective. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112110318 ↗
14. Lean automation enabled by industry 4.0 technologies10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.359 ↗
15. Lai, N.Y.G., Wong, K.H., Halim, D., Lu, J., and Kang, H.S. (2019, January 2–4). Industry 4.0 enhanced lean manufacturing. Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM), Cambridge, UK.10.1109/ICITM.2019.8710669 ↗
16. Information and digital technologies of Industry 4.0 and Lean supply chain management: A systematic literature review10.1080/00207543.2020.1743896 ↗
17. Smart lean manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0: A case study
18. Patalas-Maliszewska, J., and Kłos, S. (2019). An Approach to Supporting the Selection of Maintenance Experts in the Context of Industry 4.0. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9091848 ↗
19. Use of Conventional and Unconventional Statistical Methods in the Development of a Real Information System to Support Decision-Making Processes of Executives10.1007/978-981-15-1465-4_55 ↗
20. Sgarbossa, F., Peron, M., and Fragapane, G. (2020). Scheduling in Industry 4.0 and Cloud Manufacturing, Springer.
21. Mohanty, S., Rath, K.C., and Jena, O.P. (2022). Industrial Transformation, CRC Press.
22. Macias-Aguayo, J., Garcia-Castro, L., Barcia, K.F., McFarlane, D., and Abad-Moran, J. (2022). Industry 4.0 and Lean Six Sigma Integration: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Enablers. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122211321 ↗
23. Singh, S., Agrawal, A., Sharma, D., Saini, V., Kumar, A., and Praveenkumar, S. (2022). Implementation of Total Productive Maintenance Approach: Improving Overall Equipment Efficiency of a Metal Industry. Inventions, 7.10.3390/inventions7040119 ↗
24. Implementation of total productive maintenance to enhance the overall equipment effectiveness in medium scale industries
25. Total productive maintenance policy to increase effectiveness and maintenance performance using overall equipment effectiveness
26. Identification of total productive maintenance barriers in Indian manufacturing industries10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.222 ↗
27. Hardt, F., Kotyrba, M., Volna, E., and Jarusek, R. (2021). Innovative approach to preventive maintenance of production equipment based on a modified TPM methodology for industry 4.0. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11156953 ↗
28. Poór, P., Basl, J., and Zenisek, D. (2019, January 28). Predictive Maintenance 4.0 as next evolution step in industrial maintenance development. Proceedings of the 2019 International Research Conference on Smart Computing and Systems Engineering (SCSE), Colombo, Sri Lanka.10.23919/SCSE.2019.8842659 ↗
29. Evaluating 8 pillars of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) implementation and their contribution to manufacturing performance10.1088/1757-899X/290/1/012024 ↗
30. Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Arredondo-Soto, K.C., Carrillo-Gutiérrez, T., and Ravelo, G. (2018). Applying the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle to reduce the defects in the manufacturing industry. A case study. Appl. Sci., 8.10.20944/preprints201810.0347.v1 ↗
31. Díaz-Reza, J.R., García-Alcaraz, J.L., Avelar-Sosa, L., Mendoza-Fong, J.R., Saenz Diez-Muro, J.C., and Blanco-Fernández, J. (2018). The role of managerial commitment and TPM implementation strategies in productivity benefits. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8071153 ↗
32. Sima, V., Gheorghe, I.G., Subić, J., and Nancu, D. (2020). Influences of the industry 4.0 revolution on the human capital development and consumer behavior: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12104035 ↗
33. Digitalization of maintenance: Exploratory study on the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies and total productive maintenance practices