journal article·2023-04-24Open access

Application of an Optimized PSO-BP Neural Network to the Assessment and Prediction of Underground Coal Mine Safety Risk Factors

Dorcas Muadi Mulumba, Jiankang Liu, Jian Hao, Yining Zheng, Heqing Liu

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 9

Abstract

Coal has played an important role in the economies of many countries worldwide, which has resulted in increased surface and underground mining in countries with large coal reserves, such as China and the United States. However, coal mining is subject to frequent accidents and predictable risks that have, in some instances, led to the loss of lives, disabilities, equipment damage, etc. The assessment of risk factors in underground mines is therefore considered a commendable initiative. Therefore, this research aimed to develop an efficient model for assessing and predicting safety risk factors in underground mines using existing data from the Xiaonan coal mine. A model for evaluating safety risks in underground coal mines was developed based on the optimized particle swarm optimization-backpropagation (PSO-BP) neural network. The results showed that the PSO-BP neural network model for safety risk assessment in underground coal mines was the most reliable and effective, with MSE, MAPE, and R2 values of 2.0 × 10−4, 4.3, and 0.92, respectively. Therefore, the study proposed the neural network model PSO-BP for underground coal mine safety risk assessment. The results of this study can be adopted by decision-makers for evaluating and predicting risk factors in underground coal mines.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geoscience and Mining Technology · Mineral Processing and Grinding · Evaluation and Optimization Models

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Strata Intelligent Control and Green Mining Co-Founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China

Guotun Coal Mine of Shandong Energy Group Luxi Mining, Co., Ltd., Heze 274700, China

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province

References (85)

Show source-provided references
1. The role of behavioral factors on safety management in underground mines10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.006 ↗
2. Causal relationship of some personal and impersonal variates to occupational injuries at continuous miner worksites in underground coal mines10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105562 ↗
3. Coal mine dust lung disease. New lessons from an old exposure10.1164/rccm.201301-0042CI ↗
4. The costs of failure: A preliminary assessment of major energy accidents, 1907–200710.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.040 ↗
5. Identifying coal mine safety production risk factors by employing text mining and Bayesian network techniques10.1016/j.psep.2022.04.054 ↗
6. Hazard identification and risk assessment of groundwater inrush from a coal mine: A review10.1007/s10064-022-02925-3 ↗
7. Tong, R., Yang, Y., Ma, X., Zhang, Y., Li, S., and Yang, H. (2019). Risk assessment of Miners’ unsafe behaviors: A case study of gas explosion accidents in coal mine, china. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16101765 ↗
8. A Safe and Sustainable Development in a Hygiene and Healthy Company Using Decision Matrix Risk Assessment Technique: A case study
9. Machine learning in telemetry data mining of space mission: Basics, challenging and future directions10.1007/s10462-019-09760-1 ↗
10. Predictive maintenance system for production lines in manufacturing: A machine learning approach using IoT data in real-time10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114598 ↗
11. Kashyap, R. (2019). Cloud Computing for Geospatial Big Data Analytics: Intelligent Edge, Fog and Mist Computing, Springer.
12. Seismic driven reservoir classification using advanced machine learning algorithms: A case study from the lower Ranikot/Khadro sandstone gas reservoir, Kirthar fold belt, lower Indus Basin, Pakistan10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211451 ↗
13. Coal mine explosions in India: Management failure, safety lapses and mitigative measures
14. Intelligent technologies for construction machinery using data-driven methods10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104711 ↗
15. Artificial Intelligence technology in food safety: A behavioral approach10.1016/j.tifs.2022.03.021 ↗
16. Applications of wireless sensor networks to improve occupational safety and health in underground mines10.1016/j.jsr.2022.07.016 ↗
17. Improving coal mine safety with internet of things (IoT) based Dynamic Sensor Information Control System10.1016/j.pce.2022.103225 ↗
18. Coal mine safety evaluation based on machine learning: A BP neural network model10.1155/2022/5233845 ↗
19. Application of machine learning in anaerobic digestion: Perspectives and challenges10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126433 ↗
20. Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research10.1016/S0731-7085(99)00272-1 ↗
21. Prediction of coal and gas outburst: A method based on the BP neural network optimized by GASA10.1016/j.psep.2019.10.002 ↗
22. Rockburst prediction model based on entropy weight integrated with grey relational BP neural network
23. The exploration of internet finance by using neural network10.1016/j.cam.2019.112630 ↗
24. Advances of metaheuristic algorithms in training neural networks for industrial applications10.1007/s00500-021-05886-z ↗
25. Super efficiency SBM-DEA and neural network for performance evaluation10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102728 ↗
26. Mining employees safety and the application of information technology in coal mining10.3389/fpubh.2021.709987 ↗
27. Evaluation model of green supply chain cooperation credit based on BP neural network10.1007/s00521-020-05420-6 ↗
28. Learning Representations by Backpropagating Errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
29. López-Monroy, A.P., and García-Salinas, J.S. (2022). Biosignal Processing and Classification Using Computational Learning and Intelligence, Academic Press.
30. Optimization of effluents using artificial neural network and support vector regression in detergent industrial wastewater treatment10.1016/j.clce.2022.100039 ↗
31. Real-time prediction of shield moving trajectory during tunnelling10.1007/s11440-022-01461-4 ↗
32. Application of a physics-informed neural network to solve the steady-state Bratu equation arising from solid biofuel combustion theory10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125908 ↗
33. A simple approach for short-term wind speed interval prediction based on independently recurrent neural networks and error probability distribution10.1016/j.energy.2021.122012 ↗
34. A back propagation neural network model for accurately predicting the removal efficiency of ammonia nitrogen in wastewater treatment plants using different biological processes10.1016/j.watres.2022.118908 ↗
35. Convolutional neural networks for intra-hour solar forecasting based on sky image sequences10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118438 ↗
36. Deep Learning Techniques for Natural Language Processing
37. A novel hybrid feature fusion model for detecting phishing scam on Ethereum using deep neural network10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118463 ↗
38. Rajawat, A.S., and Jain, S. (2020, January 28–29). Fusion deep learning based on back propagation neural network for personalization. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Data, Engineering and Applications (IDEA), Bhopal, India.
39. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. (December, January 27). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, WA, Australia.
40. Particle swarm optimization applied to space trajectories10.2514/1.48475 ↗
41. Jain, M., Saihjpal, V., Singh, N., and Singh, S.B. (2022). An Overview of Variants and Advancements of PSO Algorithm. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178392 ↗
42. Quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization based on solitons10.1038/s41598-022-18351-0 ↗
43. GA-GOA hybrid algorithm and comparative study of different metaheuristic population-based algorithms for solar tower heliostat field design10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.162 ↗
44. Hybrid differential evolution and particle swarm optimization for Multi-visit and Multi-period workforce scheduling and routing problems10.1016/j.compag.2022.106929 ↗
45. Mousavirad, S.J., and Rahnamayan, S. (2020, January 11–14). CenPSO: A novel center-based particle swarm optimization algorithm for large-scale optimization. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/SMC42975.2020.9283143 ↗
46. Surrogate-assisted particle swarm optimization algorithm with Pareto active learning for expensive multi-objective optimization10.1109/JAS.2019.1911450 ↗
47. MOSMA: Multi-objective slime mould algorithm based on elitist non-dominated sorting10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047936 ↗
48. Accelerating sailfish optimization applied to unconstrained optimization problems on graphical processing unit
49. A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 202010.1016/j.jad.2021.09.098 ↗
50. Particle swarm optimization (PSO). A tutorial10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.08.020 ↗
51. Toward effective initialization for large-scale search spaces
52. A review of particle swarm optimization and its applications in solar photovoltaic system10.1016/j.asoc.2012.11.033 ↗
53. Optimum design of a hybrid PV–CSP–LPG microgrid with Particle Swarm Optimization technique10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.119 ↗
54. Comparison study of several kinds of inertia weights for PSO
55. Comprehensive learning particle swarm optimizer for global optimization of multimodal functions10.1109/TEVC.2005.857610 ↗
56. A dynamic inertia weight particle swarm optimization algorithm10.1016/j.chaos.2006.09.063 ↗
57. Eberhart, R.C., and Shi, Y. (1998, January 25–27). Comparison between genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the Evolutionary Programming VII: 7th International Conference, EP98, San Diego, CA, USA.
58. Recent approaches to global optimization problems through particle swarm optimization10.1023/A:1016568309421 ↗
59. The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space10.1109/4235.985692 ↗
60. Markowitz-based portfolio selection with cardinality constraints using improved particle swarm optimization10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.129 ↗
61. A simplified multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm10.1007/s11721-019-00170-1 ↗
62. Hybridizing salp swarm algorithm with particle swarm optimization algorithm for recent optimization functions10.1007/s12065-020-00486-6 ↗
63. Detection of alertness-related EEG signals based on decision fused BP neural network10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103479 ↗
64. A short-term load forecasting model of natural gas based on optimized genetic algorithm and improved BP neural network10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.104 ↗
65. Performance comparison of neural network training algorithms in modeling of bimodal drug delivery10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.07.056 ↗
66. A fuzzy nearest neighbor neural network statistical model for predicting demand for natural gas and energy cost savings in public buildings10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.080 ↗
67. Optimal parameters selection for BP neural network based on particle swarm optimization: A case study of wind speed forecasting10.1016/j.knosys.2013.11.015 ↗
68. Integration of new evolutionary approach with artificial neural network for solving short term load forecast problem10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.131 ↗
69. An analytical solution to the population balance equation with coalescence and breakage-the special case with constant number of particles
70. An improved GA and a novel PSO-GA-based hybrid algorithm10.1016/j.ipl.2004.11.003 ↗
71. Population size in particle swarm optimization10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100718 ↗
72. Particle swarm optimization for resource-constrained project scheduling10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.06.006 ↗
73. Adaptive Population Sizing Schemes in Genetic Algorithms10.1007/978-3-540-69432-8_9 ↗
74. Kentzoglanakis, K., and Poole, M. (2009, January 8–12). Particle swarm optimization with an oscillating inertia weight. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1145/1569901.1570140 ↗
75. Particle swarm optimization with damping factor and cooperative mechanism10.1016/j.asoc.2018.11.050 ↗
76. Multi-objective optimization of electrochemical machining process parameters using a particle swarm optimization algorithm10.1243/09544054JEM1158 ↗
77. New chaotic PSO-based neural network predictive control for nonlinear process10.1109/TNN.2006.890809 ↗
78. Principles of correlation analysis
79. A Back Propagation neural network based optimizing model of space-based large mirror structure10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.09.161 ↗
80. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation10.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗
81. Comparison of GA-BP and PSO-BP neural network models with initial BP model for rainfall-induced landslides risk assessment in regional scale: A case study in Sichuan, China10.1007/s11069-019-03806-x ↗
82. Thermal error compensation of high-speed spindle system based on a modified BP neural network10.1007/s00170-016-9254-4 ↗
83. Prediction model of PSO-BP neural network on coliform amount in special food10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.06.016 ↗
84. Parameter determination and feature selection for back-propagation network by particle swarm optimization10.1007/s10115-009-0242-y ↗
85. Optimization of online teaching quality evaluation model based on hierarchical PSO-BP neural network