journal article·2019-12-09Open access

Ensemble Discrete Wavelet Transform and Gray-Level Co-Occurrence Matrix for Microcalcification Cluster Classification in Digital Mammography

Annarita Fanizzi, Teresa Maria Basile, Liliana Losurdo, Roberto Bellotti, Ubaldo Bottigli, Francesco Campobasso, Vittorio Didonna, Alfonso Fausto, Raffaella Massafra, Alberto Tagliafico, Pasquale Tamborra, Sabina Tangaro, Vito Lorusso, Daniele La Forgia

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 24

Abstract

The presence of clusters of microcalcifications is a primary sign of breast cancer. Their identification is still difficult today for radiologists, and the wrong evaluations involve unnecessary biopsies. In this paper, an automatic tool for characterizing and discriminating clusters of microcalcifications into benign/malignant in digital mammograms is proposed. A set of 104 digital mammograms including microcalcification clusters was randomly extracted from a public available database and manually labeled by our radiologists, obtaining 96 abnormal ROIs. For each so-identified ROI, a multi-scale image decomposition based on the Haar wavelet transform was performed. On the decomposition, a textural features extraction step was carried out both on each sub-image and on the corresponding gray-level co-occurrence matrix. Then, a random forest classifier was employed for classifying microcalcification clusters into benign and malignant. The study found that the most discriminant features extracted from the ROIs decomposition by Haar transform were variance and relative smoothness, whereas as regards the textural features calculated on the GLCMs corresponding to the Haar-decomposed ROI, it emerged that the relationship between the pixels of the sub-image in the diagonal direction had high discriminating power for the classification of microcalcification clusters into benign and malignant. The proposed method was evaluated in cross-validation and performed highly in the prediction of the benign/malignant ROIs, with a mean AUC value of 97.39 ± 0.01 % .
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy

Dip. Interateneo di Fisica “M. Merlin”, Università degli Studi di Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy

INFN—Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy

Dip. di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell’Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy

Dip. di Economia e finanza, Università degli Studi di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy

Dip. di Diagnostica per Immagini, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, 53100 Siena, Italy

Dip. di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Overdiagnosis in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: A literature review10.1258/jms.2012.012082 ↗
2. Screening for breast cancer10.1001/jama.293.10.1245 ↗
3. Least-squares support vector machine for characterization of clusters of microcalcifications
4. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: A review10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.09.024 ↗
5. Mammogram classification using two dimensional discrete wavelet transform and gray-level co-occurrence matrix for detection of breast cancer10.1016/j.neucom.2014.12.032 ↗
6. Directional features for automatic tumor classification of mammogram images10.1016/j.bspc.2010.10.003 ↗
7. Automatised detection of microcalcification in mammography
8. Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support10.1016/j.jbi.2016.07.001 ↗
9. Novel network architecture and learning algorithm for the classification of mass abnormalities in digitized mammograms10.1016/j.artmed.2007.09.003 ↗
10. Detection of breast cancer with mammography: Effect of an artificial intelligence support system
11. Fanizzi, A., Losurdo, L., Basile, T.M.A., Bellotti, R., Bottigli, U., Delogu, P., Diacono, D., Didonna, V., Fausto, A., and Lombardi, A. (2019). Fully Automated Support System for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Images. J. Clin. Med., 8.10.3390/jcm8060891 ↗
12. Sánchez-Ferrero, G.V., and Arribas, J.I. (2007, January 27–29). A statistical-genetic algorithm to select the most significant features in mammograms. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, Vienna, Austria.
13. A novel approach for detection and classification of mammographic microcalcifications using wavelet analysis and extreme learning machine10.1016/j.compbiomed.2012.07.001 ↗
14. Detection and Classification of Microcalcifications Using Discrete Wavelet Transform
15. Losurdo, L., Fanizzi, A., Basile, T.M., Bellotti, R., Bottigli, U., Dentamaro, R., Didonna, V., Fausto, A., Massafra, R., and Monaco, A. (2018, January 25–27). A Combined Approach of Multiscale Texture Analysis and Interest Point/Corner Detectors for Microcalcifications Diagnosis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Granada, Spain.10.1007/978-3-319-78723-7_26 ↗
16. Microcalcification diagnosis in digital mammography using extreme learning machine based on hidden Markov tree model of dual-tree complex wavelet transform10.1016/j.eswa.2017.05.062 ↗
17. Ensemble features selection method as tool for breast cancer classification10.1504/IJIM.2015.073019 ↗
18. An approach for classification of malignant and benign microcalcification clusters10.1007/s12046-018-0805-2 ↗
19. ANN vs. SVM: Which one performs better in classification of MCCs in mammogram imaging10.1016/j.knosys.2011.07.016 ↗
20. Fanizzi, A., Basile, T., Losurdo, L., Amoroso, N., Bellotti, R., Bottigli, U., Dentamaro, R., Didonna, V., Fausto, A., and Massafra, R. (2017, January 19). Hough transform for clustered microcalcifications detection in full-field digital mammograms. Proceedings of the Applications of Digital Image Processing XL International Society for Optics and Photonics, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1117/12.2273814 ↗
21. Gonzalez, R.C., and Woods, R.E. (2002). Digital Image Processing, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
22. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation10.1109/34.192463 ↗
23. Textural features for image classification10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314 ↗
24. Discovering mammography-based machine learning classifiers for breast cancer diagnosis10.1007/s10916-011-9693-2 ↗
25. Texture analysis based on the gray-level co-occurrence matrix considering possible orientations
26. Mallat, S. (1999). A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012466606-1/50008-8 ↗
27. Image texture feature extraction using GLCM approach
28. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
29. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics10.1093/bioinformatics/btm344 ↗
30. An introduction to variable and feature selection
32. Alam, N., RE Denton, E., and Zwiggelaar, R. (2019). Classification of microcalcification clusters in digital mammograms using a stack generalization based classifier. J. Imaging, 5.10.3390/jimaging5090076 ↗
33. Hepsağ, P.U., Özel, S.A., and Yazıcı, A. (2017, January 5–8). Using deep learning for mammography classification. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK), Antalya, Turkey.10.1109/UBMK.2017.8093429 ↗
34. Breast Microcalcification Diagnosis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network from Digital Mammograms10.1155/2019/2717454 ↗