journal article·2024-07-10Open access

Validation of Challenges for Implementing ESG in the Construction Industry Considering the Context of an Emerging Economy Country

Rodrigo Rangel Ribeiro Bezerra, Vitor William Batista Martins, Alcebíades Negrão Macedo

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 14

Abstract

In pursuit of profit maximization through practices that promote sustainable development, companies increasingly use environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria to guide investment. However, there are challenges in implementing these practices across diverse sectors, such as the construction industry, especially in emerging countries with limited related studies. This study validated the challenges of implementing ESG in the construction industry in an emerging country like Brazil, considering its relationship with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). A literature review identified challenges associated with ESG implementation, followed by the development of a questionnaire based on these challenges. Subsequently, the questionnaire was administered to professionals in the construction industry and validated using the Lawshe method. Twenty-seven challenges were identified, of which twelve were validated, including the lack of standardized performance indicators, regulatory guidelines associated with ESG practices, organizational resistance, and insufficient transparency in non-financial indicators. This study provides guidance for overcoming challenges in the successful adoption of ESG in the construction industry. It also identifies the most-impacted SDGs and lays the foundation for future actions promoting sustainable development in the construction industry in emerging countries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sustainable Building Design and Assessment · Construction Project Management and Performance · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Technology, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil

Department of Production Engineering, State University of Pará, Belém 66095-015, Brazil

Funding

State University of Pará—Brazil (UEPA) · Dean of Research and Graduate Studies of the Federal University of Pará—Brazil PROPESP/UFPA (PAPQ)

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Exploring the Key Barriers to ESG Adoption in Enterprises10.1016/j.sasc.2023.200066 ↗
2. Moktadir, M.A., and Ren, J. (2023). Leveraging Environmental, Social, and Governance Strategies for Sustainable Tannery Solid Waste Management towards Achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain. Dev.10.1002/sd.2812 ↗
3. Environmental, Social and Governance Issues in Supply Chains. A Systematic Review for Strategic Performance10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140024 ↗
4. Parameswar, N., Hasan, Z., Shri, C., and Saini, N. (2023). Exploring the Barriers to ESG Adoption Using Modified TISM Approach. Kybernetes, ahead-of-print.10.1108/K-05-2023-0888 ↗
5. Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2 ↗
6. Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Model; Impacts and Sustainable Investment—Global Trends and Poland’s Perspective10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117023 ↗
7. Nakao, K., Shakya, S., Nozaki, T., and Inazumi, S. (2023). Neutralization Treatment for Recycling Construction-Generated Soils. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13116622 ↗
8. IBGE (2024, April 03). PAIC—Pesquisa Anual Da Indústria Da Construção, Available online: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/economicas/industria/9018-pesquisa-anual-da-industria-da-construcao.html.
9. (2024, April 03). SINIR Relatório Nacional de Gestão de Resíduos Sólidos, Available online: https://sinir.gov.br/relatorios/nacional/.
10. A Comprehensive Review on Green Buildings Research: Bibliometric Analysis during 1998–201810.1007/s11356-021-12739-7 ↗
11. Board Structure and Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure in Latin America10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.017 ↗
12. Socially Responsible Investment Behavior: A Study of Individual Investors from India10.1108/RBF-05-2021-0099 ↗
13. Investment in ESG Projects and Corporate Performance of Multinational Companies10.11130/jei.2022.37.1.54 ↗
14. How to Combine ESG Scores? A Proposal Based on Credit Rating Prediction10.1002/csr.2548 ↗
15. Hwang, J., Kim, H., and Jung, D.J. (2021). The Effect of ESG Activities on Financial Performance during the COVID-19 Pandemic-Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132011362 ↗
16. Jonsdottir, B., Sigurjonsson, T.O., Johannsdottir, L., and Wendt, S. (2022). Barriers to Using ESG Data for Investment Decisions. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14095157 ↗
17. Bužinskė, J., and Stankevičienė, J. (2023). Analysis of Success Factors, Benefits, and Challenges of Issuing Green Bonds in Lithuania. Economies, 11.10.3390/economies11050143 ↗
18. Meng, X.K., and Shaikh, G.M. (2023). Evaluating Environmental, Social, and Governance Criteria and Green Finance Investment Strategies Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15086786 ↗
19. Assessing Companies’ Decent Work Practices: An Analysis of ESG Rating Methodologies10.1111/ilr.12370 ↗
20. Exploring the Effectiveness of Sustainability Measurement: Which ESG Metrics Will Survive COVID-19?10.1007/s10551-022-05183-1 ↗
21. Zhang, A.Y., and Zhang, J.H. (2023). Renovation in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Research: The Application of Machine Learning. Asian Rev. Account., ahead-of-print.10.1108/ARA-07-2023-0201 ↗
22. The Perspectives of Stakeholders on the Effectiveness of Green Financing Schemes in Malaysia10.3934/GF.2022022 ↗
23. Environmental, Social, and Governance Adoption in the Malaysian Wood Products and Furniture Industries: Awareness, Adoption, and Challenges10.15376/biores.18.1.1436-1453 ↗
24. On Predicting ESG Ratings Using Dynamic Company Networks10.1145/3607874 ↗
25. Challenges to Current Sustainability Assessment Frameworks: The Era of Big Data and SDGs Has Arrived10.4018/IJSESD.301248 ↗
26. Dario, C., Sabrina, L., Landriault, E., and De Vega, P. (2021). DLT to Boost Efficiency for Financial Intermediaries. An Application in ESG Reporting Activities. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 1–14.10.1080/09537325.2021.1999921 ↗
27. Sustainability Risks & Opportunities in the Insurance Industry
28. Sustainable Investment and Environmental, Social, and Governance Investing: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review10.1111/beer.12588 ↗
29. Building a Better Future with Sustainable Investments: Insights from Recent Research10.1177/09737030231194836 ↗
30. Dzomonda, O. (2022). Environmental Sustainability Commitment and Access to Finance by Small and Medium Enterprises: The Role of Financial Performance and Corporate Governance. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14148863 ↗
31. Vivoda, V., and Matthews, R. (2023). “Friend-Shoring” as a Panacea to Western Critical Mineral Supply Chain Vulnerabilities. Miner. Econ.10.1007/s13563-023-00402-1 ↗
32. Zaccone, M.C., and Pedrini, M. (2020). ESG Factor Integration into Private Equity. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12145725 ↗
33. Environmental, Social, and Governance Policy Integration and Implementation From the Perspective of Corporations
34. Making the Invisible, Visible: Overcoming Barriers to ESG Performance with an ESG Mindset10.1016/j.bushor.2022.07.003 ↗
35. An Industry-Guided Review of Responsible Investing: Bridging the Divide between Academia and Industry10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131685 ↗
36. Wu, Y.J., and Tham, J. (2023). The Impact of Executive Green Incentives and Top Management Team Characteristics on Corporate Value in China: The Mediating Role of Environment, Social and Government Performance. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151612518 ↗
37. Amaeshi, K., and Grayson, D. (2008, January 10). Count Me out: The Challenges of Environmental, Social and Governance Risks in Making Investment Decisions. Proceedings of the Conference Corporate Responsibility and Market Valuation of Financial and Non-Financial Performance, Edinburgh, UK.
38. A Roadmap for Triggering the Convergence of Global ESG Disclosure Standards: Lessons from the IFRS Foundation and Stakeholder Engagement
39. Consortium Blockchain-Enabled Smart ESG Reporting Platform with Token-Based Incentives for Corporate Crowdsensing10.1016/j.cie.2022.108456 ↗
40. Why Don’t We See More Action? A Metasynthesis of the Investor Impediments to Integrate Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors10.1002/bse.2346 ↗
41. The Impact of Managerial Myopia on Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Engagement: Evidence from Chinese Firms10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106705 ↗
42. Sustainable Development and Financial Markets: Old Paths and New Avenues10.1177/0007650315570701 ↗
43. ESG Standards: Looming Challenges and Pathways Forward10.1177/1086026620945342 ↗
44. Connecting the Sustainable Development Goals to Firm-Level Sustainability and ESG Factors: The Need for Double Materiality10.1177/23409444221140919 ↗
45. Proposed Solutions to Anthropogenic Climate Change: A Systematic Literature Review and a New Way Forward10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20544 ↗
46. Mainstreaming Socially Responsible Investment: Do Environmental, Social and Governance Ratings of Investment Funds Converge?10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131684 ↗
47. Saxena, A., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Akram, S.V., Twala, B., Singh, A., Montero, E.C., and Priyadarshi, N. (2023). Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15010309 ↗
48. Emerging Corporate Disclosure of Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) Risks: An Australian Study10.14453/aabfj.v14i2.4 ↗
49. Promoting Sustainable Investment through Financial Architecture Reform10.1093/oxrep/grad009 ↗
50. How Does Firm ESG Performance Impact Financial Constraints? An Experimental Exploration of the COVID-19 Pandemic10.1057/s41287-021-00499-6 ↗
51. Evolving ESG Reporting Governance, Regime Theory, and Proactive Law: Predictions and Strategies10.1111/ablj.12210 ↗
52. (Vivian) Firms’ Multi-Sided Platform Construction Efforts and ESG Performance: An Information Processing Theory Perspective10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.10.018 ↗
53. Exploring the Measurement of Environmental Performance in Alignment with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): A Qualitative Study10.18576/isl/120932 ↗
54. Does Innovation in Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosures Pay off in China? An Integrated Reporting Perspective10.1016/j.bir.2023.01.001 ↗
55. Corporate Social Sustainability in Supply Chains: A Thematic Analysis of the Literature10.1080/00207543.2017.1388934 ↗
56. Materiality Assessment: The Case of Latin American Listed Companies
57. Are Firms Motivated to Greenwash by Financial Constraints? Evidence from Global Firms’ Data10.1111/jifm.12153 ↗
58. Modeling the Critical Success Factors of Implementing Net Zero Emission (NZE) and Promoting Resilience and Social Value Creation10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121759 ↗
59. A Sectoral Perspective on International Climate Governance: Key Findings and Research Priorities10.1016/j.esg.2021.100105 ↗
60. Energetic Communities for Community Energy: A Review of Key Issues and Trends Shaping Integrated Community Energy Systems10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.080 ↗
61. Quantitative Analysis on a Zero Energy Building Performance from Energy Trilemma Perspective10.1016/j.scs.2017.03.023 ↗
62. Decomposing the Linkages between Energy Consumption, Air Pollution, Climate Change, and Natural Resource Depletion in Pakistan10.1002/ep.12519 ↗
63. Effects of Technological Changes on China’s Carbon Emissions10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119938 ↗
64. Observing Technology Reserves of Carbon Capture and Storage via Patent Data: Paving the Way for Carbon Neutral10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120933 ↗
65. ESG and Industry 5.0: The Role of Technologies in Enhancing ESG Disclosure10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122806 ↗
66. Challenges of the Polish Coal Mining Industry on Its Way to Innovative and Sustainable Development10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134061 ↗
67. Zhironkin, S., and Ezdina, N. (2023). Review of Transition from Mining 4.0 to Mining 5.0 Innovative Technologies. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13084917 ↗
68. Wang, J., Song, Z., and Xue, L. (2023). Digital Technology for Good: Path and Influence—Based on the Study of ESG Performance of Listed Companies in China. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13052862 ↗
69. A New Era of Sustainability in Emerging Markets? Insights from a Global CEO Study by the United Nations Global Compact and Accenture10.1108/14720701111159208 ↗
70. Do Baltic Investors Care about Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)?
71. Dong, R., Shao, C., Xin, S., and Lu, Z. (2023). A Sustainable Development Evaluation Framework for Chinese Electricity Enterprises Based on SDG and ESG Coupling. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15118960 ↗
72. Can Environmental, Social, and Governance Rating Agencies Favor Business Models That Promote a More Sustainable Development?10.1002/csr.1695 ↗
73. The ESG Integration Paradox10.1111/jacf.12296 ↗
74. CSR and Mainstream Investing: A New Match?–An Analysis of the Existing ESG Integration Methods in Theory and Practice and the Way Forward
75. Van International Variations in ESG Disclosure—Do Cross-Listed Companies Care More?10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101731 ↗
76. Navigating the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Landscape: Constructing a Robust and Reliable Scoring Engine—Insights into Data Source Selection, Indicator Determination, Weighting and Aggregation Techniques, and Validation Processes for Comp10.12688/openreseurope.16278.1 ↗
77. “Non-Financial” Is a Misnomer, but Doesn’t Have to Be a Missed Opportunity10.1111/jacf.12410 ↗
78. Conceptualising the Contemporary Corporate Value Creation Process10.1108/AAAJ-04-2016-2529 ↗
79. Norwegian Stakeholder’s Attitudes towards EU Taxonomy10.1108/F-03-2022-0051 ↗
80. Appearance or Substance of Stewardship and ESG Reporting? The Challenges of Translating “cAppearance or Substance of Stewardship and ESG Reporting? The Challenges of Translating ‘Commitment’ into Tangible Outcomesommitment” into Tangible Outcomes
81. Anatomy of a Paradox: Management Practices, Organizational Structure and Energy Efficiency10.1016/j.jeem.2011.08.003 ↗
82. Advancing Sustainability Reporting in Canada: 2019 Report on Progress10.1111/1911-3838.12232 ↗
83. An Entrepreneur-Driven Technological Innovation System for Sustainable and Inclusive International Business: A Case Analysis of Lusophone-African MNEs
84. Asset-Backed Securitization of PPP Projects: The Case of China10.1080/10971475.2020.1857058 ↗
85. Could Environmental Regulation and R&D Tax Incentives Affect Green Product Innovation?10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120849 ↗
86. Rajat, G., and Matt, G. (2016, January 12–14). Building Performance Simulation Of Advanced Energy Technologies To Achieve Net Zero Energy Dwellings in UK. Proceedings of the 3rd IBPSA-England Conference BSO 2016, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
87. Corporate ESG Performance When Neighboring the Environmental Protection Agency10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119519 ↗
88. Pangalos, G. (2023). Financing for a Sustainable Dry Bulk Shipping Industry: What Are the Potential Routes for Financial Innovation in Sustainability and Alternative Energy in the Dry Bulk Shipping Industry?. J. Risk Financ. Manag., 16.10.3390/jrfm16020101 ↗
89. Greenwashing in Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosures10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192 ↗
90. Ju, B.B., Shi, X.N., and Mei, Y.R. (2022). The Current State and Prospects of China’s Environmental, Social, and Governance Policies. Front. Environ. Sci., 10.10.3389/fenvs.2022.999145 ↗
91. Important Environmental Social Governance Risks in Potential Phosphorite Mining in Estonia
92. A Blueprint for Integrating ESG into Equity Portfolios
93. Global Governance for the Decarbonization of Energy-Intensive Industries: Great Potential Underexploited10.1016/j.esg.2020.100072 ↗
94. Addressing Financial Objections to Sustainable Design and Construction10.3992/jgb.5.4.67 ↗
95. Huang, Y.F., Chen, A.P.S., Do, M.H., and Chung, J.C. (2022). Assessing the Barriers of Green Innovation Implementation: Evidence from the Vietnamese Manufacturing Sector. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14084662 ↗
96. Musaad, O.A.S., Zhuo, Z., Musaad, O.A.O., Siyal, Z.A., Hashmi, H., and Shah, S.A.A. (2020). A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Analysis of Barriers and Policy Strategies for Small and Medium Enterprises to Adopt Green Innovation. Symmetry, 12.10.3390/sym12010116 ↗
97. Drivers, Barriers and Practices of Net Zero Economy: An Exploratory Knowledge Based Supply Chain Multi-Stakeholder Perspective Framework10.1007/s12063-022-00255-x ↗
98. ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns: Evidence from China10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103043 ↗
99. Take It with a Pinch of Salt—ESG Rating of Stocks and Stock Indices10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102308 ↗
100. Can Sustainable Investments Outperform Traditional Benchmarks? Evidence from Global Stock Markets10.1002/bse.2397 ↗