journal article·2022-11-24Open access

Review of Computational Mechanics, Optimization, and Machine Learning Tools for Digital Twins Applied to Infrastructures

Georgios E. Stavroulakis, Barbara G. Charalambidi, Panagiotis Koutsianitis

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 23

Abstract

This review discusses the links between the newly introduced concepts of digital twins and more classical finite element modeling, reduced order models, parametric modeling, inverse analysis, machine learning, and parameter identification. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that development, as almost always is the case, is based on previously developed tools that are currently exploited since the technological tools for their implementation are available and the needs of their usage appear. This fact has rarely been declared clearly in the available literature. The need for digital twins in infrastructures arises due to the extreme loadings applied on energy-related infrastructure and to the higher importance that fatigue effects have. Digital twins promise to provide reliable and affordable models that accompany the structure throughout its whole lifetime, make fatigue and degradation prediction more reliable, and support effective predictive maintenance schemes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Electrical Fault Detection and Protection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Computational Mechanics and Optimization, School of Production Engineering and Management, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, Greece

Funding

Organization for the Development of Crete O.A.C. S.A.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin10.1186/s40323-020-00147-4 ↗
2. Bolton, A., Butler, L., Dabson, I., Enzer, M., Evans, M., Fenemore, T., and Harradence, F. (2022, October 02). Gemini Principles. Available online: https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/Resources/ResoucePublications/TheGeminiPrinciples.pdf.
3. Roest, M. (2022, October 02). Available online: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/five-ways-classify-your-digital-twin-mark-roest.
4. Siemens (2022, October 02). Available online: https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/global/en/our-story/glossary/digital-twin/24465.
5. XMPRO (2022, October 02). Available online: https://xmpro.com/digital-twins-the-ultimate-guide/.
6. ARUP (2022, October 02). Available online: https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/digital-twin-towards-a-meaningful-framework.
7. Riveiro, B., and Solla, M. (2016). Non-Destructive Techniques for the Evaluation of Structures and Infrastructure, CRC Press. [1st ed.].10.1201/b19024 ↗
8. Reduction of Stiffness and Mass Matrices10.2514/3.2874 ↗
9. Allen, M.S., Rixel, D., Van der Seijs, M., Tiso, P., Abrahamsson, T., and Mayes, R.L. (2020). Substructuring in Engineering dynamics. Emerging Numerical and Experimental Techniques, Springer. [1st ed.].10.1007/978-3-030-25532-9 ↗
10. Stavroulakis, G.E. (2000). Inverse and Crack Identification Problems in Engineering Mechanics, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4615-0019-3 ↗
11. Mróz, Z., and Stavroulakis, G.E. (2005). Neural Networks in the Identification Analysis of Structural Mechanics Problems. Parameter Identification of Materials and Structures, CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences (Courses and Lectures), Springer.10.1007/3-211-38134-1 ↗
12. Mróz, Z., and Stavroulakis, G.E. (2005). Parameter Identification of Materials and Structures, CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences (Courses and Lectures), Springer.10.1007/3-211-38134-1 ↗
13. Aster, R.C., Borchers, B., and Thurber, C.H. (2018). Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems, Elsevier. [3rd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-804651-7.00015-8 ↗
14. Structural engineering from an inverse problems perspective10.1098/rspa.2021.0526 ↗
15. Iterated Kalman methodology for inverse problems10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111262 ↗
16. Bado, M.F., Tonelli, D., Poli, F., Zonta, D., and Casas, J.R. (2022). Digital Twin for Civil Engineering Systems: An Exploratory Review for Distributed Sensing Updating. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22093168 ↗
17. A digital twin of bridges for structural health monitoring
18. Shim, C., Kang, H., and Dang, N. (2019, January 8–10). Digital Twin Models for Maintenance of Cable-Supported Bridges. Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction, Cambridge, UK.10.1680/icsic.64669.737 ↗
19. Jiang, F., Ding, Y., Song, Y., Geng, F., and Wang, Z. (2022). Digital twin-driven framework for fatigue lifecycle management of steel bridges. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng.10.1080/15732479.2022.2058563 ↗
20. Benzon, H.-H., Chen, X., Belcher, L., Castro, O., Branner, K., and Smit, J. (2022). An Operational Image-Based Digital Twin for Large-Scale Structures. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12073216 ↗
21. Seismic fragility curves for a concrete bridge using structural health monitoring and digital twins
22. Modelling and strength evaluation of masonry bridges using terrestrial photogrammetry and finite elements10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.12.007 ↗
23. Mahmoodian, M., Shahrivar, F., Setunge, S., and Mazaheri, S. (2022). Development of Digital Twin for Intelligent Maintenance of Civil Infrastructure. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14148664 ↗
24. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Matt, D.T., Vidoni, R., Rauch, E., and Dallasega, P. (2022). Development of a FEM Model for the Digital Twin Application and the Monitoring of CorTen Road Barriers in the Autonomous Province of Bozen/Bolzano. Managing and Implementing the Digital Transformation, Springer.
25. Casas Rius, J.R., Chacón Flores, R.A., Stipanovic, I., Škaric Palic, S., and Ramonell Cazador, C. (2022, October 17). D5.1 SHM Digital Twin Requirements for Residential, Industrial Buildings and Bridges, Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/2117/366624.
26. Rageh, A., Azam, S.E., Alomari, Q., Linzell, D., and Wood, R. (2022). Chapter 10: Model updating and parameter identification for developing digital twins for riveted steel railway bridges. Recent Developments in Structural Health Monitoring and Assessment—Opportunities and Challenges, World Scientific.10.1142/9789811243011_0010 ↗
27. Machine learning-based digital twin for predictive modeling in wind turbines10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3147602 ↗
28. (2022, October 02). General Electric. Available online: https://www.ge.com/digital/industrial-managed-services-remote-monitoring-for-iiot/.
29. Exploring the concept of Cognitive Digital Twin from model-based systems engineering perspective10.1007/s00170-022-09610-5 ↗
30. A Backpropagation Neural Network Model for Semi-rigid Steel Connections10.1111/j.1467-8667.1995.tb00271.x ↗
31. (2022, October 17). Available online: https://akselos.com/knowledge-base/digital-twins-for-structural-condition-assessment-for-power-station/.
32. An efficient optimization approach for designing machine learning models based on genetic algorithm10.1007/s00521-020-05035-x ↗
33. A genetically optimized neural classifier applied to numerical pile integrity tests considering concrete piles10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.08.005 ↗
34. Yagawa, G., and Oishi, A. (2021). Computational Mechanics with Neural Networks, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-66111-3 ↗
35. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
36. A Gentle Introduction to Physics-Informed Neural Networks, with Applications in Static Rod and Beam Problems10.15377/2409-5761.2022.09.8 ↗
37. Futai, M.M., Bittencourt, T.N., Carvalho, H., and Ribeiro, D.M. (2022). Challenges in the application of digital transformation to inspection and maintenance of bridges. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 18.10.1080/15732479.2022.2063908 ↗
38. Identifying the most suitable machine learning approach for a road digital twin
39. (2022, October 17). Available online: https://akselos.com/knowledge-base/a-systems-approach-to-structural-digital-twins-harnessing-data-sensors-and-robotics/.
40. (2022, October 17). Available online: https://asdeasoft.net/?digital-twinning.
41. Schroeder, G., Steinmetz, C., Pereira, C.E., Muller, I., Garcia, N., Espindola, D., and Rodrigues, R. (2016, January 19–21). Visualising the digital twin using web services and augmented reality. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 14th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Poitiers, France.10.1109/INDIN.2016.7819217 ↗
42. Künz, A., Rosmann, S., Loria, E., and Pirker, J. (2022, January 12–16). The Potential of Augmented Reality for Digital Twins: A Literature Review. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), Christchurch, New Zealand.10.1109/VR51125.2022.00058 ↗