journal article·2023-12-31Open access

Advances in Machine Learning Techniques Used in Fatigue Life Prediction of Welded Structures

Sadiq Gbagba, Lorenzo Maccioni, Franco Concli

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 1

Abstract

In the shipbuilding, construction, automotive, and aerospace industries, welding is still a crucial manufacturing process because it can be utilized to create massive, intricate structures with exact dimensional specifications. These kinds of structures are essential for urbanization considering they are used in applications such as tanks, ships, and bridges. However, one of the most important types of structural damage in welding continues to be fatigue. Therefore, it is necessary to take this phenomenon into account when designing and to assess it while a structure is in use. Although traditional methodologies including strain life, linear elastic fracture mechanics, and stress-based procedures are useful for diagnosing fatigue failures, these techniques are typically geometry restricted, require a lot of computing time, are not self-improving, and have limited automation capabilities. Meanwhile, following the conception of machine learning, which can swiftly discover failure trends, cut costs, and time while also paving the way for automation, many damage problems have shown promise in receiving exceptional solutions. This study seeks to provide a thorough overview of how algorithms of machine learning are utilized to forecast the life span of structures joined with welding. It will also go through their drawbacks and advantages. Specifically, the perspectives examined are from the views of the material type, application, welding method, input parameters, and output parameters. It is seen that input parameters such as arc voltage, welding speed, stress intensity factor range, crack growth parameters, stress histories, thickness, and nugget size influence output parameters in the manner of residual stress, number of cycles to failure, impact strength, and stress concentration factors, amongst others. Steel (including high strength steel and stainless steel) accounted for the highest frequency of material usage, while bridges were the most desired area of application. Meanwhile, the predominant taxonomy of machine learning was the random/hybrid-based type. Thus, the selection of the most appropriate and reliable algorithm for any requisite matter in this area could ultimately be determined, opening new research and development opportunities for automation, testing, structural integrity, structural health monitoring, and damage-tolerant design of welded structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Vodzyk, D. (2016). Fracture and Fatigue Analysis of Welded Structures using Finite Element Analysis. [Master’s Thesis, Carleton University Ottawa].
2. (2023, November 27). How to Predict Fatigue Life in Welds, COMSOL. Available online: https://www.comsol.com/blogs/how-to-predict-the-fatigue-life-of-welds/.
3. Effect of weld toe geometry on fatigue life of lap fillet welded ultra high strength steel joints10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.06.050 ↗
4. Fatigue failure of aircraft components10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.10.001 ↗
5. Lassen, T., and Recho, N. (2013). Fatigue Life Analysis of Welded Structures: Flaws, Wiley.
6. Hobbacher, A. (2016). Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-23757-2 ↗
7. Gandhi, R., Maccioni, L., and Concli, F. (2022). Significant Advancements in Numerical Simulation of Fatigue Behavior in Metal Additive Manufacturing-Review. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122111132 ↗
8. Fatigue crack propagation limit curves for high strength steels based on two-stage relationship10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.05.012 ↗
9. British Standards Institution (2019). BS 7910 Guide to Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures, BSI.
10. Machine learning-based fatigue life prediction of metal materials: Perspectives of physics-informed and data-driven hybrid methods10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109242 ↗
11. A comparative study of different fatigue failure assessments of welded bridge details10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.12.010 ↗
12. A Review of the Application of Machine Learning and Data Mining Approaches in Continuum Materials Mechanics
13. Prediction of fatigue failure in small-scale butt-welded joints with explainable machine learing10.1016/j.prostr.2022.03.019 ↗
14. Comparison of machine learning and stress concentration factors-based fatigue failure prediction in small-scale butt-welded joints10.1111/ffe.13800 ↗
15. Braun, M., Neuhäusler, J., Denk, M., Renken, F., Kellner, L., Schubnell, J., and Ehlers, S. (2022). Statistical characterization of stress concentrations along butt joint weld seams using deep neural networks. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12126089 ↗
16. Fatigue reliability assessment of welded steel bridge decks under stochastic truck loads via machine learning10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000982 ↗
17. (2023, November 27). The Machine Learning Process, Tech in Trend. Available online: https://techtrendmm.tech/2022/02/23/the-machine-learning-process/.
18. Di Fatta, G. (2018). Machine Learning, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano.
19. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews
20. Aurélien, G. (2019). Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow, O’Reilly. Chapter 2.
21. Fatigue life evaluation of continuous welded rails on concrete slab track in Korea high-speed railway10.1177/1369433218762501 ↗
22. Fatigue life assessment of welded joints by two local stress approaches: The notch stress approach and the peak stress method10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.024 ↗
23. Farreras, A.I., Andersen, J.E., and Chryssanthopoulos, M.K. (2013, January 6–8). A heuristic model for performance assessment of welded joints in orthotropic steel decks based on monitoring data. Proceedings of the IABSE Conference: Assessment, Upgrading and Refurbishment of Infrastructures, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
24. Performance assessment and prediction of welded joints in orthotropic decks considering hourly monitoring data10.2749/101686613X13627351081470 ↗
25. The peculiarities of fatigue failure for pipe steels of different strength classes (pipes with welds)10.2495/EQ140832 ↗
26. New Spot Weld Fatigue Criteria and Fatigue Data Editing Technique10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.614 ↗
27. Fatigue behavior of welded joints assembled by longitudinal corrugated plates10.1007/s11771-015-2805-2 ↗
28. Peng, Y., Chen, J., and Dong, J. (2019). Experimental data assessment and fatigue design recommendation for stainless-steel welded joints. Metals, 9.10.3390/met9070723 ↗
29. Cyclic elastic modulus, and low cycle fatigue life of woven-type GFRP coated aluminum plates10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107004 ↗
30. Parametric study and equations of the maximum SCF for concrete filled steel tubular T-joints under in-plane and out-of-plane bending10.1016/j.tws.2018.11.017 ↗
31. Parametric equation to predict the SIF of cracked tubular T/Y-joints10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105773 ↗
32. Probabilistic fatigue assessment of rib-to-deck joints using thickened edge U-ribs
33. Fuentes-Huerta, M.A., Gonzalez-Gonzalez, D.S., Praga-Alejo, R.J., and Solis-Rodriguez, G. (2021, January 22–26). Modeling and Prediction of Welded Joints Lifetimes by GMAW Process Using Maximum Entropy Regression Model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechatronics, Electronics and Automotive Engineering (ICMEAE), Cuernavaca, Mexico.10.1109/ICMEAE55138.2021.00036 ↗
34. Fatigue strength distribution and probabilistic evaluation on stainless steel welded components under mixed mode loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106247 ↗
35. Fatigue behaviour of load-carrying fillet-welded cruciform joints of austenitic stainless steel10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106798 ↗
36. The Steel Construction Institute (2011). Joints in Steel Construction - Simple Joints to Eurocode 3, The Steel Construction Institute. Publication P358.
37. Stress concentration factors for multi-planar DKT tubular truss joints under axially balanced loads10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106781 ↗
38. Bhatia, A., and Wattal, R. (2022). Fatigue behaviour and impact strength assessment of friction stir-welded carbon steel joints. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part E J. Process Mech. Eng.10.1177/09544089221130615 ↗
39. Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Yu, C., and Dong, Q. (2022). Simulation, and verification of master S-N curves of titanium alloy welded structures based on bootstrap method. Adv. Mech. Eng., 14.10.1177/16878132221107441 ↗
40. Design of experiment for predicting residual stresses in Gas Tungsten Arc Welding process
41. Harrison, R.L. (2011). NIH Public Access, US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health.
42. Fatigue Reliability Analysis of Steel Welded Member Using Probabilistic Stress-Life Method10.1007/s13296-018-0090-2 ↗
43. Fatigue reliability evaluation technique using probabilistic stress-life method for stress range frequency distribution of a steel welding member
44. Effect of SCFs on S-N based fatigue reliability of multi-planar tubular DKT-joints of offshore jacket-type structures10.1080/17445302.2011.627750 ↗
45. Bucas, S., Gayton, N., Chateauneuf, A., and Rumelhart, P. (2013, January 26–30). Probabilistic approach for the fatigue design of tower cranes. Proceedings of the CFM 2013-21ème Congrès Français de Mécanique, Bordeaux, France. Available online: https://hal.science/hal-03442415.
46. Grous, A., Lassen, T., and Recho, N. (2013). Safety, Reliability, Risk and Life-Cycle Performance of Structures & Infrastructures, Taylor & Francis Group.
47. D’Angelo, L., Faber, M.H., and Nussbaumer, A. (2015, January 12–15). Calibration of partial safety factors for fatigue design of steel bridges. Proceedings of the International Conference on Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP12, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
48. Determination of inspection intervals for welded rail joints on a regional network10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.004 ↗
49. Fatigue reliability assessment for orthotropic steel deck details under traffic flow and temperature loading10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.11.007 ↗
50. Dynamic Bayesian network-based system-level evaluation on fatigue reliability of orthotropic steel decks10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.06.092 ↗
51. Fatigue resistance of rib-to-deck welded joint in OSDs, analyzed by fracture mechanics10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105700 ↗
52. Probabilistic evaluation of fatigue crack growth rate for longitudinal tungsten inert gas welded al 6013-T4 under various postweld heat treatment conditions10.1051/e3sconf/201913001016 ↗
53. Reliability evaluation of fatigue crack growth rate of heat-treated tig-welded al 6013-t4 by two-parameter Weibull10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.867.75 ↗
54. Chang, H., Shen, M., Yang, X., and Hou, J. (2020). Uncertainty modeling of fatigue crack growth and probabilistic life prediction for welded joints of nuclear stainless steel. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13143192 ↗
55. Wang, E.D., Tiku, S., and Dinovitzer, A. (2021, January 13–15). Fatigue crack growth rate data assessment. Proceedings of the ASME 2021 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference, Virtual.10.1115/PVP2021-62038 ↗
56. Wang, B., and Chen, A. (2021). Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Life-Cycle Sustainability and Innovations, CRC Press.
57. ESS-based probabilistic fatigue life assessment of steel bridges: Methodology, numerical simulation, and application10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113802 ↗
58. Initial parameters to estimate the fatigue strength of welded structures using a fracture mechanical model10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114185 ↗
59. Application of the weakest link analysis to the area of fatigue design of steel welded joints10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.06.012 ↗
60. Investigation of fatigue crack propagation in spot-welded joints based on fracture mechanics approach10.1007/s11665-012-0220-5 ↗
61. Fatigue strength under optimal conditions of spot weldment using GA and FEM
62. Brittle Fracture Modeling for Steel Structures operated in the Extreme10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.169 ↗
63. Predicting weld root notch stress intensity factors for rib-to-deck welded joint under deck loading modes10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105212 ↗
64. Yu-Qing, Y., Chao, J., Yan-Ting, C., Jing, W., and Lv, W. (2021, January 14–17). BGA chip torsion finite meta analysis at high temperature. Proceedings of the 2021 22nd International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology (ICEPT), Xiamen, China.10.1109/ICEPT52650.2021.9568113 ↗
65. Influence of residual stresses on the fatigue life of welded joints. Numerica simulation and experimental tests10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106901 ↗
66. Experimental and numerical analyses on stress concentration factors of concrete-filled welded integral K-joints in steel truss bridges10.1016/j.tws.2022.110347 ↗
67. A novel correlation models for predicting stress intensity factor of semi-elliptical crack in welded pipelines under cyclic internal pressure based on Bézier base XIGA10.1016/j.ijpvp.2023.105052 ↗
68. Wikipedia Contributors (2023, September 26). Artificial Neural Network. in Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neural_network/.
69. Applications of ultrasonic testing and machine learning methods to predict the static & fatigue behavior of spot-welded joints10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.01.047 ↗
70. Fatigue behaviors prediction method of welded joints based on soft computing methods10.1016/j.msea.2012.08.144 ↗
71. Neuro-fuzzy model for the prediction and classification of the fused zone levels of imperfections in Ti6Al4V alloy butt weld10.1155/2013/952690 ↗
72. Fatigue life prediction for welding components based on hybrid intelligent technique10.1016/j.msea.2015.07.006 ↗
73. Numerical study on fatigue life of spot-welding using FEA
74. Prediction of residual stresses in resistance spot weld10.1108/AEAT-11-2012-0206 ↗
75. Dissimilar material welding and assessing reliability of super alloy for green and high efficiency thermal power plant10.1007/s12206-018-1013-z ↗
76. Ahmad, H.W., Hwang, J.H., Javed, K., Chaudry, U.M., and Bae, D.H. (2019). Probabilistic fatigue life prediction of dissimilar material weld using accelerated life method and neural network approach. Computation, 7.10.3390/computation7010010 ↗
77. Determination of notch factors for welded cruciform joints based on numerical analysis and metamodeling10.1007/s40194-019-00751-y ↗
78. Yu, X., Yao, G., Gu, L., and Fan, W. (2020). Numerical and experimental study on the steel strands under the coupling effect of a salt spray environment and cyclic loads. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13030736 ↗
79. Sensitivity analysis of the artificial neural networks in a system for durability prediction of forging tools to forgings made of C45 steel10.1007/s00170-020-05641-y ↗
80. Probabilistic fatigue life of welded plate joints under uncertainty in Arctic areas10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106412 ↗
81. Fatigue crack detection in welded structural components of steel bridges using artificial neural network10.1007/s13349-021-00488-7 ↗
82. Artificial neural network based fatigue life assessment of friction stir welding AA2024-T351 aluminum alloy and multi-objective optimization of welding parameters10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106840 ↗
83. Time-variant fatigue reliability assessment of rib-to-deck welded joints using ANN-based methods10.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.020 ↗
84. Artificial Neural network-based prediction of SCF at the Intersection of CFST Y-joints10.1186/s43251-022-00056-z ↗
85. Detection of damage in offshore jacket structure using artificial neural network10.1088/1755-1315/1130/1/012027 ↗
86. Fatigue damage prognosis of orthotropic steel deck based on data-driven LSTM10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.107777 ↗
87. Prediction of transverse welding residual stress considering transverse and bending constraints in butt welding10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.07.043 ↗
88. Gomez-Cabrera, A., and Escamilla-Ambrosio, P.J. (2022). Review of Machine-Learning Techniques Applied to Structural Health Monitoring Systems for Building and Bridge Structures. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122110754 ↗
89. Deng, Y., Li, A., and Feng, D. (2018). Fatigue reliability assessment for orthotropic steel decks based on long-term strain monitoring. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18010181 ↗
90. Fatigue testing and structural health monitoring of retrofitted web stiffeners on steel highway bridges10.3141/2360-04 ↗
91. Thöns, S., and Faber, M.H. (2013, January 16–20). Assessing the value of structural health monitoring. Proceedings of the ICOSSAR’13-11th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability-Safety, Reliability, Risk and Life-Cycle Performance of Structures and Infrastructures, New York, NY, USA.
92. Ye, X.W., Su, Y.H., and Xi, P.S. (2018). Statistical analysis of stress signals from bridge monitoring by FBG system. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18020491 ↗
93. Long, L., Alcover, I.F., and Thons, S. (2019, January 10–12). Quantification of the posterior utilities of SHM campaigns on an orthotropic steel bridge deck. Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA, USA.10.12783/shm2019/32273 ↗
94. A two-scale probabilistic time-dependent fatigue model for offshore steel wind turbines10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105620 ↗
95. Nanotechnologies of strength control of materials10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1040.101 ↗
96. Prediction of welded joint fatigue properties based on a novel hybrid SPDTRS-CS-ANN method10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108824 ↗
97. Fatigue life prognosis study of welded tubular joints in signal support structures10.1007/s13296-014-2008-y ↗
98. Khan, R.A., and Ahmad, S. (2014). Bi-linear fatigue and fracture approach for safety analysis of an offshore structure. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 136.10.1115/1.4026669 ↗
99. Prediction of fatigue life of welded details in cable-stayed orthotropic steel deck bridges10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.055 ↗
100. Maintenance decision model for steel bridges: A case in the Netherlands10.1080/15732479.2016.1158194 ↗