Gaussian Mutation Specular Reflection Learning with Local Escaping Operator Based Artificial Electric Field Algorithm and Its Engineering Application
Source abstract
Abstract
During the contribution of a metaheuristic algorithm for solving complex problems, one of the major challenges is to obtain the one that provides a well-balanced exploration and exploitation. Among the possible solutions to overcome this issue is to combine the strengths of the different methods. In this study, one of the recently developed metaheuristic algorithms, artificial electric field algorithm (AEFA), has been used, to improve its converge speed and the ability to avoid the local optimum points of the given problems. To address these issues, Gaussian mutation specular reflection learning (GS) and local escaping operator (LEO) have been added to the essential steps on AEFA and called GSLEO-AEFA. In order to observe the effect of the applied features, 23 benchmark functions as well as engineering and real-world application problems were tested and compared with the other algorithms. Friedman and Wilcoxon rank-sum statistical tests, and complexity analyses were also conducted to measure the performance of GSLEO-AEFA. The overall effectiveness of the algorithm among the compared algorithms obtained in between 84.62–92.31%. According to the achieved results, it can be seen that GSLEO-AEFA has precise optimization accuracy even in changing dimensions, especially in engineering optimization problems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research · Energy Load and Power Forecasting · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Computer Engineering Department, European University of Lefke, Mersin 10, Turkey
Software Engineering Department, European University of Lefke, Mersin 10, Turkey
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. On the application of the spectral element method in electromagnetic problems involving domain decomposition10.3906/elk-1511-115 ↗
2. A Hybrid Quantum-Behaved Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Solving Inverse Scattering Problems10.1109/TAP.2021.3060592 ↗
3. Three-Dimensional Microwave Imaging Problems Solved Through an Efficient Multiscaling Particle Swarm Optimization10.1109/TGRS.2008.2005529 ↗
4. A memory-based Grey Wolf Optimizer for global optimization tasks10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106367 ↗
5. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. (December, January 27). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the ICNN’95-International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, WA, Australia.
6. Abbas, M., Alshehri, M.A., and Barnawi, A.B. (2022). Potential Contribution of the Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm in Reducing Active Power Losses in Electrical Power Systems. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12126177 ↗
7. El Gmili, N., Mjahed, M., El Kari, A., and Ayad, H. (2019). Particle Swarm Optimization and Cuckoo Search-Based Approaches for Quadrotor Control and Trajectory Tracking. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9081719 ↗
8. Bat optimal algorithm combined uniform mutation with Gaussian mutation
9. Yuan, X., Miao, Z., Liu, Z., Yan, Z., and Zhou, F. (2020). Multi-Strategy Ensemble Whale Optimization Algorithm and Its Application to Analog Circuits Intelligent Fault Diagnosis. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10113667 ↗
10. Ni, J., Tang, J., and Wang, R. (2022). Hybrid Algorithm of Improved Beetle Antenna Search and Artificial Fish Swarm. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122413044 ↗
11. Equalized Grey Wolf Optimizer with Refraction Opposite Learning
12. Gravitational search algorithm-based design of fuzzy control systems with a reduced parametric sensitivity10.1016/j.ins.2013.05.035 ↗
13. SCA: A Sine Cosine Algorithm for solving optimization problems10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.022 ↗
14. Colliding Bodies Optimization method for optimum discrete design of truss structures10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.04.006 ↗
15. Zheng, H., Gao, J., Xiong, J., Yao, G., Cui, H., and Zhang, L. (2022). An Enhanced Artificial Electric Field Algorithm with Sine Cosine Mechanism for Logistics Distribution Vehicle Routing. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12126240 ↗
16. Juárez-Pérez, F., Cruz-Chávez, M.A., Rivera-López, R., Ávila-Melgar, E.Y., Eraña-Díaz, M.L., and Cruz-Rosales, M.H. (2022). Grid-Based Hybrid Genetic Approach to Relaxed Flexible Flow Shop with Sequence-Dependent Setup Times. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12020607 ↗
17. Wang, S.L., Adnan, S.H., Ibrahim, H., Ng, T.F., and Rajendran, P. (2022). A Hybrid of Fully Informed Particle Swarm and Self-Adaptive Differential Evolution for Global Optimization. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122211367 ↗
18. Eltaeib, T., and Mahmood, A. (2018). Differential Evolution: A Survey and Analysis. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8101945 ↗
19. Rozenberg, G., Bäck, T., and Kok, J.N. (2012). Handbook of Natural Computing, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-92910-9 ↗
20. Dimensional Learning Strategy-Based Grey Wolf Optimizer for Solving the Global Optimization Problem
21. Exploration and exploitation in evolutionary algorithms: A survey
22. AEFA: Artificial electric field algorithm for global optimization10.1016/j.swevo.2019.03.013 ↗
23. Cancer detection using convolutional neural network optimized by multistrategy artificial electric field algorithm10.1002/ima.22530 ↗
24. Petwal, H., and Rani, R. (2020). An Improved Artificial Electric Field Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8050584 ↗
25. Artificial electric field algorithm to extract nine parameters of triple-diode photovoltaic model10.1002/er.5756 ↗
26. Hybrid artificial electric field algorithm for assembly line balancing problem with equipment model selection possibility10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106905 ↗
27. Optimal Selection of Features Using Artificial Electric Field Algorithm for Classification10.1007/s13369-021-05486-x ↗
28. An efficient modified artificial electric field algorithm for solving optimization problems and parameter estimation of fuel cell10.1002/er.7103 ↗
29. Artificial electric field algorithm with inertia and repulsion for spherical minimum spanning tree10.1007/s10489-021-02415-1 ↗
30. Alanazi, A., and Alanazi, M. (2022). Artificial Electric Field Algorithm-Pattern Search for Many-Criteria Networks Reconfiguration Considering Power Quality and Energy Not Supplied. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15145269 ↗
31. An improved artificial electric field algorithm and its application in neural network optimization10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108111 ↗
32. Energy efficient cluster based routing for wireless sensor networks using moth levy adopted artificial electric field algorithm and customized grey wolf optimization algorithm10.1016/j.micpro.2022.104593 ↗
33. Dehuri, S., Prasad Mishra, B.S., Mallick, P.K., and Cho, S.-B. (2022). Biologically Inspired Techniques in Many Criteria Decision Making, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-981-16-8739-6 ↗
34. Opposition-Based Differential Evolution10.1109/TEVC.2007.894200 ↗
35. Backtracking search algorithm with specular reflection learning for global optimization10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106546 ↗
36. Alkayem, N.F., Shen, L., Al-hababi, T., Qian, X., and Cao, M. (2022). Inverse Analysis of Structural Damage Based on the Modal Kinetic and Strain Energies with the Novel Oppositional Unified Particle Swarm Gradient-Based Optimizer. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122211689 ↗
37. A new self-adaptive quasi-oppositional stochastic fractal search for the inverse problem of structural damage assessment10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.094 ↗
38. Adegboye, O.R., and Ülker, E.D. (2022, January 9–11). A Quick Performance Assessment for Artificial Electric Field Algorithm. Proceedings of the 2022 International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA), Ankara, Turkey.10.1109/HORA55278.2022.9799867 ↗
39. A study of exploratory and stability analysis of artificial electric field algorithm10.1007/s10489-021-02865-7 ↗
40. Yang, W., Xia, K., Li, T., Xie, M., and Zhao, Y. (2021). An Improved Transient Search Optimization with Neighborhood Dimensional Learning for Global Optimization Problems. Symmetry, 13.10.3390/sym13020244 ↗
41. Simulated annealing-based dynamic step shuffled frog leaping algorithm: Optimal performance design and feature selection10.1016/j.neucom.2022.06.075 ↗
42. An opposition-based differential evolution clustering algorithm for emotional preference and migratory behavior optimization10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110073 ↗
43. Performance up-gradation of Symbiotic Organisms Search by Backtracking Search Algorithm10.1007/s12652-021-03183-z ↗
44. Gaussian Perturbation Specular Reflection Learning and Golden-Sine-Mechanism-Based Elephant Herding Optimization for Global Optimization Problems10.1155/2021/9922192 ↗
45. Emambocus, B.A.S., Jasser, M.B., Mustapha, A., and Amphawan, A. (2021). Dragonfly Algorithm and Its Hybrids: A Survey on Performance, Objectives and Applications. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21227542 ↗
46. Gradient-based optimizer: A new metaheuristic optimization algorithm10.1016/j.ins.2020.06.037 ↗
47. Differential Evolution–A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces10.1023/A:1008202821328 ↗
48. Jaya: A simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems
49. Yang, X.-S., and Deb, S. (2009, January 9–11). Cuckoo Search via Lévy flights. Proceedings of the 2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC), Coimbatore, India.10.1109/NABIC.2009.5393690 ↗
50. Comparing SSALEO as a Scalable Large Scale Global Optimization Algorithm to High-Performance Algorithms for Real-World Constrained Optimization Benchmark10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3202894 ↗
51. A study on the use of non-parametric tests for analyzing the evolutionary algorithms’ behaviour: A case study on the CEC’2005 Special Session on Real Parameter Optimization
52. A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms10.1016/j.swevo.2011.02.002 ↗
53. CCSA: Conscious Neighborhood-based Crow Search Algorithm for Solving Global Optimization Problems10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105583 ↗
54. Swagatam, D., and Suganthan, P.N. (2011). Problem Definitions and Evaluation Criteria for CEC 2011 Competition on Testing Evolutionary Algorithms on Real World Optimization Problems, Jadavpur University, Nanyang Technological University.
55. A Benchmark Test Suite for Antenna S-Parameter Optimization10.1109/TAP.2021.3069524 ↗