journal article·2022-12-09Open access

Implementation and Evaluation of Dynamic Task Allocation for Human–Robot Collaboration in Assembly

Christoph Petzoldt, Dario Niermann, Emily Maack, Marius Sontopski, Burak Vur, Michael Freitag

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 24

Abstract

Human–robot collaboration is becoming increasingly important in industrial assembly. In view of high cost pressure, resulting productivity requirements, and the trend towards human-centered automation in the context of Industry 5.0, a reasonable allocation of individual assembly tasks to humans or robots is of central importance. Therefore, this article presents a new approach for dynamic task allocation, its integration into an intuitive block-based process planning framework, and its evaluation in comparison to both manual assembly and static task allocation. For evaluation, a systematic methodology for comprehensive assessment of task allocation approaches is developed, followed by a corresponding user study. The results of the study show for the dynamic task allocation on the one hand a higher fluency in the human–robot collaboration with good adaptation to process delays, and on the other hand a reduction in the cycle time for assembly processes with sufficiently high degrees of parallelism. Based on the study results, we draw conclusions regarding assembly scenarios in which manual assembly or collaborative assembly with static or dynamic task allocation is most appropriate. Finally, we discuss the implications for process planning when using the proposed task allocation framework.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems · Assembly Line Balancing Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

BIBA—Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbH, University of Bremen, Hochschulring 20, 28359 Bremen, Germany

Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Bremen, Badgasteiner Straße 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany

Funding

European Regional Development Fund (EFRE) · Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen (SuUB), Germany

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. Prediction of Human Activity Patterns for Human-Robot Collaborative Assembly Tasks10.1109/TII.2018.2882741 ↗
2. Quality- and Cost-Driven Assembly Technique Selection and Geometrical Tolerance Allocation for Mechanical Structure Assembly10.1016/j.jmsy.2013.03.003 ↗
3. Requirements for the Design of Flexible and Changeable Manufacturing and Assembly Systems: A SME-Survey10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.018 ↗
4. Evaluating Cobots for Final Assembly10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.114 ↗
5. Autonomous Processes in Assembly Systems10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.002 ↗
6. Smart Adaptable Assembly Systems10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.107 ↗
7. Applicability of Human-Robot Collaboration to Small Batch Production10.1007/978-3-319-45390-3_3 ↗
8. A Study on Challenges in the Implementation of Human-Robot Collaboration
9. Lorenz, M., Rüßmann, M., Strack, R., Lueth, K.L., and Bolle, M. (2019, December 06). Man and Machine in Industry 4.0: How will Technology Transform the Industrial Workforce Through 2025?. Bost. Consult. Group 2015. Available online: https://www.bcg.com/de-de/publications/2015/technology-business-transformation-engineered-products-infrastructure-man-machine-industry-4.
10. Müller, R., Franke, J., Henrich, D., Kuhlenkötter, B., Raatz, A., and Verl, A. (2019). Handbuch Mensch-Roboter-Kollaboration, Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG.10.3139/9783446453760.fm ↗
11. Industry 5.0: Prospect and Retrospect10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.09.017 ↗
12. Towards the Resilient Operator 5.0: The Future of Work in Smart Resilient Manufacturing Systems10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.183 ↗
13. Matheson, E., Minto, R., Zampieri, E.G.G., Faccio, M., and Rosati, G. (2019). Human-Robot Collaboration in Manufacturing Applications: A Review. Robotics, 8.10.3390/robotics8040100 ↗
14. Planning Operator Support in Cyber-Physical Assembly Systems10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.190 ↗
15. Functionalities and Implementation of Future Informational Assistance Systems for Manual Assembly
16. Worker Assistance Systems in Manufacturing: A Review of the State of the Art and Future Directions10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.02.017 ↗
17. Markets and Markets (2020, March 25). Research Collaborative Robot Market Size, Growth, Trend and Forecast to 2025. Available online: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/collaborative-robot-market-194541294.html.
18. Bauer, W., Bender, M., Braun, M., Rally, P., and Scholtz, O. (2016). Lightweight Robots in Manual Assembly—Best to Start Simply! Examining Companies’ Initial Experiences with Lightweight Robots, Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO.
19. Strategies for Implementing Collaborative Robot Applications for the Operator 4.010.1007/978-3-030-30000-5_83 ↗
20. Human Robot Collaboration in Industrial Environments10.1007/978-3-030-78513-0_2 ↗
21. Statistisches Bundesamt (2018). Industrie 4.0: Roboter in 16% Der Unternehmen Im Verarbeitenden Gewerbe, Statistisches Bundesamt.
22. Schnell, M., and Holm, M. (2022, January 26–29). Challenges for Manufacturing SMEs in the Introduction of Collaborative Robots. Proceedings of the SPS 2022: Proceedings of the 10th Swedish Production Symposium, Skövde, Sweden.10.3233/ATDE220137 ↗
23. Potential Users’ Key Concerns and Expectations for the Adoption of Cobots10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.104 ↗
24. Capability-Based Task Allocation in Human-Robot Collaboration10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.011 ↗
25. Darvish, K., Bruno, B., Simetti, E., Mastrogiovanni, F., and Casalino, G. (2018, January 27–31). Interleaved Online Task Planning, Simulation, Task Allocation and Motion Control for Flexible Human-Robot Cooperation. Proceedings of the 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Nanjing, China.10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525644 ↗
26. Gualtieri, L., Rauch, E., and Vidoni, R. (2022). Human-Robot Activity Allocation Algorithm for the Redesign of Manual Assembly Systems into Human-Robot Collaborative Assembly. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 1–26.10.1080/0951192X.2022.2083687 ↗
27. Process-Oriented Task Assignment for Assembly Processes with Human-Robot Interaction10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.080 ↗
28. Skill Shift: Automation and the Future of the Workforce
29. Survey on Human–Robot Collaboration in Industrial Settings: Safety, Intuitive Interfaces and Applications10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.02.009 ↗
30. Schmidbauer, C., Schlund, S., Ionescu, T.B., and Hader, B. (2020, January 14–17). Adaptive Task Sharing in Human-Robot Interaction in Assembly. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore.10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309971 ↗
31. Success Factors for Introducing Industrial Human-Robot Interaction in Practice: An Empirically Driven Framework10.1007/s00170-020-06398-0 ↗
32. Survey of Human-Robot Collaboration in Industrial Settings: Awareness, Intelligence, and Compliance10.1109/TSMC.2020.3041231 ↗
33. Kollaborierende Oder Kollaborationsfähige Roboter?—Welche Rolle Spielt Die Mensch-Roboter-Kollaboration in Der Praxis?
34. Ermittlung Und Bewertung von Einsatzpotentialen Der Mensch-Roboter-Kollaboration—Methodisches Vorgehensmodell Für Die Industrielle Montage10.1515/zwf-2021-0002 ↗
35. Complexity-Based Task Allocation in Human-Robot Collaborative Assembly10.1108/IR-11-2018-0231 ↗
36. Genetic Algorithm-Based Task Allocation in Multiple Modes of Human–Robot Collaboration Systems with Two Cobots10.1007/s00170-022-08670-x ↗
37. Task Allocation and Planning for Product Disassembly with Human–Robot Collaboration10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102306 ↗
38. Optimizing Human–Robot Task Allocation Using a Simulation Tool Based on Standardized Work Descriptions
39. Task Allocation for Improved Ergonomics in Human-Robot Collaborative Assembly
40. Pupa, A., and Secchi, C. (2021–1, January 27). A Safety-Aware Architecture for Task Scheduling and Execution for Human-Robot Collaboration. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Prague, Czech Republic.10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9636855 ↗
41. Heydaryan, S., Bedolla, J.S., and Belingardi, G. (2018). Safety Design and Development of a Human-Robot Collaboration Assembly Process in the Automotive Industry. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8030344 ↗
42. Mutual Trust-Based Subtask Allocation for Human–Robot Collaboration in Flexible Lightweight Assembly in Manufacturing10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.07.007 ↗
43. A Dynamic Task Allocation Strategy to Mitigate the Human Physical Fatigue in Collaborative Robotics10.1109/LRA.2022.3143520 ↗
44. Dynamic Distribution of Assembly Tasks in a Collaborative Workcell of Humans and Robots10.5937/fmet1904723A ↗
45. Design Science in Information Systems Research10.2307/25148625 ↗
46. A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302 ↗
47. Towards a Novel Software Framework for the Intuitive Generation of Process Flows for Multiple Robotic Systems10.1016/j.procir.2022.04.023 ↗
48. Intuitive Interaktionsschnittstelle Für Technische Logistiksysteme—Konfiguration Und Überwachung von Prozessabläufen Mittels Multimodaler Mensch-Technik-Interaktion Und Digitalem Zwilling
49. Konold, P., and Reger, H. (2003). Praxis Der Montagetechnik, Springer Fachmedien. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-3-663-01609-0 ↗
50. Schröter, D. (2018). Entwicklung Einer Methodik Zur Planung von Arbeitssystemen in Mensch-Roboter-Kooperation, Universität Stuttgart.
51. Beumelburg, K. (2005). Fähigkeitsorientierte Montageablaufplanung in Der Direkten Mensch-Roboter-Kooperation (Engl. Skill-Oriented Assembly Sequence Planning for the Direct Man-Robot-Cooperation), Jost Jetter Verlag.
52. Chacón, A., Ponsa, P., and Angulo, C. (2021). Usability Study through a Human-Robot Collaborative Workspace Experience. Designs, 5.10.3390/designs5020035 ↗
53. (2022, May 25). DIN EN ISO 9241-11; Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction—Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts (ISO 9241-11:2018). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/63500.html.
54. Evaluating Fluency in Human-Robot Collaboration10.1109/THMS.2019.2904558 ↗
55. A Conceptual Framework to Evaluate Human-Robot Collaboration10.1007/s00170-020-05363-1 ↗
56. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9 ↗
57. NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later
58. The Best Task Allocation Process Is to Decide on One’s Own: Effects of the Allocation Agent in Human–Robot Interaction on Perceived Work Characteristics and Satisfaction10.1007/s10111-020-00656-7 ↗
59. The Development of a Scale to Evaluate Trust in Industrial Human-Robot Collaboration10.1007/s12369-015-0333-8 ↗
60. Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., McClelland, I.L., and Weerdmeester, B. (1996). SUS: A “Quick and Dirty” Usability Scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, CRC Press.10.1201/9781498710411 ↗
61. The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307 ↗
62. Towards Effective Interface Designs for Collaborative HRI in Manufacturing: Metrics and Measures10.1145/3385009 ↗
63. Developing a Framework for Assessing Information Quality on the World Wide Web
64. Franke, T., Attig, C., and Wessel, D. (2017). Assessing Affinity for Technology Interaction—The Affinity for Technology Assessing Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI), Unpublished.
65. Prabaswari, A.D., Basumerda, C., and Utomo, B.W. (2018, January 27–29). The Mental Workload Analysis of Staff in Study Program of Private Educational Organization. Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; Institute of Physics Publishing, Makasar, Indonesia.
66. Dynamic Task Classification and Assignment for the Management of Human-Robot Collaborative Teams in Workcells10.1007/s00170-018-2400-4 ↗
67. On a Human-Robot Collaboration in an Assembly Cell10.1080/0951192X.2016.1187297 ↗
68. Optimal Subtask Allocation for Human and Robot Collaboration within Hybrid Assembly System10.1109/TASE.2013.2274099 ↗
69. A Hierarchical Human-Robot Interaction-Planning Framework for Task Allocation in Collaborative Industrial Assembly Processes10.1109/LRA.2016.2535907 ↗
70. Smyk, A. (2022, November 04). The System Usability Scale & How It’s Used in UX. Available online: https://xd.adobe.com/ideas/process/user-testing/sus-system-usability-scale-ux/.