journal article·2022-11-09Open access

Predicting Road Crash Severity Using Classifier Models and Crash Hotspots

Md. Kamrul Islam, Imran Reza, Uneb Gazder, Rocksana Akter, Md Arifuzzaman, Muhammad Muhitur Rahman

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 22

Abstract

The rapid increase in traffic volume on urban roads, over time, has altered the global traffic scenario. Additionally, it has increased the number of road crashes, some of which are severe and fatal in nature. The identification of hazardous roadway sections using the spatial pattern analysis of crashes and recognition of the primary and contributing factors may assist in reducing the severity of road traffic crashes (R.T.C.s). For crash severity prediction, along with spatial patterns, various machine learning models are used, and the spatial relations of R.T.C.s with neighboring areas are evaluated. In this study, tree-based ensemble models (gradient boosting and random forest) and a logistic regression model are compared for the prediction of R.T.C. severity. Sample data of road crashes in Al-Ahsa, the eastern province of Saudi Arabia, were obtained from 2016 to 2018. Random forest (R.F.) identifies significant features strongly correlated with the severity of the R.T.C.s. The analysis findings showed that the cause of the crash and the type of collision are the most crucial elements affecting the severity of injuries in traffic crashes. Furthermore, the target-specific model interpretation results showed that distracted driving, speeding, and sudden lane changes significantly contributed to severe crashes. The random forest (R.F.) method surpassed other models in terms of injury severity, individual class accuracies, and collective prediction accuracy when using k-fold (k = 10) based on various performance metrics. In addition to taking into account the machine learning approach, this study also included spatial autocorrelation analysis based on G.I.S. for identifying crash hotspots, and Getis Ord Gi* statistics were devised to locate cluster zones with high- and low-severity crashes. The results demonstrated that the research area’s spatial dependence was very strong, and the spatial patterns were clustered with a distance threshold of 500 m. The analysis’s approaches, which included Getis Ord Gi*, the crash severity index, and the spatial autocorrelation of accident incidents according to Moran’s I, were found to be a successful way of locating and rating crash hotspots and crash severity. The techniques used in this study could be applied to large-scale crash data analysis while providing a useful tool for policymakers looking to improve roadway safety.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traffic and Road Safety · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia

Department of Civil, Architectural & Construction Management, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82070, USA

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bahrain, Isa Town P.O. Box 32038, Bahrain

Department of Civil Engineering, Dhaka University of Engineering and Technology, Gazipur 1707, Bangladesh

School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya 47500, Malaysia

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research in the King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia

References (84)

Show source-provided references
1. Risk Factors Associated with Traffic Violations and Accident Severity in China10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.004 ↗
2. Distracted Driving and Risk of Road Crashes among Novice and Experienced Drivers10.1056/NEJMsa1204142 ↗
3. World Health Organization (2015). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2015.
4. Lee, J., Yoon, T., Kwon, S., and Lee, J. (2020). Model Evaluation for Forecasting Traffic Accident Severity in Rainy Seasons Using Machine Learning Algorithms: Seoul City Study. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10010129 ↗
5. Analysis of the Traffic Injury Severity on Two-Lane, Two-Way Rural Roads Based on Classification Tree Models10.1016/j.ssci.2011.04.019 ↗
6. Urban Freeway Crash Analysis Geometric, Operational, and Weather Effects on Crash Number and Severity10.3141/2015-14 ↗
7. Analysis of Traffic Injury Severity: An Application of Nonparametric Classification Tree Techniques10.1016/j.aap.2006.04.009 ↗
8. Presentation of Clustering-Classification Heuristic Method for Improvement Accuracy in Classification of Severity of Road Accidents in Iran10.1016/j.ssci.2013.06.008 ↗
9. Extracting Decision Rules from Police Accident Reports through Decision Trees10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.006 ↗
10. Improving Student Enrollment Prediction Using Ensemble Classifiers
11. McClafferty, J., and Hankey, J.M. (2010). 100-Car Reanalysis: Summary of Primary and Secondary Driver Characteristics, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.
12. Studying the Effects of Driver Distraction and Traffic Density on the Probability of Crash and Near-Crash Events in Naturalistic Driving Environment10.1109/TITS.2013.2261988 ↗
13. Klauer, S.G., Guo, F., Sudweeks, J.D., and Dingus, T.A. (2010). An Analysis of Driver Inattention Using a Case-Crossover Approach on 100-Car Data: Final Report, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute. US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
14. Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Neale, V.L., Sudweeks, J.D., and Ramsey, D.J. (2006). The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data Analysis, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.10.1037/e729262011-001 ↗
15. Guo, F. (2011). Individual Driver Risk Analysis Using Naturalistic. Road Safety Simulation. [Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Virginia Tech].
16. Driving Anger, Emotional and Instrumental Aggressiveness, and Impulsiveness in the Prediction of Aggressive and Transgressive Driving10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.029 ↗
17. Analysis of Traffic Accident Injury Severity on Spanish Rural Highways Using Bayesian Networks10.1016/j.aap.2010.09.010 ↗
18. Application of Optimized Machine Learning Techniques for Prediction of Occupational Accidents10.1016/j.cor.2018.02.021 ↗
19. Becky, P.Y.l., and Anderson, T.K. (2022, November 01). 21 September 2015, Road Safety as a Public Health Issue from: Spatial Analysis Methods of Road Traffic Collisions CRC Press. Available online: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.1201/b18937-4.
20. Traffic Collisions in Space: Four Decades of Advancement in Applied, G.I.S10.1080/19475683.2015.1085440 ↗
21. Xu, Q., and Tao, G. (2018, January 22–24). Traffic Accident Hotspots Identification Based on Clustering Ensemble Model. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing/4th International Conference on Edge Computing and Scalable Cloud (CSCloud/EdgeCom), Shanghai, China.10.1109/CSCloud/EdgeCom.2018.00010 ↗
22. (2022, November 01). Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Economics (BITRE), 2012, Evaluation of the National Black Spot Program Volume 1 BITRE Report 126, Canberra ACT, Available online: https://www.bitre.gov.au/publications/2012/report_126.
23. Black Spot Analysis Methods: Literature Review. Onderz
24. Incorporating Travel Time Reliability in Predicting the Likelihood of Severe Crashes on Arterial Highways Using Non-Parametric Random-Effect Regression
25. The Statistical Analysis of Crash-Frequency Data: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Alternatives10.1016/j.tra.2010.02.001 ↗
26. The Statistical Analysis of Highway Crash-Injury Severities: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Alternatives10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.025 ↗
27. Rule Extraction from an Optimized Neural Network for Traffic Crash Frequency Modeling10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.017 ↗
28. The Effects of Congestion Charging on Road Traffic Casualties: A Causal Analysis Using Difference-in-Difference Estimation10.1016/j.aap.2012.02.013 ↗
29. Analysis of Freeway Accident Frequencies: Negative Binomial Regression versus Artificial Neural Network10.1016/j.ssci.2005.04.004 ↗
30. Forecasting Highway Casualties under the Effect of Railway Development Policy in Turkey Using Artificial Neural Networks10.1007/s00521-011-0778-0 ↗
31. Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis Algorithms for Discrete Symbol Sequences with Applications to Airline Safety10.1109/TSMCC.2008.2007248 ↗
32. Development and Evaluation of Neural Network Freeway Incident Detection Models Using Field Data10.1016/S0968-090X(97)00016-8 ↗
33. Haykin, S. (2009). Neural Networks and Learning Machines, Prentice Hall. [3rd ed.].
34. Identifying Significant Predictors of Injury Severity in Traffic Accidents Using a Series of Artificial Neural Networks10.1016/j.aap.2005.06.024 ↗
35. An Improved Deep Learning Model for Traffic Crash Prediction10.1155/2018/3869106 ↗
36. Prediction of Accident Severity Using Artificial Neural Networks
37. Predicting Motor Vehicle Collisions Using Bayesian Neural Network Models: An Empirical Analysis10.1016/j.aap.2006.12.014 ↗
38. A Bayesian Network Model of Two-Car Accidents
39. A Tutorial on Support Vector Regression10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗
40. Predicting Motor Vehicle Crashes Using Support Vector Machine Models10.1016/j.aap.2008.04.010 ↗
41. Forecasting of Short-Term Freeway Volume with v-Support Vector Machines10.3141/2024-11 ↗
42. Heidelberg, S.B. (2005). Support Vector Machines–An Introduction. Support Vector Machines: Theory and Applications, Springer.
43. Machine Learning Applied to Road Safety Modeling: A Systematic Literature Review
44. Analysis of Traffic Accident Severity Using Decision Rules via Decision Trees10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.027 ↗
45. Evaluation of Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm in Prediction of the Car Accidents on the Roads: A Case Study
46. Using Decision Trees for Comparing Different Consistency Models10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.145 ↗
47. Holland, J.H. (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press.
48. Analyzing Angle Crashes at Unsignalized Intersections Using Machine Learning Techniques10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.002 ↗
49. Deep Learning Methods and Applications10.1561/2000000039 ↗
50. Deep Learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
51. Traffic Accident Prediction Model Using Support Vector Machines with Gaussian Kernel10.1007/978-981-10-0451-3_1 ↗
52. Deep Architecture for Traffic Flow Prediction: Deep Belief Networks with Multitask Learning10.1109/TITS.2014.2311123 ↗
53. Mandal, J., Dutta, P., and Mukhopadhyay, S. (2017, January 24–25). Road-User Specific Analysis of Traffic Accident Using Data Mining Techniques. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communications, and Business Analytics, Kolkata, India.
54. Almamlook, R.E., Kwayu, K.M., Alkasisbeh, M.R., and Frefer, A.A. (2019, January 9–11). Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Traffic Accident Severity. Proceedings of the Jordan International Joint Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (JEEIT), Amman, Jordan.10.1109/JEEIT.2019.8717393 ↗
55. Mining Road Traffic Accident Data to Improve Safety: Role of Road-Related Factors on Accident Severity in Ethiopia
56. Predicting Driver Injury Severity in Single-Vehicle and Two-Vehicle Crashes with Boosted Regression Trees10.3141/2514-15 ↗
57. Modelling Pedestrian Crash Severity at Mid-Blocks
58. Economic Development, Demographic Characteristics, Road Network and Traffic Accidents in Zhongshan, China: Gradient Boosting Decision Tree Model
59. Predicting Bus Passenger Flow and Prioritizing Influential Factors Using Multi-Source Data: Scaled Stacking Gradient Boosting Decision Trees10.1109/TITS.2020.3035647 ↗
60. Predicting Injury Severity Levels in Traffic Crashes: A Modeling Comparison10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2004)130:2(204) ↗
61. A Data Mining Approach to Investigate Patterns of Powered Two-Wheeler Crashes in Spain10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.027 ↗
62. Jamal, A., Rahman, M.T., Al-Ahmadi, H.M., and Mansoor, U. (2020). The Dilemma of Road Safety in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia: Consequences and Prevention Strategies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17010157 ↗
63. Rahman, M.M., Islam, K., Al-Shayeb, A., and Arifuzzaman, M. (2022). Towards Sustainable Road Safety in Saudi Arabia: Exploring Traffic Accident Causes Associated with Driving Behavior Using a Bayesian Belief Network. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14106315 ↗
64. Almoshaogeh, M., Abdulrehman, R., Haider, H., Alharbi, F., Jamal, A., Alarifi, S., and Shafiquzzaman, M.D. (2021). Traffic Accident Risk Assessment Framework for Qassim, Saudi Arabia: Evaluating the Impact of Speed Cameras. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11156682 ↗
65. Islam, M.K., Gazder, U., Akter, R., and Arifuzzaman, M. (2022). Involvement of Road Users from the Productive Age Group in Traffic Crashes in Saudi Arabia: An Investigative Study Using Statistical and Machine Learning Techniques. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12136368 ↗
66. (2022, November 06). City-Fact. Available online: https://www.city-facts.com/al-ahsa.
67. Exploring Spatio-Temporal Effects in Traffic Crash Trend Analysis
68. Factors Influencing Crash Frequency on Colombian Rural Roads10.7307/ptt.v32i4.3385 ↗
69. Spatial Analysis of Road Crashes Involving Vulnerable Road Users in Support of Road Safety Management Strategies10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.031 ↗
70. Road Crashes in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Empirical Findings between the Years 2010 and 201410.4314/afrrev.v11i2.1 ↗
71. Analytic Methods in Accident Research: Methodological Frontier and Future Directions
72. Random Forest in Remote Sensing: A Review of Applications and Future Directions10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011 ↗
73. Flach, P. (2012). Machine Learning: The Art and Science of Algorithms That Make Sense of Data, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511973000 ↗
74. Demystifying Uncertainty in PM10 Susceptibility Mapping Using Variable Drop-off in Extreme-Gradient Boosting (X.G.B.) and Random Forest (R.F.) Algorithms10.1007/s11356-021-13255-4 ↗
75. Boschetti, A., and Massaron, L. (2018). Python Data Science Essentials: A Practitioner’s Guide Covering Essential Data Science Principles, Tools, and Techniques, Packt Publishing Ltd.
76. An Optimized XGBoost Based Diagnostic System for Effective Prediction of Heart Disease
77. Fiorentini, N., and Losa, M. (2020). Handling Imbalanced Data in Road Crash Severity Prediction by Machine Learning Algorithms. Infrastructures, 5.10.3390/infrastructures5070061 ↗
78. Classification of Motor Vehicle Crash Injury Severity: A Hybrid Approach for Imbalanced Data10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.025 ↗
79. Injury Severity Prediction of Traffic Crashes with Ensemble Machine Learning Techniques: A Comparative Study10.1080/17457300.2021.1928233 ↗
80. Murphy, K.P. (2012). Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective, M.I.T. Press.
81. Géron, A. (2019). Hands-on Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems, O’Reilly Media.
82. Boşanma Verilerinin Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Destekli Mekânsal İstatistiksel Yöntemler Ile İrdelenmesi. Investigation of Divorce Data with Spatial Statistical Methods Aided Geographic Information Systems Investigation of Divorce Data with Spatial Statistic
83. Exploring Alternative Spatial Weights to Detect Crash Hotspots10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101398 ↗
84. Spatiotemporal Analysis of Traffic Accidents Hotspots Based on Geospatial Techniques10.3390/ijgi11040260 ↗