Comparison of Nonlinear and Linear Controllers for Magnetic Levitation System
Source abstract
Abstract
Nonlinear system control belongs to advanced control problems important for real plants control design. Various techniques have been developed in this field. In this paper we compare two different approaches to a nonlinear unstable Magnetic levitation system control. The first control design approach further develops our recent results on robust discrete-time pole-placement, based on convex DR-regions. The second studied approach is based on feedback linearization and the simplified development of the corresponding nonlinear control law is provided. Both approaches are compared and evaluated. The efficiency of robust discrete-time pole-placement controller is shown as well as its competitiveness in comparison with nonlinear control for Magnetic levitation system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics · Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems · Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Automotive Mechatronics, Slovak University of Technology, 812 19 Bratislava, Slovakia
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Isidori, A. (1995). Nonlinear Control Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84628-615-5 ↗
2. Astolfi, A. (2007). Analysis and Design of Nonlinear Control Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-74358-3 ↗
3. Robust structural feedback linearization based on the nonlinearities rejection10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.11.044 ↗
4. CDM Based Servo State Feedback Controller with Feedback Linearization for Magnetic Levitation Ball System10.18517/ijaseit.8.3.1218 ↗
5. Robust control of uncertain systems: Classical results and recent developments10.1016/j.automatica.2014.02.042 ↗
6. Survey research on gain scheduling10.1016/S0005-1098(00)00058-3 ↗
7. Robust pole placement in LMI regions10.1109/9.811208 ↗
8. Boyd, S., El Ghaoui, L., Feron, E., and Balakrishnan, V. (1994). Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory, SIAM.10.1137/1.9781611970777 ↗
9. A new robust D-stability condition for real convex polytopic uncertainty10.1016/S0167-6911(99)00119-X ↗
10. Ebihara, Y., Peaucelle, D., and Arzelier, D. (2015). S-Variable Approach to LMI-Based Robust Control, Springer. Communications and Control Engineering.10.1007/978-1-4471-6606-1 ↗
11. Skelton, R.E., Iwasaki, T., and Grigoriadis, K. (1998). A Unified Algebraic Approach to Linear Control Design, Taylor and Francis.
12. Chestnov, V.N., Alexandrov, V.A., and Rezkov, I.G. (2019, January 1–4). Discrete-Time Control Based on Pole Placement by Engineering Performance Indices for SISO systems. Proceedings of the 2019 27th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED), Akko, Israel.10.1109/MED.2019.8798567 ↗
13. Performance boundary mapping for continuous and discrete time linear systems10.1016/j.automatica.2019.05.055 ↗
14. New results on restricted static output feedback H∞ controller design with regional pole placement10.1049/iet-cta.2018.6138 ↗
15. Behrouz, H., Mohammadzaman, I., and Mohammadi, A. (2019). Robust static output feedback design with pole placement constraints for linear systems with polytopic uncertainties. Trans. Inst. Meas. Control.10.1177/0142331218823857 ↗
16. Oliveira, R.C.L.F., de Oliveira, M.C., and Peres, P.L.D. (2011, January 28–30). Robust state feedback LMI methods for continuous-time linear systems: Discussions, extensions and numerical comparisons. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design (CACSD), Denver, CO, USA.10.1109/CACSD.2011.6044553 ↗
17. Khatibi, H., Karimi, A., and Longchamp, R. (2007, January 2–5). Robust pole placement of systems with polytopic uncertainty via convex optimization. Proceedings of the 2007 European Control Conference (ECC), Kos, Greece.10.23919/ECC.2007.7068219 ↗
18. Rosinová, D., and Hypiusová, M. (2019). LMI pole regions for a robust discrete-time pole placement controller design. Algorithms, 12.10.3390/a12080167 ↗
19. Hypiusová, M., and Rosinová, D. (2021). Discrete-Time Pole-Region Robust Controller for Magnetic Levitation Plant. Symmetry, 13.10.3390/sym13010142 ↗
20. Hypiusová, M., and Rosinová, D. (2019, January 11–14). Robust Pole Placement: DR-regions for Discrete-time Systems. Proceedings of the 2019 22nd International Conference on Process Control (PC19), Strbske Pleso, Slovakia.10.1109/PC.2019.8815107 ↗
21. Mahapatro, K., Rane, M., and Suryawanshi, P. (2016, January 12–13). Robust uncertainty compensation in MagLev by using extended state observer. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Computing Communication Control and automation (ICCUBEA), Pune, India.10.1109/ICCUBEA.2016.7860137 ↗
22. Stabilizujące sprzężenie zwrotne dla systemu magnetycznej lewitacji
23. Design of an adaptive state feedback controller for a magnetic levitation systems
24. Hypiusová, M., and Kozáková, A. (2017, January 6–9). Robust PID Controller Design for the Magnetic Levitation System: Frequency Domain. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Process Control, Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia.10.1109/PC.2017.7976226 ↗
25. (2008). Magnetic Levitation System 2EM—User’s Manual, INTECO Ltd.
26. Balko, P., and Rosinová, D. (2017, January 6–9). Modeling of magnetic levitation system. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Process Control, Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia.10.1109/PC.2017.7976222 ↗
27. Hypiusová, M., and Rosinová, D. (February, January 31). Discrete-time Robust LMI Pole Placement for Magnetic Levitation. Proceedings of the Cybernetics and Informatics, Lazy pod Makytou, Slovakia.
28. A new discrete-time robust stability condition10.1016/S0167-6911(99)00035-3 ↗
29. Lasserre, J. (2015). An Introduction to Polynomial ans Semi-Algebraic Optimization, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107447226 ↗