Comparison of a Response Surface Method and Artificial Neural Network in Predicting the Aerodynamic Performance of a Wind Turbine Airfoil and Its Optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
To find the optimal design for an engineering object, thousands of (or even more) simulations should be implemented to obtain the outcome data for the variously designed objects. However, repeating simulations this many times is impossible because a typical simulation is a computationally expensive task. Instead of conducting all the required simulations, a more efficient way is predicting the outcome from the approximation model, called the surrogate model. The response surface method (RSM) with polynomials and artificial neural network (ANN) are the most prominent methods in constructing a surrogate model in the engineering fields. In this study, the prediction accuracy of the surrogate models computed by using an RSM and ANN is compared with several datasets showing different complexities. This comparison is investigated by constructing the surrogate models in predicting aerodynamic performance of a wind turbine airfoil. In the current paper, it is verified that the prediction accuracy of the ANN-computed surrogate model is higher than the RSM-computed one when the datasets have a high level of complexity, but the opposite phenomenon is observed if the datasets have a low level of complexity. When the surrogate models with different accuracies are used to enhance the performance of a wind turbine airfoil, the surrogate model with a high level of accuracy produces the optimal design, showing a high performance improvement. The current study is expected to give guidance on how to properly choose between an RSM and ANN to construct a highly accurate surrogate model that can help in finding a design with a high performance improvement during the optimization process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Wind Energy Research and Development · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang 10540, Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C., and Anderson-Cook, C.M. (2016). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, John Wiley & Sons.
2. Finite element model updating in structural dynamics by using the response surface method10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.04.019 ↗
3. Improved response surface method and its application to stiffened plate reliability analysis10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00136-9 ↗
4. Hassoun, M.H. (1995). Fundamentals of Artificial Neural Networks, MIT Press.10.1109/JPROC.1996.503146 ↗
5. Artificial neural networks: Fundamentals, computing, design, and application10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00201-3 ↗
6. Graupe, D. (2013). Principles of Artificial Neural Networks, World Scientific.10.1142/8868 ↗
7. Finding the optimal shape of the leading-and-trailing car of a high-speed train using design-by-morphing10.1007/s00466-017-1482-4 ↗
8. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2019). Montly Energy Review.
9. Numerical investigation of dimple effects on darrieus vertical axis wind turbine10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.105 ↗
10. Performance evaluation of profile modifications on straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine by energy and Spalart Allmaras models10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.071 ↗
11. Feasibility analysis of a Darrieus vertical-axis wind turbine installation in the rooftop of a building10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.008 ↗
12. Darrieus vertical axis wind turbine for power generation II: Challenges in HAWT and the opportunity of multi-megawatt Darrieus VAWT development10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.039 ↗
13. Reduction of the generated aero-acoustics noise of a vertical axis wind turbine using CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) techniques10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.100 ↗
14. Development of low-noise drag-type vertical wind turbines10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.047 ↗
15. Botha, J., Rasam, A., Catháin, D., Rice, H., and Shahrokhi, A. (2016, January 19–21). Some noise predictions for small wind turbines. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISMA 2016 and International Conference on Uncertainty in Structural Dynamics, USD2016, Leuven, Belgium.
16. A wind turbine blade profile analysis code based on the singularities method10.1016/j.renene.2004.05.004 ↗
17. Mohammadi, M., Doosttalab, A., and Doosttalab, M. (2012, January 2–3). The effect of various gurney flaps shapes on the performace of wind turbine airfoils. Proceedings of the ASME Early Career Technical Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA.
18. Aerodynamic analysis of blunt trailing edge airfoils10.1115/1.1629103 ↗
19. Aramendia, I., Saenz-Aguirre, A., Fernandez-Gamiz, U., Zulueta, E., Lopez-Guede, J.M., Boyano, A., and Sancho, J. (2018). Gurney Flap Implementation on a DU91W250 Airfoil. Proceedings, 2.10.3390/proceedings2231448 ↗
20. Aramendia, I., Fernandez-Gamiz, U., Zulueta, E., Saenz-Aguirre, A., and Teso-Fz-Betoño, D. (2019). Parametric Study of a Gurney Flap Implementation in a DU91W (2) 250 Airfoil. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12020294 ↗
21. Numerical study of effect of solidity on vertical axis wind turbine with Gurney flap10.1016/j.jweia.2018.12.016 ↗
22. A critical study on passive flow control techniques for straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.072 ↗
23. The effects of aerofoil profile modification on a vertical axis wind turbine performance10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.034 ↗
24. Analysis of high Reynolds numbers effects on a wind turbine airfoil using 2D wind tunnel test data10.1088/1742-6596/753/2/022047 ↗
25. Multi-point robust design optimization of wind turbine airfoil under geometric uncertainty10.1177/0957650911426540 ↗
26. Low Reynolds number airfoil optimization for wind turbine applications using genetic algorithm10.1063/1.4822037 ↗
27. Nested and self-adaptive Bézier parameterizations for shape optimization10.1016/j.jcp.2006.12.016 ↗
28. Bezier-PARSEC: An optimized aerofoil parameterization for design10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.05.002 ↗
29. Curve intersection using Bézier clipping10.1016/0010-4485(90)90039-F ↗
30. Farin, G. (2014). Curves and Surfaces for Computer-Aided Geometric Design: A Practical Guide, Elsevier.
31. Drela, M. (1989). XFOIL: An analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoils. Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-84010-4_1 ↗
32. Use of XFOIL in design of camber-controlled morphing UAVs10.1002/cae.20437 ↗
33. Comparison of airfoil precomputational analysis methods for optimization of wind turbine blades10.1109/TSTE.2016.2522381 ↗
34. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019 ↗
35. Aerodynamic shape optimization of a transonic fan by an adjoint-response surface method10.1016/j.ast.2017.05.005 ↗
36. Classifying the perceptual interpretations of a bistable image using EEG and artificial neural networks10.3389/fnins.2017.00674 ↗
37. Ranked Feature-Based Laser Material Processing Monitoring and Defect Diagnosis Using k-NN and SVM10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.015 ↗
38. Artificial neural network (ANN) based model predictive control (MPC) and optimization of HVAC systems: A state of the art review and case study of a residential HVAC system10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.012 ↗
39. Residual neural network-based fully convolutional network for microstructure segmentation10.1080/13621718.2019.1687635 ↗
40. Deterministic global process optimization: Accurate (single-species) properties via artificial neural networks10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.10.007 ↗
41. Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., and Isard, M. (2016, January 2–4). Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. Proceedings of the 12th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI 16), Savannah, GA, USA.
42. Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization
43. A genetic algorithm tutorial10.1007/BF00175354 ↗
44. Cavazzuti, M. (2012). Optimization Methods: From Theory to Design Scientific and Technological Aspects in Mechanics, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-642-31187-1 ↗
45. Ioffe, S., and Szegedy, C. (2015). Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv.
46. Global design optimization for aerodynamics and rocket propulsion components10.1016/S0376-0421(01)00002-1 ↗
47. Design of experiments: Concept and applications of Plackett Burman design10.1080/10601330701220520 ↗
48. Application of central composite face-centered design and response surface methodology for the optimization of electro-Fenton decolorization of Azure B dye10.1007/s11356-011-0668-0 ↗
49. Comparison of artificial neural network (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) in the prediction of quality parameters of spray-dried pomegranate juice10.1080/07373930902988247 ↗
50. Modelling and optimization of Mn/activate carbon nanocatalysts for NO reduction: Comparison of RSM and ANN techniques10.1080/09593330.2012.750381 ↗