Virtual Reality and Internet of Things Based Digital Twin for Smart City Cross-Domain Interoperability
Source abstract
Abstract
The fusion of Internet of Things (IoT), Digital Twins, and Virtual Reality (VR) technologies marks a pivotal advancement in urban development, offering new services to citizens and municipalities in urban environments. This integration promises enhanced urban planning, management, and engagement by providing a comprehensive, real-time digital reflection of the city, enriched with immersive experiences and interactive capabilities. It enables smarter decision-making, efficient resource management, and personalized citizen services, transforming the urban landscape into a more sustainable, livable, and responsive environment. The research presented herein focuses on the practical implementation of a DT concept for managing cross-domain smart city services, leveraging VR technology to create a virtual replica of the urban environment and IoT devices. Imperative for cross-domain city services is interoperability, which is crucial not only for the seamless operation of these advanced tools but also for unlocking the potential of cross-service applications. Through the deployment of our model at the IoTMADLab facilities, we showcase the integration of IoT devices within varied urban infrastructures. The outcomes demonstrate the efficacy of VR interfaces in simplifying complex interactions, offering pivotal insights into device functionality, and enabling informed decision-making processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society · E-commerce and Technology Innovations · Advanced Technologies in Various Fields
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CEDINT-UPM, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Campus de Montegancedo sn, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcon, Spain
Funding
Business Forum for Madrid
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Smart Cities—A Structured Literature Review10.3390/smartcities6040080 ↗
2. Smart Cities: From Silos to Cross-Border Approach
3. A Review on Digital Twin Technology in Smart Grid, Transportation System and Smart City: Challenges and Future10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3241588 ↗
4. Bellini, P., Nesi, P., and Pantaleo, G. (2022). IoT-Enabled Smart Cities: A Review of Concepts, Frameworks and Key Technologies. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12031607 ↗
5. Internet of Things for Smart Cities10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328 ↗
6. Ramírez-Moreno, M.A., Keshtkar, S., Padilla-Reyes, D.A., Ramos-López, E., García-Martínez, M., Hernández-Luna, M.C., Mogro, A.E., Mahlknecht, J., Huertas, J.I., and Peimbert-García, R.E. (2021). Sensors for Sustainable Smart Cities: A Review. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11178198 ↗
7. A systematic review of a digital twin city: A new pattern of urban governance toward smart cities
8. Shahat, E., Hyun, C.T., and Yeom, C. (2021). City Digital Twin Potentials: A Review and Research Agenda. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13063386 ↗
9. Digital Twin for maintenance: A literature review10.1016/j.compind.2020.103316 ↗
10. Segovia, M., and Garcia-Alfaro, J. (2022). Design, Modeling and Implementation of Digital Twins. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22145396 ↗
11. Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002 ↗
12. Al-Ali, A.R., Gupta, R., Zaman Batool, T., Landolsi, T., Aloul, F., and Al Nabulsi, A. (2020). Digital Twin Conceptual Model within the Context of Internet of Things. Future Internet, 12.10.3390/fi12100163 ↗
13. Big data analysis of the internet of things in the digital twins of smart city based on deep learning10.1016/j.future.2021.10.006 ↗
14. Empowering digital twins with eXtended reality collaborations10.1016/j.vrih.2022.06.004 ↗
15. Digital twin collaborative platforms: Applications to humans-in-the-loop crafting of urban areas10.1109/MCE.2022.3214944 ↗
16. Jamei, E., Mortimer, M., Seyedmahmoudian, M., Horan, B., and Stojcevski, A. (2017). Investigating the Role of Virtual Reality in Planning for Sustainable Smart Cities. Sustainability, 9.10.3390/su9112006 ↗
17. Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives10.1080/10630732.2014.942092 ↗
18. A systematic review on semantic interoperability in the IoE-enabled smart cities10.1016/j.iot.2023.100754 ↗
19. Chaturvedi, K., and Kolbe, T.H. (2019). Towards Establishing Cross-Platform Interoperability for Sensors in Smart Cities. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19030562 ↗
20. Rocha, Á., and Guarda, T. (2018, January 10–12). Smart Cities Semantics and Data Models. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology & Systems (ICITS 2018), Libertad City, Ecuador. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing.10.1007/978-3-319-73450-7_110 ↗
21. Teixeira, B., Pinto, T., Silva, F., Santos, G., Praça, I., and Vale, Z. (2018). Multi-Agent Decision Support Tool to Enable Interoperability among Heterogeneous Energy Systems. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8030328 ↗
22. Aydin, S., and Aydin, M.N. (2020). Semantic and Syntactic Interoperability for Agricultural Open-Data Platforms in the Context of IoT Using Crop-Specific Trait Ontologies. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10134460 ↗
23. Dimara, A., Vasilopoulos, V.-G., Papaioannou, A., Angelis, S., Kotis, K., Anagnostopoulos, C.-N., Krinidis, S., Ioannidis, D., and Tzovaras, D. (2022). Self-Healing of Semantically Interoperable Smart and Prescriptive Edge Devices in IoT. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122211650 ↗
24. Jiang, S., Jiang, L., Han, Y., Wu, Z., and Wang, N. (2019). OpenBIM: An Enabling Solution for Information Interoperability. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9245358 ↗
25. Mannino, A., Dejaco, M.C., and Re Cecconi, F. (2021). Building Information Modelling and Internet of Things Integration for Facility Management—Literature Review and Future Needs. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11073062 ↗
26. Exploring Digital Twin Adaptation to The Urban Environment: Comparison With Cim To Avoid Silo-Based Approaches
27. A survey of data fusion in smart city applications10.1016/j.inffus.2019.05.004 ↗
28. Leveraging Deep Learning and IoT big data analytics to support the smart cities development: Review and future directions10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100303 ↗
29. Buhnova, B., Kazickova, T., Ge, M., Walletzky, L., Caputo, F., and Carrubbo, L. (2022). Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Optimization Tools for Smart Cities, Springer.
30. (2024, March 07). The Madrid IoT Laboratory. Available online: https://iotmadlab.es/en/the-laboratory/.
31. (2024, March 07). uCIFI Data Model. Available online: https://ucifi.org/ucifi-data-model/.
32. Datta, S.K., and Bonnet, C. (2015, January 7–9). A lightweight framework for efficient M2M device management in oneM2M architecture. Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Internet of Things (RIoT), Singapore.10.1109/RIOT.2015.7104900 ↗
33. Jimenez, J., Koster, M., and Tschofenig, H. (2016). Position Paper for the IOT Semantic Interoperability Workshop, OMA Specworks.
34. Shelby, Z., Hartke, K., and Bormann, C. (2014). The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) (No. rfc7252), Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).10.17487/rfc7252 ↗
35. Bormann, C., and Hoffman, P. (2013). Concise Binary Object Representation (cbor) (No. rfc7049), Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).10.17487/rfc7049 ↗
36. (2024, March 06). Home Assistant. Available online: https://www.home-assistant.io/.
37. (2024, March 06). The OpenXR Specification. Available online: https://registry.khronos.org/OpenXR/specs/1.0/html/xrspec.html.