Show source-provided references
1. Barthel, M., Mitchell, A., and Holcomb, J. (2020, May 02). Many Americans Believe Fake News Is Sowing Confusion. Available online: https://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion/.
2. (2021, January 15). CIGI-Ipsos Global Survey on Internet Security and Trust. Available online: https://www.cigionline.org/internet-survey-2019.
3. Silverman, C. (2020, May 02). This Analysis Shows How Viral Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News on Facebook. Available online: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook#.emA15rzd0.
4. Gowen, A. (2020, May 02). As Mob Lynchings Fueled by Whatsapp Messages Sweep India, Authorities Struggle to Combat Fake News. Available online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/as-mob-lynchings-fueled-by-whatsapp-sweep-india-authorities-struggle-to-combat-fake-news/2018/07/02/683a1578-7bba-11e8-ac4e-421ef7165923_story.html.
5. Kudrati, M. (2020, July 10). This Picture of Donald Trump Endorsing PM Modi Is a Hoax. Available online: https://www.boomlive.in/this-picture-of-donald-trump-endorsing-pm-modi-is-a-hoax/.
6. Baynes, C. (2020, July 15). Coronavirus: Patients Refusing Treatment Because of Fake News on Social Media, NHS Staff Warn. Available online: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-fake-news-conspiracy-theories-antivax-5g-facebook-twitter-a9549831.html.
7. Stoll, J. (2020, May 02). Reading Fake News about the Coronavirus in Norway 2020, by Source. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1108710/reading-fake-news-about-the-coronavirus-in-norway-by-source/.
8. Unnikrishnan, D. (2020, July 10). Photo of PM Narendra Modi Bowing to Xi Jinping Is Morphed. Available online: https://www.boomlive.in/fake-news/photo-of-pm-narendra-modi-bowing-to-xi-jinping-is-morphed-8579.
9. Alteration of Photos Raise Host of Legal, Ethical Issues
10. Jaffe, J. (2020, July 10). Dubya, Willya Turn the Book Over. Available online: https://www.wired.com/2002/11/dubya-willya-turn-the-book-over/.
11. Mishra, M., and Adhikary, M.C. (2013). Digital Image Tamper Detection Techniques—A Comprehensive Study. arXiv.
12. Mandankandy, A.A. (2017, January 17–18). Image forgery and its detection: A survey. Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovations in Information, Embedded and Communication Systems (ICIIECS), Coimbatore, India.
13. Parikh, S.B., and Atrey, P.K. (2018, January 10–12). Media-Rich Fake News Detection: A Survey. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR), Miami, FL, USA.
10.1109/MIPR.2018.00093 ↗16. Copy-move forgery detection using integrated DWT and SURF
17. Jwaid, M.F., and Baraskar, T.N. (2017, January 10–11). Study and analysis of copy-move & splicing image forgery detection techniques. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC), Palladam, India.
10.1109/I-SMAC.2017.8058268 ↗18. Huh, M., Liu, A., Owens, A., and Efros, A.A. (2018, January 8–14). Fighting Fake News: Image Splice Detection via Learned Self-Consistency. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany.
10.1007/978-3-030-01252-6_7 ↗19. Vadsola, M. (2020, May 10). The Math behind GANs (Generative Adversarial Networks). Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/the-math-behind-gans-generative-adversarial-networks-3828f3469d9c.
20. Vincent, J. (2020, July 10). Facebook’s Problems Moderating Deepfakes Will Only Get Worse in 2020. Available online: https://www.theverge.com/2020/1/15/21067220/deepfake-moderation-apps-tools-2020-facebook-reddit-social-media.
21. A comprehensive evaluation procedure for copy-move forgery detection methods: Results from a systematic review
10.1007/s11042-022-12010-2 ↗22. Fridrich, J., Soukal, D., and Lukas, J. (2003, January 6–8). Detection of copy-move forgery in digital images. Proceedings of the Digital Forensic Research Workshop, Cleveland, OH, USA.
23. Popescu, A.C., and Farid, H. (2004). Exposing Digital Forgeries by Detecting Duplicated Image Regions, Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College.
24. Li, G., Wu, Q., Tu, D., and Sun, S. (2007, January 2–5). A Sorted Neighborhood Approach for Detecting Duplicated Regions in Image Forgeries Based on DWT and SVD. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Beijing, China.
10.1109/ICME.2007.4285009 ↗25. Bayram, S., Sencar, H.T., and Memon, N. (2009, January 19–24). An efficient and robust method for detecting copy-move forgery. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Taipei, Taiwan.
10.1109/ICASSP.2009.4959768 ↗26. Gul, G., Avcibas, I., and Kurugollu, F. (2010, January 26–29). SVD based image manipulation detection. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Hong Kong, China.
10.1109/ICIP.2010.5652854 ↗28. An efficient scheme for detecting copy-move forged images by local binary patterns
35. Tanaka, M., Shiota, S., and Kiya, H. (2021). A Detection Method of Operated Fake-Images Using Robust Hashing. J. Imaging, 7.
10.3390/jimaging7080134 ↗39. A Novel Copy-Move Forgery Detection Algorithm via Feature Label Matching and Hierarchical Segmentation Filtering
10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102783 ↗40. Ng, T., and Chang, S. (2004, January 24–27). A model for image splicing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Singapore.
42. Image splicing detection using 2-D phase congruency and statistical moments of characteristic function
43. Wang, W., Dong, J., and Tan, T. (2009, January 7–10). Effective image splicing detection based on image chroma. Proceedings of the 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Cairo, Egypt.
44. Zhao, X., Li, J., Li, S., and Wang, S. (2010, January 1–3). Detecting Digital Image Splicing in Chroma Spaces. Proceedings of the Digital Watermarking: 9th International Workshop, IWDW 2010, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
48. Mazumdar, A., and Bora, P.K. (2016, January 18–22). Exposing splicing forgeries in digital images through dichromatic plane histogram discrepancies. Proceedings of the Tenth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, Guwahati, India.
10.1145/3009977.3010032 ↗49. Moghaddasi, Z., Jalab, H.A., and Noor, R.M. (2017, January 22–23). Image splicing detection using singular value decomposition. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of things, Data and Cloud Computing, Cambridge, UK.
10.1145/3018896.3036383 ↗56. Agrawal, S., Kumar, P., Seth, S., Parag, T., Singh, M., and Babu, V. (2022, January 19–20). SISL: Self-Supervised Image Signature Learning for Splicing Detection & Localization. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Work-Shops, New Orleans, LA, USA.
10.1109/CVPRW56347.2022.00012 ↗59. Fillion, C., and Sharma, G. (2010). Media Forensics and Security II, SPIE.
63. Krawetz, N. (2020, May 10). A Picture’s Worth… Hacker Factor Solutions. Available online: https://www.hackerfactor.com/papers.
64. Zhang, J., Wang, H., and Su, Y. (2008, January 21–22). Detection of Double-Compression in JPEG2000 Images. Proceedings of the 2008 Second International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application, Shanghai, China.
10.1109/IITA.2008.83 ↗68. Detecting GAN generated Fake Images using Co-occurrence Matrices
69. Matern, F., Riess, C., and Stamminger, M. (2019, January 7–11). Exploiting visual artifacts to expose deepfakes and face manipulations. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Winter Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW), Waikoloa Village, HI, USA.
10.1109/WACVW.2019.00020 ↗70. Li, Y., Chang, M.-C., and Lyu, S. (2018, January 11–13). In Ictu Oculi: Exposing AI Created Fake Videos by Detecting Eye Blinking. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), Hong Kong, China.
10.1109/WIFS.2018.8630787 ↗71. Zhang, W., Zhao, C., and Li, Y. (2020). A Novel Counterfeit Feature Extraction Technique for Exposing Face-Swap Images Based on Deep Learning and Error Level Analysis. Entropy, 22.
10.3390/e22020249 ↗73. Sunstein, C.R. (2014). On Rumors: How Falsehoods Spread, Why We Believe Them, and What Can Be Done, Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400851225 ↗74. Jin, Z., Cao, J., Luo, J., and Zhang, Y. (2016). Image credibility analysis with effective domain transferred deep networks. arXiv.
76. Ghanem, B., Ponzetto, S.P., and Rosso, P. (2020, January 14–16). FacTweet: Profiling Fake News Twitter Accounts. Proceedings of the International Conference on Statistical Language and Speech Processing, Cardiff, UK.
10.1007/978-3-030-59430-5_3 ↗77. PRNU-based Image Forgery Localization with Deep Multi-scale Fusion
10.1145/3548689 ↗78. Xie, X., Liu, Y., de Rijke, M., He, J., Zhang, M., and Ma, S. (2018, January 5–9). Why People Search for Images using Web Search Engines. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
10.1145/3159652.3159686 ↗79. Xie, X., Mao, J., Liu, Y., de Rijke, M., Shao, Y., Ye, Z., Zhang, M., and Ma, S. (2019, January 13–17). Grid-based Evaluation Metrics for Web Image Search. Proceedings of the The World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2019), San Francisco, CA, USA.
10.1145/3308558.3313514 ↗80. Gaikwad, M., and Hoeber, O. (2019, January 10–14). An Interactive Image Retrieval Approach to Searching for Images on Social Media. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR, 2019), Glasgow, UK.
10.1145/3295750.3298930 ↗82. Gupta, A., Lamba, H., Kumaraguru, P., and Joshi, A. (2013, January 13–17). Faking Sandy: Characterizing and identifying fake images on Twitter during Hurricane Sandy. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
10.1145/2487788.2488033 ↗86. Xu, Z., Li, S., and Deng, W. (2015, January 3–6). Learning temporal features using LSTM-CNN architecture for face anti-spoofing. Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Conference on Pattern Recognition, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
10.1109/ACPR.2015.7486482 ↗87. Bayar, B., and Stamm, M.C. (2016, January 20–22). A deep learning approach to universal image manipulation detection using a new convolutional layer. Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security, Vigo, Spain.
10.1145/2909827.2930786 ↗88. Rao, Y., and Ni, J. (2016, January 4–7). A deep learning approach to detection of splicing and copy-move forgeries in images. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
10.1109/WIFS.2016.7823911 ↗91. Bappy, J.H., Roy-Chowdhury, A.K., Bunk, J., Nataraj, L., and Manjunath, B. (2017, January 22–29). Exploiting Spatial Structure for Localizing Manipulated Image Regions. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy.
10.1109/ICCV.2017.532 ↗92. Zhou, P., Han, X., Morariu, V.I., and Davis, L.S. (2018, January 18–22). Learning Rich Features for Image Manipulation Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
10.1109/CVPR.2018.00116 ↗94. Image splicing forgery detection combining coarse to refined convolutional neural network and adaptive clustering
10.1016/j.ins.2019.09.038 ↗95. Wu, Y., Abd-Almageed, W., and Natarajan, P. (2018). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer.
96. Bi, X., Wei, Y., Xiao, B., and Li, W. (2019, January 16–17). RRU-Net: The Ringed Residual U-Net for Image Splicing Forgery Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Long Beach, CA, USA.
10.1109/CVPRW.2019.00010 ↗