Machine Learning Prediction of Turning Precision Using Optimized XGBoost Model
Source abstract
Abstract
The present study proposes a machine learning approach for optimizing turning parameters in such a way as to maximize the turning precision. The Taguchi method is first employed to optimize the turning parameters, and the experimental results are then used to train three machine learning models to predict the turning precision for any given values of the input parameters. The model which shows the best prediction performance (XGBoost) is further improved through the use of a synthetic minority over-sampling technique for regression with Gaussian noise (SMOGN) and four different optimization algorithms, including center particle swarm optimization (CPSO). Finally, the performances of the various models are evaluated and compared using the leave-one-out cross-validation technique. The experimental results show that the XGBoost model, combined with SMOGN and CPSO, provides the best performance, and is a useful tool for predicting the machining error of turning. The method can also reduce the cost of obtaining the optimized turning parameters corresponding with the predicted machining error.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Intelligent Automation Engineering, National Chin Yi University of Technology, Taichung City 41170, Taiwan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 62102, Taiwan
Advanced Institute of Manufacturing with High-Tech Innovations (AIM-HI), National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 62102, Taiwan
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Stephenson, D.A., and Agapiou, J.S. (2018). Metal Cutting Theory and Practice, CRC Press.10.1201/9781315373119 ↗
2. Su, Y., Zhao, G., Zhao, Y., Meng, J., and Li, C. (2020). Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters in turning AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Metals, 10.10.3390/met10020217 ↗
3. Experimental and statistical investigation of the effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness, vibration and energy consumption in machining of titanium 6Al-4V ELI (grade 5) alloy10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108465 ↗
4. Zhou, T., He, L., Wu, J., Du, F., and Zou, Z. (2019). Prediction of surface roughness of 304 stainless steel and multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters based on GA-GBRT. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183684 ↗
5. Wu, T.Y., and Lin, C.C. (2021). Optimization of machining parameters in milling process of inconel 718 under surface roughness constraints. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11052137 ↗
6. Sivalingam, V., Sun, J., Mahalingam, S.K., Nagarajan, L., Natarajan, Y., Salunkhe, S., Nasr, E.A., Davim, J.P., and Hussein, H.M.A.M. (2021). Optimization of process parameters for turning Hastelloy x under different machining environments using evolutionary algorithms: A comparative study. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11209725 ↗
7. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects10.1126/science.aaa8415 ↗
8. Lu, X., Hou, P., Luan, Y., Sun, X., Qiao, J., and Zhou, Y. (2022). Study on surface roughness of sidewall when micro-milling LF21 waveguide slits. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12115415 ↗
9. Chen, C.H., Jeng, S.Y., and Lin, C.J. (2022). Prediction and analysis of the surface roughness in CNC end milling using neural networks. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12010393 ↗
10. Prediction of surface roughness in CNC face milling using neural networks and Taguchi’s design of experiments10.1016/S0736-5845(02)00005-4 ↗
11. Approach to optimization of cutting conditions by using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.123 ↗
12. Modeling and prediction of surface roughness in turning operations using artificial neural network and multiple regression method10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.041 ↗
13. Optimization of radial basis function neural network employed for prediction of surface roughness in hard turning process using Taguchi’s orthogonal arrays10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.058 ↗
14. Influence of coating material and cutting parameters on surface roughness and material removal rate in turning process using Taguchi method10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.550 ↗
15. Kolarik, M., Burget, R., and Riha, K. (2020, January 7–9). Comparing normalization methods for limited batch size segmentation neural networks. Proceedings of the 2020 43rd International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP), Milan, Italy.10.1109/TSP49548.2020.9163397 ↗
16. Leave-one-out-training and leave-one-out-testing hidden Markov models for a handwritten numeral recognizer: The implications of a single classifier and multiple classifications10.1109/TPAMI.2008.254 ↗
17. Prihatno, A.T., Nurcahyanto, H., and Jang, Y.M. (2021, January 13–16). Predictive maintenance of relative humidity using random forest method. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC), Jeju Island, Korea.10.1109/ICAIIC51459.2021.9415213 ↗
18. A novel seepage behavior prediction and lag process identification method for concrete dams using HGWO-XGBoost model10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3056588 ↗
19. Patil, S., and Kulkarni, U. (2019, January 23–25). Accuracy prediction for distributed decision tree using machine learning approach. Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), Tirunelveli, India.10.1109/ICOEI.2019.8862580 ↗
20. Branco, P., Torgo, L., and Ribeiro, R.P. (2017, January 22). SMOGN: A pre-processing approach for imbalanced regression. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Learning with Imbalanced Domains: Theory and Applications, Skopje, Macedonia.
21. Forecasting of photovoltaic power generation and model optimization: A review10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.017 ↗
22. Development of NOx reduction system utilizing artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic algorithm (GA)10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.276 ↗
23. An improved grey wolf optimizer for solving engineering problems
24. An integrated design of particle swarm optimization (PSO) with fusion of features for detection of brain tumor10.1016/j.patrec.2019.11.017 ↗
25. Yang, X., Jiao, Q., and Liu, X. (2019, January 15–17). Center particle swarm optimization algorithm. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 3rd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC), Chengdu, China.