Data-Driven Personalized Learning Path Planning Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments in MOOCs
Source abstract
Abstract
Personalized learning paths aim to save learning time and improve learning achievements by providing the most appropriate learning sequence for heterogeneous students. Most existing methods that construct personalized learning paths focus on students’ characteristics or knowledge structure, while ignoring the critical roles of learning states. This study describes a dynamic personalized learning path planning algorithm to recommend appropriate knowledge points for online students based on their learning states and the difficulty of each knowledge point. The proposed method first calculates the difficulty of knowledge points automatically and constructs a knowledge difficulty model. Then, a dynamic knowledge mastery model is built based on learning behavior and normalized test scores. Finally, a path that satisfies students’ personalized changing states is generated. To achieve the aforementioned goal, a novel method that calculates the difficulty of knowledge points automatically is proposed. Moreover, the personalized learning path planning method proposed in this research is not limited to a particular course. To evaluate the method, we use a series of approaches to verify the impact of the personalized path on student learning. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can effectively generate personalized learning paths. Results demonstrate that the personalized path proposed by the algorithm can improve effective behavior rates, course completion rates and learning efficiency. Results also show that the personalized learning paths based on student states would help students to master knowledge.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Online Learning and Analytics · Educational Technology and Assessment · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Educational Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210049, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Xiao, J., Jiang, B., Xu, Z., and Wang, M. (2014, January 8–10). The usability research of learning resource design for MOOCs. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), Wellington, New Zealand.10.1109/TALE.2014.7062640 ↗
2. Nawrot, I., and Doucet, A. (2014, January 7–11). Building engagement for MOOC students: Introducing support for time management on online learning platforms. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, Seoul, Korea.10.1145/2567948.2580054 ↗
3. Wang, L., and Wang, H. (2019, January 23–25). Learning behavior analysis and dropout rate prediction based on MOOCs data. Proceedings of the 2019 10th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME), Qingdao, China.10.1109/ITME.2019.00100 ↗
4. US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology (2017). Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan Update, National Education Technology Plan Update.
5. Fasihuddin, H., Skinner, G., and Athauda, R. (2014, January 24). Towards an adaptive model to personalise open learning environments using learning styles. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information, Communication Technology and System (ICTS) 2014, Surabaya, Indonesia.10.1109/ICTS.2014.7010580 ↗
6. LD–LP Generation of Personalized Learning Path Based on Learning Diagnosis10.1109/TLT.2021.3058525 ↗
7. Supporting teachers in identifying students’ learning styles in learning management systems: An automatic student modelling approach
8. Auvinen, T. (2015, January 9–12). Harmful study habits in online learning environments with automatic assessment. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/LaTiCE.2015.31 ↗
9. Nabizadeh, A.H., Gonçalves, D., Gama, S., Jorge, J., and Rafsanjani, H.N. (2020). Adaptive learning path recommender approach using auxiliary learning objects. Comput. Educ., 147.10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103777 ↗
10. Cai, D., Zhang, Y., and Dai, B. (2019, January 6–9). Learning path recommendation based on knowledge tracing model and reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), Chengdu, China.10.1109/ICCC47050.2019.9064104 ↗
11. Li, W., and Zhang, L. (2019, January 18–20). Personalized learning path generation based on network embedding and learning effects. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 10th International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), Beijing, China.10.1109/ICSESS47205.2019.9040721 ↗
12. Wanichsan, D., Panjaburee, P., and Chookaew, S. (2021). Enhancing knowledge integration from multiple experts to guiding personalized learning paths for testing and diagnostic systems. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., 2.10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100013 ↗
13. LPR: A bio-inspired intelligent learning path recommendation system based on meaningful learning theory10.1007/s10639-020-10133-3 ↗
14. Learning path recommendation based on modified variable length genetic algorithm10.1007/s10639-017-9637-7 ↗
15. Adorni, G., and Koceva, F. (December, January 29). Educational concept maps for personalized learning path generation. Proceedings of the Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, Genova, Italy.
16. Rohloff, T., Sauer, D., and Meinel, C. (2019, January 24–25). On the acceptance and usefulness of personalized learning objectives in MOOCs. Proceedings of the the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1145/3330430.3333624 ↗
17. An evolutionary approach for personalization of content delivery in e-learning systems based on learner behavior forcing compatibility of learning materials10.1016/j.tele.2017.02.004 ↗
18. Feng, X., Xie, H., Peng, Y., Chen, W., and Sun, H. (2010, January 7–11). Groupized learning path discovery based on member profile. Proceedings of the International Conference on Web-Based Learning, Shanghai, China.10.1007/978-3-642-20539-2_32 ↗
19. Collaborative optimization algorithm for learning path construction in E-learning10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.06.016 ↗
20. An attribute-based ant colony system for adaptive learning object recommendation10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.066 ↗
21. Xie, H., Chu, H.C., Hwang, G.J., and Wang, C.C. (2019). Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Comput. Educ., 140.10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103599 ↗
22. Yu, C.H., Wu, J., and Liu, A.C. (2019). Predicting learning outcomes with MOOC clickstreams. Educ. Sci., 9.10.3390/educsci9020104 ↗
23. CCVis: Visual analytics of student online learning behaviors using course clickstream data10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2019.1.VDA-681 ↗
24. Xia, M., Sun, M., Wei, H., Chen, Q., Wang, Y., Shi, L., Qu, H., and Ma, X. (2019, January 4–9). Peerlens: Peer-inspired interactive learning path planning in online question pool. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Scotland, UK.10.1145/3290605.3300864 ↗
25. Learning path combination recommendation based on the learning networks10.1007/s00500-019-04205-x ↗
26. Dalipi, F., Imran, A.S., and Kastrati, Z. (2018, January 17–20). MOOC dropout prediction using machine learning techniques: Review and research challenges. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363340 ↗
27. Fung, S., Tam, V., and Lam, E.Y. (2011, January 6–8). Enhancing learning paths with concept clustering and rule-based optimization. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Athens, GA, USA.10.1109/ICALT.2011.78 ↗
28. A multi-constraint learning path recommendation algorithm based on knowledge map10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.011 ↗
29. Liang, J., Li, C., and Zheng, L. (2016, January 23–25). Machine learning application in MOOCs: Dropout prediction. Proceedings of the 2016 11th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), Nagoya, Japan.10.1109/ICCSE.2016.7581554 ↗
30. Li, X., Xie, L., and Wang, H. (2016, January 17). Grade prediction in MOOCs. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) and IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC) and 15th Intl Symposium on Distributed Computing and Applications for Business Engineering (DCABES), Paris, France.10.1109/CSE-EUC-DCABES.2016.213 ↗
31. Shi, D., Wang, T., Xing, H., and Xu, H. (2020). A learning path recommendation model based on a multidimensional knowledge graph framework for e-learning. Knowl.-Based Syst., 195.10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105618 ↗
32. Rahayu, N.W., Ferdiana, R., and Kusumawardani, S.S. (2022). A systematic review of ontology use in E-Learning recommender system. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., 13.10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100047 ↗
33. Yu, J., Wang, Y., Zhong, Q., Luo, G., Mao, Y., Sun, K., Feng, W., Xu, W., Cao, S., and Zeng, K. (2021, January 1–5). MOOCCubeX: A Large Knowledge-centered Repository for Adaptive Learning in MOOCs. Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, Online.10.1145/3459637.3482010 ↗
34. Saaty, T.L., and Kearns, K.P. (1985). Chapter 3—The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Analytical Planning, Pergamon.10.1016/B978-0-08-032599-6.50006-4 ↗