Data-Driven Adaptive Control for Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing with Automatic Controller Tuning
Source abstract
Abstract
Closed-loop control is desirable in direct energy deposition (DED) to stabilize the process and improve the fabrication quality. Most existing DED controllers require system identifications by experiments to obtain plant models or layer-dependent adaptive control rules, and such processes are cumbersome and time-consuming. This paper proposes a novel data-driven adaptive control strategy to adjust laser voltage with the melt pool size feedback. A multitasking controller architecture is developed to incorporate an autotuning unit that optimizes controller parameters based on the DED process data automatically. Experimental validations show improvements in the geometric accuracy and melt pool consistency of controlled samples. The main advantage of the proposed controller is that it can adapt to DED processes with different part shapes, materials, tool paths, and process parameters without tweaking. System identification is not required even when process conditions are changed, which reduces the controller implementation time and cost for end-users.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, 73 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637662, Singapore
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Ave, Singapore 639798, Singapore
Funding
A*ccelerate
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Dass, A., and Moridi, A. (2019). State of the Art in Directed Energy Deposition: From Additive Manufacturing to Materials Design. Coatings, 9.10.3390/coatings9070418 ↗
2. Microstructural Control of Additively Manufactured Metallic Materials10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031816 ↗
3. A Review on Process Monitoring and Control in Metal-Based Additive Manufacturing10.1115/1.4028540 ↗
4. Closed loop control of melt pool width in robotized laser powder–directed energy deposition process10.1007/s00170-019-04195-y ↗
5. Study on influential factors for process monitoring and control in laser aided additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.10.006 ↗
6. A Process Map for Consistent Build Conditions in the Solid Freeform Fabrication of Thin-Walled Structures10.1115/1.1370497 ↗
7. Process Maps for Predicting Residual Stress and Melt Pool Size in the Laser-Based Fabrication of Thin-Walled Structures10.1115/1.2335852 ↗
8. Identification and qualification of temperature signal for monitoring and control in laser cladding10.1016/j.optlaseng.2006.01.009 ↗
9. Characterization of the process control for the direct laser metallic powder deposition10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.05.006 ↗
10. A camera based feedback control strategy for the laser cladding process10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.06.027 ↗
11. Sensing, modeling and control for laser-based additive manufacturing10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00163-3 ↗
12. OpenLMD, an open source middleware and toolkit for laser-based additive manufacturing of large metal parts10.1016/j.rcim.2018.04.006 ↗
13. A feedforward controller for tuning laser cladding melt pool geometry in real time10.1007/s00170-016-9138-7 ↗
14. Control of melt pool temperature and deposition height during direct metal deposition process10.1007/s00170-011-3395-2 ↗
15. Melt pool size control through multiple closed-loop modalities in laser-wire directed energy deposition of Ti-6Al-4V
16. Virtual reference feedback tuning: A direct method for the design of feedback controllers10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00032-8 ↗
17. (2020, July 25). OpenCV. Available online: https://opencv.org/.
18. Visioli, A. (2006). Practical PID Control, Springer.
19. Bazanella, A.S., Campestrini, L., and Eckhard, D. (2011). Data-Driven Controller Design: The H2 Approach, Springer Science & Business Media.
20. Deterministic continuous-time Virtual Reference Feedback Tuning (VRFT) with application to PID design10.1016/j.sysconle.2019.03.007 ↗
21. Ogata, K. (1998). Discrete-Time Control Systems, Prentice-Hall. [2nd ed.].
22. Campi, M.C., Lecchini, A., and Savaresi, S.M. (2000, January 12–15). Virtual reference feedback tuning (VRFT): A new direct approach to the design of feedback controllers. Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187), Sydney, Australia.
23. pyvrft: A Python package for the Virtual Reference Feedback Tuning, a direct data-driven control method10.1016/j.softx.2019.100383 ↗
24. Stoica, P., and Moses, R.L. (2005). Spectral Analysis of Signals, Pearson, Prentice Hall.
25. Gröchenig, K. (2001). Foundations of Time-Frequency Analysis, Birkhäuser Boston.10.1007/978-1-4612-0003-1 ↗
26. Chen, L., Yao, X., Xu, P., Moon, S.K., and Bi, G. (2020, January 20–23). Surface Monitoring for Additive Manufacturing with in-situ Point Cloud Processing. Proceedings of the 2020 6th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR), Singapore.10.1109/ICCAR49639.2020.9108092 ↗
27. Chen, L., Yao, X., Xu, P., Moon, S.K., and Bi, G. (2020). Rapid surface defect identification for additive manufacturing with in-situ point cloud processing and machine learning. Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 1–18.10.1080/17452759.2020.1832695 ↗
28. Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers10.1115/1.2899060 ↗