STHarDNet: Swin Transformer with HarDNet for MRI Segmentation
Source abstract
Abstract
In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentation, conventional approaches utilize U-Net models with encoder–decoder structures, segmentation models using vision transformers, or models that combine a vision transformer with an encoder–decoder model structure. However, conventional models have large sizes and slow computation speed and, in vision transformer models, the computation amount sharply increases with the image size. To overcome these problems, this paper proposes a model that combines Swin transformer blocks and a lightweight U-Net type model that has an HarDNet blocks-based encoder–decoder structure. To maintain the features of the hierarchical transformer and shifted-windows approach of the Swin transformer model, the Swin transformer is used in the first skip connection layer of the encoder instead of in the encoder–decoder bottleneck. The proposed model, called STHarDNet, was evaluated by separating the anatomical tracings of lesions after stroke (ATLAS) dataset, which comprises 229 T1-weighted MRI images, into training and validation datasets. It achieved Dice, IoU, precision, and recall values of 0.5547, 0.4185, 0.6764, and 0.5286, respectively, which are better than those of the state-of-the-art models U-Net, SegNet, PSPNet, FCHarDNet, TransHarDNet, Swin Transformer, Swin UNet, X-Net, and D-UNet. Thus, STHarDNet improves the accuracy and speed of MRI image-based stroke diagnosis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Neural Network Applications · Brain Tumor Detection and Classification · Medical Imaging and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea
Funding
Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Badža, M., and Barjaktarović, M. (2021). Segmentation of Brain Tumors from MRI Images Using Convolutional Autoencoder. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11094317 ↗
2. Ghosh, S., Huo, M., Shawkat, M.S.A., and McCalla, S. (2021). Using Convolutional Encoder Networks to Determine the Optimal Magnetic Resonance Image for the Automatic Segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11188335 ↗
3. Wu, S., Wu, Y., Chang, H., Su, F.T., Liao, H., Tseng, W., Liao, C., Lai, F., Hsu, F., and Xiao, F. (2021). Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Various Brain Lesions for Radiosurgery. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11199180 ↗
4. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015, January 5–9). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
5. Wang, D., Wu, Z., and Yu, H. (2021). TED-Net: Convolution-Free T2T Vision Transformer-Based Encoder-Decoder Dilation Network for Low-Dose CT Denoising. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-030-87589-3_43 ↗
6. Zhou, H.-Y., Guo, J., Zhang, Y., Yu, L., Wang, L., and Yu, Y. (2021). nnFormer: Interleaved Transformer for Volumetric Segmentation. arXiv.
7. End-to-End Object Detection with Trans-formers
8. Zheng, S., Lu, J., Zhao, H., Zhu, X., Luo, Z., Wang, Y., Fu, Y., Feng, J., Xiang, T., and Torr, P.H. (2021, January 21–24). Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformers. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00681 ↗
9. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., and Gelly, S. (2020). An Image Is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. arXiv.
10. Xu, G., Wu, X., Zhang, X., and He, X. (2021). LeViT-UNet: Make Faster Encoders with Transformer for Medical Image Segmentation. arXiv.10.2139/ssrn.4116174 ↗
11. Chang, Y., Menghan, H., Guangtao, Z., and Xiao-Ping, Z. (2021). TransClaw U-Net: Claw U-Net with Transformers for Medical Image Segmentation. arXiv.
12. Chen, J., Lu, Y., Yu, Q., Luo, X., Adeli, E., Wang, Y., Lu, L., Yuille, A.L., and Zhou, Y. (2021). TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentation. arXiv.
13. Wang, W., Chen, C., Ding, M., Yu, H., Zha, S., and Li, J. (2021). TransBTS: Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Transformer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-87193-2_11 ↗
14. Chao, P., Kao, C.-Y., Ruan, Y., Huang, C.-H., and Lin, Y.-L. (November, January 27). HarDNet: A Low Memory Traffic Network. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, Korea.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00365 ↗
15. Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., and Guo, B. (2021). Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows. arXiv.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986 ↗
16. Cao, H., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Jiang, D., Zhang, X., Tian, Q., and Wang, M. (2021). Swin-Unet: Unet-like Pure Transformer for Medical Image Segmentation. arXiv.
17. X-Net: Brain Stroke Lesion Segmentation Based on Depthwise Separable Convolution and Long-Range Dependencies
18. D-UNet: A Dimension-Fusion U Shape Network for Chronic Stroke Lesion Segmentation10.1109/TCBB.2019.2939522 ↗
19. DFENet: A Novel Dimension Fusion Edge Guided Network for Brain MRI Segmentation10.1007/s42979-021-00835-x ↗
20. MI-UNet: Multi-Inputs UNet Incorporating Brain Parcellation for Stroke Lesion Segmentation From T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Images10.1109/JBHI.2020.2996783 ↗
21. (2021, February 15). Anatomical Tracings of Lesions after Stroke (ATLAS) R1.1. Available online: http://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/retro/atlas.html.
22. A large, open source dataset of stroke anatomical brain images and manual lesion segmentations10.1038/sdata.2018.11 ↗
23. SegNnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615 ↗
24. Zhao, H., Shi, J., Qi, X., Wang, X., and Jia, J. (2017, January 21–26). Pyramid scene parsing network. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.660 ↗