journal article·2021-10-05Open access

Solving the Dynamic Weapon Target Assignment Problem by an Improved Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm

Lingren Kong, Jianzhong Wang, Peng Zhao

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 19

Abstract

Dynamic weapon target assignment (DWTA) is an effective method to solve the multi-stage battlefield fire optimization problem, which can reflect the actual combat scenario better than static weapon target assignment (SWTA). In this paper, a meaningful and effective DWTA model is established, which contains two practical and conflicting objectives, namely, maximizing combat benefits and minimizing weapon costs. Moreover, the model contains limited resource constraints, feasibility constraints and fire transfer constraints. The existence of multi-objective and multi-constraint makes DWTA more complicated. To solve this problem, an improved multiobjective particle swarm optimization algorithm (IMOPSO) is proposed in this paper. Various learning strategies are adopted for the dominated and non-dominated solutions of the algorithm, so that the algorithm can learn and evolve in a targeted manner. In order to solve the problem that the algorithm is easy to fall into local optimum, this paper proposes a search strategy based on simulated binary crossover (SBX) and polynomial mutation (PM), which enables elitist information to be shared among external archive and enhances the exploratory capabilities of IMOPSO. In addition, a dynamic archive maintenance strategy is applied to improve the diversity of non-dominated solutions. Finally, this algorithm is compared with three state-of-the-art multiobjective optimization algorithms, including solving benchmark functions and DWTA model in this article. Experimental results show that IMOPSO has better convergence and distribution than the other three multiobjective optimization algorithms. IMOPSO has obvious advantages in solving multiobjective DWTA problems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Military Defense Systems Analysis · Guidance and Control Systems · Military Strategy and Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

China North Vehicle Research Institute, Beijing100072, China

Funding

Defense Industrial Technology Development Program

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Allocating weapons to target complexes by means of nonlinear programming10.1287/opre.14.6.992 ↗
2. Constrained Weapon–Target Assignment: Enhanced Very Large Scale Neighborhood Search Algorithm10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2030163 ↗
3. Advanced Input Generating Algorithm for Effect-Based Weapon–Target Pairing Optimization10.1109/TSMCA.2011.2159591 ↗
4. Optimization of Weapon–Target Pairings Based on Kill Probabilities10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2231673 ↗
5. Quick Collateral Damage Estimation Based on Weapons Assigned to Targets10.1109/TSMC.2014.2360823 ↗
6. Approximating the optimal mapping for weapon target assignment by fuzzy reasoning10.1016/j.ins.2013.08.004 ↗
7. The Weapon-Target Assignment Problem10.1016/j.cor.2018.10.015 ↗
8. The multiagent planning problem
9. Hosein, P.A., and Athans, M. (1990). Preferential Defense Strategies. Part I: The Static Case (Technical Report), MIT Lab. Inf. Decis. Syst.. LIPS-P-2002.
10. Weapon Target Assignment Optimization for Land based Multi-Air Defense Systems: A Goal Programming Approach10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.015 ↗
11. Mission decision-making method of multi-aircraft cooperatively attacking multi-target based on game theoretic framework10.1016/j.cja.2016.09.006 ↗
12. A Lagrange Relaxation Method for Solving Weapon-Target Assignment Problem10.1155/2011/873292 ↗
13. Adaptive chaos parallel clonal selection algorithm for objective optimization in WTA application10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.12.122 ↗
14. A parallel simulated annealing algorithm for weapon-target assignment problem
15. Evolutionary decision-makings for the dynamic weapon-target assignment problem10.1007/s11432-009-0190-x ↗
16. Weapon-target assignment problem by multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition10.1155/2018/8623051 ↗
17. Improved ant colony optimization for weapon-target assignment10.1155/2018/6481635 ↗
18. Juan, L.I., Jie, C., and Bin, X. (2015, January 28–30). Efficiently solving multi-objective dynamic weapon-target assignment problems by NSGA-II. Proceedings of the 2015 34th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Hangzhou, China.10.1109/ChiCC.2015.7260033 ↗
19. Li, J., Chen, J., Xin, B., and Dou, L. (2015, January 25–28). Solving multi-objective multi-stage weapon target assignment problem via adaptive NSGA-II and adaptive MOEA/D: A comparison study. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), Sendai, Japan.10.1109/CEC.2015.7257280 ↗
20. Li, J., Chen, J., Xin, B., and Chen, L. (2017, January 5–8). Efficient multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for solving the multi-stage weapon target assignment problem: A comparison study. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), Donostia, Spain.
21. A modified pareto ant colony optimization approach to solve biobjective weapon-target assignment problem10.1155/2017/1746124 ↗
22. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., and Thiele, L. (2001, January 19–21). SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm. Proceedings of the EUROGEN 2001 Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimization and Control with Applications to Industrial Problems, Athens, Greece.
23. Corne, D.W., Jerram, N.R., Knowles, J.D., and Oates, M.J. (2001, January 7–11). PESA-II: Region-based selection in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, San Francisco, CA, USA.
24. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
25. MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition10.1109/TEVC.2007.892759 ↗
26. Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067 ↗
27. Li, X. (2003, January 12–16). A non-dominated sorting particle swarm optimizer for multiobjective optimization. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1007/3-540-45105-6_4 ↗
28. Li, X. (2004, January 26–30). Better spread and convergence: Particle swarm multiobjective optimization using the maximin fitness function. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1007/978-3-540-24854-5_11 ↗
29. Raquel, C.R., and Naval, P.C. (2005, January 25–29). An effective use of crowding distance in multiobjective particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Washington, DC, USA.10.1145/1068009.1068047 ↗
30. Santana, R.A., Pontes, M.R., and Bastos-Filho, C.J.A. (December, January 30). A multiple objective particle swarm optimization approach using crowding distance and roulette wheel. Proceedings of the 2009 Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, Pisa, Italy.10.1109/ISDA.2009.73 ↗
31. Interactive particle swarm: A Pareto-adaptive metaheuristic to multiobjective optimization10.1109/TSMCA.2007.914767 ↗
32. Integrated MOPSO algorithms for task scheduling in cloud computing10.3233/JIFS-181005 ↗
33. Parameter optimization design of vehicle E-HHPS system based on an improved MOPSO algorithm10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.05.011 ↗
34. Modelling and solving a bi-objective single period problem with incremental and all unit discount within stochastic constraints: NSGAII and MOPSO
35. Efficiently solving general weapon-target assignment problem by genetic algorithms with greedy eugenics10.1109/TSMCB.2003.808174 ↗
36. A novel multi-objective particle swarm optimization with multiple search strategies10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.071 ↗
37. Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results10.1162/106365600568202 ↗
38. Van Veldhuizen, D.A., and Lamont, G.B. (1998, January 22–25). Evolutionary computation and convergence to a Pareto front. Proceedings of the Late Breaking Papers at the Genetic Programming 1998 Conference, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
39. Deb, K. (2001). Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
40. Cui, H.B. (2010). Study on Firepower Optimal Distribution of Artillery Group Based on NSGA-I. [Master’s Thesis, National University of Defense Technology]. (In Chinese).
41. Ranking vectors by means of the dominance degree matrix10.1109/TEVC.2016.2567648 ↗