Where We Come from and Where We Are Going: A Systematic Review of Human Factors Research in Driving Automation
Source abstract
Abstract
During the last decade, research has brought forth a large amount of studies that investigated driving automation from a human factor perspective. Due to the multitude of possibilities for the study design with regard to the investigated constructs, data collection methods, and evaluated parameters, at present, the pool of findings is heterogeneous and nontransparent. This literature review applied a structured approach, where five reviewers investigated n = 161 scientific papers of relevant journals and conferences focusing on driving automation between 2010 and 2018. The aim was to present an overview of the status quo of existing methodological approaches and investigated constructs to help scientists in conducting research with established methods and advanced study setups. Results show that most studies focused on safety aspects, followed by trust and acceptance, which were mainly collected through self-report measures. Driving/Take-Over performance also marked a significant portion of the published papers; however, a wide range of different parameters were investigated by researchers. Based on our insights, we propose a set of recommendations for future studies. Amongst others, this includes validation of existing results on real roads, studying long-term effects on trust and acceptance (and of course other constructs), or triangulation of self-reported and behavioral data. We furthermore emphasize the need to establish a standardized set of parameters for recurring use cases to increase comparability. To assure a holistic contemplation of automated driving, we moreover encourage researchers to investigate other constructs that go beyond safety.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Traffic and Road Safety · Safety Warnings and Signage
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Esplanade 10, 85049 Ingolstadt, Germany
Institute for Pervasive Computing, Johannes Kepler University, Altenbergerstr. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria
frisUX, Stocketweg 5, 83355 Grabenstaett, Germany
BMW Group, Knorrstr. 147, 80937 Munich, Germany
Chair for Ergonomics, Technical University Munich, Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching, Germany
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. SAE (2018). Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems, SAE International.
2. Automation surprises
3. Billings, C.E. (2018). Aviation Automation: The Search for a Human-Centered Approach, CRC Press.
4. Aviation automation: General perspectives and specific guidance for the design of modes and alerts10.1518/155723409X448026 ↗
5. AdaptIVe Consortium (2020, November 15). Final Human Factors Recommendations (D3.3); 2017. Available online: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/161983/.
6. RESPONSE Consortium (2020, November 15). Code of Practice for the Design and Evaluation of ADAS: RESPONSE 3: A PReVENT Project, Available online: https://www.acea.be/uploads/publications/20090831_Code_of_Practice_ADAS.pdf.
7. Hoeger, R., Zeng, H., Hoess, A., Kranz, T., Boverie, S., and Strauss, M. (2011). The Future of Driving—HAVEit (Final Report, Deliverable D61.1), Continental Automotive GmbH.
8. Pettersson, I., Lachner, F., Frison, A.K., Riener, A., and Butz, A. (2018, January 21–26). A Bermuda Triangle? A Review of Method Application and Triangulation in User Experience Evaluation. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1145/3173574.3174035 ↗
9. Lamm, L., and Wolff, C. (2019, January 22–25). Exploratory Analysis of the Research Literature on Evaluation of In-Vehicle Systems. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Utrecht, The Netherlands.10.1145/3342197.3344527 ↗
10. Ayoub, J., Zhou, F., Bao, S., and Yang, X.J. (2019, January 22–25). From Manual Driving to Automated Driving: A Review of 10 Years of AutoUI. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Utrecht, The Netherlands.10.1145/3342197.3344529 ↗
11. Forster, Y., Hergeth, S., Naujoks, F., and Krems, J.F. (2018, January 23–25). How Usability can Save the Day: Methodological Considerations for Making Automated Driving a Success Story. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1145/3239060.3239076 ↗
12. The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions
13. Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., and Bengler, K. (October, January 30). “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA.
14. Transition to manual: Driver behavior when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle10.1016/j.trf.2014.09.005 ↗
15. Jarosch, O., Kuhnt, M., Paradies, S., and Bengler, K. (2017, January 26–29). It’s Out of Our Hands Now! Effects of Non-Driving Related Tasks During Highly Automated Driving on Drivers’ Fatigue. Proceedings of the 9th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Manchester Village, VT, USA.10.17077/drivingassessment.1653 ↗
16. Fatigue and voluntary utilization of automation in simulated driving10.1177/0018720811423261 ↗
17. Feldhütter, A., Segler, C., and Bengler, K. (2017, January 17–21). Does Shifting Between Conditionally and Partially Automated Driving Lead to a Loss of Mode Awareness?. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_70 ↗
18. Keep your scanners peeled: Gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving10.1177/0018720815625744 ↗
19. Prior familiarization with takeover requests affects drivers’ takeover performance and automation trust10.1177/0018720816678714 ↗
20. Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., and Neukum, A. (2017, January 11–14). Increasing anthropomorphism and trust in automated driving functions by adding speech output. Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1109/IVS.2017.7995746 ↗
21. Wintersberger, P., Riener, A., Schartmüller, C., Frison, A.K., and Weigl, K. (2018, January 23–25). Let Me Finish before I Take Over: Towards Attention Aware Device Integration in Highly Automated Vehicles. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1145/3239060.3239085 ↗
22. Preface to the special section on human factors and automation in vehicles: Designing highly automated vehicles with the driver in mind10.1177/0018720812461374 ↗
23. User acceptance of automated shuttles in Berlin-Schöneberg: A questionnaire study10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.024 ↗
24. Osswald, S., Wurhofer, D., Trösterer, S., Beck, E., and Tscheligi, M. (2012, January 17–19). Predicting information technology usage in the car: Towards a car technology acceptance model. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Portsmouth, NH, USA.10.1145/2390256.2390264 ↗
25. Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014 ↗
26. Wintersberger, P., Riener, A., and Frison, A.K. (2016, January 24–26). Automated Driving System, Male, or Female Driver: Who’d You Prefer? Comparative Analysis of Passengers’ Mental Conditions, Emotional States & Qualitative Feedback. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.10.1145/3003715.3005410 ↗
27. Impact of training and in-vehicle task performance on manual control recovery in an automated car10.1016/j.trf.2017.02.001 ↗
28. Fostering User Acceptance and Trust in Fully Automated Vehicles: Evaluating the Potential of Augmented Reality
29. Learning to Use Automation: Behavioral Changes in Interaction with Automated Driving Systems10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.013 ↗
30. Test procedure for evaluating the human–machine interface of vehicles with automated driving systems10.1080/15389588.2019.1603374 ↗
31. Rödel, C., Stadler, S., Meschtscherjakov, A., and Tscheligi, M. (2014, January 17–19). Towards Autonomous Cars. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1145/2667317.2667330 ↗
32. Frison, A.K., Wintersberger, P., Riener, A., and Schartmüller, C. (2017, January 24–27). Driving Hotzenplotz: A Hybrid Interface for Vehicle Control Aiming to Maximize Pleasure in Highway Driving. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Oldenburg, Germany.10.1145/3122986.3123016 ↗
33. Frison, A.K., Wintersberger, P., Riener, A., Schartmüller, C., Boyle, L., Miller, E., and Weigl, K. (2019, January 4–9). In UX We Trust: Investigation of Aesthetics and Usability of Driver-Vehicle Interfaces and Their Impact on the Perception of Automated Driving. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, UK.10.1145/3290605.3300374 ↗
34. DIN-EN ISO (2011). Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion—Teil 210: Prozess zur Gestaltung Gebrauchstauglicher Interaktiver Systeme, EIN e.V.
35. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology10.2307/249008 ↗
36. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view10.2307/30036540 ↗
37. Engineering joy10.1109/52.903170 ↗
38. What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.325 ↗
39. Needs, affect, and interactive products–Facets of user experience10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.002 ↗
40. Frison, A.K., Wintersberger, P., Liu, T., and Riener, A. (2019, January 17–20). Why do you like to drive automated?: A context-dependent analysis of highly automated driving to elaborate requirements for intelligent user interfaces. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1145/3301275.3302331 ↗
41. Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., and Neukum, A. (2016, January 24–26). Your Turn or My Turn? Design of a Human–Machine Interface for Conditional Automation. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.10.1145/3003715.3005463 ↗
42. Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042155 ↗
43. Drivers’ attitudes toward imperfect distraction mitigation strategies10.1016/j.trf.2006.02.001 ↗
44. Van Veen, T., Karjanto, J., and Terken, J. (2016, January 24–26). Situation awareness in automated vehicles through proximal peripheral light signals. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.10.1145/3122986.3122993 ↗
45. Yusof, N.M., Karjanto, J., Terken, J., Delbressine, F., Hassan, M.Z., and Rauterberg, M. (2016, January 24–26). The Exploration of Autonomous Vehicle Driving Styles. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.10.1145/3003715.3005455 ↗
46. Trösterer, S., Meschtscherjakov, A., Mirnig, A.G., Lupp, A., Gärtner, M., McGee, F., McCall, R., Tscheligi, M., and Engel, T. (2017, January 24–27). What We Can Learn from Pilots for Handovers and (De)Skilling in Semi-Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Oldenburg, Germany.10.1145/3122986.3123020 ↗
47. Dikmen, M., and Burns, C.M. (2016, January 24–26). Autonomous driving in the real world: Experiences with tesla autopilot and summon. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.10.1145/3003715.3005465 ↗
48. Omozik, K., Yang, Y., Kuntermann, I., Hergeth, S., and Bengler, K. (2019, January 24–27). How long does it take to relax? Observation of driver behaviors during real-world conditionally automated driving. Proceedings of the 10th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Santa Fe, NM, USA.10.17077/drivingassessment.1702 ↗
49. Noncritical State Transitions During Conditionally Automated Driving on German Freeways: Effects of Non–Driving Related Tasks on Takeover Time and Takeover Quality10.1177/0018720818824002 ↗
50. Wintersberger, P., Frison, A.K., and Riener, A. (2018, January 23–25). Man vs. Machine: Comparing a Fully Automated Bus Shuttle with a Manually Driven Group Taxi in a Field Study. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1145/3239092.3265969 ↗
51. Reig, S., Norman, S., Morales, C.G., Das, S., Steinfeld, A., and Forlizzi, J. (2018, January 23–25). A Field Study of Pedestrians and Autonomous Vehicles. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI’18), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1145/3239060.3239064 ↗
52. Kunze, A., Summerskill, S., Marshall, R., and Filtness, A. (2018, January 23–25). Augmented Reality Displays for Communicating Uncertainty Information in Automated Driving. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1145/3239060.3239074 ↗
53. Hock, P., Kraus, J., Walch, M., Lang, N., and Baumann, M. (2016, January 24–26). Elaborating Feedback Strategies for Maintaining Automation in Highly Automated Driving. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.10.1145/3003715.3005414 ↗
54. Chang, C.M., Toda, K., Sakamoto, D., and Igarashi, T. (2017, January 24–27). Eyes on a Car: An Interface Design for Communication between an Autonomous Car and a Pedestrian. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Oldenburg, Germany.10.1145/3122986.3122989 ↗
55. Van der Meulen, H., Kun, A.L., and Janssen, C.P. (2016, January 24–26). Switching Back to Manual Driving: How Does it Compare to Simply Driving Away After Parking?. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.10.1145/3003715.3005452 ↗
56. Sikkenk, M., and Terken, J. (2015, January 1–3). Rules of conduct for autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Nottingham, UK.10.1145/2799250.2799270 ↗
57. Balters, S., Sibi, S., Johns, M., Steinert, M., and Ju, W. (2017, January 24–27). Learning-by-Doing: Using Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Detect Habituation and Adaptation in Automated Driving. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Oldenburg, Germany.10.1145/3122986.3123006 ↗
58. McCall, R., McGee, F., Meschtscherjakov, A., Louveton, N., and Engel, T. (2016, January 24–26). Towards a taxonomy of autonomous vehicle handover situations. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.10.1145/3003715.3005456 ↗
59. Wintersberger, P., Green, P., and Riener, A. (2017, January 26–29). Am I driving or are you or are we both? A taxonomy for handover and handback in automated driving. Proceedings of the 9th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Manchester Village, VT, USA.10.17077/drivingassessment.1655 ↗
60. Naujoks, F., Hergeth, S., Wiedemann, K., Schömig, N., and Keinath, A. (2018, January 1–5). Use Cases for Assessing, Testing, and Validating the Human Machine Interface of Automated Driving Systems. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, USA.10.1177/1541931218621426 ↗
61. Gold, C., Naujoks, F., Radlmayr, J., Bellem, H., and Jarosch, O. (2017, January 17–21). Testing Scenarios for Human Factors Research in Level 3 Automated Vehicles. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_54 ↗
62. Forster, Y., Hergeth, S., Naujoks, F., and Krems, J.F. (2018, January 23–25). Unskilled and Unaware: Subpar Users of Automated Driving Systems Make Spurious Decisions. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1145/3239092.3265960 ↗
63. Millonig, A., and Fröhlich, P. (2018, January 23–25). Where Autonomous Buses Might and Might Not Bridge the Gaps in the 4 A’s of Public Transport Passenger Needs: A Review. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1145/3239060.3239079 ↗
64. Inners, M., and Kun, A.L. (2017, January 24–27). Beyond liability: Legal issues of human-machine interaction for automated vehicles. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Oldenburg, Germany.10.1145/3122986.3123005 ↗
65. Roider, F., Rümelin, S., Pfleging, B., and Gross, T. (2017, January 24–27). The effects of situational demands on gaze, speech and gesture input in the vehicle. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Oldenburg, Germany.10.1145/3122986.3122999 ↗
66. Merenda, C., Kim, H., Gabbard, J.L., Leong, S., Large, D.R., and Burnett, G. (2017, January 24–27). Did You See Me?: Assessing Perceptual vs. Real Driving Gains Across Multi-Modal Pedestrian Alert Systems. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Oldenburg, Germany.10.1145/3122986.3123013 ↗
67. Liu, R., Kwak, D., Devarakonda, S., Bekris, K., and Iftode, L. (2017, January 24–27). Investigating remote driving over the LTE network. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Oldenburg, Germany.10.1145/3122986.3123008 ↗
68. Empfehlungen für die Bestimmung der Spurhaltegüte im Kontext der Fahrsimulation
69. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9 ↗
70. Lee, J., Kim, N., Imm, C., Kim, B., Yi, K., and Kim, J. (2016, January 24–26). A question of trust: An ethnographic study of automated cars on real roads. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.10.1145/3003715.3005405 ↗
71. Currano, R., Park, S.Y., Domingo, L., Garcia-Mancilla, J., Santana-Mancilla, P.C., Gonzalez, V.M., and Ju, W. (2018, January 23–25). ¡Vamos!: Observations of Pedestrian Interactions with Driverless Cars in Mexico. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1145/3239060.3241680 ↗
72. Telpaz, A., Rhindress, B., Zelman, I., and Tsimhoni, O. (2015, January 1–3). Haptic seat for automated driving: Preparing the driver to take control effectively. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Nottingham, UK.10.1145/2799250.2799267 ↗
73. Frison, A.K., Aigner, L., Wintersberger, P., and Riener, A. (2018, January 23–25). Who is Generation A?: Investigating the Experience of Automated Driving for Different Age Groups. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1145/3239060.3239087 ↗
74. Forster, Y., Kraus, J., Feinauer, S., and Baumann, M. (2018, January 23–25). Calibration of Trust Expectancies in Conditionally Automated Driving by Brand, Reliability Information and Introductionary Videos: An Online Study. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI’18), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1145/3239060.3239070 ↗
75. Drivers’ mental workload in agricultural semi-autonomous vehicles10.1177/1541931213571402 ↗
76. 80 MPH and out-of-the-loop: Effects of real-world semi-automated driving on driver workload and arousal10.1177/1541931218621427 ↗
77. Maurer, S., Erbach, R., Kraiem, I., Kuhnert, S., Grimm, P., and Rukzio, E. (2018, January 23–25). Designing a Guardian Angel: Giving an Automated Vehicle the Possibility to Override Its Driver. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI’18), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1145/3239060.3239078 ↗
78. Situational Awareness and Time to Takeover: Exploring an Alternative Method to Measure Engagement with High-Level Automation10.1177/1541931213601848 ↗
79. The effect of peripheral visual feedforward system in enhancing situation awareness and mitigating motion sickness in fully automated driving10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.046 ↗
80. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.018 ↗
81. Oliveira, L., Luton, J., Iyer, S., Burns, C., Mouzakitis, A., Jennings, P., and Birrell, S. (2018, January 23–25). Evaluating How Interfaces Influence the User Interaction with Fully Autonomous Vehicles. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI’18), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1145/3239060.3239065 ↗
82. Reimer, B., Pettinato, A., Fridman, L., Lee, J., Mehler, B., Seppelt, B., Park, J., and Iagnemma, K. (2016, January 24–26). Behavioral Impact of Drivers’ Roles in Automated Driving. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Automotive’UI 16), Ann Arbor, MI, USA.10.1145/3003715.3005411 ↗
83. Can we study autonomous driving comfort in moving-base driving simulators? A validation study10.1177/0018720816682647 ↗
84. Terken, Z., Haex, R., Beursgens, L., Arslanova, E., Vrachni, M., Terken, J., and Szostak, D. (2013, January 28–30). Unwinding After Work: An In-car Mood Induction System for Semi-autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI’13), Eindhoven, The Netherlands.10.1145/2516540.2516571 ↗
85. Glatz, C., Krupenia, S.S., Bülthoff, H.H., and Chuang, L.L. (2018, January 21–26). Use the right sound for the right job: Verbal commands and auditory icons for a task-management system favor different information processes in the brain. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1145/3173574.3174046 ↗
86. Guo, C., Sentouh, C., Popieul, J.C., Haué, J.B., Langlois, S., Loeillet, J.J., Soualmi, B., and That, T.N. (2017). Cooperation between driver and automated driving system: Implementation and evaluation. Transp. Res. Part Traffic Psychol. Behav.
87. Walch, M., Sieber, T., Hock, P., Baumann, M., and Weber, M. (2016, January 24–26). Towards Cooperative Driving: Involving the Driver in an Autonomous Vehicle’s Decision Making. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.10.1145/3003715.3005458 ↗
88. Learning and development of trust, acceptance and the mental model of ACC. A longitudinal on-road study10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.005 ↗
89. The lane-change-task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation
90. Controllability of partially automated driving functions–does it matter whether drivers are allowed to take their hands off the steering wheel?10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.022 ↗
91. Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04 ↗
92. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust 110.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x ↗
93. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 ↗
94. A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00025-3 ↗
95. Schaefer, K.E. (2016). Measuring trust in human robot interactions: Development of the “trust perception scale-HRI”. Robust Intelligence and Trust in Autonomous Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4899-7668-0_10 ↗
96. I trust it, but I don’t know why: Effects of implicit attitudes toward automation on trust in an automated system10.1177/0018720812465081 ↗
97. Helldin, T., Falkman, G., Riveiro, M., and Davidsson, S. (2013, January 28–30). Presenting system uncertainty in automotive UIs for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.10.1145/2516540.2516554 ↗
98. A method to assess the driver mental workload: The driving activity load index (DALI)10.1049/iet-its:20080023 ↗
99. Zijlstra, F.R.H. (1993). Efficiency in Work Behaviour: A Design Approach for Modern Tools. [Ph.D. Dissertation, Delft Technical University, Delft University Press].
100. Entwicklung und Überprüfung einer Skala zur Erfassung subjektiv erlebter Anstrengung