journal article·2021-08-06Open access

Drift Evaluation of a Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Sprayer: Effect of Liquid Pressure and Wind Speed on Drift Potential Based on Wind Tunnel Test

Qi Liu, Shengde Chen, Guobin Wang, Yubin Lan

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 16

Abstract

Background: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) applied to agricultural plant protection is widely used, and the field of operation is expanding due to their high efficiency and pesticide application reduction. However, the work on pesticide drift lags behind the development of the UAV spraying device. Methods: We compared the spray drift potential at four liquid pressures of 2, 3, 4, and 5 bar ejected from the hydraulic nozzles mounted on a UAV test platform exposed to different wind speeds of 2, 4, and 6 m/s produced by a wind tunnel. The combination of the wind tunnel and the UAV test platform was used to obtain strict test conditions. The droplet size distribution under spray drift pressures was measured by a laser diffraction instrument. Results: Increasing the pressure leads to smaller droplet volume diameters and produced fine droplets of less than 100 µm. The deposition in the drift area was elevated at most of the sampling locations by setting higher pressure and faster wind speed. The deposition ratios were all higher than the flow ratios under three wind speeds after the adjustment of pressures. For most samples within a short drift distance (2–8 m), the drift with the rotor motor off was more than an order of magnitude higher than that with the rotor motor on at a pressure of 3 bar. Conclusions: In this study, the wind speed and liquid pressure all had a significant effect on the UAV spray drift, and the rotor wind significantly inhibited a large number of droplets from drifting further.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plant Surface Properties and Treatments · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shandong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Agricultural Aviation Intelligent Equipment, College of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255022, China

National Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticides Spraying Technology (NPAAC), College of Electronic Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China

Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA

Funding

Academy of Ecological Unmanned Farm · the Science and Technology Development Program of Zibo

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Acute Pesticide Illnesses Associated with Off-Target Pesticide Drift from Agricultural Applications: 11 States, 1998–200610.1289/ehp.1002843 ↗
2. Pesticides and human chronic diseases: Evidences, mechanisms, and perspectives10.1016/j.taap.2013.01.025 ↗
3. Spray characteristics and drift reduction potential with air induction and conventional flat-fan nozzles10.13031/2013.23129 ↗
4. Improvements in Modelling Bystander and Resident Exposure to Pesticide Spray Drift: Investigations into New Approaches for Characterizing the ‘Collection Efficiency’ of the Human Body10.1093/annweh/wxy017 ↗
5. Bystander exposure to pesticide spray drift: New data for model development and validation10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.05.017 ↗
6. Visual Determination of Potential Dermal and Inhalation Exposure Using Allura Red as an Environmentally Friendly Pesticide Surrogate10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b03050 ↗
7. Wang, G., Lan, Y., and Yuan, H. (2018). Comparison of Spray Deposition, Control Efficacy on Wheat Aphids and Working Efficiency in the Wheat Field of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Boom Sprayer and Two Conventional Knapsack Sprayers. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9020218 ↗
8. Field evaluation of spray drift and environmental impact using an agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139793 ↗
9. Exploring the operation mode of spraying cotton defoliation agent by plant protection UAV
10. Research status and trends of downwash airflow of spray UAVs in agriculture
11. Jenkins, D., and Vasigh, B. (2013). The Economic Impact of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration in 549 the United States, Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI).
12. Designing intelligent fluids for controlling spray applications10.1016/S1631-0705(03)00043-4 ↗
13. A review of spray generation, delivery to the target and how adjuvants influence the process
14. How adjuvants influence spray formation with different hydraulic nozzles10.1016/S0261-2194(98)00097-0 ↗
15. A photographic investigation into the disintegration of liquid sheets
16. Some aspects of liquid flow through fan spray nozzles10.1016/0009-2509(60)90004-X ↗
17. The formation of drops from viscous water-in-oil emulsions sprayed through fan-jet nozzles10.1088/0508-3443/18/4/312 ↗
18. Effects of nozzle types, adjuvants and environmental conditions on spray drift potential of unmanned aerial vehicles in a wind tunnel
19. Agdrift: A Model For Estimating Near-Field Spray Drift from Aerial Applications
20. AGDISP: The aircraft spray dispersion model, code development and experimental validation10.13031/2013.31005 ↗
21. Transport of aerial spray I: A model of aerial dispersion10.1016/0002-1571(75)90009-6 ↗
22. Drift potential of UAV with adjuvants in aerial applications
23. Influencing factors research and performance experiment on droplets deposition at low wind speed
24. Wind tunnel experimental study on droplet drift reduction by a conical electrostatic nozzle for pesticide spraying
25. Wind tunnel experiment and regression model for spray drift
26. Determining the drift potential of Venturi nozzles compared with standard nozzles across three insecticide spray solutions in a wind tunnel10.1002/ps.4214 ↗
27. Comparison between indirect and direct spray drift assessment methods10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.08.004 ↗
28. Droplet size and velocity characteristics of agricultural sprays10.13031/2013.29127 ↗
29. A comparison of initial spray characteristics produced by agricultural nozzles10.1016/j.cropro.2013.06.017 ↗
30. Determination of potential dermal and inhalation operator exposure to malathion in greenhouses with the whole body dosimetry method
31. Pesticide risk assessment in flower greenhouses in Argentina: The importance of manipulating concentrated products10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.028 ↗
32. Dermal & inhalation exposure of operators during fungicide application in vineyards. Evaluation of coverall performance10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.021 ↗
33. Measurement of operator exposure to chlorpyrifos10.1002/ps.3601 ↗
34. ISO 22866 (2005). Equipment for Crop Protection-Methods for Field Measurement of Spray Drift, International Organization for Standardization.
35. Drift and deposition of pesticide applied by UAV on pineapple plants under different meteorological conditions
36. Atomization characteristics of normal flat fan nozzle and air induction nozzle under high speed airflow conditions
37. Effects on pesticide spray drift of the physicochemical properties of the spray liquid10.1007/s11119-008-9089-6 ↗
38. Wind Tunnel Experiment of Influence on Droplet Size Distribution of Flat Fan Nozzles
39. Numerical simulation of spray drift and deposition from a crop spraying aircraft using a CFD approach10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.11.017 ↗
40. Wind tunnel measurements and model predictions for estimating spray drift reduction under field conditions10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.08.013 ↗
41. Influence of wing tip vortex on drift of single rotor plant protection unmanned aerial vehicle
42. Effects of Working Height of Single-rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle on Drift and Droplets Deposition Distribution of Areca Tree