journal article·2021-05-20Open access

Validation of a TAM Extension in Agriculture: Exploring the Determinants of Acceptance of an e-Learning Platform

Ivonne Angelica Castiblanco Jimenez, Laura Cristina Cepeda García, Federica Marcolin, Maria Grazia Violante, Enrico Vezzetti

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 10

Abstract

Supporting education and training initiatives has been identified as an effective way to address Sustainable Development Challenges. In this sense, e-learning stands out as one of the most viable alternatives considering its advantages in terms of resources, time management, and geographical location. Understanding the reasons that move users to adopt these technologies is critical for achieving the desired social objectives. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) provides valuable guidelines to identify the variables shaping users’ acceptance of innovations. The present study aims to validate a TAM extension designed for FARMER 4.0, an e-learning application in the agricultural sector. Findings suggest that content quality (CQ) is the primary determinant of farmers’ and agricultural entrepreneurs’ perception of the tool’s usefulness (PU). Furthermore, experience (EXP) and self-efficacy (SE) shape potential users’ perceptions about ease of use (PEOU). This study offers helpful insight into the design and development of e-learning applications in the farming sector and provides empirical evidence of TAM’s validity to assess technology acceptance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Technology Adoption and User Behaviour · Digitalization and Economic Development in Agriculture · Organizational and Employee Performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

Funding

European Erasmus+ project “Farmer 4.0”

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Our common future—Call for action10.1017/S0376892900016805 ↗
2. Sustainable development goals and inclusive development10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z ↗
3. Nie, D., Panfilova, E., Samusenkov, V., and Mikhaylov, A. (2020). E-Learning Financing Models in Russia for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12114412 ↗
4. Commission, E. (2012, August 25). Erasmus+ Programme Guide 2020. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/sites/default/files/erasmus_programme_guide_2020_v3_en.pdf.
5. Aggarwal, V. (2017, October 24). E-Learning for Skill Training: Applications and Best Practices for the Public Sector. Available at SSRN 3026964. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3026964.10.2139/ssrn.3026964 ↗
6. E-Learning-Facilitator Tool for the Development of Technological Entrepreneurship10.12753/2066-026X-19-094 ↗
7. The contribution of the e-learning projects to the quality of life in four regions for development during the programming period 2007–2013, romania10.12753/2066-026X-17-051 ↗
8. A framework for developing sustainable e-learning programmes10.1080/02680513.2016.1270198 ↗
9. Lin, C.H., Wang, W.C., Liu, C.Y., Pan, P.N., and Pan, H.R. (2019). Research into the E-learning model of agriculture technology companies: Analysis by deep learning. Agronomy, 9.10.3390/agronomy9020083 ↗
10. Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036 ↗
11. Mercurio, D.I., and Hernandez, A.A. (2020, January 28–29). Understanding User Acceptance of Information System for Sweet Potato Variety and Disease Classification: An Empirical Examination with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Proceedings of the 2020 16th IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications (CSPA), Langkawi, Malaysia.10.1109/CSPA48992.2020.9068527 ↗
12. Drivers of farmers’ intention to adopt technological innovations in Italy: The role of information sources, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.028 ↗
13. Attitudes and behaviour of adopters of technological innovations in agricultural tractors: A case study in Italian agricultural system10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.012 ↗
14. Non-adoption of environmental innovations in wine growing10.1080/01140671.2012.744760 ↗
15. Modelling the faddish, fashionable and efficient diffusion of agricultural technologies: A case study of the diffusion of wool testing technology in Australia10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.005 ↗
16. What influences agricultural professionals’ views towards organic agriculture?10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.014 ↗
17. Davis, F.D. (1985). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. [Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
18. Castiblanco Jimenez, I.A., Cepeda García, L.C., Violante, M.G., Marcolin, F., and Vezzetti, E. (2021). Commonly Used External TAM Variables in e-Learning, Agriculture and Virtual Reality Applications. Future Internet, 13.10.3390/fi13010007 ↗
19. Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 201310.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 ↗
20. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (2020, March 03). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40237022?seq=1.
21. Triandis, H.C. (1979). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press.
22. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action, American Psychological Association.
23. The theory of planned behavior10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T ↗
24. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations: Modifications of a model for telecommunications. Die Diffusion von Innovationen in der Telekommunikation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-79868-9_2 ↗
25. Task-technology fit and individual performance10.2307/249689 ↗
26. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view10.2307/30036540 ↗
27. An extension of TAM model with IDT and security/privacy risk in the adoption of internet banking services in Greece10.1108/14502191211225365 ↗
28. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 ↗
29. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x ↗
30. Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.047 ↗
31. Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM)10.1080/00140139.2014.895855 ↗
32. Between the technology acceptance model and sustainable energy technology acceptance model: Investigating smart meter acceptance in the United States10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.011 ↗
33. Determinants of intention to use the mobile banking apps: An extension of the classic TAM model10.1016/j.sjme.2016.12.001 ↗
34. Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467 ↗
35. Development of e-learning solutions: Different approaches, a common mission
36. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 ↗
37. Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014 ↗
38. An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e-learning system10.1108/14684520610706406 ↗
39. Extending the technology acceptance model to understand students’ use of learning management systems in Saudi higher education10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9732 ↗
40. Intentions to use information technologies: An integrative model10.4018/joeuc.2006070102 ↗
41. Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60372-X ↗
42. Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs10.2307/249751 ↗
43. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology10.1287/isre.9.2.204 ↗
44. Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.018 ↗
45. Investigating the determinants of construction professionals’ acceptance of web-based training: An extension of the technology acceptance model10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.016 ↗
46. Informal tools in formal contexts: Development of a model to assess the acceptance of mobile technologies among teachers10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.002 ↗
47. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills10.1287/isre.6.2.118 ↗
48. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test10.2307/249688 ↗
49. Consumers’ intention to use self-scanning technology: The role of technology readiness and perceptions toward self-service technology
51. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology10.2307/249008 ↗
52. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models10.1287/isre.6.2.144 ↗
53. Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model10.1108/JEIM-08-2013-0065 ↗
54. Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine faculty use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions
55. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 ↗
56. The virtual reality hardware acceptance model (VR-HAM): Extending and individuating the technology acceptance model (TAM) for virtual reality hardware10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.021 ↗
57. Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006 ↗
58. Assessing the moderating effect of gender differences and individualism-collectivism at individual-level on the adoption of mobile commerce technology: TAM3 perspective10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.09.006 ↗
59. MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061 ↗
60. User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001 ↗
61. Mobile internet acceptance in Korea10.1108/10662240510590324 ↗
62. Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems
63. Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003 ↗
64. Understanding the intention to use mobile shopping applications and its influence on price sensitivity10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.02.010 ↗
65. An investigation of employees’ use of e-learning systems: Applying the technology acceptance model10.1080/0144929X.2011.577190 ↗
66. Enjoyment and social influence: Predicting mobile payment adoption10.1080/02642069.2015.1043278 ↗
67. Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028 ↗
68. Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.010 ↗
69. Survey instruments in information systems10.2307/249555 ↗
70. A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education10.1007/s11423-018-9581-2 ↗
71. Ullman, J.B., and Bentler, P.M. (2003). Structural equation modeling. Handbook of Psychology, Wiley.10.1002/0471264385.wei0224 ↗
72. Bagozzi, R.P. (1980). Causal Models in Marketing, Wiley.
73. Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01313.x ↗
74. Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model10.1016/j.aci.2014.09.001 ↗
75. Chin, W., Marcolin, B., and Newsted, P. (1996, January 16–18). A partial least squares latent variable modelling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Carlo simulation study and voice mail emotion/adoption study. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA.
76. Measuring the moderating effect of gender and age on e-learning acceptance in England: A structural equation modeling approach for an extended technology acceptance model10.2190/EC.51.2.b ↗
77. Cultural impacts on e-learning systems’ success10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.06.003 ↗
78. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 ↗
79. Understanding farmers’ ecological conservation behavior regarding the use of integrated pest management-an application of the technology acceptance model
80. How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00078-6 ↗
81. Carmines, E.G., and Zeller, R.A. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assessment, Sage Publications.10.4135/9781412985642 ↗
82. Adoption of ERP system: An empirical study of factors influencing the usage of ERP and its impact on end user10.1016/j.iimb.2015.04.008 ↗
83. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., and Tatham, R.L. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall.
84. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice
85. Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus10.2307/3250922 ↗
86. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, Sage Publications. [2nd ed.].
87. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., and Black, W. (1998). Factorial analysis. Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall. [5th ed.].
88. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error10.1177/002224378101800104 ↗
89. Palant, J. (2020, March 03). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM Spss. Available online: https://www.routledge.com/SPSS-Survival-Manual-A-step-by-step-guide-to-data-analysis-using-IBM-SPSS/Pallant/p/book/9781760875534#.10.4324/9781003117407 ↗
90. E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001 ↗
91. Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.010 ↗
92. Falk, R.F., and Miller, N.B. (1992). A Primer for Soft Modeling, University of Akron Press.
93. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 ↗
94. Naspetti, S., Mandolesi, S., Buysse, J., Latvala, T., Nicholas, P., Padel, S., Van Loo, E.J., and Zanoli, R. (2017). Determinants of the acceptance of sustainable production strategies among dairy farmers: Development and testing of a modified technology acceptance model. Sustainability, 9.10.3390/su9101805 ↗
95. Byrne, B.M. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Routledge.10.4324/9780203807644 ↗
96. Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan: The general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010 ↗
97. Predicting the intention to use a web-based learning system: Perceived content quality, anxiety, perceived system quality, image, and the technology acceptance model10.1002/hfm.20548 ↗
98. Towards the Acceptance of RSS to Support Learning: An empirical study to validate the Technology Acceptance Model in Lebanon
99. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x ↗
100. Vidanapathirana, N., Hirimburegama, K., Hirimburegama, W., and Nelka, S. (2015, January 6–8). Exploring farmers acceptance of e-learning using Technology Acceptance Model-case study in Sri Lanka. Proceedings of the EDULEARN15 Conference, Barcelona, Spain.