journal article·2020-10-08Open access

Prosody-Based Measures for Automatic Severity Assessment of Dysarthric Speech

Abner Hernandez, Sunhee Kim, Minhwa Chung

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 19

Abstract

One of the first cues for many neurological disorders are impairments in speech. The traditional method of diagnosing speech disorders such as dysarthria involves a perceptual evaluation from a trained speech therapist. However, this approach is known to be difficult to use for assessing speech impairments due to the subjective nature of the task. As prosodic impairments are one of the earliest cues of dysarthria, the current study presents an automatic method of assessing dysarthria in a range of severity levels using prosody-based measures. We extract prosodic measures related to pitch, speech rate, and rhythm from speakers with dysarthria and healthy controls in English and Korean datasets, despite the fact that these two languages differ in terms of prosodic characteristics. These prosody-based measures are then used as inputs to random forest, support vector machine and neural network classifiers to automatically assess different severity levels of dysarthria. Compared to baseline MFCC features, 18.13% and 11.22% relative accuracy improvement are achieved for English and Korean datasets, respectively, when including prosody-based features. Furthermore, most improvements are obtained with a better classification of mild dysarthric utterances: a recall improvement from 42.42% to 83.34% for English speakers with mild dysarthria and a recall improvement from 36.73% to 80.00% for Korean speakers with mild dysarthria.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Voice and Speech Disorders · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Speech Recognition and Synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Linguistics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea

Department of French Language Education, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea

Funding

Korea Creative Content Agency

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Progression of Dysarthria and Dysphagia in Postmortem-Confirmed Parkinsonian Disorders10.1001/archneur.58.2.259 ↗
2. Resolution of Dysarthria in Multiple Sclerosis by Treatment with Weak Electromagnetic Fields10.3109/00207459508986327 ↗
3. Clinical features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis according to the El Escorial and Airlie House diagnostic criteria: A population-based study10.1001/archneur.57.8.1171 ↗
4. Early recognition of speech and speech-associated disorders after acute stroke10.1007/s10354-004-0127-3 ↗
5. Aphasia and Dysarthria in Acute Stroke: Recovery and Functional Outcome10.1111/ijs.12067 ↗
6. Impact of Co-occurring Dysarthria and Aphasia on Functional Recovery in Post-stroke Patients10.5535/arm.2016.40.6.1010 ↗
7. Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Review10.1080/13554790490960440 ↗
8. Progressive Nonfluent Aphasia and Its Characteristic Motor Speech Deficits10.1097/WAD.0b013e31815d19fe ↗
9. Slowly progressive aphasia: Three cases with language, memory, CT and PET data10.1136/jnnp.53.11.987 ↗
10. Cerebral blood flow in progressive aphasia without dementia10.1093/brain/113.5.1395 ↗
11. Duffy, J.R. (2019). Motor Speech Disorders E-Book: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management, Elsevier Health Sciences.
12. Maximum Performance Tests of Speech Production
13. Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria10.1044/jshr.1202.246 ↗
14. Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment10.3109/13682828009112541 ↗
15. Identification of dysarthria types based on perceptual analysis10.1016/0021-9924(87)90025-6 ↗
16. Interobserver Reliability and Perceptual Ratings10.1044/jshr.3101.131 ↗
17. Zeplin, J., and Kent, R.D. (1996). Reliability of Auditory-Perceptual Scaling of Dysarthria. Disorders of Motor Speech: Assessment, Treatment, and Clinical Characterization, Brookes.
18. López, J.V.E., Orozco-Arroyave, J.R., and Gosztolya, G. (2019, January 15–19). Assessing Parkinson’s Disease from Speech Using Fisher Vectors. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH), Graz, Austria.10.21437/Interspeech.2019-2217 ↗
19. Kodrasi, I., and Bourlard, H. (2019, January 12–17). Super-gaussianity of Speech Spectral Coefficients as a Potential Biomarker for Dysarthric Speech Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Brighton, UK.10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683107 ↗
20. Tripathi, A., Bhosale, S., and Kopparapu, S.K. (2020, January 4–8). Improved Speaker Independent Dysarthria Intelligibility Classification Using Deepspeech Posteriors. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9054492 ↗
21. Millet, J., and Zeghidour, N. (2019, January 12–17). Learning to Detect Dysarthria from Raw Speech. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Brighton, UK.10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8682324 ↗
22. Mayle, A., Mou, Z., Bunescu, R., Mirshekarian, S., Xu, L., and Liu, C. (2019, January 15–19). Diagnosing Dysarthria with Long Short-Term Memory Networks. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH), Graz, Austria.10.21437/Interspeech.2019-2903 ↗
23. Automatic intelligibility classification of sentence-level pathological speech10.1016/j.csl.2014.02.001 ↗
24. An, K., Kim, M., Teplansky, K., Green, J., Campbell, T., Yunusova, Y., Heitzman, D., and Wang, J. (2018, January 2–6). Automatic Early Detection of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis from Intelligible Speech Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH), Hyderabad, India.10.21437/Interspeech.2018-2496 ↗
25. Acoustic analysis of fricatives in dysarthric speakers with cerebral palsy10.13064/KSSS.2019.11.3.023 ↗
26. Hernandez, A., and Chung, M.H. (2019, January 15–16). Dysarthria Classification Using Acoustic Properties of Fricatives. Proceedings of the Seoul International Conference on Speech Sciences (SICSS), Seoul, Korea.
27. Narendra, N.P., and Alku, P. (2018, January 2–6). Dysarthric Speech Classification Using Glottal Features Computed from Non-words, Words and Sentences. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH), Hyderabad, India.
28. Quantitative acoustic measurements for characterization of speech and voice disorders in early untreated Parkinson’s disease10.1121/1.3514381 ↗
29. Bocklet, T., Nöth, E., Stemmer, G., Ruzickova, H., and Rusz, J. (2011, January 11–15). Detection of persons with Parkinson’s disease by acoustic, vocal, and prosodic analysis. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition Understanding, Waikoloa, HI, USA.10.1109/ASRU.2011.6163978 ↗
30. Aspects of disturbed prosody in dysarthria10.3109/02699209308985549 ↗
31. Perceptuo-acoustic assessment of prosodic impairment in dysarthria10.1080/026992000298922 ↗
32. Prosodic variation across sampling tasks in normal and dysarthric speakers10.1080/14015430127772 ↗
33. Prosodic Characteristics in the Persons with Spastic and Athetoid Cerebral Palsy
34. A Preliminary Study of the Automated Assessment of Prosody in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease
35. The Prosodic Characteristics of Dysarthria with Respect to Speech Rate and Intonation Slope
36. Kadi, K.L., Selouani, S.A., Boudraa, B., and Boudraa, M. (2013, January 3–5). Discriminative prosodic features to assess the dysarthria severity levels. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (WCE), London, UK.
37. Menendez-Pidal, X., Polikoff, J.B., Peters, S.M., Leonzio, J.E., and Bunnell, H.T. (1996, January 3–6). The Nemours database of dysarthric speech. Proceedings of the Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), Philadelphia, PA, USA.10.21437/ICSLP.1996-503 ↗
38. Hernandez, A., Yeo, E.J., Kim, S.H., and Chung, M.H. (2020, January 25–29). Dysarthria Detection and Severity Assessment using Rhythm-Based Metrics. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH), Shanghai, China.10.21437/Interspeech.2020-2354 ↗
39. Roach, P. (2009). English Phonetics and Phonology Paperback with Audio CDs (2): A Practical Course, Cambridge University Press.
40. Jun, S.A. (2005). Korean Intonational Phonology and Prosodic Transcription. Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.001.0001 ↗
41. On the distinction between ‘stress-timed’ and ‘syllable-timed’ languages
42. Rhythm metrics of spoken Korean
43. Mok, P., and Lee, S.I. (2008, January 21–26). Korean speech rhythm using rhythmic measures. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Linguists (CIL18), Seoul, Korea.
44. Lee, H.B., Jin, N.T., Seong, C.J., Jung, I.J., and Lee, S.M. (1994, January 18–22). An experimental phonetic study of speech rhythm in Standard Korean. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), Yokohama, Japan.10.21437/ICSLP.1994-287 ↗
45. Lee, H.Y. (1990). The Structure of Korean Prosody. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of London].
46. Rhythm typology of Korean speech10.1007/s10339-004-0023-1 ↗
47. Introducing Parselmouth: A Python interface to Praat10.1016/j.wocn.2018.07.001 ↗
48. Un confronto tra diverse metriche ritmiche usando Correlatore 1.0
49. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00058-X ↗
50. Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis
51. Dellwo, V., and Wagner, P. (2003, January 3–9). Relationships between speech rate and rhythm. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Barcelona, Spain.
52. Objective and Subjective Evaluation of Voice Quality in Multiple Sclerosis10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.05.006 ↗
53. Disordered speech disrupts conversational entrainment: A study of acoustic-prosodic entrainment and communicative success in populations with communication challenges10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01187 ↗
54. Boersma, P., and Weenink, D. (2020, March 02). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer Program]. Version 6.0.37, Retrieved March 2020. Available online: http://www.praat.org/.
55. Jović, A., Brkić, K., and Bogunović, N. (2015, January 25–29). A review of feature selection methods with applications. Proceedings of the 38th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia.10.1109/MIPRO.2015.7160458 ↗
56. Literature review on feature selection methods for high-dimensional data
57. A survey on feature selection methods10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.024 ↗
58. Kim, H., Hasegawa-Johnson, M., Perlman, A., Gunderson, J., Huang, T.S., Watkin, K., and Frame, S. (2008, January 22–26). Dysarthric speech database for universal access research. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH), Brisbane, Australia.10.21437/Interspeech.2008-480 ↗
59. The TORGO database of acoustic and articulatory speech from speakers with dysarthria10.1007/s10579-011-9145-0 ↗
60. Choi, D.L., Kim, B.W., Kim, Y.W., Lee, Y.J., Um, Y., and Chung, M. (2012, January 21–27). Dysarthric Speech Database for Development of QoLT Software Technology. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Istanbul, Turkey.10.1109/ICSDA.2011.6085978 ↗
61. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python
62. Automatic detection of Parkinson’s disease in running speech spoken in three different languages10.1121/1.4939739 ↗
63. Bhat, C., Vachhani, B., and Kopparapu, S.K. (2017, January 5–9). Automatic assessment of dysarthria severity level using audio descriptors. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/ICASSP.2017.7953122 ↗