journal article·2023-09-30Open access

Infrared and Visible Image Fusion: Methods, Datasets, Applications, and Prospects

Yongyu Luo, Zhongqiang Luo

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 19

Abstract

Infrared and visible light image fusion combines infrared and visible light images by extracting the main information from each image and fusing it together to provide a more comprehensive image with more features from the two photos. Infrared and visible image fusion has gained popularity in recent years and is increasingly being employed in sectors such as target recognition and tracking, night vision, scene segmentation, and others. In order to provide a concise overview of infrared and visible picture fusion, this paper first explores its historical context before outlining current domestic and international research efforts. Then, conventional approaches for infrared and visible picture fusion, such as the multi-scale decomposition method and the sparse representation method, are thoroughly introduced. The advancement of deep learning in recent years has greatly aided the field of picture fusion. The outcomes of the fusion have a wide range of potential applications due to the neural networks’ strong feature extraction and reconstruction skills. As a result, this research also evaluates deep learning techniques. After that, some common objective evaluation indexes are provided, and the performance evaluation of infrared and visible image fusion is introduced. The common datasets in the areas of infrared and visible image fusion are also sorted out at the same time. Datasets play a significant role in the advancement of infrared and visible image fusion and are an essential component of infrared and visible image fusion testing. The application of infrared and visible image fusion in many domains is then simply studied with practical examples, particularly in developing fields, used to show its application. Finally, the prospect of the current infrared and visible image fusion field is presented, and the full text is summarized.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Image Fusion Techniques · Infrared Target Detection Methodologies · Remote-Sensing Image Classification

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Automation and Information Engineering, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Yibin 644000, China

Artificial Intelligence Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Yibin 644000, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Sichuan Science and Technology Program · Innovation Fund of Chinese Universities · Innovation Fund of Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education of China, Digital Learning Technology Integration and Application · 2022 Graduate Innovation Fund of Sichuan University of Science and Engineering

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Image fusion meets deep learning: A survey and perspective10.1016/j.inffus.2021.06.008 ↗
2. Infrared and visible image fusion methods and applications: A survey10.1016/j.inffus.2018.02.004 ↗
3. Visible and Infrared Image Fusion Using Deep Learning10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3261282 ↗
4. A survey on region based image fusion methods10.1016/j.inffus.2018.07.010 ↗
5. Rosenfeld, A. (1984). Multiresolution Image Processing and Analysis, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-51590-3 ↗
6. Merging images through pattern decomposition10.1117/12.966501 ↗
7. Image fusion by a ratio of low-pass pyramid10.1016/0167-8655(89)90003-2 ↗
8. Merging thermal and visual images by a contrast pyramid10.1117/12.7977034 ↗
9. Multisensor image fusion using the wavelet transform10.1006/gmip.1995.1022 ↗
10. Image fusion using steerable dyadic wavelet transform10.1109/ICIP.1995.537623 ↗
11. Color night vision: Fusion of intensified visible and thermal IR imagery10.1117/12.212755 ↗
12. Color night vision: Opponent processing in the fusion of visible and IR imagery
13. A study of three-dimensional reconstruction using spatial image fusion techniques
14. Real-time image fusion: A vision aid for helicopter pilotage10.1117/12.458519 ↗
15. Fault diagnosis for photovoltaic array with the technique of infrared/visible image fusion10.1117/12.539825 ↗
16. Sequential Trajectory Association Algorithm in Multi-sensor Fusion Multi-target Tracking
17. Advances in low-power visible/thermal IR video image fusion hardware10.1117/12.603655 ↗
18. Research on visible and infrared imaging guide head technology for surface-to-surface missiles
19. Youzhi, Z. (2009). Research on Image Fusion Algorithm Based on Multi-Scale Empirical Modal Decomposition. [Ph.D. Thesis, Tsinghua University].
20. Particle swarm optimization based fusion of near infrared and visible images for improved face verification10.1016/j.patcog.2010.08.006 ↗
21. Fu, Z. (2014). Research and Realization of Multi-Band Image Fusion Algorithm. [Master’s Thesis, Beijing Institute of Technology].
22. Infrared and visible image fusion with the use of multi-scale edge-preserving decomposition and guided image filter10.1016/j.infrared.2015.07.003 ↗
23. Jiafa, Y. (2016). Design and Implementation of Infrared and Visible Light Dual Image Intelligent Monitoring System. [Master’s Thesis, University of Science and Technology of China].
24. GANMcC: A generative adversarial network with multiclassification constraints for infrared and visible image fusion
25. STDFusionNet: An infrared and visible image fusion network based on salient target detection
26. Infrared and visible outdoor image fusion based on convolutional neural network
27. DIVFusion: Darkness-free infrared and visible image fusion10.1016/j.inffus.2022.10.034 ↗
28. RADFNet: An infrared and visible image fusion framework based on distributed network10.3389/fpls.2022.1056711 ↗
29. A general framework for multiresolution image fusion: From pixels to regions10.1016/S1566-2535(03)00046-0 ↗
30. Sadjadi, F. (2005, January 20–25). Comparative image fusion analysais. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05)-Workshops, San Diego, CA, USA.
31. Gaussian pyramid wavelet transform for multiresolution analysis of images10.1006/gmip.1996.0032 ↗
32. Image fusion of visible and thermal images for fruit detection10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.02.009 ↗
33. A gradient pyramid basis for pattern-selective image fusion
34. The contourlet transform: An efficient directional multiresolution image representation10.1109/TIP.2005.859376 ↗
35. Localized energy-based fusion algorithm for infrared and visible images in the NSCT domain
36. Sparse representation for computer vision and pattern recognition10.1109/JPROC.2010.2044470 ↗
37. Semi-supervised sparse representation based classification for face recognition with insufficient labeled samples10.1109/TIP.2017.2675341 ↗
38. Ma, W., Wang, K., Li, J., Yang, S.X., Li, J., Song, L., and Li, Q. (2023). Infrared and Visible Image Fusion Technology and Application: A Review. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23020599 ↗
39. Stability and instance optimality for Gaussian measurements in compressed sensing10.1007/s10208-009-9046-4 ↗
40. Infrared and visible image fusion based on compressed sensing
41. Compressed sensing based fusion algorithm for infrared and visible images
42. Robust principal component analysis?
43. Independent component analysis: An introduction10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01813-1 ↗
44. Region-based multimodal image fusion using ICA bases10.1109/JSEN.2007.894926 ↗
45. Song, H.A., and Lee, S.Y. (2013, January 3–7). Hierarchical representation using NMF. Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing: 20th International Conference, ICONIP 2013, Daegu, Republic of Korea. Proceedings, Part I 20.
46. Technique for image fusion based on non-subsampled contourlet transform domain improved NMF10.1007/s11432-010-4118-2 ↗
47. Infrared and visible image fusion based on visual saliency map and weighted least square optimization10.1016/j.infrared.2017.02.005 ↗
48. Infrared and visible image fusion method based on saliency detection in sparse domain10.1016/j.infrared.2017.04.018 ↗
49. Performance Analysis of Multi-scale Transforms for Saliency-Based Infrared and Visible Image Fusion
50. Li, H., Wu, X.J., and Kittler, J. (2018, January 20–24). Infrared and visible image fusion using a deep learning framework. Proceedings of the 2018 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Beijing, China.10.1109/ICPR.2018.8546006 ↗
51. Infrared and visible image fusion with ResNet and zero-phase component analysis10.1016/j.infrared.2019.103039 ↗
52. Xu, H., Ma, J., Le, Z., Jiang, J., and Guo, X. (2020, January 3). Fusiondn: A unified densely connected network for image fusion. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, USA.10.1609/aaai.v34i07.6936 ↗
53. IFCNN: A general image fusion framework based on convolutional neural network10.1016/j.inffus.2019.07.011 ↗
54. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2014, January 8–13). Generative adversarial nets. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2014, Montreal, QC, Canada.
55. FusionGAN: A generative adversarial network for infrared and visible image fusion10.1016/j.inffus.2018.09.004 ↗
56. Flgc-fusion gan: An enhanced fusion gan model by importing fully learnable group convolution
57. AttentionFGAN: Infrared and visible image fusion using attention-based generative adversarial networks10.1109/TMM.2020.2997127 ↗
58. Hou, J., Zhang, D., Wu, W., Ma, J., and Zhou, H. (2021). A generative adversarial network for infrared and visible image fusion based on semantic segmentation. Entropy, 23.10.3390/e23030376 ↗
59. Ram Prabhakar, K., Sai Srikar, V., and Venkatesh Babu, R. (2017, January 22–29). Deepfuse: A deep unsupervised approach for exposure fusion with extreme exposure image pairs. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.505 ↗
60. DenseFuse: A fusion approach to infrared and visible images10.1109/TIP.2018.2887342 ↗
61. Fu, Y., and Wu, X.J. (2021, January 10–15). A dual-branch network for infrared and visible image fusion. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Milan, Italy.10.1109/ICPR48806.2021.9412293 ↗
62. Self-supervised feature adaption for infrared and visible image fusion10.1016/j.inffus.2021.06.002 ↗
63. TCPMFNet: An infrared and visible image fusion network with composite auto encoder and transformer—convolutional parallel mixed fusion strategy10.1016/j.infrared.2022.104405 ↗
64. SSL-WAEIE: Self-supervised learning with weighted auto-encoding and information exchange for infrared and visible image fusion10.1109/JAS.2022.105815 ↗
65. Infrared and visible image fusion via saliency analysis and local edge-preserving multi-scale decomposition10.1364/JOSAA.34.001400 ↗
66. Novel fusion method for visible light and infrared images based on NSST–SF–PCNN10.1016/j.infrared.2014.04.003 ↗
67. Wang, X., Yao, L., Song, R., and Xie, H. (2017, January 7–10). A new infrared and visible image fusion algorithm in nsct domain. Proceedings of the Intelligent Computing Theories and Application: 13th International Conference, ICIC 2017, Liverpool, UK. Proceedings, Part I 13.
68. A Review of Research on Image Fusion Quality Evaluation Methods
69. (2002). Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures, International Telecommunication Union. Recommendation BT.500.
70. Evaluation of focus measures in multi-focus image fusion10.1016/j.patrec.2006.09.005 ↗
71. Overview of quality evaluation methods of fused infrared and visible images
72. Perceptual evaluation of different image fusion schemes10.1016/S0141-9382(02)00069-0 ↗
73. Fusion of landsat TM and SAR images based on principal component analysis
74. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 ↗
75. A categorization of multiscale-decomposition-based image fusion schemes with a performance study for a digital camera application10.1109/5.775414 ↗
76. Wang, Q., Yu, D., and Shen, Y. (2009, January 5–7). An overview of image fusion metrics. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Singapore.10.1109/IMTC.2009.5168582 ↗
77. Zhang, X.l., Liu, Z.f., Kou, Y., Dai, J.b., and Cheng, Z.m. (2010, January 25–26). Quality assessment of image fusion based on image content and structural similarity. Proceedings of the 2010 2nd International Conference on Information Engineering and Computer Science, Wuhan, China.10.1109/ICIECS.2010.5678340 ↗
78. A new image fusion performance metric based on visual information fidelity10.1016/j.inffus.2011.08.002 ↗
79. A Multi-focus Image Fusion Method Based on Laplacian Pyramid10.4304/jcp.6.12.2559-2566 ↗
80. Tetrolet transform images fusion algorithm based on fuzzy operator
81. Combination of images with diverse focuses using the spatial frequency10.1016/S1566-2535(01)00038-0 ↗
82. A sparse image fusion algorithm with application to pan-sharpening10.1109/TGRS.2012.2213604 ↗
83. Sun, C., Zhang, C., and Xiong, N. (2020). Infrared and visible image fusion techniques based on deep learning: A review. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9122162 ↗
84. The TNO multiband image data collection10.1016/j.dib.2017.09.038 ↗
85. U2Fusion: A unified unsupervised image fusion network10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3012548 ↗
86. Lin, T.Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., and Zitnick, C.L. (2014, January 6–12). Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. Proceedings of the Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland. Proceedings, Part V 13.10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 ↗
87. Single image haze removal using dark channel prior10.1109/TPAMI.2010.168 ↗
88. Jia, X., Zhu, C., Li, M., Tang, W., and Zhou, W. (2021, January 10–17). LLVIP: A visible-infrared paired dataset for low-light vision. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICCVW54120.2021.00389 ↗
89. Li, C., Zhao, N., Lu, Y., Zhu, C., and Tang, J. (2017, January 23–27). Weighted sparse representation regularized graph learning for RGB-T object tracking. Proceedings of the 25th ACM international conference on Multimedia, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3123266.3123289 ↗
90. RGB-T object tracking: Benchmark and baseline10.1016/j.patcog.2019.106977 ↗
91. Background-subtraction using contour-based fusion of thermal and visible imagery10.1016/j.cviu.2006.06.010 ↗
92. An iterative integrated framework for thermal–visible image registration, sensor fusion, and people tracking for video surveillance applications10.1016/j.cviu.2011.10.006 ↗
93. Learning collaborative sparse representation for grayscale-thermal tracking10.1109/TIP.2016.2614135 ↗
94. Cognitively-engineered multisensor image fusion for military applications10.1016/j.inffus.2008.08.008 ↗
95. Recent advances in visual and infrared face recognition—A review10.1016/j.cviu.2004.04.001 ↗
96. The ethical application of biometric facial recognition technology10.1007/s00146-021-01199-9 ↗
97. Finite asymmetric generalized Gaussian mixture models learning for infrared object detection10.1016/j.cviu.2013.07.007 ↗
98. Liu, H., and Sun, F. (2008, January 19–23). Fusion tracking in color and infrared images using sequential belief propagation. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, CA, USA.
99. X-ray computerized tomography10.2118/16983-PA ↗
100. Nanoscale magnetic resonance imaging10.1073/pnas.0812068106 ↗