Effect of Process Parameters on Tensile Strength of FDM Printed Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polyamide Parts
Source abstract
Abstract
Reinforcing the polymer with nanoparticles and fibers improves the mechanical, thermal and electrical properties. Owing to this, the functional parts produced by the FDM process of such materials can be used in industrial applications. However, optimal parameters’ selection is crucial to produce parts with optimal properties, such as mechanical strength. This paper focuses on the analysis of influential process parameters on the tensile strength of FDM printed parts. Two statistical methods, RSM and ANN, were applied to investigate the effect the layer thickness, printing speed, raster angle and wall thickness on the tensile strength of test specimens printed with a short carbon fiber reinforced polyamide composite. The reduced cubic model was developed by the RSM method, and the correlation between the input parameters and the output response was analyzed by ANOVA. The results show that the layer thickness and raster angle have the most significant influence on tensile strength. As for machine learning, among the nine different tested ANN topologies, the best configuration was found based on the lowest MAE and MSE test sample result. The results show that the proposed model could be a useful tool for predicting tensile strength. Its main advantage is the reduction in time needed for experiments with the LOSO (leave one subject out) k-fold cross validation scheme, offering better generalization ability, given the small set of learning examples.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sarajevo, Vilsonovo Setaliste 9, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
Funding
UNDP, Norwegian Embassy, University of Sarajevo and Federal Ministry of Education and Science, B&H
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Additive Manufacturing a Powerful Tool for the Aerospace Industry10.1108/RPJ-01-2021-0009 ↗
2. Herzog, T., Schnell, G., Tille, C., and Seitz, H. (Rapid Prototyp. J., 2022). Investigation of Suitable Material and Adhesion Promoter Combinations for Fused Filament Fabrication on Flexible Silicone Build Plates, Rapid Prototyp. J., ahead-of-print.10.1108/RPJ-06-2021-0154 ↗
3. On the Build Orientation Effect in As-Printed and as-Sintered Bending Properties of 17-4PH Alloy Fabricated by Metal Fused Filament Fabrication10.1108/RPJ-07-2021-0174 ↗
4. Review on Particle Emissions during Fused Deposition Modeling of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene and Polylactic Acid Polymers10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.521 ↗
5. Experimental Analysis on Density, Micro-Hardness, Surface Roughness and Processing Time of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) through Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Using Box Behnken Design (BBD)10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102353 ↗
6. Materials Selection of 3D Printing Filament and Utilization of Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) in a Redesigned Breadboard10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.337 ↗
7. Optimization of Stereolithography and Fused Deposition Modeling Process Parameters
8. Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., and Tran, P. (2020). FDM-Based 3D Printing of Polymer and Associated Composite: A Review on Mechanical Properties, Defects and Treatments. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12071529 ↗
9. Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing of Polyamide-Based Composites and Its Applications10.1016/j.coco.2020.100413 ↗
10. Verdejo de Toro, E., Coello Sobrino, J., Martínez Martínez, A., Miguel Eguía, V., and Ayllón Pérez, J. (2020). Investigation of a Short Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Polyamide and Comparison of Two Manufacturing Processes: Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) and Polymer Injection Moulding (PIM). Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13030672 ↗
11. Aw, Y., Yeoh, C., Idris, M., Teh, P., Hamzah, K., and Sazali, S. (2018). Effect of Printing Parameters on Tensile, Dynamic Mechanical, and Thermoelectric Properties of FDM 3D Printed CABS/ZnO Composites. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11040466 ↗
12. Comprehensive Investigation of Reclaimed Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polyamide (RCF/PA) Filaments and FDM Printed Composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109646 ↗
13. Investigation of Processing Parameters on Tensile Performance for FDM-Printed Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polyamide 6 Composites10.1016/j.coco.2020.100478 ↗
14. High-Performance Polyamide/Carbon Fiber Composites for Fused Filament Fabrication: Mechanical and Functional Performances10.1007/s11665-021-05635-1 ↗
15. Belei, C., Joeressen, J., and Amancio-Filho, S.T. (2022). Fused-Filament Fabrication of Short Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polyamide: Parameter Optimization for Improved Performance under Uniaxial Tensile Loading. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14071292 ↗
16. Properties of Oriented Carbon Fiber/Polyamide 12 Composite Parts Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.027 ↗
17. Additive Manufacturing of PA6 with Short Carbon Fibre Reinforcement Using Fused Deposition Modelling10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.928.26 ↗
18. Preferred Orientation of Chopped Fibers in Polymer-based Composites Processed by Selective Laser Sintering and Fused Deposition Modeling: Effects on Mechanical Properties10.1002/app.49152 ↗
19. Additive Manufacturing of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Composites Using Fused Deposition Modeling: Effects of Process Parameters on Tensile Properties10.1177/0021998316646169 ↗
20. Interface and Performance of 3D Printed Continuous Carbon Fiber Reinforced PLA Composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 ↗
21. Prediction of Tensile Strength in FDM Printed ABS Parts Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.788 ↗
22. Modeling and Parametric Optimization of FDM 3D Printing Process Using Hybrid Techniques for Enhancing Dimensional Preciseness10.1007/s12008-019-00536-z ↗
23. Experimental Investigation and Modelling of FDM Process Parameters for Tensile Strength Improvement Using RSM Method
24. Experimental Investigation on Flexural Properties of FDM Processed Nylon 12 Parts Using RSM10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012137 ↗
25. An Integrated RSM-GA Based Approach for Multi Response Optimization of FDM Process Parameters for Pyramidal ABS Primitives
26. Optimization of FDM 3D Printing Process Parameters for Multi-Material Using Artificial Neural Network10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.225 ↗
27. The Creation of a Neural Network Based Capability Profile to Enable Generative Design and the Manufacture of Functional FDM Parts10.1007/s00170-021-06770-8 ↗
28. Bayesian Regularization-Based Levenberg–Marquardt Neural Model Combined with BFOA for Improving Surface Finish of FDM Processed Part10.1007/s00170-011-3675-x ↗
29. Modeling, Analysis, and Optimization of Dimensional Accuracy of FDM-Fabricated Parts Using Definitive Screening Design and Deep Learning Feedforward Artificial Neural Network10.1007/s40436-020-00336-9 ↗
30. (2021, December 06). Novamid ID1030 CF10. Available online: https://Ultimaker.Com/Materials/Dsm-Novamid-r-Id1030-Cf10.
31. Modeling and Optimization of Finish Diamond Turning of Spherical Surfaces Based on Response Surface Methodology and Cuckoo Search Algorithm
32. Syrlybayev, D., Zharylkassyn, B., Seisekulova, A., Akhmetov, M., Perveen, A., and Talamona, D. (2021). Optimisation of Strength Properties of FDM Printed Parts—A Critical Review. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13101587 ↗
33. The Effect of Process Parameters on Tensile Behavior of 3D Printed Flexible Parts of Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA)10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.013 ↗
34. Statistical and Experimental Analysis of Process Parameters of 3D Nylon Printed Parts by Fused Deposition Modeling: Response Surface Modeling and Optimization10.1007/s11665-021-05848-4 ↗
35. Development of Family of Artificial Neural Networks for the Prediction of Cutting Tool Condition
36. Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overview10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 ↗
37. Determining the Efficient Structure of Feed-Forward Neural Network to Classify Breast Cancer Dataset
38. Ficko, M., Begic-Hajdarevic, D., Cohodar Husic, M., Berus, L., Cekic, A., and Klancnik, S. (2021). Prediction of Surface Roughness of an Abrasive Water Jet Cut Using an Artificial Neural Network. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14113108 ↗
39. Berus, L., Klancnik, S., Brezocnik, M., and Ficko, M. (2018). Classifying Parkinson’s Disease Based on Acoustic Measures Using Artificial Neural Networks. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19010016 ↗
40. Li, F., Wang, L., Liu, J., Wang, Y., and Chang, Q. (2019). Evaluation of Leaf N Concentration in Winter Wheat Based on Discrete Wavelet Transform Analysis. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11111331 ↗