journal article·2021-12-20Open access

Collaborative Workplace Design: A Knowledge-Based Approach to Promote Human–Robot Collaboration and Multi-Objective Layout Optimization

Andrea Rega, Castrese Di Marino, Agnese Pasquariello, Ferdinando Vitolo, Stanislao Patalano, Alessandro Zanella, Antonio Lanzotti

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 24

Abstract

The innovation-driven Industry 5.0 leads us to consider humanity in a prominent position as the center of the manufacturing field even more than Industry 4.0. This pushes us towards the hybridization of manufacturing plants promoting a full collaboration between humans and robots. However, there are currently very few workplaces where effective Human–Robot Collaboration takes place. Layout designing plays a key role in assuring safe and efficient Human–Robot Collaboration. The layout design, especially in the context of collaborative robotics, is a complex problem to face, since it is related to safety, ergonomics, and productivity aspects. In the current work, a Knowledge-Based Approach (KBA) is adopted to face the complexity of the layout design problem. The framework resulting from the KBA allows for developing a modeling paradigm that enables us to define a streamlined approach for the layout design. The proposed approach allows for placing resource within the workplace according to a defined optimization criterion, and also ensures compliance with various standards. This approach is applied to an industrial case study in order to prove its feasibility. A what-if analysis is performed by applying the proposed approach. Changing three control factors (i.e., minimum distance, robot speed, logistic space configuration) on three levels, in a Design of Experiments, 27 layout configurations of the same workplace are generated. Consequently, the inputs that most affect the layout design are identified by means of an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The results show that only one layout is eligible to be the best configuration, and only two out of three control factors are very significant for the designing of the HRC workplace layout. Hence, the proposed approach enables the designing of standard compliant and optimized HRC workplace layouts. Therefore, several alternatives of the layout for the same workplace can be easily generated and investigated in a systematic manner.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · BIM and Construction Integration

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy

Department of Management, Information and Production Engineering, University of Bergamo, 24129 Bergamo, Italy

Fraunhofer J-Lab IDEAS, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy

Centro Ricerche FIAT SCpA, 10043 Orbassano, Italy

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0—A human-centric solution. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11164371 ↗
2. Production Scheduling in the Context of Industry 4.0: Review and Trends10.1080/00207543.2020.1718794 ↗
3. A Framework for Collaborative Robot (CoBot) Integration in Advanced Manufacturing Systems10.4271/2016-01-0337 ↗
4. Anthropocentric Approach for Smart Assembly: Integration and Collaboration10.1155/2019/3146782 ↗
5. A New Approach to the Anthropocentric Design of Human–Robot Collaborative Environments10.21014/acta_imeko.v9i4.743 ↗
6. Innovative Control of Assembly Systems and Lines10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.010 ↗
7. International Federation of Robotics (2019). World Robotics Industrial Robots, International Federation of Robotics. Technical Report.
8. Application of Axiomatic Design for the Design of a Safe Collaborative Human-Robot Assembly Workplace10.1051/matecconf/201822301003 ↗
9. Collaborative Robotics: A Survey10.1115/1.4046238 ↗
10. The Facility Layout Problem10.1016/0377-2217(87)90238-4 ↗
11. Facility Layout Problems: A Survey10.1016/j.arcontrol.2007.04.001 ↗
12. Optimal Robot Motion Planning and Work-Cell Layout Design10.1017/S0263574797000052 ↗
13. Scimmi, L.S., Melchiorre, M., Troise, M., Mauro, S., and Pastorelli, S. (2021). A Practical and Effective Layout for a Safe Human-Robot Collaborative Assembly Task. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11041763 ↗
14. Deployment and Evaluation of a Flexible Human–Robot Collaboration Model Based on AND/OR Graphs in a Manufacturing Environment10.1007/s11370-020-00332-9 ↗
15. Base Part Centered Assembly Task Precedence Generation10.1007/s00170-019-04864-y ↗
16. Optimizing Human–Robot Task Allocation Using a Simulation Tool Based on Standardized Work Descriptions10.1007/s10845-018-1411-1 ↗
17. A Human-Robot Collaboration Framework for Improving Ergonomics During Dexterous Operation of Power Tools10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102084 ↗
18. RGB-D Ergonomic Assessment System of Adopted Working Postures10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.004 ↗
19. Stress Measurement in Multi-Tasking Decision Processes Using Executive Functions Analysis10.1007/978-3-030-20473-0_33 ↗
20. Colim, A., Faria, C., Braga, A.C., Sousa, N., Rocha, L., Carneiro, P., Costa, N., and Arezes, P. (2020). Towards an Ergonomic Assessment Framework for Industrial Assembly Workstations—A Case Study. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10093048 ↗
21. Rojas, R., Wehrle, E., and Vidoni, R. (2020). A Multicriteria Motion Planning Approach for Combining Smoothness and Speed in Collaborative Assembly Systems. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10155086 ↗
22. Design of a Virtual Reality Training System for Human–Robot Collaboration in Manufacturing Tasks10.1007/s12008-015-0259-2 ↗
23. ISO 10218-1:2011 (2011). Robots and Robotic Devices-Safety Requirements for Industrial Robots-Part 1: Robots, International Organization for Standardization.
24. ISO 10218-2:2011 (2011). Robots and Robotic Devices-Safety Requirements for Industrial Robots-Part 2: Robot Systems and Integration, International Organization for Standardization.
25. ISO\TS 15066:2016 (2011). Robots and Robotic Devices: Collaborative Robots, International Organization for Standardization.
26. A New Strategy for Ensuring Human Safety during Various Levels of Interaction with Industrial Robots10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.009 ↗
27. Refining Levels of Collaboration to Support the Design and Evaluation of Human-Robot Interaction in the Manufacturing Industry10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.214 ↗
28. Cobot Programming for Collaborative Industrial Tasks: An Overview10.1016/j.robot.2019.03.003 ↗
29. Matheson, E., Minto, R., Zampieri, E.G.G., Faccio, M., and Rosati, G. (2019). Human–Robot Collaboration in Manufacturing Applications: A Review. Robotics, 8.10.3390/robotics8040100 ↗
30. Developing a Reference Model for Human–Robot Interaction10.1007/s12008-019-00591-6 ↗
31. Digital Twins for Collaborative Robots: A Case Study in Human-Robot Interaction10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102092 ↗
32. Kousi, N., Gkournelos, C., Aivaliotis, S., Lotsaris, K., Bavelos, A.C., Baris, P., Michalos, G., and Makris, S. (2021). Digital Twin for Designing and Reconfiguring Human–Robot Collaborative Assembly Lines. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11104620 ↗
33. Multi-Robot Multi-Operator Collaborative Assembly Systems: A Performance Evaluation Model10.1007/s10845-020-01714-7 ↗
34. The Influence of the Product Characteristics on Human-Robot Collaboration: A Model for the Performance of Collaborative Robotic Assembly10.1007/s00170-019-04670-6 ↗
35. On a Human–Robot Workplace Design and Task Allocation System10.1080/0951192X.2017.1307524 ↗
36. Design Method of Human–Industrial Robot Collaborative Workstation with Industrial Application10.1080/0951192X.2020.1815844 ↗
37. Lietaert, P., Billen, N., and Burggraeve, S. (2019, January 23–24). Model-Based Multi-Attribute Collaborative Production Cell Layout Optimization. Proceedings of the 2019 20th International Conference on Research and Education in Mechatronics (REM), Wels, Austria.10.1109/REM.2019.8744136 ↗
38. A Structured Methodology for the Design of a Human-Robot Collaborative Assembly Workplace10.1007/s00170-019-03356-3 ↗
39. Methods for Considering Safety in Design of Robotics Applications Featuring Human-Robot Collaboration10.1007/s00170-020-05076-5 ↗
40. A Conceptual Framework to Evaluate Human-Robot Collaboration10.1007/s00170-020-05363-1 ↗
41. A Knowledge-Based Approach to Manage Information Systems Interoperability10.1016/j.is.2008.01.008 ↗
42. Favi, C., Garziera, R., and Campi, F. (2021). A Rule-Based System to Promote Design for Manufacturing and Assembly in the Development of Welded Structure: Method and Tool Proposition. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11052326 ↗
43. Application of Knowledge-Based Approaches in Software Architecture: A Systematic Mapping Study10.1016/j.infsof.2012.11.005 ↗
44. Supporting Decision Making in Urban Wastewater Systems Using a Knowledge-Based Approach10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.11.009 ↗
45. A Knowledge-Based Approach for Representing Jobholder Profile toward Optimal Human–Machine Collaboration in Cyber Physical Production Systems10.1016/j.cirpj.2019.11.005 ↗
46. Design Considerations for Safe Human-Robot Collaborative Workplaces10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.014 ↗
47. Survey on Human–Robot Collaboration in Industrial Settings: Safety, Intuitive Interfaces and Applications10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.02.009 ↗
48. Matthias, B., and Reisinger, T. (2016, January 21–22). Example Application of ISO/TS 15066 to a Collaborative Assembly Scenario. Proceedings of the ISR 2016: 47st International Symposium on Robotics, Rome, Italy.
49. Bauer, W., Bender, M., Braun, M., Rally, P., and Scholtz, O. (2016). Lightweight Robots in Manual Assembly–Best to Start Simply. Examining Companies’ Initial Experiences with Lightweight Robots, Frauenhofer-Institut für Arbeitswirtschaft und Organisation IAO.
50. TechNavio (2021, December 10). Global Collaborative Robots Market 2020–2024 (Research and Markets). Available online: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200804005683/en/Analysis-on-Impact-of-COVID-19–Global-Collaborative-Robots-Market-2020-2024-Evolving-Opportunities-with-ABB-Ltd.-and-FANUC-Corp.-Technavio.
51. Deo, N. (2017). Graph Theory with Applications to Engineering and Computer Science, Dover Publications.
52. Majeed, A., and Rauf, I. (2020). Graph Theory: A Comprehensive Survey about Graph Theory Applications in Computer Science and Social Networks. Inventions, 5.10.3390/inventions5010010 ↗
54. Characterizing Task-Based Human–Robot Collaboration Safety in Manufacturing10.1109/TSMC.2014.2337275 ↗
55. Pheasant, S., and Haslegrave, C.M. (2018). Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomic and the Design of Work, CRC Press. [3rd ed.].10.1201/9781315375212 ↗
56. Bazaraa, M., Sherali, H., and Shetty, C. (2005). Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms, Wiley.10.1002/0471787779 ↗
57. ISO 13854:2017 (1993). Safety of Machinery-Minimum Gaps to Avoid Crushing of Parts of the Human Body, International Organization for Standardization.
58. ISO 12100:2010 (2010). Safety of Machinery-General Principles for Design -Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction, International Organization for Standardization.
59. ISO 13850:2015 (2015). Safety of Machinery-Emergency Stop Function-Principles for Design, International Organization for Standardization.
60. ISO 11228-1:2003 (2003). Ergonomics-Manual Handling-Part 1: Lifting and Carrying, International Organization for Standardization.
61. ISO 13849-1:2015 (2015). Safety of Machinery-Safety-Related Parts of Control Systems-Part 1: General Principles for Design, International Organization for Standardization.
62. Research of Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique for Decision Support10.1088/1742-6596/930/1/012015 ↗
63. Study of the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique For Decision Support
64. The Efficacy of SMARTER — Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Extended to Ranking10.1016/0001-6918(96)00010-8 ↗
65. Simulation Methodology for Performance and Safety Evaluation of Human–Industrial Robot Collaboration Workstation Design10.1007/s41315-019-00097-0 ↗