journal article·2024-01-12Open access

Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Parameters of FDM- and SLA-Printed ABS Materials

Elvis Hozdić

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 2

Abstract

This research paper provides an in-depth examination of the mechanical characteristics of 3D-printed specimens made from acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and resins akin to ABS, with a focus on two widely used 3D printing methodologies: fused deposition modeling (FDM) and stereolithography (SLA). The study investigates how variations in 3D printing technology and infill density impact mechanical parameters such as Young’s modulus, tensile strength, strain, nominal strain at break, maximum displacement, and maximum force at break. Tensile testing was conducted to assess these critical parameters. The results indicate distinct differences in mechanical performance between FDM- and SLA-printed specimens, with SLA consistently showing superior mechanical parameters, especially in terms of tensile strength, displacement, and Young’s modulus. SLA-printed specimens at 30% infill density exhibited a 38.11% increase in average tensile strength compared to FDM counterparts and at 100% infill density, a 39.57% increase was observed. The average maximum displacement for SLA specimens at 30% infill density showed a 14.96% increase and at 100% infill density, a 30.32% increase was observed compared to FDM specimens. Additionally, the average Young’s modulus for SLA specimens at 30% infill density increased by 17.89% and at 100% infill density, a 13.48% increase was observed, highlighting the superior mechanical properties of SLA-printed ABS-like resin materials. In tensile testing, FDM-printed specimens with 30% infill density showed an average strain of 2.16% and at 100% infill density, a slightly higher deformation of 3.1% was recorded. Conversely, SLA-printed specimens at 30% infill density exhibited a strain of 2.24% and at 100% infill density, a higher strain value of 4.15% was observed. The comparison suggests that increasing the infill density in FDM does not significantly improve deformation resistance, while in SLA, it leads to a substantial increase in deformation, raising questions about the practicality of higher infill densities. The testing data underscore the impact of infill density on the average nominal strain at break, revealing improved performance in FDM and significant strain endurance in SLA. The study concludes that SLA technology offers clear advantages, making it a promising option for producing ABS and ABS-like resin materials with enhanced mechanical properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Novo mesto, Na Loko 2, 8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia

Funding

University of Novo Mesto, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Novo mesto, Slovenia

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Gibson, I., Rosen, D., Stucker, B., and Khorasani, M. (2021). Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-56127-7 ↗
2. 3D Systems’ Technology Overview and New Applications in Manufacturing, Engineering, Science, and Education10.1089/3dp.2014.1502 ↗
3. Additive manufacturing: Scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 ↗
4. (2015). Additive Manufacturing-General Principles—Part 2: Overview of Process Categories and Feedstock (Standard No. ISO 17296-2:2015).
5. Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications and research needs10.1007/s11465-013-0248-8 ↗
6. (2015). Additive Manufacturing—General principles—Terminology (Standard No. ISO/ASTM 52900:2015).
7. Comparison of Mechanical Properties of PLA and ABS Based Structures Produced by Fused Deposition Modelling Additive Manufacturing
8. Jiang, J., Xu, X., and Stringer, J. (2018). Support Structures for Additive Manufacturing: A Review. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 2.10.3390/jmmp2040064 ↗
9. Chua, C.K., Leong, K.F., and Lim, C.S. (2010). Rapid Prototyping: Principles and Applications, World Scientific.10.1142/6665 ↗
10. Algarni, M., and Ghazali, S. (2021). Comparative Study of the Sensitivity of PLA, ABS, PEEK, and PETG’s Mechanical Properties to FDM Printing Process Parameters. Crystals, 11.10.3390/cryst11080995 ↗
11. Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: A review of current research and future prospects10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7 ↗
12. Naveed, N. (2021). Investigating the material properties and microstructural changes of fused filament fabricated PLA and tough-PLA parts. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13091487 ↗
13. Quantitative analysis of surface profile in fused deposition modelling
14. FDM 3D printing technology in manufacturing composite elements10.2478/amm-2013-0186 ↗
15. Fused deposition modelling: A review10.1108/RPJ-04-2019-0106 ↗
16. Hozdić, E., and Hozdić, E. (2023). Comparative Analysis of the Influence of Mineral Engine Oil on the Mechanical Parameters of FDM 3D-Printed PLA, PLA+CF, PETG, and PETG+CF. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16186342 ↗
17. Additive Manufacturing: Unlocking the Evolution of Energy Materials10.1002/advs.201700187 ↗
18. Effects of Curing on Photosensitive Resins in SLA Additive Manufacturing10.3390/applmech2040055 ↗
19. 3D Printing as a Promising Tool in Personalized Medicine10.1208/s12249-020-01905-8 ↗
20. Influence of post-polymerization processing on the mechanical characteristics of 3D-printed occlusal splints10.1088/1742-6596/1492/1/012018 ↗
21. 3D Printing of Polymer Nanocomposites via Stereolithography10.1002/mame.201600553 ↗
22. A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050 ↗
23. Huang, J., Qin, Q., and Wang, J. (2020). A Review of Stereolithography: Processes and Systems. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8091138 ↗
24. Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Copolymers (ABS): Pyrolysis and Combustion Products and their Toxicity—A review of the Literature10.1002/fam.810100303 ↗
25. Plastics materials10.1016/0142-9418(88)90055-4 ↗
26. Fatigue Characteristics of 3D Printed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS)10.1088/1757-899X/269/1/012060 ↗
27. Recent Progress on Polymer Materials for Additive Manufacturing10.1002/adfm.202003062 ↗
28. Tensile, creep, and fatigue behaviors of 3D-printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene10.1007/s11665-017-2961-7 ↗
29. A review paper on 3D-printing aspects and various processes used in the 3D-printing
30. Thermal characterization of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene-ABS obtained with different manufacturing processes10.1007/s10973-023-12258-2 ↗
31. Fatimatuzahraa, A.W., Farahaina, B., and Yusoff, W.A.Y. (2011, January 25–28). The effect of employing different raster orientations on the mechanical properties and microstructure of Fused Deposition Modeling parts. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA), Langkawi, Malaysia.10.1109/ISBEIA.2011.6088811 ↗
32. Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 ↗
33. Anisotropic mechanical properties of ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling
34. Tensile and fatigue behavior of layered acrylonitrile butadiene styrene10.1108/RPJ-09-2013-0086 ↗
35. Failure Analysis and Mechanical Characterization of 3D Printed ABS With Respect to Layer Thickness and Orientation10.1007/s11668-016-0113-2 ↗
36. Effect of layer thickness and cross-section geometry on the tensile and compression properties of 3D printed ABS
37. Effect of fused deposition modelling process parameters on the quality of ABS product
38. Study of infill print design on production cost-time of 3D printed ABS parts10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2015.074809 ↗
39. Optimization of FDM 3D printing process parameters for multi-material using artificial neural network10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.225 ↗
40. Mechanical property of FDM printed ABS: Influence of printing parameters10.1007/s00170-019-03313-0 ↗
41. Rodríguez-Panes, A., Claver, J., and Camacho, A.M. (2018). The Influence of Manufacturing Parameters on the Mechanical Behaviour of PLA and ABS Pieces Manufactured by FDM: A Comparative Analysis. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11081333 ↗
42. Process-structure-property effects on ABS bond strength in fused filament fabrication
43. Influence of ABS print parameters on a 3D open-source, self-replicable printer10.1108/RPJ-10-2019-0267 ↗
44. Domingo-Espin, M., Travieso-Rodriguez, J.A., Jerez-Mesa, R., and Lluma-Fuentes, J. (2018). Fatigue Performance of ABS Specimens Obtained by Fused Filament Fabrication. Materials, 11.10.20944/preprints201811.0225.v1 ↗
45. Galeja, M., Hejna, A., Kosmela, P., and Kulawik, A. (2020). Static and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed ABS as a Function of Raster Angle. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13020297 ↗
46. Yankin, A., Alipov, Y., Temirgali, A., Serik, G., Danenova, S., Talamona, D., and Perveen, A. (2023). Optimization of Printing Parameters to Enhance Tensile Properties of ABS and Nylon Produced by Fused Filament Fabrication. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15143043 ↗
47. Golubović, Z., Danilov, I., Bojović, B., Petrov, L., Sedmak, A., Mišković, Ž., and Mitrović, N. (2023). A Comprehensive Mechanical Examination of ABS and ABS-like Polymers Additively Manufactured by Material Extrusion and Vat Photopolymerization Processes. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15214197 ↗
48. Wypych, G. (2013). Handbook of Odors in Materials, Elsevier.
49. Campo, E.A. (2008). Selection of Polymeric Materials—How to Select Design Properties from Different Standards, William Andrew Inc.
50. Short Review of Polymer Composites for 3D Printing10.1088/1757-899X/758/1/012046 ↗
51. Influence of Build Direction and Post Processes on the Material and Part Attributes of Hard Resins Fabricated by Photopolymerization Based Additive Manufacturing10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2022-0362 ↗
52. Billings, C., Cai, C., and Liu, Y. (2021). Utilization of Antibacterial Nanoparticles in Photocurable Additive Manufacturing of Advanced Composites for Improved Public Health. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13162616 ↗
53. Influence of printing direction on 3D printed ABS specimens10.30657/pea.2020.26.24 ↗
54. Anastas, P.T., and Hammond, D.G. (2016). Inherent Safety at Chemical Sites—Reducing Vulnerability to Accidents and Terrorism through Green Chemistry, Elsevier Inc.
55. (2023, October 17). 3DTRCEK. Available online: https://3dtrcek.si/sl/abs-flame-retardant-v0-filament.
56. (2023, October 17). ANYCUBIC. Available online: https://www.anycubic.com/collections/abs-like-resin/products/get-3-for-the-price-of-2-anycubic-abs-like-resin.
57. (2012). Plastics-Determination of Tensile Properties—Part 2: Test Conditions for Moulding and Extrusion Plastics (Standard No. ISO 527-2:2012).