Novel Vision Transformer–Based Bi-LSTM Model for LU/LC Prediction—Javadi Hills, India
Source abstract
Abstract
Continuous monitoring and observing of the earth’s environment has become interactive research in the field of remote sensing. Many researchers have provided the Land Use/Land Cover information for the past, present, and future for their study areas around the world. This research work builds the Novel Vision Transformer–based Bidirectional long-short term memory model for predicting the Land Use/Land Cover Changes by using the LISS-III and Landsat bands for the forest- and non-forest-covered regions of Javadi Hills, India. The proposed Vision Transformer model achieves a good classification accuracy, with an average of 98.76%. The impact of the Land Surface Temperature map and the Land Use/Land Cover classification map provides good validation results, with an average accuracy of 98.38%, during the process of bidirectional long short-term memory–based prediction analysis. The authors also introduced an application-based explanation of the predicted results through the Google Earth Engine platform of Google Cloud so that the predicted results will be more informative and trustworthy to the urban planners and forest department to take proper actions in the protection of the environment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Remote Sensing in Agriculture · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Remote-Sensing Image Classification
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Information Technology and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Baig, M.F., Mustafa, M.R.U., Baig, I., Takaijudin, H.B., and Zeshan, M.T. (2022). Assessment of land use land cover changes and future predictions using CA-ANN simulation for selangor, Malaysia. Water, 14.10.3390/w14030402 ↗
2. Analysis and mapping of present and future drivers of local urban climate using remote sensing: A case of Lahore, Pakistan10.1007/s12517-020-5214-2 ↗
3. Effects of preservation policy on land use changes in Iranian Northern Zagros forests10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.036 ↗
4. Chaves, M.E.D., Michelle, C.A.P., and Ieda, D.S. (2020). Recent applications of Landsat 8/OLI and Sentinel-2/MSI for land use and land cover mapping: A systematic review. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12183062 ↗
5. A comparative study of advanced land use/land cover classification algorithms using Sentinel-2 data
6. Urban growth dynamics of an Indian metropolitan using CA markov and logistic regression
7. Modelling spatial drivers for LU/LC change prediction using hybrid machine learning methods in Javadi Hills, Tamil Nadu, India10.1007/s12524-020-01258-6 ↗
8. Remote sensing data and SLEUTH urban growth model: As decision support tools for urban planning10.1007/s11769-018-0946-6 ↗
9. Urban land cover classification using hyperspectral data10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-8-751-2014 ↗
10. Precision and accuracy of EO-1 Advanced Land Imager (ALI) data for semiarid vegetation studies10.1109/TGRS.2003.813132 ↗
11. Qualitative assessment of groundwater quality based on land use spectral retrieved indices: Case study Sohag Governorate, Egypt
12. Mapping mosquito larval densities and assessing area vulnerable to diseases transmission in Nile valley of Giza, Egypt
13. Land use change assessment in coastal mangrove forests of Iran utilizing satellite imagery and CA–Markov algorithms to monitor and predict future change10.1007/s12665-018-7392-8 ↗
14. Using the mixture-tuned matched filtering method for lithological mapping with Landsat TM5 images10.1080/01431161.2013.853144 ↗
15. Hyperspectral data for land use/land cover classification10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-8-991-2014 ↗
16. Modelling land-cover types using multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis in a desert city10.1080/01431160802549328 ↗
17. Preprocessing of hyperspectral and multispectral images10.1016/B978-0-444-63977-6.00003-1 ↗
18. Remote sensing classification using fuzzy C-means clustering with spatial constraints based on Markov random field10.5721/EuJRS20134617 ↗
19. Comprehensive review on land use/land cover change classification in remote sensing10.1255/jsi.2020.a8 ↗
20. Study of land use/land cover dynamics through classification algorithms for Harangi catchment area, Karnataka State, India10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.183 ↗
21. Land use and land cover classification of multispectral LANDSAT-8 satellite imagery using discrete wavelet transform10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-703-2018 ↗
22. A multi-sensor and multi-temporal remote sensing approach to detect land cover change dynamics in heterogeneous urban landscapes10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.033 ↗
23. A novel cellular automata model integrated with deep learning for dynamic spatio-temporal land use change simulation10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104430 ↗
24. CNN-Bi LSTM neural network for simulating groundwater level
25. Land use/land cover (LULC) analysis (2009–2019) with google earth engine and 2030 prediction using Markov-CA in the Rondônia State, Brazil10.1007/s10661-021-09016-y ↗
26. Modeling dynamic land use changes in the eastern portion of the hexi corridor, China by cnn-gru hybrid model10.1080/15481603.2022.2037888 ↗
27. Gaetano, R., Ienco, D., Ose, K., and Cresson, R. (2018). A two-branch CNN architecture for land cover classification of PAN and MS imagery. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10111746 ↗
28. Urban land use and land cover change prediction via self-adaptive cellular based deep learning with multisourced data10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2956318 ↗
29. Modeling the relationship between land use/land cover and land surface temperature in Dhaka, Bangladesh using CA-ANN algorithm10.1016/j.envc.2021.100190 ↗
30. Survey on land use/land cover (LU/LC) change analysis in remote sensing and GIS environment: Techniques and challenges10.1007/s11356-020-09091-7 ↗
31. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., and Gelly, S. (2020). An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv.
32. SpectralFormer: Rethinking hyperspectral image classification with transformers10.1109/TGRS.2022.3172371 ↗
33. Wen, Q., Zhou, T., Zhang, C., Chen, W., Ma, Z., Yan, J., and Sun, L. (2022). Transformers in time series: A survey. arXiv.10.24963/ijcai.2023/759 ↗
34. Khan, S., Naseer, M., Hayat, M., Zamir, S.W., Khan, F.S., and Shah, M. (2021). Transformers in vision: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR), 1–38.10.1145/3505244 ↗
35. Bazi, Y., Bashmal, L., Rahhal, M.M.A., Dayil, R.A., and Ajlan, N.A. (2021). Vision transformers for remote sensing image classification. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13030516 ↗
36. Vision transformer: An excellent teacher for guiding small networks in remote sensing image scene classification
37. MITformer: A multi-instance vision transformer for remote sensing scene classification10.1109/LGRS.2022.3176499 ↗
38. Tang, J., Kan, M.Y., Zhao, D., Li, S., and Zan, H. (2019). Explainable AI: A brief survey on history, research areas, approaches and challenges. CCF International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing, Springer.
39. Schlegel, U., Arnout, H., El-Assady, M., Oelke, D., and Keim, D.A. (2019, January 27–28). Towards a rigorous evaluation of XAI methods on time series. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW), Seoul, Korea.10.1109/ICCVW.2019.00516 ↗
40. Saeed, W., and Christian, O. (2021). Explainable AI (XAI): A systematic meta-survey of current challenges and future opportunities. arXiv.
41. Ribeiro, J., Silva, R., Cardoso, L., and Alves, R. (2021, January 15–18). Does dataset complexity matters for model explainers?. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/BigData52589.2021.9671630 ↗
42. Explaining deep neural networks and beyond: A review of methods and applications10.1109/JPROC.2021.3060483 ↗
43. LinarLinardatos, P., Papastefanopoulos, V., and Kotsiantis, S. (2020). Explainable AI: A review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy, 23.10.3390/e23010018 ↗
44. Multispectral and hyperspectral images based land use/land cover change prediction analysis: An extensive review10.1007/s11042-020-09531-z ↗
45. Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015 ↗
46. Soft computing techniques for land use and land cover monitoring with multispectral remote sensing images: A review10.1007/s11831-017-9239-y ↗
47. Kaselimi, M., Voulodimos, A., Daskalopoulos, I., Doulamis, N., and Doulamis, A. (2022). A Vision transformer model for convolution-free multilabel classification of satellite imagery in deforestation monitoring. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 1–9.10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3144791 ↗
48. High resolution SAR image classification using global-local network structure based on vision transformer and CNN
49. Ghali, R., Akhloufi, M.A., Jmal, M., Souidene Mseddi, W., and Attia, R. (2021). Wildfire segmentation using deep vision transformers. Remote Sensing, 13.10.3390/rs13173527 ↗
50. Multiscale feature learning by transformer for building extraction from satellite images
51. Vision transformer for pansharpening
52. Assessing land use–land cover change and its impact on land surface temperature using LANDSAT data: A comparison of two urban areas in India10.1007/s41748-020-00155-9 ↗
53. Sekertekin, A., and Stefania, B. (2020). Land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat 5, 7, and 8 over rural areas: Assessment of different retrieval algorithms and emissivity models and toolbox implementation. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12020294 ↗
54. Effect of the urban land use dynamics on land surface temperature: A case study of kohat city in Pakistan for the period 1998–201810.1007/s41748-022-00292-3 ↗
55. Sefrin, O., Riese, F.M., and Keller, S. (2020). Deep learning for land cover change detection. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13010078 ↗
56. Cao, C., Dragićević, S., and Li, S. (2019). Short-term forecasting of land use change using recurrent neural network models. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11195376 ↗
57. Wang, H., Zhao, X., Zhang, X., Wu, D., and Du, X. (2019). Long time series land cover classification in China from 1982 to 2015 based on Bi-LSTM deep learning. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11141639 ↗
58. Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052 ↗
59. Fulton, L.B., Lee, J.Y., Wang, Q., Yuan, Z., Hammer, J., and Perer, A. (2020, January 25–30). Getting playful with explainable AI: Games with a purpose to improve human understanding of AI. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1145/3334480.3382831 ↗
60. Deep learning and explainable artificial intelligence techniques applied for detecting money laundering–a critical review10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3086230 ↗