Secure Healthcare Record Sharing Mechanism with Blockchain
Source abstract
Abstract
The transfer of information is a demanding issue, particularly due to the presence of a large number of eavesdroppers on communication channels. Sharing medical service records between different clinical jobs is a basic and testing research topic. The particular characteristics of blockchains have attracted a large amount of attention and resulted in revolutionary changes to various business applications, including medical care. A blockchain is based on a distributed ledger, which tends to improve cyber security. A number of proposals have been made with respect to the sharing of basic medical records using a blockchain without needing earlier information or the trust of patients. Specialist service providers and insurance agencies are not secure against data breaches. The safe sharing of clinical records between different countries, to ensure an incorporated and universal medical service, is also a significant issue for patients who travel. The medical data of patients normally reside on different healthcare units around the world, thus raising many concerns. Firstly, a patient’s history of treatment by different physicians is not accessible to the doctor in a single location. Secondly, it is very difficult to secure widespread data residing in different locations. This study proposed record sharing in a chain-like structure, in which every record is globally connected to the others, based on a blockchain under the suggestions and recommendations of the HL7 standards. This study focused on making medical data available, especially of patients who travel in different countries, for a specific period of time after validating the required authentication. Authorization and authentication are performed on the Shibboleth identity management system with the involvement of patient in the sanction process, thereby revealing the patient data for the specific period of time. The proposed approach improves the performance with respect to other record sharing systems, e.g., it reduces the time to read, write, delete, and revoke a record by a noticeable margin. The proposed system takes around three seconds to upload and 7.5 s to download 250 Mb of data, which can contain up to sixteen documents, over a stable network connection. The system has a latency of 413.76 ms when retrieving 100 records, compared to 447.9 and 459.3 ms in previous systems. Thus, the proposed system improved the performance and ensured seclusion by using a blockchain.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · IoT and Edge/Fog Computing · Cloud Data Security Solutions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of CS&IT, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad 13100, Pakistan
Faculty of Computer and Information Systems, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia
Raptor Interactive (Pty) Ltd., Eco Boulevard, Witch Hazel Ave, Gauteng 0157, South Africa
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 37224, Korea
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Exceptional Opportunities in Medical Science: A View from the National Institutes of Health10.1001/jama.2014.16736 ↗
2. Security and privacy in electronic health records: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.jbi.2012.12.003 ↗
3. A comparative performance analysis of data resampling methods on imbalance medical data10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3102399 ↗
4. Blockchains and smart contracts for the Internet of Things10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2566339 ↗
5. Transaction, C.P. (2018). Blockchain: Opportunities for Health Care, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Ltd.. Technical Report.
6. Z notation formalization of blockchain healthcare document sharing based on crbac
7. TierIon (2018, September 18). TierIon: Technology and Products that Reduce the Cost and Complexity of Trust. Available online: https://tierion.com/.
8. GEMOS (2018, September 18). The Blockchain Operating System. Available online: https://enterprise.gem.co/.
9. Brannan, B. (2018, August 21). Healthcoin-Blockchain-Enabled Platform for Diabetes Prevention. Available online: https://medium.com/blockchain-healthcare-review/healthcoin-blockchain-enabled-platform-for-diabetes-prevention-b3448b34cf36.
10. Haidar, F., Kaiser, A., Lonc, B., Urien, P., and Denis, R. (2018, January 3–6). C-its use cases: Study, extension and classification methodology. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 87th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), Porto, Portugal.10.1109/VTCSpring.2018.8417866 ↗
11. Xu, Y., Li, Q., Min, X., Cui, L., Xiao, Z., and Kong, L. (2016, January 10–11). E-commerce blockchain consensus mechanism for supporting high-throughput and real-time transaction. Proceedings of the International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, Beijing, China.10.1007/978-3-319-59288-6_46 ↗
12. Li, K., Li, H., Hou, H., Li, K., and Chen, Y. (2017, January 18–20). Proof of vote: A high performance consensus protocol based on vote mechanism & consortium blockchain. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 19th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 15th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 3rd International Conference on Data Science and Systems, Bangkok, Thailand.10.1109/HPCC-SmartCity-DSS.2017.61 ↗
13. What is Core and What Future Holds for Blockchain Technologies and Cryptocurrencies: A Bibliometric Analysis10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3046931 ↗
14. A comparative analysis of blockchain architecture and its applications: Problems and recommendations10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957660 ↗
15. Blockchain technology
16. Nakamoto, S. (2019). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Econometrica, 1–48.
17. Yaga, D., Mell, P., Roby, N., and Scarfone, K. (2018). NISTIR 8202 Blockchain Technology Overview, National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce.10.6028/NIST.IR.8202 ↗
18. Vukolić, M. (2017, January 2). Rethinking permissioned blockchains. Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Blockchain, Cryptocurrencies and Contracts, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.10.1145/3055518.3055526 ↗
19. Comparison of Smart Contract blockchains for Healthcare Applications
20. AlTaei, M., Al Barghuthi, N.B., Mahmoud, Q.H., Al Barghuthi, S., and Said, H. (2018, January 18–19). Blockchain for UAE Organizations: Insights from CIOs with opportunities and challenges. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT), Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2018.8606033 ↗
21. Analysis of blockchain technology: Pros, Cons and SWOT10.1007/s10586-018-2387-5 ↗
22. What is communication?10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00042.x ↗
23. Communication and representation understood as sender–receiver coordination10.1111/mila.12293 ↗
24. Shaukat, K., Luo, S., Varadharajan, V., Hameed, I.A., Chen, S., Liu, D., and Li, J. (2020). Performance comparison and current challenges of using machine learning techniques in cybersecurity. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13102509 ↗
25. Session Hijacking and Prevention Technique10.14419/ijet.v7i2.6.10566 ↗
26. Jain, V., Sahu, D.R., and Tomar, D.S. (2015, January 25–27). Session Hijacking: Threat Analysis and Countermeasures. Proceedings of the International Conference on Futuristic Trends in Computational Analysis and Knowledge Management, Greater Noida, India.
27. Burgers, W., Verdult, R., and Eekelen, M.V. (2013). Prevent Session Hijacking by Binding the Session to the Cryptographic Network Credentials, Springer. Nordic Conference on Secure IT Systems.10.1007/978-3-642-41488-6_3 ↗
28. Botnet: Classification, attacks, detection, tracing, and preventive measures10.1155/2009/692654 ↗
29. Shaukat, K., Alam, T.M., Hameed, I.A., Khan, W.A., Abbas, N., and Luo, S. (2021, January 2–4). A Review on Security Challenges in Internet of Things (IoT). Proceedings of the 2021 26th International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC), Portsmouth, UK.10.23919/ICAC50006.2021.9594183 ↗
30. Grangeia, L. (2004). Dns Cache Snooping, Securi Team—Beyond Security. Technical Report.
31. Rieck, K., Holz, T., Willems, C., Düssel, P., and Laskov, P. (2008, January 10–11). Learning and classification of malware behavior. Proceedings of the International Conference on Detection of Intrusions and Malware, and Vulnerability Assessment, Paris, France.
32. Shaukat, K., Faisal, A., Masood, R., Usman, A., and Shaukat, U. (2016, January 5–6). Security quality assurance through penetration testing. Proceedings of the 2016 19th International Multi-Topic Conference (INMIC), Islamabad, Pakistan.10.1109/INMIC.2016.7840115 ↗
33. Zhang, X. (2008). The Diagnosis and Prevention of Computer Virus, China Environmental Science Press.
34. Study on Computer Trojan Horse Virus and Its Prevention
35. A Survey on Various Cyber Attacks and their Classification
36. Awerbuch, B., Curtmola, R., Holmer, D., Nita-Rotaru, C., and Rubens, H. (2004). Mitigating Byzantine Attacks in Ad HocWireless Networks, Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University. Technical Report Version.
37. Shaukat, K., Luo, S., Chen, S., and Liu, D. (2020, January 20–21). Cyber Threat Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Performance Evaluation Perspective. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ICCWS), Islamabad, Pakistan.10.1109/ICCWS48432.2020.9292388 ↗
38. Androulaki, A., Barger, V., Bortnikov, C., Cachin, K., Christidis, A., De Caro, D., Enyeart, C., Ferris, G., Laventman, Y., and Manevich, S. (2018, January 23–26). Hyperledger fabric: A distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. Proceedings of the Thirteenth EuroSys Conference, EuroSys’18, Porto, Portugal.10.1145/3190508.3190538 ↗
39. Karp, R., Schindelhauer, C., Shenker, S., and Vocking, B. (2000, January 12–14). Randomized rumor spreading. Proceedings of the Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), Redondo Beach, CA, USA.
40. Identity Management Systems10.4018/IJSDS.2018010105 ↗
41. The Shibboleth Authentication/Authorization System10.1080/00987913.2004.10764917 ↗
42. Dudczak, A., Helinski, M., Mazurek, C., Mielnicki, M., and Werla, M. (2008, January 18–21). Extending the Shibboleth identity management model with a networked user profile. Proceedings of the 2008 1st International Conference on Information Technology, Gdansk, Poland.10.1109/INFTECH.2008.4621619 ↗
43. Federated identity management systems: A privacy-based characterization10.1109/MSP.2013.114 ↗
44. Blockchain-based electronic healthcare record system for healthcare 4.0 applications
45. A Blockchain-Based Medical Data Sharing Mechanism with Attribute-Based Access Control and Privacy Protection10.1155/2021/6685762 ↗
46. Khezr, S., Benlamri, R., and Yassine, A. (2020, January 17–22). Blockchain-based Model for Sharing Activities of Daily Living in Healthcare Applications. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, International Conference on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, International Conference on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech), Calgary, AB, Canada.10.1109/DASC-PICom-CBDCom-CyberSciTech49142.2020.00109 ↗
47. Towards secure and privacy-preserving data sharing for COVID-19 medical records: A blockchain-empowered approach10.1109/TNSE.2021.3101842 ↗
48. HealthBlock: A secure blockchain-based healthcare data management system10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108500 ↗
49. Medical blockchain: Data sharing and privacy preserving of EHR based on smart contract
50. MeDShare: Trust-less medical data sharing among cloud service providers via blockchain10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2730843 ↗
51. Shen, B., Guo, J., and Yang, Y. (2019). MedChain: Efficient healthcare data sharing via blockchain. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9061207 ↗
52. Prokofieva, M., and Miah, S.J. (2019). Blockchain in healthcare. Australas. J. Inf. Syst., 23.10.3127/ajis.v23i0.2203 ↗
53. A novel blockchain-based framework for vehicle life cycle tracking: An end-to-end solution10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3002170 ↗
54. Choudhury, O., Fairoza, N., Sylla, I., and Das, A. (2019). A blockchain framework for managing and monitoring data in multi-site clinical trials. arXiv.10.1109/ICHI.2019.8904634 ↗
55. Srinivasu, P.N., Bhoi, A.K., Nayak, S.R., Bhutta, M.R., and Woźniak, M. (2021). Blockchain Technology for Secured Healthcare Data Communication among the Non-Terminal Nodes in IoT Architecture in 5G Network. Electronics, 10.10.3390/electronics10121437 ↗
56. Data exchanges based on blockchain in m-Health applications10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.088 ↗
57. Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger
58. Schneier, B., and Kelsey, J. (1998, January 26–29). Cryptographic Support for Secure Logs on Untrusted Machines. Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium, San Antonio, TX, USA.
59. Secure audit logs to support computer forensics10.1145/317087.317089 ↗
60. The RSNA Image Sharing Network10.1007/s10278-014-9714-z ↗
61. Medblock: Efficient and secure medical data sharing via blockchain10.1007/s10916-018-0993-7 ↗
62. Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., and Lippman, A. (2016, January 22–24). Medrec: Using blockchain for medical data access and permission management. Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD), Vienna, Austria.10.1109/OBD.2016.11 ↗