Energy Use in the EU Livestock Sector: A Review Recommending Energy Efficiency Measures and Renewable Energy Sources Adoption
Source abstract
Abstract
This study conducts a review bringing together data from a large number of studies investigating energy use in EU livestock systems. Such a study has not been conducted previously, and improvements in our understanding of energy use concentrations in livestock systems will aid in developing interventions to achieve the EU’s 2030 and 2050 sustainability targets. The results from the Life Cycle Assessments included in this review indicate that energy use is concentrated in feed, housing, and manure management. In most systems, animal feed is the dominant energy use category. Regarding specific livestock categories, the studies covered indicate that energy use requirements range from 2.1 to 5.3 MJ/kg per ECM for cow milk, 59.2 MJ/kg for a suckler cow–calf, and 43.73 MJ/kg for a dairy bull, 15.9 MJ/kg to 22.7 MJ/kg for pork production, 9.6 MJ/kg to 19.1 MJ/kg for broiler production, 20.5–23.5 MJ/kg for chicken egg production. Our review indicates dominance of and dependence on fossil fuel and discusses the situation and research around transitioning towards renewable energy sources and improving energy efficiency. Our analysis indicates that existing energy use data in livestock systems are fragmented and characterized by multiple methodologies and considerable data gaps. In our view, there is a need for the development of a standardized methodology for measuring energy use in livestock systems, which we consider a necessary step to develop interventions that reduce fossil energy use in livestock systems and its contribution to climatic change.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Energy and Environment Impacts · Environmental Impact and Sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Natural Resources and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos str., 11855 Athens, Greece
Institute of Bio-Economy & Agro-Technology, Centre of Research & Technology Hellas, Dimarchou Georgiadou 118, 38333 Volos, Greece
Funding
European Union
References (82)
Show source-provided references
1. Peyraud, J., and Macleod, M. (2020). Study on Future of EU Livestock: How to Contribute to a Sustainable Agricultural Sector?, European Comision.
2. Eurostat (2019). Agri-Environmental Indicator–Livestock Patterns Statistics Explained, Eurostat.
3. Eurostat (2021, January 14). Agricultural Production—Livestock and Meat. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Agricultural_production_-_livestock_and_meat&oldid=470510#Livestock_population.
4. FADN (2021, October 17). Farm Economy Focus by Sector—Crops. Available online: https://agridata.ec.europa.eu/extensions/DashboardFarmEconomyFocusCrops/DashboardFarmEconomyFocusCrops.html.
5. European Commission (2020). Farm to Fork Strategy, European Comission.
6. FAO (2021, October 17). FAOSTAT—Energy Use. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GN.
7. Energy Use for Climate Control of Animal Houses: The State of the Art in Europe10.1016/j.egypro.2016.11.024 ↗
8. Greenhouse gas emissions from the EU livestock sector: A life cycle assessment carried out with the CAPRI model10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.015 ↗
9. How much energy to process one pound of meat? A comparison of energy use and specific energy consumption in the meat industry of four European countries10.1016/j.energy.2005.08.007 ↗
10. Veermäe, I., Frorip, J., Kokin, E., Praks, J., Poikalainen, V., Ruus, A., and Lepasalu, L. (2012). Energy Consumption in Animal Production, Estonian University of Life Sciences.
11. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007 ↗
12. Environmental consequences of different beef production systems in the EU10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.023 ↗
13. Fossil energy and GHG saving potentials of pig farming in the EU10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.051 ↗
14. Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: The case of pig production in France10.1016/j.agee.2004.05.007 ↗
15. Environmental impacts of French and Brazilian broiler chicken production scenarios: An LCA approach10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.011 ↗
16. Energy consumption in mixed crop-sheep farming systems: What factors of variation and how to decrease?10.1017/S1751731110000480 ↗
17. Wallman, M., Cederberg, C., and Sonesson, U. (2011). Life Cycle Assessment of Swedish Lamb Production Version 2, SIK.
18. Environmental costs of meat production: The case of typical EU pork production10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.018 ↗
19. Ecological and economic evaluation of Dutch egg production systems10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.011 ↗
20. Energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and economic performance assessments in French Charolais suckler cattle farms: Model-based analysis and forecasts10.1016/j.agsy.2009.08.005 ↗
21. De Visser, C., de Buisonje, F., Ellen, H., Stanghellini, C., and van der Voort, M. (2012). State of the Art on Energy Efficiency in Agriculture, Country Data on Energy Consumption in Different Agroproduction Sectors in the European Countries, agrEE.
22. Cederberg, C., and Flysjö, A. (2004). SIK-Rapport Nr Environmental Assessment of Future Pig Farming Systems-Quantifications of Three Scenarios from the FOOD 21 Synthesis Work, SIK.
23. System Expansion and Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment of Milk and Beef Production10.1007/BF02978508 ↗
24. Shine, P., Upton, J., Sefeedpari, P., and Murphy, M.D. (2020). Energy Consumption on Dairy Farms: A Review of Monitoring, Prediction Modelling, and Analyses. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13051288 ↗
25. Parameters affecting the environmental impact of a range of dairy farming systems in Denmark, Germany and Italy10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.035 ↗
26. Pimentel, D. (1980). Handbook of Energy Utilization in Agriculture, CRC Press.
27. Energy and the food system10.1098/rstb.2010.0172 ↗
28. Feed use and nitrogen excretion of livestock in EU-2710.1016/j.agee.2015.11.025 ↗
29. Greenpeace (2019). Feeding the Problem, Greenpeace European Unit.
30. Livestock production: Recent trends, future prospects10.1098/rstb.2010.0134 ↗
31. Defining a land boundary for sustainable livestock consumption10.1111/gcb.14321 ↗
32. A greener path for the EU Common Agricultural Policy10.1126/science.aax3146 ↗
33. Assessing the environmental impacts of production- and consumption-side measures in sustainable agriculture intensification in the European Union10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.042 ↗
34. How can forage production in Nordic and Mediterranean Europe adapt to the challenges and opportunities arising from climate change?10.1016/j.eja.2017.09.016 ↗
35. Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) (2019). Drivers of Change and Development in the EU Livestock Sector, Federal Office for Agriculture and Food.
36. Energy consumption in animal production-case farm study
37. Beckman, J., Borchers, A., and Jones, C.A. (2013). Agriculture’s Supply and Demand for Energy and Energy Products, Elsevier.10.2139/ssrn.2267323 ↗
38. DG Agriculture and Rural Development, Analysis and Outlook Unit (2020). EU Agricultural Outlook: For Markets, Income and Environment 2020–2030, European Commission.
39. Grain Legume Production and Use in European Agricultural Systems10.1016/bs.agron.2017.03.003 ↗
40. European Commission (2020). EU + UK Feed Protein Balance Sheet, European Commission.
41. Overview of Animal Manure Management for Beef, Pig, and Poultry Farms in France10.3389/fsufs.2018.00036 ↗
42. Manure management: Implications for greenhouse gas emissions10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.036 ↗
43. Eurostat (2021, April 26). Milk and Milk Product Statistics. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Milk_and_milk_product_statistics#Milk_production.
44. Surveying selected European feed and livestock production chains for features enabling the case-specific post-market monitoring of livestock for intake and potential health impacts of animal feeds derived from genetically modified crops10.1016/j.fct.2017.10.004 ↗
45. Upton, J. (2014). Strategies to Reduce Electricity Consumption on Dairy Farms—An Economic and Environmental Assessment, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences.
46. Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands10.1016/j.agsy.2007.06.001 ↗
47. Greenwood, P.L. (2021). Review: An Overview of Beef Production from Pasture and Feedlot Globally, as Demand for Beef and the Need for Sustainable Practices Increase, Elsevier.10.1016/j.animal.2021.100295 ↗
48. Distributions of emissions intensity for individual beef cattle reared on pasture-based production systems10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.113 ↗
49. Is the Grass Always Greener? Comparing the Environmental Impact of Conventional, Natural and Grass-Fed Beef Production Systems10.3390/ani2020127 ↗
50. Cabezas-Garcia, E.H., Lowe, D., and Lively, F. (2021). Energy requirements of beef cattle: Current energy systems and factors influencing energy requirements for maintenance. Animals, 11.10.3390/ani11061642 ↗
51. Markou, G., Balafoutis, T., Mohamed, E., Papadakis, G., Michael, P., and Janssen, R. (2017). The Cyprus Energy Profile for the Animal Sector: Current Situation and Energy Saving Measures in Combination with RES, European Commission.
52. From farm to fork—A life cycle assessment of fresh Austrian pork10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.005 ↗
53. EPRS (2019). The EU Poultry Meat and Egg Sector, European Parliament.
54. (2021, December 05). DG AGRI DG AGRI Dashboard: Poultry Meat EU. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/food-farming-fisheries/farming/documents/poultry-meat-dashboard_en.pdf.
55. Katajajuuri, J.-M., Grönroos, J., Usva, K., Virtanen, Y., Sipilä, I., Venäläinen, E., Kurppa, S., Tanskanen, R., Mattila, T., and Virtanen, H. (2006). Broilerin fileesuikaleiden tuotannon ympäristövaikutukset ja kehittämismahdollisuudet, MTT.
56. Energy Consumption and Energy Saving Measures in Poultry10.13189/eee.2017.050201 ↗
57. Williams, A.G., Audsley, E., and Sandars, D. (2006). Determining the Environmental Burdens and Resource Use in the Production of Agricultural Andhorticultural Commodities, DEFRA. Main Report Defra Research Project ISO205.
58. Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the united kingdom through a life cycle assessment: Egg production systems10.3382/ps.2011-01635 ↗
59. Kanyarushoki, C., Fuchs, F., and van der Werf, H. (2008, January 12–14). Environmental evaluation of cow and goat milk chains in France. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on LCA in the Agri-Food Sector—Towards a Sustainable Management of the Food Chain, Zurich, Switzerland.10.1007/s11367-009-0121-5 ↗
60. Cossu, M., Ledda, L., Solinas, S., Cossu, A., and Pazzona, A. (2020). Evaluation of the Energy Utilization Index in Sheep Milk Cooling Systems. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13092127 ↗
61. Energy use in open-field agriculture in the EU: A critical review recommending energy efficiency measures and renewable energy sources adoption10.1016/j.rser.2022.112098 ↗
62. Passive envelope solutions to aid design of sustainable livestock buildings in Mediterranean climate10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127444 ↗
63. Life cycle assessment of milk production—S comparison of conventional and organic farming10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00311-X ↗
64. Environmental impact of the substitution of imported soybean meal with locally-produced rapeseed meal in dairy cow feed10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.10.005 ↗
65. (2021, November 30). U.S. Energy Information Administration Energy for Growing and Harvesting Crops is a Large Component of Farm Operating Costs—Today in Energy—U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Available online: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=18431.
66. Identification of energy-efficient solutions for broiler house envelopes through a primary energy approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127639 ↗
67. Model integrated of life-cycle costing and dynamic thermal simulation (MILD) to evaluate roof insulation materials for existing livestock buildings10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.06.005 ↗
68. Passive cooling systems in livestock buildings towards energy saving: A critical review10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109368 ↗
69. Use of heat pumps in HVAC systems for precise environment control in broiler houses: System’s modeling and calculation of the basic design parameters10.1016/j.compag.2019.104876 ↗
70. Renewable energy for sustainable agriculture10.1051/agro/2010029 ↗
71. Rota, A., Sehgal, K., Nwankwo, O., and Gelle, R. (2012). Livestock and Renewable Energy, IFAD.10.2139/ssrn.3339261 ↗
72. EIP-AGRI Focus Group (2020). New Feed for Pigs and Poultry Final Report, European Commission.
73. European Commission (2019). Fertilisers in the EU Prices, Trade and Use Contents, European Commission.
74. Current Developments in Production and Utilization of Biogas and Biomethane in Germany10.1002/cite.201700077 ↗
75. A spatial analysis of biogas potential from manure in Europe10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.035 ↗
76. Economic analysis of advanced biofuels, renewable gases, electrofuels and recycled carbon fuels for the Greek transport sector until 205010.1016/j.rser.2021.111038 ↗
77. Lawson, N., Alvarado-Morales, M., Tsapekos, P., and Angelidaki, I. (2021). Techno-economic assessment of biological biogas upgrading based on danish biogas plants. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14248252 ↗
78. Review: Sustainable livestock systems: Anticipating demand-side challenges10.1016/j.animal.2021.100288 ↗
79. The relative greenhouse gas impacts of realistic dietary choices10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.054 ↗
80. How can the EU climate targets be met? A combined analysis of technological and demand-side changes in food and agriculture10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.12.012 ↗
81. European Commission (2021, September 14). The New Common Agricultural Policy: 2023–2027. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/key-policies/common-agricultural-policy/new-cap-2023-27_en.
82. British Poultry Science On-farm quantification of sustainability indicators: An application to egg production systems On-farm quantification of sustainability indicators: An application to egg production systems10.1080/00071660600829282 ↗