journal article·2022-02-08Open access

Efficient Fake News Detection Mechanism Using Enhanced Deep Learning Model

Tahir Ahmad, Muhammad Shahzad Faisal, Atif Rizwan, Reem Alkanhel, Prince Waqas Khan, Ammar Muthanna

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

The spreading of accidental or malicious misinformation on social media, specifically in critical situations, such as real-world emergencies, can have negative consequences for society. This facilitates the spread of rumors on social media. On social media, users share and exchange the latest information with many readers, including a large volume of new information every second. However, updated news sharing on social media is not always true.In this study, we focus on the challenges of numerous breaking-news rumors propagating on social media networks rather than long-lasting rumors. We propose new social-based and content-based features to detect rumors on social media networks. Furthermore, our findings show that our proposed features are more helpful in classifying rumors compared with state-of-the-art baseline features. Moreover, we apply bidirectional LSTM-RNN on text for rumor prediction. This model is simple but effective for rumor detection. The majority of early rumor detection research focuses on long-running rumors and assumes that rumors are always false. In contrast, our experiments on rumor detection are conducted on real-world scenario data set. The results of the experiments demonstrate that our proposed features and different machine learning models perform best when compared to the state-of-the-art baseline features and classifier in terms of precision, recall, and F1 measures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Misinformation and Its Impacts · Spam and Phishing Detection · Media Influence and Politics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Science, Attock Campus, COMSATS University Islamabad, Attock 43600, Pakistan

Department of Computer Engineering, Jeju National University, Jejusi 63243, Korea

Department of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia

Department of Telecommunication Networks and Data Transmission, The Bonch-Bruevich Saint-Petersburg State University of Telecommunications, 193232 Saint Petersburg, Russia

Department of Applied Probability and Informatics, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Matsa, K.E., and Shearer, E. (2018). News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2018, Pew Research Center.
2. (2021, August 12). Incredible and Interesting Twitter Stats and Statistics. Available online: https://www.brandwatch.com/blog/twitter-stats-and-statistics/.
3. False rumor of explosion at White House causes stocks to briefly plunge; AP confirms its Twitter feed was hacked, CNBC
4. Supporting Online Material
5. Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism
6. Predicting information credibility in time-sensitive social media10.1108/IntR-05-2012-0095 ↗
7. (2021, August 25). Lies, Damn Lies and Viral Content 2015. Available online: https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8Q81RHH.
8. Cai, G., Wu, H., and Lv, R. (2014, January 17–20). Rumors detection in chinese via crowd responses. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2014), Beijing, China.10.1109/ASONAM.2014.6921694 ↗
9. The role of social media in the capital market: Evidence from consumer product recalls10.1111/1475-679X.12074 ↗
10. Detecting breaking news rumors of emerging topics in social media10.1016/j.ipm.2019.02.016 ↗
11. Qazvinian, V., Rosengren, E., Radev, D., and Mei, Q. (2011, January 27–31). Rumor has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs. Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Scotland, UK.
12. Takahashi, T., and Igata, N. (2012, January 20–24). Rumor detection on twitter. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems, and the 13th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligence Systems, Kobe, Japan.10.1109/SCIS-ISIS.2012.6505254 ↗
13. Wang, D., Irani, D., and Pu, C. (2011, January 1–2). A social-spam detection framework. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Collaboration, Electronic Messaging, Anti-Abuse and Spam Conference, Perth, Australia.10.1145/2030376.2030382 ↗
14. Zhang, Q., Zhang, S., Dong, J., Xiong, J., and Cheng, X. (2015). Automatic detection of rumor on social network. Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-25207-0_10 ↗
15. Hamidian, S., and Diab, M. (2016, January 16). Rumor identification and belief investigation on twitter. Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on cOmputational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and sOcial Media Analysis, San Diego, CA, USA.10.18653/v1/W16-0403 ↗
16. Rumor detection on Twitter using a supervised machine learning framework
17. Geng, Y., Sui, J., and Zhu, Q. (2019, January 12–15). Rumor detection of Sina Weibo based on SDSMOTE and feature selection. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analysis (ICCCBDA), Chengdu, China.10.1109/ICCCBDA.2019.8725715 ↗
18. Twitter rumour detection in the health domain10.1016/j.eswa.2018.05.019 ↗
19. Towards early identification of online rumors based on long short-term memory networks10.1016/j.ipm.2018.11.003 ↗
20. Measuring user influence on Twitter: A survey10.1016/j.ipm.2016.04.003 ↗
21. Ma, J., Gao, W., Mitra, P., Kwon, S., Jansen, B.J., Wong, K.F., and Cha, M. (2016, January 9–15). Detecting Rumors from Microblogs with Recurrent Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2016), New York, NY, USA.
22. Event relatedness assessment of Twitter messages for emergency response10.1016/j.ipm.2016.09.002 ↗
23. Wartime rumors of waste and special privilege: Why some people believe them10.1037/h0058110 ↗
24. Ratkiewicz, J., Conover, M., Meiss, M., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, A., and Menczer, F. (2011, January 17–21). Detecting and tracking political abuse in social media. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain.
25. Effects of racial stereotypes on eyewitness performance: Implications of the real and the rumoured Allport and Postman studies10.1002/acp.2350030106 ↗
26. (2021, August 02). PHEME dataset for Rumour Detection and Veracity Classification. Available online: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/PHEME_dataset_for_Rumour_Detection_and_Veracity_Classification/6392078.
27. Cristianini, N., and Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000). An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801389 ↗
28. Rizwan, A., Iqbal, N., Ahmad, R., and Kim, D.H. (2021). WR-SVM model based on the margin radius approach for solving the minimum enclosing ball problem in support vector machine classification. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11104657 ↗
29. Wang, L. (2005). Support Vector Machines: Theory and Applications, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/b95439 ↗
30. Correlation and variable importance in random forests10.1007/s11222-016-9646-1 ↗
31. Mitchell, T.M. (2006). The Discipline of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Machine Learning.
32. (2021, August 07). Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python—Scikit-Learn 1.0.1 Documentation. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/.